https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116082
--- Comment #6 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is not about padding. The string literal has a final NUL character and
yours then has two. The warning is about truncation of the final NUL character
in the string literal. So I think the wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
--- Comment #2 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #0)
>
> % gfortran -c source-allocate-pure-function-result-component.f90
> source-allocate-pure-function-result.f90:17:20:
>
>17 | allocate(test%i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112307
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61179|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119949
Bug ID: 119949
Summary: -Wnarrowing in arm's comp_not_to_clear_mask_str_un
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119937
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Lemme try repro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119364
--- Comment #21 from Matthias Klose ---
the attached patch doesn't apply anymore for the 15.1.0 release, and the build
on i686 fails with
In file included from ../../src/gcc/cobol/cdf.y:37:
../../src/gcc/cobol/../../libgcobol/common-defs.h:186:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119937
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
a cross compiler targeting arm-linux-gnueabihf is built successful.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119937
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119946
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
Bug ID: 119948
Summary: Source allocation of pure function result
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116082
--- Comment #5 from Steffen Nurpmeso ---
different to some other comments i think this is plain a bug in gcc.
C99, 6.7.8 p21, and C23 is not different (here 6.7.10 p22; disclaimer: i have
not truly read any standard beyond C99, though!!) want
``
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116082
Steffen Nurpmeso changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steffen at sdaoden dot eu
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The xfail was added with r0-128999-gd74db8ff1c8f12 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1)
> But it seems to pass for me with the grep with GCC 14 as well?
This ended up being because it is discovered in another pass and my grep was
inaccurate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60674
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
devirt-23.C started to pass with r16-101-g132d01d96ea9d6 .
So just need to update the testcase removing the xfail and close this bug as
fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60674
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> devirt-23.C started to pass with r16-101-g132d01d96ea9d6 .
>
> So just need to update the testcase removing the xfail and close this bug as
> fixed.
The reason
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60674
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(Paste got mangled, my grep was just "Discovered")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Seen at
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-testresults/20250425213822.d51602cc...@gnu-skx-1.sc.intel.com/T/#u
too.
But it seems to pass for me with the grep with GCC 14 as well?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947
Bug ID: 119947
Summary: [16 regression] XPASS g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuite-fail
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119946
Bug ID: 119946
Summary: memset/memcpy with a null argument should be folded
into `if (size_arg) __builtin_unreachable();`
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119943
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-O3 forgets trivial code|improve function splitting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119943
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119945
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Well, you'd need to know during tailc pass that the target returns char *
> the same as size_t, which isn't guaranteed.
> Especially e.g. int and unsigned could
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119945
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119943
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Kleinsorge ---
I dont think this is the a vectorization issue here!
Moving a struct initialization around, seems not related to the duplicate you
mentioned, for me. Could you please check again?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119945
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119945
Bug ID: 119945
Summary: [14/15/16 Regression] missed tail call due to IPA-VRP
and different type but same mode
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119943
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115777
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleks at physik dot
tu-berlin.de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119943
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kleinsorge ---
Created attachment 61197
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61197&action=edit
full sample code (1 file)
version above has the issue active.
gcc -o radix.exe -march=native -O3 radix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119884
--- Comment #2 from Konstantinos Eleftheriou ---
We have submitted a fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/681886.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Petazzoni ---
Now that GCC 15.1 is out, I was wondering if this issue has somehow been
resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119944
Bug ID: 119944
Summary: [16] RISC-V:
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119943
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119944
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119942
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119944
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[16] RISC-V:|[16] RISC-V:
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[16 regression] |[16 regression]
|g++.dg/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119943
Bug ID: 119943
Summary: -O3 forgets trivial code shift. causing significant
slowdown
Product: gcc
Version: 12.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930
--- Comment #3 from Edwin Lu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I noticed this too. It was working at r16-89-g0650ea627399a0 .
for risc-v, our postcommit has it starting within this range
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/compa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ewlu at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119942
Bug ID: 119942
Summary: [16 Regression] RISC-V: Segmentation fault in
pr103953.exe
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119941
Bug ID: 119941
Summary: -Warray-bounds warning in
adjust_offset_for_component_ref when building for
bpf-unknown-none
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119919
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Exchange2 regression is solved and tonto seem to be noise (performance is back
today w/o change of a checksum of the text segment).
still we account one extra setcc and misaccount scatter, so lets keep this t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119878
--- Comment #2 from Kees Cook ---
Ugh, I'm sorry I botched this example so badly. I'm not sure where I got off
track in trying to get it into one of the selftests. The problem I ran into was
with querying array members of the multidimensional ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.2|15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119878
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think the current behavior is correct. nonstring attribute is a declaration
attribute. So __builtin_has_attribute returns true if passed a declaration
which has one. multi2[1] (like say single + 0) is s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102900
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc8d86ee4680d56eefeb76a8f2f752282e2631e3
commit r16-150-gcc8d86ee4680d56eefeb76a8f2f752282e2631e3
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119764
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44e31eb265ba1984638908466a88095744a88709
commit r16-149-g44e31eb265ba1984638908466a88095744a88709
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87185
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44e31eb265ba1984638908466a88095744a88709
commit r16-149-g44e31eb265ba1984638908466a88095744a88709
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #441 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #440)
> The branch for GCC 16 has opened now, so I assume it would be a good time to
> rebase the patches so I can re-test them.
I just tried
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119940
Bug ID: 119940
Summary: Incorrect calculate MD5 (for -gcodeview) under windows
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118141
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110998
Pierre Ossman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ossman at cendio dot se
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119811
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c565e0d3c4ad7c58697f3661269483ce6067e313
commit r16-144-gc565e0d3c4ad7c58697f3661269483ce6067e313
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119937
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #26 from Tomasz Kamiński ---
The latest commit (optimization) is for GCC 16 only.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #25 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01e5ef3e8b91288f5d387a27708f9f8979a50edf
commit r16-142-g01e5ef3e8b91288f5d387a27708f9f8979a50edf
Author: Tomasz KamiÅski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119937
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] ICE in |[15/16 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119939
Bug ID: 119939
Summary: [modules] Constraints attached to defaulted friend
functions don't work correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119878
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116479
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8073fa147248aa67c11227f922d91d784659077e
commit r16-140-g8073fa147248aa67c11227f922d91d784659077e
Author: Andre Vieira
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #24 from Tomasz Kamiński ---
> Although it doesn't seem to be in the upcoming GCC-15 release.
GCC 15.1 has everything expect formatters for adaptors. So ranges, debug
presentation, pair, tuple and std::vector::reference will be in.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119919
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #23 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to Tomasz Kamiński from comment #22)
> > That is highly intentional to fix incorrect formatting when the container
> > is a string. See https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3881
>
> I am well aware of thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119528
--- Comment #8 from akallabeth+gnu at posteo dot net ---
Update on the workaround:
while this indeed silences the deprecation warnings you now get
-Wredundant-decl warnings instead...
On 31.03.25 09:38, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #22 from Tomasz Kamiński ---
> That is highly intentional to fix incorrect formatting when the container is
> a string. See https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3881
I am well aware of this quirk, but my implementation uses range_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119873
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119873
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f36ec88aa85a1a8f4ec300dfcd862fc4fbca1c53
commit r15-9590-gf36ec88aa85a1a8f4ec300dfcd862fc4fbca1c53
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #21 from 康桓瑋 ---
> Furthermore the standard specifies these formatters as delegating to
> formatter, charT>, which in turn
> delegates to range_formatter. This patch avoids one level of indirection,
> and dependency o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119873
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d156c9e9bdaf351f77e3348b7d0d75e08f65580
commit r16-139-g3d156c9e9bdaf351f77e3348b7d0d75e08f65580
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113920
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.2|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119938
Bug ID: 119938
Summary: [15/16 Regression][modules] Class type NTTPs are not
considered constant when imported
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119937
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
the build for the soft-float variant succeeds. See
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-15&suite=experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119937
Bug ID: 119937
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at
dwarf2cfi.cc:2591
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106749
Bug 106749 depends on bug 109162, which changed state.
Bug 109162 Summary: C++23 improvements to std::format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkaminsk at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17e0decc1dbf827747aebfa0573cc8e50969ae3f
commit r15-9589-g17e0decc1dbf827747aebfa0573cc8e50969ae3f
Author: Tomasz KamiÅ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5bd02daf8430ecce1d7fd847ef4fc9c369179542
commit r15-9588-g5bd02daf8430ecce1d7fd847ef4fc9c369179542
Author: Tomasz KamiÅ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96191
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113416
Bug 113416 depends on bug 101018, which changed state.
Bug 101018 Summary: ICE when enabling OpenMP on a simple loop with SVE
intrinsics (aarch64)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101018
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101018
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119936
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-25
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b6cc2064306ba506b61f3e224829219033a9373
commit r16-136-g8b6cc2064306ba506b61f3e224829219033a9373
Author: Tomasz KamiÅski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113949
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.0|15.2
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119918
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119399
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118443
Bug 118443 depends on bug 119399, which changed state.
Bug 119399 Summary: [12 Backport] Overlap check in vectorized code may invoke UB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119399
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 116125, which changed state.
Bug 116125 Summary: [12 Regression] Does not fully checking for overlapping
memory regions with the vectorizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116125
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116125
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bacf741a92a9a84becd23542b73186da4e4acbf6
commit r16-135-gbacf741a92a9a84becd23542b73186da4e4acbf6
Author: Tomasz KamiÅski
Date:
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo