[Bug tree-optimization/118659] get_known_nonzero_bits_1 should use wi::bit_and_not instead of `a & ~b`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118659 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/118617] the auto_vec converts variable that gets passed into supportable_indirect_convert_operation could use internal storage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118617 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/118617] the auto_vec converts variable that gets passed into supportable_indirect_convert_operation could use internal storage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118617 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69bcf1d6aa52a531f7bc4976e407325fe9742cf6 commit r16-342-g69bcf1d6aa52a531f7bc4976e407325fe9742cf6 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Thu

[Bug tree-optimization/118616] [15 regression] false positive -Waggressive-loop-optimizations warnings in tree-vect-generic.cc with LTO and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118616 --- Comment #21 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69bcf1d6aa52a531f7bc4976e407325fe9742cf6 commit r16-342-g69bcf1d6aa52a531f7bc4976e407325fe9742cf6 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Th

[Bug tree-optimization/118659] get_known_nonzero_bits_1 should use wi::bit_and_not instead of `a & ~b`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118659 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:adefadda3e87f693f20f0b2b34bced00aa525207 commit r16-341-gadefadda3e87f693f20f0b2b34bced00aa525207 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Thu

[Bug middle-end/118090] unsignedp argument get_compare_parts is unused by callers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118090 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/118090] unsignedp argument get_compare_parts is unused by callers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118090 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d5bed0caef4570c255f35343be00e314dd8a08d commit r16-340-g5d5bed0caef4570c255f35343be00e314dd8a08d Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Thu

[Bug rtl-optimization/120059] [16 regression] ICE when building mesa in vartrack since r16-286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120059 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/120059] [16 regression] ICE when building mesa in vartrack since r16-286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120059 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61269 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61269&action=edit Reduced `-O2 -g` is enough even on x86_64.

[Bug rtl-optimization/120059] [16 regression] ICE when building mesa in vartrack since r16-286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120059 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- This semi obvious patch fixes it. The only thing I am not 100% sure yet is why is simplify_gen_subreg failing; but yes simplify_gen_subreg is known in some cases to return NULL. ``` diff --git a/gcc/simpli

[Bug rtl-optimization/120059] [16 regression] ICE when building mesa in vartrack since r16-286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120059 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61267|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/120059] [16 regression] ICE when building mesa in vartrack since r16-286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120059 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[16 regression] ICE when|[16 regression] ICE when

[Bug rtl-optimization/120059] [16 regression] ICE when building mesa in vartrack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120059 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Most likely > https://gcc.gnu.org/cgit/gcc/commit/gcc/simplify-rtx. > cc?id=d84fbc516ea57de7e88fce76ff6f342ee808c02e Almost positive since simplify_with_subreg

[Bug rtl-optimization/120059] [16 regression] ICE when building mesa in vartrack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120059 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Most likely https://gcc.gnu.org/cgit/gcc/commit/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc?id=d84fbc516ea57de7e88fce76ff6f342ee808c02e

[Bug rtl-optimization/120059] [16 regression] ICE when building mesa in vartrack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120059 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0 Keywords|

[Bug debug/120059] [16 regression] ICE when building mesa in vartrack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120059 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Created attachment 61267 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61267&action=edit vk_graphics_state.c.i.xz ``` $ gcc -m32 -c vk_graphics_state.c.i -ggdb3 -O2 -march=tigerlake during RTL pass: var

[Bug debug/120059] New: [16 regression] ICE when building mesa in vartrack

isable-isl-version-check --enable-default-pie --enable-host-pie --enable-host-bind-now --enable-default-ssp --disable-fixincludes --with-gxx-libcxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/v1 --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 16.0.

[Bug c/120055] [16 Regression] ice in convert_arguments with recent compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120055 --- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer --- Patch posted: [PATCH] c: Fix crash in c-typeck.cc convert_arguments with indirect calls

[Bug c/120058] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120058 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/120055] [16 Regression] ice in convert_arguments with recent compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120055 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tharakan at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug c/120058] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

n algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 16.0.0 20250501 (experimental) (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-Wall' '-Wmissing-prototypes' '-Wpointer-arith' '-Wdeclaration-after-statement' '-Werror=vla' '-Wendif-labels

[Bug c/120055] [16 Regression] ice in convert_arguments with recent compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120055 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/120057] [15/16 regression] 'constexpr' integer initializer is not an integer constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120057 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- (I mean the ones for embed.)

[Bug c/120057] [15/16 regression] 'constexpr' integer initializer is not an integer constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120057 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.2 Summary|[15 regression] 'co

[Bug c/120057] New: [15 regression] 'constexpr' integer initializer is not an integer constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120057 Bug ID: 120057 Summary: [15 regression] 'constexpr' integer initializer is not an integer constant expression Product: gcc Version: 15.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/120056] Circular constraint satisfaction error with non-trivial container iterators to callables taking std::expected parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120056 --- Comment #1 from catsith at me dot com --- The source code comment is wrong; std::expected template arguments do matter - replacing int with void removes the issue. The use of function pointers isn't necessary to trigger this; also happens wi

คุณเดือดร้อน เราช่วยคุณได้ ไม่มีโอนก่อนไม่มีมัดจำ

[Bug c++/120056] New: Circular constraint satisfaction error with non-trivial container iterators to callables taking std::expected parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120056 Bug ID: 120056 Summary: Circular constraint satisfaction error with non-trivial container iterators to callables taking std::expected parameters Product: gcc Ver

[Bug middle-end/98753] -Wfree-nonheap-object on unreachable code with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98753 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski --- The Wfree-nonheap-object code needs to do something as similar to what was done for uninitialized code here: r12-7175-g0f58ba4dd6b25b and not warning in unreachable branches.

[Bug middle-end/98753] -Wfree-nonheap-object on unreachable code with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98753 Christian Kreibich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||christian at zeek dot org --- Comme

[Bug c/120055] [16 Regression] ice in convert_arguments with recent compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120055 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/120055] [16 Regression] ice in convert_arguments with recent compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120055 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Version|15.0|16.0 Summary|ice in convert_

[Bug c/120055] New: ice in convert_arguments with recent compiler

/tree.h:3979 0x7bef88 fndecl_built_in_p ../../trunk/gcc/tree.h:6922 0x7bef88 convert_arguments /home/dcb40b/gcc/working/gcc/../../trunk/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc:4340 The bug seems to have started in the last few days: foundBugs $ ../results.20250430.ubsan/bin/gcc -c -w -std=gnu99 bug1098.c foundBugs

[Bug c++/120025] rfe: split assignable temporaries from -fpermissive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120025 --- Comment #8 from Stas Sergeev --- The interesting thing is that this works: ``` #include struct A { int a; ~A() { std::cout << "a=" << a << std::endl; } }; int main() { (int&)A().a = 5; return 0; } ``` So I can just cast t

[Bug c/119317] Named loops (C2y) do not compile with -O1 and -ggdb2 or higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119317 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25921d664242f651ed8a25b3db55093a19a5ae7b commit r16-336-g25921d664242f651ed8a25b3db55093a19a5ae7b Author: Christopher Bazley Da

[Bug target/120054] New: [16 regression] RISC-V: gcc.target/riscv/predef-19.c failing since r16-299-ga992164c289

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120054 Bug ID: 120054 Summary: [16 regression] RISC-V: gcc.target/riscv/predef-19.c failing since r16-299-ga992164c289 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/119986] Complex array part references are being passed incorrectly to a procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119986 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/105475] coroutines: ICE in coerce_template_parms, at cp/pt.cc:9183

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105475 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/103923] is_invocable inexplicably fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103923 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||piersh at hotmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug c++/107022] error: use of deleted function 'std::unordered_map

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107022 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #16 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 5/1/25 11:55, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 > > --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas --- > (In reply to kargls from comment #14) >> HI Pau

[Bug c++/105475] coroutines: ICE in coerce_template_parms, at cp/pt.cc:9183

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105475 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3389c96234eb3c259867edc91876571b5254392 commit r14-11720-gd3389c96234eb3c259867edc91876571b5254392 Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug c++/120053] __is_trivially_constructible() requiring default member initializer unnecessarily

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120053 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- >This doesn't make sense. It looks like an internal state bug. It is not. It is more complex because the inner type is not exactly completed until the outer one is.

[Bug c++/58616] [meta-bug] nsdmi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616 Bug 58616 depends on bug 101227, which changed state. Bug 101227 Summary: Clang++ fails to instantiate std::optional if nested type has a non-static data member initializer https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101227 What|

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to kargls from comment #14) > HI Paul, > > The difference in my pr119948_1.f90 and pr119948_2.f90 is > that the former is Damian's testcase with a result-name > while latter does not use result-nam

[Bug c++/96645] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||florin at iucha dot net --- Comment #37

[Bug libstdc++/101227] Clang++ fails to instantiate std::optional if nested type has a non-static data member initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101227 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/113008] Trivially default constructible requires default member initializer before the end of its enclosing class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113008 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96645] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/96645] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roi.jacobson1 at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/58616] [meta-bug] nsdmi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616 Bug 58616 depends on bug 102199, which changed state. Bug 102199 Summary: is_default_constructible incorrect for an inner type with NSDMI https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102199 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/102199] is_default_constructible incorrect for an inner type with NSDMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102199 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/108588] __is_constructible returns wrong value for invalid (but non deleted) default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108588 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96645] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 --- Comment #34 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 102199 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/96645] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago at kde dot org --- Comment #33 fr

[Bug c++/120053] __is_trivially_constructible() requiring default member initializer unnecessarily

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120053 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/120053] New: __is_trivially_constructible() requiring default member initializer unnecessarily

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120053 Bug ID: 120053 Summary: __is_trivially_constructible() requiring default member initializer unnecessarily Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug middle-end/120052] [13/14/15/16 Regression] VLA with OpenMP vs -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug ada/119698] gen_il-main: raised PROGRAM_ERROR : finalize/adjust raised exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698 --- Comment #14 from John David Anglin --- I installed Debian gcc and gnat 12.3.0-14. With it, gen_il-main doesn't fault. I'm building 12.4.0-5 and I'll see if I can find issue with Debian build.

[Bug target/111107] i686-w64-mingw32 does not realign stack when __attribute__((aligned)) or __attribute__((vector_size)) are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 LIU Hao changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61261|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ipa/120048] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{s,2} with "-fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in type, at value-range.h:982

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #5) > 6358value_range tmp = plats->m_value_range.m_vr; > 6359tree type = ipa_get_type (info, i); > 6360i

[Bug ipa/120048] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{s,2} with "-fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in type, at value-range.h:982

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod --- It is trapping when asking for the type() of an UNDEFINED range. Looking up the call chain: Breakpoint 2, ipcp_store_vr_results () at /gcc/master/gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.cc:6366 6366 tmp.update

[Bug c/119950] __builtin_constant_p warning with -Wdeprecated-non-prototype inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119950 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Florian Weimer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6d37ec1dd2a228d94e7b5b438f3aa53684316bc commit r16-334-gb6d37ec1dd2a228d94e7b5b438f3aa53684316bc Author: Florian Weimer Date: T

[Bug target/111107] i686-w64-mingw32 does not realign stack when __attribute__((aligned)) or __attribute__((vector_size)) are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 --- Comment #41 from Eric Botcazou --- > This reads to me like `-mstackrealign` usually decreases > `incoming_stack_boundary` from 128 to 32; realignment is actually a result > of that, right? Yes, both -mstackrealign and force_align_arg_pointe

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #14 from kargls at comcast dot net --- HI Paul, The difference in my pr119948_1.f90 and pr119948_2.f90 is that the former is Damian's testcase with a result-name while latter does not use result-name so the function-name is the resul

[Bug middle-end/120052] [13/14/15/16 Regression] VLA with OpenMP vs -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/120052] VLA with OpenMP vs -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- gcc_checking_assert (TREE_CODE (repl) != ERROR_MARK); This is due to s.1 not being recorded in the #pragma: #pragma omp parallel firstprivate(counts.3) firstprivate(D.3444) private(counts)

[Bug c++/120052] VLA with OpenMP vs -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- during GIMPLE pass: omplower dump file: /app/output.cpp.010t.omplower : In function 'f': :5:14: internal compiler error: in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.cc:4005 5 | counts[i][indx] = 1; |

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #13 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Oh s***t! Don't do that - post in the existing PR. I must confess that I looked at the second testcase and couldn't see the difference. I'll put stronger glasses on. Thanks Paul

[Bug c++/120052] internal compiler error: in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.cc:4005

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61262 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61262&action=edit Cleaned up and reduced testcase

[Bug c++/120012] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] P1008R1 causes tail padding reuse in C++20 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120012 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #3) > On branches I'm thinking to give the warning under -Wabi=0. It's awkward > that plain -Wabi currently gives a warning, though that could change. That is, since

[Bug rtl-optimization/116564] [12 Regression] aarch64: gcc hangs when compiling vst2_f64 instrinsic at -O1 and above since r12-4910-g66f206b853

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116564 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/116564] [12 Regression] aarch64: gcc hangs when compiling vst2_f64 instrinsic at -O1 and above since r12-4910-g66f206b853

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116564 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91be90b5ae9ee345bd011afdf02df7003d7598d3 commit r12-11082-g91be90b5ae9ee345bd011afdf02df7003d7598d3 Author: Alex Coplan Da

[Bug c++/120052] New: internal compiler error: in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.cc:4005

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052 Bug ID: 120052 Summary: internal compiler error: in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.cc:4005 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/120049] ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED ()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- I should mention That this issue was first identified by Vincent Magnin. Vincent has also confirmed the issue on gfortran 11.5 on Ubuntu. There is also a variation where it compiles and segfaults at run tim

[Bug c++/110871] coroutine precondition should be evaluated before the initial suspend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110871 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.3

[Bug c++/120012] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] P1008R1 causes tail padding reuse in C++20 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120012 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > going to be interesting to decide what to do on branches ... does it affect > the ABI of any part of libstdc++, in the shared object or instantiated > templates

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #12 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 5/1/25 07:45, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 > > --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- > (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #10) >> T

[Bug target/111107] i686-w64-mingw32 does not realign stack when __attribute__((aligned)) or __attribute__((vector_size)) are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 --- Comment #40 from LIU Hao --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #39) > > What's the difference between the `-mstackrealign` option and the > > `force_align_arg_pointer` attribute? > > -mstackrealign (ix86_force_align_arg_pointer) is on

[Bug c++/110872] coroutine postcondition is not evaluated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110872 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/115434] Post contracts are ignored on functions with no return statement.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115434 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/110871] coroutine precondition should be evaluated before the initial suspend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110871 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/112341] error: insufficient contextual information to determine type on co_await result in function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112341 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad4c136b906c7658d6e800b3a5241a6dac2e0bdc commit r14-11719-gad4c136b906c7658d6e800b3a5241a6dac2e0bdc Author: Arsen Arsenovi

[Bug c++/115906] [coroutines] missing diagnostic and ICE when co_await used as default argument in function declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115906 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b4cb031cf7de0ac350197e4ae869df9fe1d08a1 commit r14-11718-g7b4cb031cf7de0ac350197e4ae869df9fe1d08a1 Author: Arsen Arsenovi

[Bug c++/115906] [coroutines] missing diagnostic and ICE when co_await used as default argument in function declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115906 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee0736f665971446f8665a94ef597f683f8128e9 commit r14-11717-gee0736f665971446f8665a94ef597f683f8128e9 Author: Arsen Arsenovi

[Bug c++/111728] C++ 20 coroutine segmentation fault in generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111728 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:074a89e4c5f9b237176626d464fcc494389905f6 commit r14-11716-g074a89e4c5f9b237176626d464fcc494389905f6 Author: Arsen Arsenovi

[Bug c++/110872] coroutine postcondition is not evaluated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110872 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c commit r14-11715-gfbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug c++/110871] coroutine precondition should be evaluated before the initial suspend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110871 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c commit r14-11715-gfbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug c++/115434] Post contracts are ignored on functions with no return statement.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115434 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c commit r14-11715-gfbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug libstdc++/119282] [15 Regression] views::transform producing ranges piped to views::join | ranges::to() fails to compile in constant evaluation.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119282 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f523d49ada91050445f71821a9a06b0988402f5 commit r16-332-g9f523d49ada91050445f71821a9a06b0988402f5 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Th

[Bug ada/119698] gen_il-main: raised PROGRAM_ERROR : finalize/adjust raised exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-01 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/111107] i686-w64-mingw32 does not realign stack when __attribute__((aligned)) or __attribute__((vector_size)) are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 --- Comment #39 from Eric Botcazou --- > What's the difference between the `-mstackrealign` option and the > `force_align_arg_pointer` attribute? -mstackrealign (ix86_force_align_arg_pointer) is only used here: /* In 32bit, use MIN_STACK_BOU

[Bug c++/119034] Nested using-declaration doesn't do ADL or uses wrong associated namespace (overly strict use of deleted function before ADL)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119034 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68942] overly strict use of deleted function before argument-dependent lookup (ADL)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68942 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fb5abc3919f376f3dedccad636eba4a4ad7e4a7 commit r16-330-g1fb5abc3919f376f3dedccad636eba4a4ad7e4a7 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Thu

[Bug c++/119034] Nested using-declaration doesn't do ADL or uses wrong associated namespace (overly strict use of deleted function before ADL)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119034 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fb5abc3919f376f3dedccad636eba4a4ad7e4a7 commit r16-330-g1fb5abc3919f376f3dedccad636eba4a4ad7e4a7 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Th

[Bug target/116827] New C++ failures in macOS 15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116827 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:623aaebc7d755ef8696834bebd14f8eddd88200e commit r14-11713-g623aaebc7d755ef8696834bebd14f8eddd88200e Author: Iain Sandoe

[Bug target/119172] [12/13/14 regression] macOS SDK version is not set by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119172 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86b51d7287e9e12e9f9936f376537545e31ee03a commit r14-11711-g86b51d7287e9e12e9f9936f376537545e31ee03a Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug target/116809] Failure to build GCC on macOS 15 / Xcode 16 for Intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809 --- Comment #33 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cae584bddd0e348d9ac6f9bd917b47255a26458e commit r14-11709-gcae584bddd0e348d9ac6f9bd917b47255a26458e Author: Mark Mentovai

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #10) > The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : I will close as fixed if no appetite for backporting is expressed in the next week. Paul

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0abc77da9d704bba55a376bb5c162a54826ab94a commit r16-329-g0abc77da9d704bba55a376bb5c162a54826ab94a Author: Paul Thomas Date: Thu M

  1   2   >