https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119122
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119122
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42ce61eaefc4db70e2e7ea2d8ef091daa458eb48
commit r16-124-g42ce61eaefc4db70e2e7ea2d8ef091daa458eb48
Author: Yuriy Kolerov
Date: Thu Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119934
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119935
Bug ID: 119935
Summary: libcobol fails to build on powerpc64-linux-gnu when
explicitly enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119934
Bug ID: 119934
Summary: cobol builds on sparc64-linux-gnu with test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119933
Bug ID: 119933
Summary: cobol builds on loongarch64-linux-gnu with test
failures
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119932
Bug ID: 119932
Summary: cobol builds on s390x-linux-gnu with test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119917
--- Comment #4 from Jin Haobo ---
The latest clang (trunk version) has applied this optimization, including
8/16/32/64-bit situation.
Link: https://godbolt.org/z/aTbqGTPex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119931
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
yes this is a testcae issue but neither noipa nor -fno-ipa-cp is correct here.
The testcase is no longer testing what originally going wrong either.
Maybe it should search for `# DEBUG i => 5` now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119931
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |testsuite
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119931
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug |tree-optimization
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930
Bug ID: 119930
Summary: [16 regression] g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr103953.C
FAILs with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: c++-corout
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119931
Bug ID: 119931
Summary: [16 regression] gcc.dg/vla-1.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuite-fail
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119917
--- Comment #3 from Jin Haobo ---
Thank you for your confirmation. I understand that the char/short cases are
treated differently due to integer promotion.
While I acknowledge that 8/16-bit unsigned integers undergo integer promotion
which chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119929
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1)
> r16-51-g727a43e0a66052
That patch was dependent on
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/20250131171232.1018281-14-aleksandar.ra...@htecgroup.com/
but that one didn'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119929
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Summary|[16 Regression] bui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119929
Bug ID: 119929
Summary: [16 Regression] build fails on mips64el-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84958
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53535
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104930
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109740
Hermann Voßeler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prg at ichthyostega dot de
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119873
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:567684733e0c4f28158e19b72f4e7f660ad81561
commit r16-121-g567684733e0c4f28158e19b72f4e7f660ad81561
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:419f40af5c5335b84c16e4891377142f12f7577b
commit r16-119-g419f40af5c5335b84c16e4891377142f12f7577b
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119766
Simon Marchi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119766
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79330
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looking for examples of the apparent difference between subroutine and
module subroutine in the interface block, I found an example in
F2023:C.10.4 Modules with submodules
paragraph 5, "module c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79330
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3)
> > Still fails on trunk (16)
>
> In looking at the code, I'm wondering if it conforms to the Fortran standard.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102900
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118892
--- Comment #20 from Pavol Rusnak ---
`force_lowpart_subreg` function is now in `releases/gcc-14` branch because it
has been backported in commit b33e9eb8d404475a45a53afa3e3cc0ff742d75ec
backporting of this fix from commit `d883f3233c4b7e0dce52
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119928
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119602
--- Comment #1 from Alex ---
I somehow botched the test case in my original post,
here is the fixed version.
https://godbolt.org/z/no9Pbv78K
```
typedef enum omp_interop_t : __UINTPTR_TYPE__
{
omp_interop_none = 0
} omp_interop_t;
typedef enu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119928
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.5.0, 12.4.1, 13.3.1,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119928
Bug ID: 119928
Summary: [15/16 Regression] Bogus "Interface mismatch" in
gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_52.f90 with -Wall
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104654
--- Comment #3 from Brecht Sanders
---
What I think needs to be fixed is really
libphobos/libdruntime/core/sys/posix/pthread.d
It should also include version(MinGW) parts to define POSIX threads from
MinGW-w64 when GCC is built with --enable-t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104654
--- Comment #2 from Brecht Sanders
---
As GCC15 release is getting closer, I noticed the gthread.d is still not fixed.
Can anybody with experience calling C from D fix gthread.d so it can find whet
is defined in MinGW-w64's pthread.h?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119917
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119917
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119919
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2056d52d74070f50c5f8a22e4a600fcc3974fd88
commit r16-117-g2056d52d74070f50c5f8a22e4a600fcc3974fd88
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Thu Ap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119924
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfb04e0de6aa438df9d8b83a3d8c7f93789b5c9f
commit r16-116-gcfb04e0de6aa438df9d8b83a3d8c7f93789b5c9f
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Thu Ap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119925
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||119393
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119921
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The fix would be in switch_conversion::check_final_bb () (near the call to
initializer_constant_valid_p). To check that the vector type is not a variable
length one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119714
Johannes Larsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mail at johslarsen dot net
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116954
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e448005c51320801c0e2fa6ddf577da51cec7c7
commit r16-113-g3e448005c51320801c0e2fa6ddf577da51cec7c7
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119926
--- Comment #1 from Yuxuan Shui ---
Created attachment 61196
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61196&action=edit
patch
Patch to remove the check, not sure if this will break other things.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119919
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||119902
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118924
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd7c5d9729851940ab6bb7a8522a548c62e8dade
commit r14-11683-gcd7c5d9729851940ab6bb7a8522a548c62e8dade
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118065
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119925
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15/16 Regression] 4% |[15/16 Regression] 4%
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118924
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19dd791b3a7166df0766dfd0b5e6918f8e3d1bba
commit r14-11682-g19dd791b3a7166df0766dfd0b5e6918f8e3d1bba
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119919
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119927
Bug ID: 119927
Summary: 5% slowdown of 415.gamess on Intel Ice Lake
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119926
Bug ID: 119926
Summary: Allow -fasan-shadow-offset= to be used with
-fsanitize=address
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58310|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119711
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110343
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c8c400ddf0d6de54b0ee557836a934b4025d21f
commit r16-111-g4c8c400ddf0d6de54b0ee557836a934b4025d21f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119610
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa61afef18a8566d1907a5ae0e7754e1eac207d9
commit r16-112-gfa61afef18a8566d1907a5ae0e7754e1eac207d9
Author: Richard Sandiford
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119399
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:261bcbf171021d20323ff0271f1e33850ff4
commit r13-9615-g261bcbf171021d20323ff0271f1e33850ff4
Author: Richard San
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116125
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf40537f3afc4903a5278305db78b7675be4f97a
commit r13-9614-gcf40537f3afc4903a5278305db78b7675be4f97a
Author: Richard Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119925
Bug ID: 119925
Summary: [15/16 Regression] 4% slowdown of 538.imagick_r on
Aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119925
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119924
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119924
Bug ID: 119924
Summary: [16 Regression] ICE when building 531.deepsjeng_r
during ipa-cp since r16-101-g132d01d96ea9d6
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119552
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, I'd handle it as a subpass of bitintlower (in the early code just try to
detect it and move them to be adjacent and then either handle in the bitint
lowering pass specially or match up the adjacent cases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119552
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
widening_mul is unfortunately too late here.
The normal widening_mul divmod optimization can handle not just
c = a / b;
d = a % b;
or
d = a % b;
c = a / b;
but also
c = a / b;
... hundreds of stmts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119920
--- Comment #4 from Alfie Richards ---
Ah okay great, I'll shelve this for now and check back later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119147
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
as g:132d01d96ea9d617aaffdd5dfba3284a8958e529 I have committed the patch that
enables ipa-cp to clone over edges which are !maybe_hot_p().
This improves x264 with FDO by 7.8% and exchange by 3.3%
It causes qu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119900
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[16 regression] imagick |[16 regression] imagick
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119921
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119235
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6a66eca19b5c556e2be7ca8c2b0d556ef52374c
commit r13-9613-ga6a66eca19b5c556e2be7ca8c2b0d556ef52374c
Author: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119921
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note my reduced testcase fails even for GCC 10.1.0. So this is not a regression
either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119921
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.0
Summary|[12/13/14/15/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119921
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61194
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61194&action=edit
Reduced testcase all the way
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119923
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Maybe ms-extensions should be updated to what MSVC actually does these days ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119923
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
>For comparison, Clang in MinGW mode doesn't allow neither of those, and I
>couldn't find any flag to enable them.
Most likely because clang started to support mingw way after Visual Studio 2005
was releas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119923
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The requiring & was changed in Visual Studio 2005:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/error-messages/compiler-errors-2/compiler-error-c3867?view=msvc-170
implicit int is PR 119400 .
So I think it migh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119235
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29004acab5caa46e59f53c8516619a9e996f8c49
commit r14-11681-g29004acab5caa46e59f53c8516619a9e996f8c49
Author:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119920
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||64700
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119923
Bug ID: 119923
Summary: `-pedantic-errors` should imply `-fno-ms-extensions`
on MinGW
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119920
--- Comment #2 from Alfie Richards ---
Ive explored adding a simplify to match.pd and a case to tree-vect-patterns.cc
but both cause other trade-offs that are sub-optimal.
Interested in any thoughts on changing ifcvt behavior in this case to ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119922
Bug ID: 119922
Summary: V4SI & {-1, -1, 0, 0} should produce movq
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119915
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a4f7a92770db4e739e76a06175454ba38d60b22
commit r16-107-g7a4f7a92770db4e739e76a06175454ba38d60b22
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119920
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119921
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|13.3.1 |16.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119921
Bug ID: 119921
Summary: [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE building SVE ACLE in
varasm
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119920
Bug ID: 119920
Summary: Missed vectorization for conditioned adds
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119606
--- Comment #7 from Jennifer Schmitz ---
For another regression in the Snappy workload
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119910), we found that it was
caused by an alignment issue. I added -falign-functions=32 -falign-loops=32
-falig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119373
--- Comment #10 from rdapp.gcc at gmail dot com ---
> Since the primary underlying scalar mode in the loop is DF, the autodetected
> vector mode returned by preferred_simd_mode is RVVM1DF. In comparison, AArch64
> picks VNx2DF, which allows the v
Since the primary underlying scalar mode in the loop is DF, the autodetected
vector mode returned by preferred_simd_mode is RVVM1DF. In comparison, AArch64
picks VNx2DF, which allows the vectorisation factor to be 8. By choosing
RVVMF8QI, RISC-V is restricted to VF = 4.
Generally we pick the lar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117249
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression]
|--di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43374
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed also for 13.4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102674
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed also for 13.4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98533
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE when |[12 Regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114870
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114877
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression] wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116108
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] GCC |[12 Regression] GCC crashes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116678
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed also for 14.3 and 13.4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116738
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
