https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118892
--- Comment #13 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> E.g. the i386 backend usually uses force_reg in this case. If the operand
> is a REG, it does nothing, if it is a SUBREG, it is forced into a temporary
> an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112490
--- Comment #8 from Chameleon ---
No, it is partially fixed.
Please patch also this:
template<__detail::__not_a_const_iterator _Sent,
same_as _Self>
requires sized_sentinel_for<_Sent, _It>
friend constexpr differenc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117047
--- Comment #39 from Richard Biener ---
playback::rvalue *
playback::context::
new_bitcast (location *loc,
rvalue *expr,
type *type_)
{
tree expr_size = TYPE_SIZE (expr->get_type ()->as_tree ());
Hmm, so the issue is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118940
--- Comment #17 from Miao Wang ---
(In reply to GCC Commits from comment #15)
> The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3071eb2848a2e748cfd67e8c897890ce06c69d06
>
> commit r15-7730-g3071eb2848a2e748
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117047
--- Comment #38 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #34)
> from ggc.h:
> ```
> /* The internal primitive. */
> extern void *ggc_internal_alloc (size_t, void (*)(void *), size_t,
> size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112490
--- Comment #7 from Chameleon ---
It seems fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118940
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||115458
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118538
--- Comment #21 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Disservin from comment #20)
Could you try build a vanilla GCC in the github runner (possibly with
--enable-default-pie or whatever else) and see if it fails using that?
I can try spend some time
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118996
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #11)
> Created attachment 60609 [details]
> An untested patch
Tested on x86-64 with RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='unix{-m32,}'".
There are no regressions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89967
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Ok, so my current patches actually make it worse because SRA decided to
scalarize inbetween the builtins.
That is because we don't look back over things that don't alias (in this case
the clobber):
```
# .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119053
--- Comment #2 from Yunbo Ni ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Dup. The only difference between this and PR 118922 is the variable names
> and the offset is slightly different.
>
> Since this is the third issue you filed for th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118465
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118922
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 119053 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119053
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119053
Bug ID: 119053
Summary: Miscompile at -O2/3
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119012
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Can you link me to your packaging script? Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119012
--- Comment #7 from Levi Zim ---
(In reply to Levi Zim from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > Can you attach the preprocessed source for rust-lex.cc ?
> >
> > The big difference between stage1 and stage2 is debug inf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119012
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
Thanks. First, try strip out various bits from the packaging like STAGE1_*FLAGS
(which is only really safe if you're 100% sure the stage1 compiler is robust,
and I would not make that bet for riscv at this time)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119012
--- Comment #6 from Levi Zim ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> Can you link me to your packaging script? Thanks.
Our packaging script is a patch[1] over Arch Linux's one[2].
After applying the patch, it is https://paste.rs/578r4
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119052
Bug ID: 119052
Summary: [15 regression] Uninitialized memory use in
selftest::check_line
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118996
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60607|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119052
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ak at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119012
--- Comment #4 from Levi Zim ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Can you attach the preprocessed source for rust-lex.cc ?
>
> The big difference between stage1 and stage2 is debug info.
Here are the preprocessed source (*.ii, *.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118996
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> Created attachment 60607 [details]
> A patch
>
> Here is the patch to change TARGET_SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES_FOR_MODE_P to
> return false for x86-64.
This doesn't work:
/ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118996
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
Testing this:
diff --git a/gcc/ira.cc b/gcc/ira.cc
index 885239d1b43..e93a596e2a9 100644
--- a/gcc/ira.cc
+++ b/gcc/ira.cc
@@ -2158,6 +2158,10 @@ decrease_live_ranges_number (void)
|| (targetm.small_regis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116961
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
Bootstrap passed. I'll give it a few more runs but I suspect that's done it.
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41471
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37917
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bmei at broadcom dot com
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37917
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adam at adamrosenfield dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119051
Bug ID: 119051
Summary: Inline Function Behavior Varies Across Optimization
Levels
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86360
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97945
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37917
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dongjianqiang2 at huawei dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37917
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dwmw2 at infradead dot org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37917
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||garyfunck at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65219
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49653
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48194
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117047
--- Comment #37 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 60608
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60608&action=edit
Excerpt from jit-playback.s
This is an excerpt from the .s file for
_ZN3gcc3jit8playback7context11new_bitcas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37917
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38754
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37917
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||klein at cage dot ugent.be
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119051
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37917
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xieym3 at zohomail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118996
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 60607
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60607&action=edit
A patch
Here is the patch to change TARGET_SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES_FOR_MODE_P to
return false for x86-64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116961
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
Testing it now
86_64-pc-linux-gnu/15/ -isystem ./gcc/include
-isystem ./gcc/include-fixed
==4062041==
GNU D (GCC) version 15.0.1 20250227 (experimental) (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 15.0.1 20250227 (experimental), GMP version
6.3.0, MPFR version 4.2.1, MPC version 1.3.1, isl version isl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117047
--- Comment #36 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #34)
> a simple test is to mark ggc_free as noinline (or noipa) or remove the
> ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC usage from ggc.h header file.
--- a/gcc/ggc.h
+++ b/gcc/ggc.h
@@ -127,8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116336
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116961
--- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw ---
Created attachment 60606
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60606&action=edit
Patch in testing
@Sam, currently building with the attached patch, if you are able to confirm it
fixes PR118802
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117047
--- Comment #35 from Sam James ---
On another note -- David, at the moment, we're building libgccjit separately as
is recommended at
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/jit/internals/index.html#packaging-notes but
with --disable-bootstrap on the firs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116961
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Valgrind reports|[12/13/14/15 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116961
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118996
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES was added by
>
> commit c98f874233428d7e6ba83def7842fd703ac0ddf1
> Author: James Van Artsdalen
> Date: Sun Feb 9 13:28:48 1992 +
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116961
--- Comment #7 from Iain Buclaw ---
Minimal test passes with gdc-11, fails from gdc-12 onwards.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116961
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Andrei Horodniceanu from comment #4)
> Sorry for the wait:
> -
> $ cat repro.d
> module object;
> struct Gcx
> {
> float thing = 0.0;
> }
Thanks, tweaked your test into:
```
module object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118802
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||116961
--- Comment #24 from Sam James ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116961
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #2)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #0)
> > When bootstrapping with some patches for improving Valgrind support (see
> > PR116947), I hit this:
> >
> > ==26778== Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118802
--- Comment #23 from Iain Buclaw ---
@Sam, I have a suspicion that this is related to PR116961.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118996
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES was added by
commit c98f874233428d7e6ba83def7842fd703ac0ddf1
Author: James Van Artsdalen
Date: Sun Feb 9 13:28:48 1992 +
Initial revision
which became TARGET_SMALL_REGISTER_CLA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117047
--- Comment #34 from Andrew Pinski ---
from ggc.h:
```
/* The internal primitive. */
extern void *ggc_internal_alloc (size_t, void (*)(void *), size_t,
size_t CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO)
ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC;
...
/*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117047
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] Segfault in |[15 regression] Segfault in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118892
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119050
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #0)
> Or maybe -Wundef can be refinded not to warn about the C++ feature macros ...
Even with that change, it would be a big project to clean up hundreds of other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118931
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e7287cbbb208b676991096dd9081ff8a61c49781
commit r15-7743-ge7287cbbb208b676991096dd9081ff8a61c49781
Author: Pan Li
Date: Sat Feb 22 19:3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109431
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117712
--- Comment #14 from Max Ivan ---
I built gcc using this patch, and the resulting gcc was able to build the mesa
package without any problems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119050
Bug ID: 119050
Summary: libstdc++ headers are not `-Wsystem-headers -Wundef `
friendly
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118813
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119034
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119038
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119049
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119049
Bug ID: 119049
Summary: Procedures are mishandled in -fc-prototypes-external
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119030
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8371e7f240c1130a3827be1afb94f73c26df81a6
commit r15-7740-g8371e7f240c1130a3827be1afb94f73c26df81a6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119030
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118860
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:518def14ef1a8e6e307079f205ff98ad619ccd7b
commit r15-7739-g518def14ef1a8e6e307079f205ff98ad619ccd7b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119042
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119048
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-02-27
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108369
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107635
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bac2d8a246892334e24dfa7d62be0cd0648c5606
commit r15-7736-gbac2d8a246892334e24dfa7d62be0cd0648c5606
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20250227/configure
--prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging
--enable-libstdcxx-backtrace=yes --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108369
--- Comment #24 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfc9f42122f41668b986126ba7e65e3dd8bf1e9e
commit r15-7732-gcfc9f42122f41668b986126ba7e65e3dd8bf1e9e
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118538
--- Comment #20 from Disservin ---
I just tried the reproduction on a public runner from github using their
"ubuntu 24.04 arm"
you can see the segmentation fault happening there as well..
https://github.com/Disservin/gcc-bug/actions/runs/135750
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114222
--- Comment #4 from Jan Dubiec ---
I agree, there is an infinite recursion, but I do not think it is a newlib
problem. The implementation of ffs() in newlib just calls __builtin_ffs()
(https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=blob;f=new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118928
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118928
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9792126ac769f2962c0f305991818c64f9e51221
commit r15-7731-g9792126ac769f2962c0f305991818c64f9e51221
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118940
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3071eb2848a2e748cfd67e8c897890ce06c69d06
commit r15-7730-g3071eb2848a2e748cfd67e8c897890ce06c69d06
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117047
--- Comment #32 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks for the script and the notes. I can now reproduce the crash on my main
development box, with e.g. test-bitcast.c
It seems to not be writing a vtable ptr to an object; the class's operator new
alloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3003d404b436c2dbd5a3a282c25b797d887237d9
commit r14-11346-g3003d404b436c2dbd5a3a282c25b797d887237d9
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118940
--- Comment #14 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> The inline asm stresses the RA to the maximum, it needs 6 registers, di, cx,
> ax + 3 others and sp is fixed and bp is used as frame pointer.
> But at least
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118793
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116336
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e59dd301aea9c8d5a5d04e808c87d591a26e85bb
commit r15-7729-ge59dd301aea9c8d5a5d04e808c87d591a26e85bb
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19bf2732ae4ad0c37c2493e82cc500724de746a8
commit r14-11348-g19bf2732ae4ad0c37c2493e82cc500724de746a8
Author: Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116336
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> This works for me on trunk now. I assume Vlad's fix for PR116234 may have
> done it.
Yes, exactly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=decc6c0d4d909c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a72e782528749bf553158039783ce79fa760e3a4
commit r14-11349-ga72e782528749bf553158039783ce79fa760e3a4
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4f66a79e0c9b65d78aed6c982bdcff48ed098d5
commit r14-11347-gb4f66a79e0c9b65d78aed6c982bdcff48ed098d5
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 118285, which changed state.
Bug 118285 Summary: [14 Regression] GCC rejects some constexpr std::string
usages
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
