https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120630
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Summary|wrong code at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120629
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 61620
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61620&action=edit
build.log.xz
It's during stagetrain, actually..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120629
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[16 regression] |[16 regression]
|bootstra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120629
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120604
--- Comment #9 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #8)
> David, can you please bootstrap with the attached patch?
Bootstrapping now. It will take 6-12 hours to complete.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120231
chenglulu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chenglulu at loongson dot cn
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120629
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||x86_64
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513
--- Comment #32 from Greg Chandler ---
Starting to get some progress
I added a print statement in gcc.cc to see what is being executed:
-> 3298 /*HERE*/
-> 3299 for (n_commands = 1, i = 0; argbuf.iterate (i, &arg); i++)
-> 3300
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120490
--- Comment #1 from Wentao Zhang ---
Here is a reduced program:
$ gcc --version | head -1
gcc (GCC) 16.0.0 20250511 (experimental)
$ cat > test.c << 'EOF'
int g;
static inline __attribute__((always_inline))
int foo() { return 0; }
#define PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120628
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90693
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e477e7cd104af96c55379f69125db3f1c350c9ed
commit r16-1410-ge477e7cd104af96c55379f69125db3f1c350c9ed
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120434
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3dde39e597f48832208f423fb20f29674ce49ae
commit r16-1409-gf3dde39e597f48832208f423fb20f29674ce49ae
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120629
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
```
==2259076== Invalid write of size 8
==2259076==at 0x57F874A: ipa_predicate::stream_in(lto_input_block*)
(ipa-predicate.cc:614)
==2259076==by 0x577856A: inline_read_section(lto_file_decl_data*, char
c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120629
Bug ID: 120629
Summary: [16 regression] bootstrap-lto fails
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120491
--- Comment #1 from Wentao Zhang ---
Here is a reduced program:
$ gcc --version | head -1
gcc (GCC) 16.0.0 20250511 (experimental)
$ cat > test.cc << 'EOF'
int g;
class C1 {
int x;
int y;
public:
C1() {}
C1(int x, int y) : x(x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120492
Bug ID: 120492
Summary: Wrong line coverage for C++ push_back() of a char
pointer into string vector
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120628
Bug ID: 120628
Summary: GCC emits incorrect warnings/errors for identifiers
"final" and "override" in C++98 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120628
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120569
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217
--- Comment #29 from rdubner at symas dot com ---
> -Original Message-
> From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 11:43
> To: rdub...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [Bug cobol/119217] cobol: build broken on non-lin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116792
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb1d203445c923aa64bca01b0ffb6d3d16a82130
commit r16-1406-gcb1d203445c923aa64bca01b0ffb6d3d16a82130
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120610
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3dcce649a1e0833a4c3bb9ced4b9c0b38c3fb8a5
commit r16-1404-g3dcce649a1e0833a4c3bb9ced4b9c0b38c3fb8a5
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120627
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120627
Bug ID: 120627
Summary: [15/16 regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since
r15-2186-g9d8ef2711df
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120626
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||94511
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120626
Bug ID: 120626
Summary: Wrong type generation with non-type template arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119064
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> The patch is on top of the
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-June/686210.html
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-June/686211.html
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120510
--- Comment #6 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is the last remaining issue.
PATCH: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-June/686379.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42909
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61618
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61618&action=edit
Patch which I am testing for the aarch64 issue
This also improves:
```
struct s1 { int x[1024]; };
struct s1 gs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120303
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120609
--- Comment #3 from Marc Adams ---
On my system, commands "gcc decBugDemo.c
-Wl,—no-as-needed,-ldfp,—as-needed" then "./a.out" produced correct
printout "2.000e+00".
From: pinskia at gcc dot g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120519
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I was not cc:'ed. And I did not approve it. It should not have been
committed.
We have (minimal!) process for a reason. It would be chaos without it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74585
--- Comment #17 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The stack is always in memory, AFAIK :-) Do we have any targets where it
is not? Do we have any targets where BLKmode is not always in memory? That
is something that should be documented btw :-)
Any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120519
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
> Please always post all patches to gcc-patches@, and never ever commit
> anything
> to config/rs6000 without approval by its maintainers!
It was posted:
htt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120519
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42909
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82705
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Missing tail calls for |Missing tail calls for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99832
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5327eef7b003f66b90841af77c5095eebfa53938
commit r15-9819-g5327eef7b003f66b90841af77c5095eebfa53938
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120548
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:974d59aec69b35bd4f7f8464a3bcfc55e849ed1f
commit r15-9818-g974d59aec69b35bd4f7f8464a3bcfc55e849ed1f
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513
--- Comment #30 from Greg Chandler ---
It's not the preprocessor:
root@bigbang:/tmp# gcc -E 1.c
root@bigbang:/tmp#
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513
--- Comment #31 from Greg Chandler ---
This hangs:
root@bigbang:/tmp# gcc -S 1.c
>From ps -faux:
root 391 0.0 0.1 4832 3912 ttyS0Ss 03:28 0:00 -bash
root 432 0.4 0.1 6616 2512 ttyS0S+ 03:57 0:00 \_ gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120622
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Actually that looks like it's fixing a similar but different issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113060
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |peppe at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120622
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/serge-sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120604
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 61617
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61617&action=edit
Proposed patch
David, can you please bootstrap with the attached patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120434
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54da199f28da07166a44eae7d53acb9e3abe1306
commit r16-1399-g54da199f28da07166a44eae7d53acb9e3abe1306
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120604
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-10
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120434
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e4688a7202d73baeb4de18ca4591e6b0985f4a4
commit r16-1400-g2e4688a7202d73baeb4de18ca4591e6b0985f4a4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120434
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8154fc95f097a146f9c80edcaafb2baff73065b5
commit r16-1398-g8154fc95f097a146f9c80edcaafb2baff73065b5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120625
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120622
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119064
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120622
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Previously std::copy with random access iterators would find the distance
between the iterators and then loops that many times, i.e.
for (auto n = last - first; n > 0; --n)
now we just loop on the iterat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120625
Bug ID: 120625
Summary: [15/16 Regression] std::formatter<__disabled>
specializations cause errors in user code
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119064
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61616
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61616&action=edit
gcc16-pr119064-wip.patch
Untested WIP patch. On slightly modified clang testcase this now mostly works
(the o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99625
--- Comment #6 from Giuseppe D'Angelo ---
Related to this: https://github.com/cplusplus/CWG/issues/686
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113060
--- Comment #10 from Giuseppe D'Angelo ---
LEWG has forwaded P3146 to LWG; I've implemented Jiang An's idea in
https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc-TEST/pulls/51 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120620
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61615
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61615&action=edit
Semi reduced, removed some unneeded code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120620
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120620
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.4.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118150
--- Comment #3 from Spencer Abson ---
>It looks like we also miss AND+PTEST because the existing combine matches the
>>(and ( ((a) (b)) (c)) canonicalisation of predicated ior and xor,
>>where c is all-true.
Sorry - I mean that c is an all-tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120620
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61614
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61614&action=edit
Testcase GodBolt link
Next time please attach or place inline the testcase instead of JUST linking to
GodBolt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118150
Spencer Abson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sabson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120544
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|GCC 15.1.0 and MacOS|[15/16 Regression]
|M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120544
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111873
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114864
Bug 114864 depends on bug 111873, which changed state.
Bug 111873 Summary: [12/13/14/15 regression] runtime Segmentation fault with
'-O3 -fno-code-hoisting -fno-early-inlining -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre' since
r12-434-g93f8cb4965cebe
https://g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111873
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16d6a270b11a00d30966d42d9bc086e5873b5632
commit r12-11132-g16d6a270b11a00d30966d42d9bc086e5873b5632
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217
--- Comment #28 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #27 from Robert Dubner ---
> I have managed to compile gcobol and libgcobol.so on a i386-pc-solaris
> system.
> (Thanks, Richard!)
Good! (It's Rainer btw.;-)
> Attem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120624
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120624
Bug ID: 120624
Summary: aarch64: Incorrect DCE of a ZA restore in SME code
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: aarch64-sme, wrong-code
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120623
Bug ID: 120623
Summary: gcobol-16 on i386-solaris results in "out of memory".
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120623
Robert Dubner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rdubner at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120622
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 61613
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61613&action=edit
Reduced test-case
This is a reduced self-contained (other than the libstdc++ dependency)
test-case that I obta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120622
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 61612
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61612&action=edit
Unreduced test-case
This is a tarball with the original code snipped from pythran, the
"pythonic" "library" it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120622
Bug ID: 120622
Summary: Compilation error ( no match for operator==) since
libstdc++ commit r15-4475-g7ed561f63e7955
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119705
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka ---
With -fsyntax-only and a checking compiler (which means frequent GCs), we
allocate 5.8GB of GC memory according to -ftime-report, but maximum RSS is 5GB
according to /usr/bin/time -v, which I think means the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119210
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-10
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211
Bug 119211 depends on bug 119217, which changed state.
Bug 119217 Summary: cobol: build broken on non-linux by unguarded use of
Linux-specific facilities.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217
Robert Dubner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60428
--- Comment #4 from Pierre Ossman ---
Any updates on this? Still seems to be needed for gcc 15.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621
Bug ID: 120621
Summary: COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: cobol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120613
--- Comment #9 from P. Ruber ---
Thank you very much for all the feedback! Will notify downstream.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66587
Pierre Ossman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120589
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120620
Bug ID: 120620
Summary: Internal Compiler Error in tree.cc, Line #11240
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120390
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Just tried it on godbolt and seems clang just silently doesn't tail call it.
> That is IMHO worse behavior than erroring on that out.
Sorry, ignore this, PEBKA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120544
--- Comment #7 from bug-reports.delphin at laposte dot net ---
But compilation and installation OK for GCC v. 14.3.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120544
--- Comment #8 from bug-reports.delphin at laposte dot net ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> What version of texinfo you have installed?
>
> Are you building from the tar balls or from git tag?
>
>
> If from git tag, then `Texi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120544
--- Comment #6 from bug-reports.delphin at laposte dot net ---
But compilation and installation OK for GCC v. 14.3.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68122
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 120619 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120619
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94762
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68122
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120619
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
fn = gimple_call_fn (stmt);
/* Functions with the attribute are by definition irrevocable. */
if (is_tm_irrevocable (fn))
return true;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120619
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
[apinski@xeond2 gcc]$ ./cc1 -fsanitize=thread -fgnu-tm t.c
f
Analyzing compilation unit
Performing interprocedural optimizations
<*free_lang_data> {heap 1116k} {heap 1116k}
{heap 1116k} {heap 1392k} {h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81106
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120460
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is now https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue4268
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
