https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120106
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120106
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou ---
The build and host changes should be separated. I'm not sure that we want to
change the host side (gnattools) given that they mimic Make-lang.in. The build
changes are more desirable, but the EXTRA_TARGET_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87778
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
The ChangeLog must be relative to the ChangeLog file present gcc/ada:
gcc/ada/
* Make-generated.in: Remove -q gnatmake option.
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in: Likewise.
But the change does more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117871
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
So this depends on removing sel scheduling.
Which does this mess:
```
void
sel_register_cfg_hooks (void)
{
sched_split_block = sel_split_block;
orig_cfg_hooks = get_cfg_hooks ();
sel_cfg_hooks = orig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116938
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/682589.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116939
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/682591.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111276
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/682590.html
(with the LIM patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/682588.html
)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120108
Bug ID: 120108
Summary: Feature request: Command-line option to rename module
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120099
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120107
Bug ID: 120107
Summary: -fc-prototypes for ISO_FORTRAN_ENV generates duplicate
typedefs
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118977
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #4)
> I managed to narrow down the commit that broke this. RTEMS has some
> functions to support libatomic in libatomic/config/rtems. What tiny bit of
> magic are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 61307
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61307&action=edit
Prelimnary patch to fix this.
With the attached patch this case compiles and runs.
$ cat z2.f90
program tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049
--- Comment #13 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
On 5/4/25 16:51, kargls at comcast dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049
>
> --- Comment #12 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049
--- Comment #12 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #11)
> (In reply to kargls from comment #8)
> > program tests_gtk_sup
> >use gtk_sup
> >implicit none
> >type(c_ptr), target :: val
> >prin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #8)
> program tests_gtk_sup
>use gtk_sup
>implicit none
>type(c_ptr), target :: val
>print *, c_associated(val, c_loc(val))
>print *, c_associated(c_loc(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120019
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #8)
> Created attachment 61306 [details]
> Simplified patch
Rainer, can you please test this patch on your target?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120019
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-04
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120106
Bug ID: 120106
Summary: replace hardcoded gnatmake commands with configuration
variables
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Nicolas Boulenguez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44952|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120105
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120105
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61303
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61303&action=edit
Reduced as much as I can get it
This ones ICEs all the way back to GCC 4.7.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120105
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing ...
s with
gnatmake: "" compilation error
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED======+
| 16.0.0 20250504 (experimental) (x86_64-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure failed
precondition from einfo-entities.ads:3296|
| Error de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120105
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61302
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61302&action=edit
Preprocessed with line #s stripped
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120105
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.0, 11.4.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120105
Bug ID: 120105
Summary: -Wpadded leads to internal_error
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111276
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> This is why I didn't see it before even. I wonder if the
> compute_invariantness change should take into account conditional
> expressions ...
I have a fix, wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87778
Nicolas Boulenguez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58132|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120103
Bug ID: 120103
Summary: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119986
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fceb6022798b587c9111d0241aaff72602dcd626
commit r16-376-gfceb6022798b587c9111d0241aaff72602dcd626
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin ---
On hppa, size_t is unsigned long. I'll test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120054
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-04
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120101
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #5 from Jørgen Kvalsvik ---
Does the pretty-print.cc test fail, too?
Anyway, the fix is simple, in a way -- we don't really need the full size_t
width (probably), so I'd wager it's harmless to change it to %u. It's not the
nicest ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120089
--- Comment #23 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
I dumped all optimization trees before and after the bad commit, the divergence
starts with "vect", where the bad tree output is three times as long.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120095
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120095
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The issue is with the return type difference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120095
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61299
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61299&action=edit
Reduced slightly more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120097
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-04
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120097
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120097
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61298
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61298&action=edit
Reduced testcase for the diagnostic issue
GCC gives for this:
```
:8:6: error: could not convert '()'
from ''
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120097
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61297
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61297&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112761
--- Comment #4 from nrk at disroot dot org ---
> 6.7.6.3#7 A declaration of a parameter as ''array of type'' shall be adjusted
> to ''qualified pointer to type''
Though after a bit more thought I guess it makes sense that the adjustment
happens
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112761
nrk at disroot dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nrk at disroot dot org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120097
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, wrong-code
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120102
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112761
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izaberina at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120102
Bug ID: 120102
Summary: function prototype with array of forward declared
struct is incomplete?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Guess this is a problem in other files:
bash-5.1$ grep zu *.cc
crc-verification.cc:fprintf (dump_file, "Checking %zu bit.\n", it_end);
crc-verification.cc:fprintf (dump_file, "Checking %zu bit.\
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
(In reply to Jørgen Kvalsvik from comment #2)
> Interesting. I looked at the attach'd .gcov file and it is filled with these:
>
> paths covered 1 of zu
>
> Does the target not support size_t with print
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120099
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120089
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61295|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120101
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
```
$ diff -u <(gcc-14 gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81627.c -o a -O3
-fdump-tree-pcom-details=- | grep Store) <(gcc gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81627.c -o a
-O3 -fdump-tree-pcom-details=- | grep Store-s)
--- /dev/fd/63 2025-05-04
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120100
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120101
Bug ID: 120101
Summary: [16 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81627.c FAILs since
r16-372-g064cac730f88dc
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120101
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120100
Bug ID: 120100
Summary: [16 regression] g++.dg/vect/pr64410.cc FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuite-fail
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120099
Bug ID: 120099
Summary: [16 regression] gfortran.dg/specifics_1.f90 FAILs
since r16-372-g064cac730f88dc
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120098
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120098
Bug ID: 120098
Summary: [16 regression] g++.dg/lto/devirt-23 FAILs since
r16-372-g064cac730f88dc
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
After r16-372-g064cac730f88dc, I see extra coroutine FAILs:
Running g++:/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/coro-torture.exp ...
+FAIL: g++.dg/coroutines/torture/exceptions-test-01-n4849-a.C -O2 executio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120089
--- Comment #21 from Sam James ---
The simplification of the array is debatable I think. Having many zeroes means
that as a testcase, it's less likely to show up a problem. But it's still
useful for debugging.
But if you're going to go that rou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120089
--- Comment #20 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Created attachment 61295
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61295&action=edit
further cleanup and converted to C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120089
--- Comment #19 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
-O3 can be replaced with -O2 -funswitch-loops -fvect-cost-model=dynamic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120097
Bug ID: 120097
Summary: source_location line is wrong when used in an
initializer list
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120096
Bug ID: 120096
Summary: d: Side effects not evaluated for array literals on
stack
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120089
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120095
--- Comment #1 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Created attachment 61293
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61293&action=edit
reduction.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11900
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:064cac730f88dc71c6da578f9ae5b8e092ab6cd4
commit r16-372-g064cac730f88dc71c6da578f9ae5b8e092ab6cd4
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Sun May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119900
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:064cac730f88dc71c6da578f9ae5b8e092ab6cd4
commit r16-372-g064cac730f88dc71c6da578f9ae5b8e092ab6cd4
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Sun Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120095
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120095
Bug ID: 120095
Summary: ICE in convert_mode_scalar when casting double
(*)(double) to int (*)(float) and calling it with a
large argument
Product: gcc
Version: 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120092
Bug ID: 120092
Summary: [16 Regression] FAIL:
g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr103953.C -O3 -g
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119931
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120094
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120094
Bug ID: 120094
Summary: [16 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vla-1.c
scan-tree-dump-times optimized " s=> i" 2
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120091
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119919#c6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120093
Bug ID: 120093
Summary: [16 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr101145.c
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: mid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120092
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120090
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120091
Bug ID: 120091
Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr119919.c
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120090
Bug ID: 120090
Summary: [16 Regression] gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-pr103750-2.c
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120089
--- Comment #17 from Connor Abbott ---
Whoops, I see now that you already found that in the meantime.
84 matches
Mail list logo
