[Bug preprocessor/120061] [14 Regression] libqt6webengine fails static_assert (__LINE__ == 470, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'll try to use gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/location-overflow-test* framework for reproducer.

[Bug preprocessor/120061] [14 Regression] libqt6webengine fails static_assert (__LINE__ == 470, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061 --- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 5 May 2025, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061 > > --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Created attachment 61328 > --> https://

[Bug target/113939] Switch m68k to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939 --- Comment #7 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #6) > I suggest we switch m68k to LRA, so we can close this bug report. Plus file > bug reports for the issues with M2, Fortran and JIT. JIT

[Bug tree-optimization/120031] Fails to pattern match ctz from DeBruijn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120031 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd index 2a63e4c7ddb..6edd7deb6c2 100644 --- a/gcc/match.pd +++ b/gcc/match.pd @@ -11298,7 +11298,7 @@ and, in the top 5 or 6 bits. This is then indexed into a tab

[Bug tree-optimization/120031] Fails to pattern match ctz from DeBruijn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120031 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Richard B

[Bug c++/120124] New: "g++: fatal error: Killed signal..." when reporting error involving very complex lambda type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120124 Bug ID: 120124 Summary: "g++: fatal error: Killed signal..." when reporting error involving very complex lambda type Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/117042] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in tsubst(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117042 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug gcov-profile/120086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-29.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/120049] ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED ()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049 --- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle --- Patch submitted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-May/062094.html

[Bug target/120034] Fails to recognize bzhi consistently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120034 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug middle-end/120021] Offloading vs. C++ 'std::initializer_list'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120021 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-06 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/120032] Fails to pattern match clz from DeBruijn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Severity|normal

[Bug tree-optimization/120031] Fails to pattern match ctz from DeBruijn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120031 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/120000] Unoptimal structure copy loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-06 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/120123] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Implicit this is not used in a requires clause in nested lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||67491 Summary|[11/12/13/14/1

[Bug c++/120123] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] Implicit this is not used in a requires clause in nested lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123 --- Comment #1 from Valentin Tolmer --- Note that the code compiles with gcc 11.2, but starts breaking with gcc 11.3

[Bug c++/120123] New: Implicit this is not used in a requires clause in nested lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123 Bug ID: 120123 Summary: Implicit this is not used in a requires clause in nested lambdas Product: gcc Version: 15.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/120049] ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED ()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- The patch regressions tests OK. I dont know how to do a test case that requires two files to compile. I am looking through the test suite for the incantations.

[Bug fortran/120111] program with bad format that compiles and runs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120111 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID CC|

[Bug target/113939] Switch m68k to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939 --- Comment #6 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5) > So the m68k bootstrap with LRA enabled blows up. It looks like the stage1 > compiler is mis-compiling the stage2 compiler. The result is a metric

[Bug target/120119] [15/16 Regression] GCC 15.1.0 ICEs (segfaults) compiling VK-GL-CTS on aarch64 with -O2 -mcpu=cortex-a57 since r15-5422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- Cannot rename chain v30 (8) at insn 54 (mark_read) Creating chain v29 (13) at insn 54 Cannot rename chain v29 (13) at insn 30 (mark_read) Widening register in chain v29 (13) at insn 30 Cannot rename chain v3

[Bug target/119971] [15 Regression] RISC-V: Wrong code with bitmanip extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119971 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[15/16 Regression] RISC-V: |[15 Regression] RISC-V:

[Bug target/119971] [15/16 Regression] RISC-V: Wrong code with bitmanip extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119971 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05d75c5bfcf923bc0258b79a08c5861590c5a2b9 commit r16-394-g05d75c5bfcf923bc0258b79a08c5861590c5a2b9 Author: Jeff Law Date: Mon May 5 17

[Bug target/120119] [15/16 Regression] GCC 15.1.0 ICEs (segfaults) compiling VK-GL-CTS on aarch64 with -O2 -mcpu=cortex-a57 since r15-5422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- Some debugging info: 949 /* Search the chain where this instruction is (one of) the root. */ 950 dest_op_info = insn_rr[INSN_UID (insn)].op_info; 951 dest_regno = R

[Bug preprocessor/120061] [14 Regression] libqt6webengine fails static_assert (__LINE__ == 470, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- Unfortunately the 14 patch regresses +FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/named-constants-via-macros-traditional.c (test for warnings, line 13) +FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/named-constants-via-macros-traditional.c

[Bug c++/116880] [15 Regression] too early coroutine destruction of co_await on nix-2.24.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116880 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b69209936680dabbb7bbe08e71646a2c25ece0bf commit r14-11740-gb69209936680dabbb7bbe08e71646a2c25ece0bf Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug c++/116506] [15 Regression] Destructors of temporary awaitables are executed too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116506 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b69209936680dabbb7bbe08e71646a2c25ece0bf commit r14-11740-gb69209936680dabbb7bbe08e71646a2c25ece0bf Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug c++/98935] [coroutines] co_await on statement expressions causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98935 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug c++/98935] [coroutines] co_await on statement expressions causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98935 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bcd0d98c9f8f45c496bc2d0d0b6bda4fefcf9a6a commit r14-11738-gbcd0d98c9f8f45c496bc2d0d0b6bda4fefcf9a6a Author: Iain Sandoe Da

[Bug c++/116793] [15 regression] ice in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3309 since r15-3513

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116793 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4000f922425f7763bdab7bb8822975c0a669097 commit r14-11737-gb4000f922425f7763bdab7bb8822975c0a669097 Author: Arsen Arsenov

[Bug middle-end/102253] scalability issues with large loop depth

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102253 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/116502] [15 Regression] -Wunused-result warning cannot be suppressed if coroutine awaiter returns a reference after r15-2318-g2664c1bf83855b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116502 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:694b942a179f5fbaee882a5e619e5bbaf64b4d11 commit r14-11735-g694b942a179f5fbaee882a5e619e5bbaf64b4d11 Author: Arsen Arsenovi

[Bug c++/115905] [coroutines] Wrong behavior of await_suspend()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115905 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/115905] [coroutines] Wrong behavior of await_suspend()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115905 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb600ecb6af628e492fb86dee50cda049ac708e3 commit r14-11733-geb600ecb6af628e492fb86dee50cda049ac708e3 Author: Iain Sandoe

[Bug target/120090] [16 Regression] gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-pr103750-2.c since r16-160

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120090 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/682674.html

[Bug ada/87778] Remove -q quiet option from some GNAT bootstrap command lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87778 Nicolas Boulenguez changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61300|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/120119] [15/16 Regression] GCC 15.1.0 ICEs (segfaults) compiling VK-GL-CTS on aarch64 with -O2 -mcpu=cortex-a57 since r15-5422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target|aarch64-poky-lin

[Bug target/120119] [15/16 Regression] GCC 15.1.0 ICEs (segfaults) compiling VK-GL-CTS on aarch64/musl target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61331 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61331&action=edit Reduced as far as I can get it

[Bug c++/106973] coroutine generator and setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106973 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/102891] Passing real part of complex type component using w%z%re to a subroutine gives erroneous value of dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102891 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 61330 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61330&action=edit Patch for comment#2 This patch fixes the checking of the references, so that inquiry references of

[Bug tree-optimization/120122] [14/15/16 Regression] wrong code due to VCE of bool being pulled out of loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120122 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug preprocessor/120061] [14 Regression] libqt6webengine fails static_assert (__LINE__ == 470, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 61329 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61329&action=edit gcc16-pr120061.patch Trunk version of the same patch.

[Bug preprocessor/120061] [14 Regression] libqt6webengine fails static_assert (__LINE__ == 470, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 61328 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61328&action=edit gcc14-pr120061.patch Untested 14 branch version of the patch which fixes all 3 tests (though none included, I

[Bug target/120119] [15/16 Regression] GCC 15.1.0 ICEs (segfaults) compiling VK-GL-CTS on aarch64/musl target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119 --- Comment #4 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- Bisect bad commit: r15-5422-g279475fd7236a9

[Bug c++/106973] coroutine generator and setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106973 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74cfbedd24cfc4bb26b33bdb0b7c55a9139cd757 commit r14-11732-g74cfbedd24cfc4bb26b33bdb0b7c55a9139cd757 Author: Arsen Arsenov

[Bug c++/105104] [coroutines] ICE during GIMPLE pass: coro-early-expand-ifns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105104 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/105104] [coroutines] ICE during GIMPLE pass: coro-early-expand-ifns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105104 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a275b5bebdf7746af590fa57378cd48cb8e679a commit r14-11731-g5a275b5bebdf7746af590fa57378cd48cb8e679a Author: Arsen Arsenovi

[Bug tree-optimization/120122] [14/15/16 Regression] wrong code due to VCE of bool being pulled out of loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120122 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.3

[Bug c++/116482] Bogus -Wunused-parameter with C++ coroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116482 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2fa7e036e72fa0ed63df602cebd4005b078336e commit r14-11730-gb2fa7e036e72fa0ed63df602cebd4005b078336e Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug tree-optimization/120122] New: [14/15/16 Regression] wrong code due to VCE of bool being pulled out of loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120122 Bug ID: 120122 Summary: [14/15/16 Regression] wrong code due to VCE of bool being pulled out of loop Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: w

[Bug c++/113457] Nesting coroutine definitions (e.g. via a lambda or a template expansion) can ICE the compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113457 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/120061] [14 Regression] libqt6webengine fails static_assert (__LINE__ == 470, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Unfortunately --- libcpp/files.cc.jj 2025-05-03 11:02:02.502647404 +0200 +++ libcpp/files.cc 2025-05-05 21:09:18.042680877 +0200 @@ -1006,14 +1006,6 @@ _cpp_stack_file (cpp_reader *pfile, _cpp

[Bug c++/113457] Nesting coroutine definitions (e.g. via a lambda or a template expansion) can ICE the compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113457 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:805b9914846a1228b84a3c3dd8f9ba2f21f9ff59 commit r14-11729-g805b9914846a1228b84a3c3dd8f9ba2f21f9ff59 Author: Arsen Arsenov

[Bug c++/110635] Segmentation fault when the awaiter's await_resume in initial-suspend returns a class type.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110635 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/110635] Segmentation fault when the awaiter's await_resume in initial-suspend returns a class type.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110635 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4042cecd6245dc773fc150d5fd839968674e4500 commit r14-11728-g4042cecd6245dc773fc150d5fd839968674e4500 Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug c++/102051] [coroutines] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102051 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/102051] [coroutines] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102051 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce3f523f9cb4c20704bc5f41b8fbc34b5b84ed88 commit r14-11727-gce3f523f9cb4c20704bc5f41b8fbc34b5b84ed88 Author: Iain Sandoe

[Bug c++/109682] coroutines: ICE in morph_fn_to_coro on wrong return type for get_return_object_on_allocation_failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109682 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/109682] coroutines: ICE in morph_fn_to_coro on wrong return type for get_return_object_on_allocation_failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109682 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b3addb6fe05a80d5e043fbb12cc9c0cc426b0e6 commit r14-11726-g1b3addb6fe05a80d5e043fbb12cc9c0cc426b0e6 Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug c++/100476] coroutines: questionable handling of void get_return_object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/100476] coroutines: questionable handling of void get_return_object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98364636c194398d5dccb477e5405cb1d02a55f1 commit r14-11725-g98364636c194398d5dccb477e5405cb1d02a55f1 Author: Iain Sandoe

[Bug preprocessor/120061] [14 Regression] libqt6webengine fails static_assert (__LINE__ == 470, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, my understanding of what's going on on the #c11 vs. #c12 vs. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr120067-2.c.jj2024-09-17 09:04:10.523093614 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr120067-2.c 2025-05-0

[Bug fortran/120111] program with bad format that compiles and runs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120111 --- Comment #2 from kargls at comcast dot net --- This is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052 which you submitted. I don't have 15.1 installed, so cannot confirm whether or not the patch made it into 15.1.

[Bug libstdc++/119714] [15/16 Regression] Failure when using == operator on a class derived from std::expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119714 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/120121] Comparison of integer expressions of different signedness not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120121 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pi

[Bug c++/113852] -Wsign-compare doesn't warn on unsigned result types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113852 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stefano.d at posteo dot de --- Comment

[Bug target/120019] [16 regression] PR 111657 change broke Solaris/x86 bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120019 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/119714] Failure when using == operator on a class derived from std::expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119714 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||catsith at me dot com --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug libstdc++/120056] Circular constraint satisfaction error with non-trivial container iterators to callables taking std::expected parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120056 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/120121] Comparison of integer expressions of different signedness not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120121 --- Comment #5 from Stefano --- >From a *user perspective*, this is unexpected behavior.

[Bug c++/120121] Comparison of integer expressions of different signedness not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120121 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > (In reply to Stefano from comment #2) > > @Andrew Pinski: I can't follow. Did you see my second example with the > > compilation error? They are semantically equ

[Bug c++/120121] Comparison of integer expressions of different signedness not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120121 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Stefano from comment #2) > @Andrew Pinski: I can't follow. Did you see my second example with the > compilation error? They are semantically equivalent and both produce the > same assembly outpu

[Bug target/120019] [16 regression] PR 111657 change broke Solaris/x86 bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120019 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c182f4d14d65b3e012ad65b5014d86352fabc86f commit r16-393-gc182f4d14d65b3e012ad65b5014d86352fabc86f Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Mon M

[Bug c++/120121] Comparison of integer expressions of different signedness not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120121 --- Comment #2 from Stefano --- @Andrew Pinski: I can't follow. Did you see my second example with the compilation error? They are semantically equivalent and both produce the same assembly output. So, why is there an error produced in the seco

[Bug target/120120] [16 Regression] gcc-16: performance regression with -O3 compared to gcc-15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120120 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target Milestone|

[Bug c++/120121] Comparison of integer expressions of different signedness not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120121 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/120121] New: Comparison of integer expressions of different signedness not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120121 Bug ID: 120121 Summary: Comparison of integer expressions of different signedness not detected Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c/120120] New: gcc-16: performance regression with -O3 compared to gcc-15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120120 Bug ID: 120120 Summary: gcc-16: performance regression with -O3 compared to gcc-15 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug target/120119] [15/16 Regression] GCC 15.1.0 ICEs (segfaults) compiling VK-GL-CTS on aarch64/musl target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/120119] [15/16 Regression] GCC 15.1.0 ICEs (segfaults) compiling VK-GL-CTS on aarch64/musl target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Reducing ...

[Bug tree-optimization/120080] [16 regression] ICE when building llvm-20.1.3 (find_bit_tests, at tree-switch-conversion.cc:1799) since r16-347-g1381a5114788a2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120080 --- Comment #9 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- Created attachment 61324 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61324&action=edit improved reduction.c Andrew's reduction modified for reproducing on latest trunk, fortunately not much h

[Bug target/120119] [15/16 Regression] GCC 15.1.0 ICEs (segfaults) compiling VK-GL-CTS on aarch64/musl target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Summary|[1

[Bug tree-optimization/120080] [16 regression] ICE when building llvm-20.1.3 (find_bit_tests, at tree-switch-conversion.cc:1799) since r16-347-g1381a5114788a2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120080 --- Comment #8 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- Since r16-372-g064cac730f88dc Andrew's reduction does not cause an error on my computer. I haven't checked the original file after this revision

[Bug rtl-optimization/120119] [15 Regression] GCC 15.1.0 segfaults compiling VK-GL-CTS on aarch64/musl target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119 --- Comment #1 from Khem Raj --- Just -O2 -mcpu=cortex-a57+crc is enough to reproduce the ICE, it works with -O1 or -Os with -O2 it only works without -mcpu=cortex-a57+crc

[Bug rtl-optimization/120119] New: [15 Regression] GCC 15.1.0 segfaults compiling VK-GL-CTS on aarch64/musl target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119 Bug ID: 120119 Summary: [15 Regression] GCC 15.1.0 segfaults compiling VK-GL-CTS on aarch64/musl target Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug modula2/120117] ICE when attempting to obtain the MAX of an aliased set type.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120117 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug modula2/120117] ICE when attempting to obtain the MAX of an aliased set type.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120117 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb83283e5c5c55eab7493a58c5e415aa56f5940c commit r16-392-gbb83283e5c5c55eab7493a58c5e415aa56f5940c Author: Gaius Mulley Date: Mon

[Bug middle-end/120109] [12/13/14/15 regression] ICE in expand_builtin_init_trampoline with __builtin_init_trampoline not having a function pointer as 2nd argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120109 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/107845] __builtin_init_trampoline ICEs on invalid arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107845 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.rodriguezb1 at um dot es --- Comm

[Bug middle-end/120109] [12/13/14/15 regression] ICE in expand_builtin_init_trampoline with __builtin_init_trampoline not having a function pointer as 2nd argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120109 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|[12/13/14/15 regre

[Bug fortran/102891] Passing real part of complex type component using w%z%re to a subroutine gives erroneous value of dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102891 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The original issue (comment#0) is fixed with the fix for pr119986, but the other issue in comment#2 still remains. It looks like gfc_conv_intrinsic_transfer gets confused by the inquiry ref.

[Bug target/90260] function multiversioning: template functions not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90260 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81276] Function multiversioning doesn't work with C++ templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81276 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nheart at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 f

[Bug target/120090] [16 Regression] gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-pr103750-2.c since r16-160

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120090 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61322 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61322&action=edit Patch which I am testing I did a quick test with the patch and compile.exp had no failures on x86_64. Will do

[Bug target/120090] [16 Regression] gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-pr103750-2.c since r16-160

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120090 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > > But nowhere in simplify-rtx.cc checks that gen_lowpart_no_emit will return > CLOBBER. Or should we wrap gen_lowpart_for_combine and return NULL when it > is a

[Bug preprocessor/120118] ICE in c and c++ in cpp_spell_token with unterminated macro stringification inside #pragma message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120118 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/79516] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE: unspellable token PRAGMA_EOL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79516 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.rodriguezb1 at um dot es --- Comme

[Bug preprocessor/120118] ICE in c and c++ in cpp_spell_token with unterminated macro stringification inside #pragma message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120118 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/120090] [16 Regression] gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-pr103750-2.c since r16-160

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120090 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/119966] [16 regression] pru: Invalid register in RTL expression starting with r16-160-ge6f89d78c1a752

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119966 --- Comment #8 from Dimitar Dimitrov --- Posted https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/682657.html . I'm trying to setup gcc testing environment for big endian target, in order to check Richard's comment: > But we would have to skip

  1   2   >