[Bug target/108678] Windows on ARM64 platform target aarch64-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108678 --- Comment #16 from Brecht Sanders --- What is the current status of GCC for aarch64-w64-mingw32 ? When can I expect a snapshot version of GCC 15 to build for this platform?

[Bug tree-optimization/118902] missing predicated VN due to Canonical order of comparison with invariant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118902 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-02-17 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/118902] New: missing predicated VN due to Canonical order of comparison with invariant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118902 Bug ID: 118902 Summary: missing predicated VN due to Canonical order of comparison with invariant Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: mis

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 118862, which changed state. Bug 118862 Summary: UBSAN: shift exponent too large since r15-7345-gc2a0ee58865c5a https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118862 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/118862] UBSAN: shift exponent too large since r15-7345-gc2a0ee58865c5a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118862 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/118862] UBSAN: shift exponent too large since r15-7345-gc2a0ee58865c5a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118862 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Koenig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b57e6e1b38cdaf7a982474d93ebede1cc30f1d46 commit r15-7586-gb57e6e1b38cdaf7a982474d93ebede1cc30f1d46 Author: Thomas Koenig Date: S

[Bug target/118843] The predefined macro `__loongarch_frecipe` is still defined when using `-mfpu=none`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118843 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by LuluCheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:889fb66025cef4e434cc60e35add9f7406e38db7 commit r14-11316-g889fb66025cef4e434cc60e35add9f7406e38db7 Author: Lulu Cheng Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/116351] RISC-V ICE: in get_len_load_store_mode, at optabs-tree.cc:664

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116351 Li Pan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pan2.li at intel dot com --- Comment #2 from L

[Bug ipa/85103] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Performance regressions on SPEC with r257582

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |SUSPENDED

[Bug middle-end/88780] [12/13/14/15 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation for copying as many bytes from a string as its length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88780 --- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Some thoughts. The block with the key statements looks like: : __builtin_strncpy (d_8(D), s_5(D), len_6); _2 = d_8(D) + len_6; *_2 = 0; We probably need to recover the array indexing and produce the eq

[Bug ipa/89584] [12/13/14/15 Regression] CPU2000 degradations with r9-5763 (172.mgrid -22%, 252.eon -8%)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89584 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14/15 Regression]

[Bug c/118897] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in categorize_ctor_elements_1, at expr.cc:7247

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118897 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE: tree check: expected |[12/13/14/15 Regression]

[Bug ipa/89584] [12/13/14/15 Regression] CPU2000 degradations with r268448 (172.mgrid -22%, 252.eon -8%)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89584 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey

[Bug tree-optimization/118900] Wrong code at -O0 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118900 --- Comment #2 from Anonymous --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > ((&b[1] - (a & ~a)) - a) goes outside of the array bounds of b. so it > becomes undefined, at the second iteration > > But in this case, it just happens the address

[Bug tree-optimization/118900] Wrong code at -O0 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118900 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- The undefinedness in this case is recorded as PR 118721 not being able to detected by ubsan. But even then you can still run into issues like this where `&b[2] == &c` at different optimization levels becaus

[Bug target/118901] RISC-V: bfloat16-complex.c:(.text.startup+0x5f6): undefined reference to `__divbc3' when zfh or zvfh

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118901 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/118900] Wrong code at -O0 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118900 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/90036] [12/13/14/15 Regression] false positive: directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90036 --- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So it's not full formed yet, but a bit of framework where we could detect this case is starting to form. I want to get this recorded for future work. The key blocks (using a gcc-15 development compiler) l

[Bug target/118815] [15 Regression] Getting `Vector size conflicts between AVX10.1 and AVX512, using 512 as max vector size` warning with -Wsystem-headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118815 Haochen Jiang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/118901] New: RISC-V: bfloat16-complex.c:(.text.startup+0x5f6): undefined reference to `__divbc3' when zfh or zvfh

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118901 Bug ID: 118901 Summary: RISC-V: bfloat16-complex.c:(.text.startup+0x5f6): undefined reference to `__divbc3' when zfh or zvfh Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/118900] New: Wrong code at -O0 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118900 Bug ID: 118900 Summary: Wrong code at -O0 on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optim

[Bug target/118815] [15 Regression] Getting `Vector size conflicts between AVX10.1 and AVX512, using 512 as max vector size` warning with -Wsystem-headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118815 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Haochen Jiang : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31cbac836bb4f4c2172a91ee6164d8fdd32a8cb8 commit r14-11314-g31cbac836bb4f4c2172a91ee6164d8fdd32a8cb8 Author: Haochen Jiang

[Bug target/118815] [15 Regression] Getting `Vector size conflicts between AVX10.1 and AVX512, using 512 as max vector size` warning with -Wsystem-headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118815 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Haochen Jiang : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e15216046dba02ffa1c3ae367cdc86d5fd3df0be commit r15-7582-ge15216046dba02ffa1c3ae367cdc86d5fd3df0be Author: Haochen Jiang Date: M

[Bug target/116594] [meta-bug] xtheadvector brokeness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116594 --- Comment #4 from Jin Ma --- Hi, if there are no other related issues, I will close this in a day. :) Best regards, Jin Ma

[Bug target/118844] Link failure caused by crtbeginS.o

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118844 chenglulu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/118844] Link failure caused by crtbeginS.o

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118844 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by LuluCheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae14d7d04da8c6cb542269722638071f999f94d8 commit r15-7581-gae14d7d04da8c6cb542269722638071f999f94d8 Author: Lulu Cheng Date: Wed Feb

[Bug c/118899] New: ICE: tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in get_attribute_name, at attribs.cc:1063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118899 Bug ID: 118899 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in get_attribute_name, at attribs.cc:1063 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/117081] [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr91384.c since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081 --- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #17) > > For reproduce, not only on ADL, the fix patch showed regression on all > Cascade Lake/Ice Lake/Sapphire Rapids with ~2-4% for 511.povary_r with > o2_generic_v3. C

[Bug rtl-optimization/117081] [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr91384.c since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081 Haochen Jiang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com --- Comm

[Bug target/118815] [15 Regression] Getting `Vector size conflicts between AVX10.1 and AVX512, using 512 as max vector size` warning with -Wsystem-headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118815 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |haochen.jiang at intel dot com

[Bug c/118898] New: ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:85

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118898 Bug ID: 118898 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:85 Product: gcc V

[Bug c/115644] [gcc][trunk] ICE if redeclare a variable with different type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115644 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bic60176 at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug c/118898] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:85

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118898 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c/118898] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:85

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118898 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/118897] New: ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in categorize_ctor_elements_1, at expr.cc:7247

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118897 Bug ID: 118897 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in categorize_ctor_elements_1, at expr.cc:7247 Product: gcc Versi

[Bug fortran/88052] Format contravening constraint C1002 permitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to john.harper from comment #14) > The comma between A and F is still required by F2023 constraint C1302, > and gfortran 14.2.0 still compiles and runs the test program omitting it > even if the -s

[Bug middle-end/118288] Using new crc builtins on i386 leads to ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118288 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |middle-end Assignee|law at gcc

[Bug fortran/88052] Format contravening constraint C1002 permitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052 --- Comment #14 from john.harper at vuw dot ac.nz --- The comma between A and F is still required by F2023 constraint C1302, and gfortran 14.2.0 still compiles and runs the test program omitting it even if the -std=f2023 option is used. On Sun, 1

[Bug fortran/84591] Compiling gfortran.dg/bind_c_usage_10.f03 with -fdefault-integer-8 gives errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84591 --- Comment #7 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to kargls from comment #6) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #5) > > (In reply to kargls from comment #4) > > > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #3) > > > > Resolve as invalid? >

[Bug fortran/84591] Compiling gfortran.dg/bind_c_usage_10.f03 with -fdefault-integer-8 gives errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84591 --- Comment #6 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #5) > (In reply to kargls from comment #4) > > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #3) > > > Resolve as invalid? > > > > IMHO. Yes. > > > > IMNSHO, -fdefault

[Bug fortran/55978] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978 --- Comment #37 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #36) > Anything left to do in this PR? I'd need to go through the variations of comment#19. IIRC there were some loopholes passing pointers to contiguous

[Bug fortran/48958] Add runtime diagnostics for SIZE intrinsic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48958 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #8) > Sounds like a good solution to me. OK. I'll package with a dedicated testcase and submit.

[Bug fortran/84591] Compiling gfortran.dg/bind_c_usage_10.f03 with -fdefault-integer-8 gives errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84591 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargls from comment #4) > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #3) > > Resolve as invalid? > > IMHO. Yes. > > IMNSHO, -fdefault-integer-8 should have been removed from > gfortra

[Bug target/118248] [15 Regression] gdc ICE (segfault) building a riscv64 cross compiler on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118248 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/118789] [15 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.cc:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118789 --- Comment #7 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #6) > Steve have you had a closer look at this one? I did watch f951 in gdb with the code in comment #3, but I could not find where to avoid an ICE. The s

[Bug target/118248] [15 Regression] gdc ICE (segfault) building a riscv64 cross compiler on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118248 --- Comment #26 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68e74199c61c5ad81ffe37e41cd62d0d7415b3ab commit r15-7579-g68e74199c61c5ad81ffe37e41cd62d0d7415b3ab Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Sun F

[Bug fortran/84591] Compiling gfortran.dg/bind_c_usage_10.f03 with -fdefault-integer-8 gives errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84591 kargls at comcast dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargls at comcast dot net ---

[Bug fortran/118789] [15 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.cc:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118789 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/118793] request NAMELIST reports of input errors indicate position of error and show line containing error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118793 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-02-16 CC|

[Bug fortran/118896] The fortran compiler is unable to devirtualize typebound indirect calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118896 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Morin --- This area of the code has an interesting history. TREE_READONLY was introduced for virtual tables with r0-114543 together with the fix for PR51809 diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-d

[Bug target/118764] [avr] Add support for Compact Vector Table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118764 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22a0cba3c5a24860205086e98c0dae56f50422c1 commit r15-7578-g22a0cba3c5a24860205086e98c0dae56f50422c1 Author: Georg-Johann Lay Dat

[Bug fortran/118896] The fortran compiler is unable to devirtualize typebound indirect calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118896 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Morin --- Draft patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc index 4ae22a5584d..95d39e837e9 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc @@ -2085,7 +2085,8 @@ gfc

[Bug fortran/118896] New: The fortran compiler is unable to devirtualize typebound indirect calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118896 Bug ID: 118896 Summary: The fortran compiler is unable to devirtualize typebound indirect calls Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/117838] [12/13/14/15 regression] IRA issues: The higher cost variable a is spilled for the lower cost variable conflict_a in improve_allocation() since r12-6416-g037cc0b4a6646c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117838 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/80042] gcc thinks sin/cos don't set errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80042 Vishnu Mohandas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vishnu240404 at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug tree-optimization/118567] [15 Regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-vectorize-1.c fail starting with r15-6807-g68326d5d1a593d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118567 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug testsuite/118597] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-fncall-mask.c fails since r15-6945-gea1deefe54ea1c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118597 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/118815] [15 Regression] Getting `Vector size conflicts between AVX10.1 and AVX512, using 512 as max vector size` warning with -Wsystem-headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118815 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/118835] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in s390_valid_shift_count since r10-1731-ge2839e47894f0b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118835 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] ICE

[Bug preprocessor/118860] [15 Regression] ICE Segfault with --param=file-cache-files= since r15-7431-g66af77cbed6c5b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118860 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/118876] [15 Regression][OpenMP] ICE in add_stmt, at cp/semantics.cc:551 - register_dtor_fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118876 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/118895] [15 regression] ICE: during GIMPLE pass: pre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118895 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/114796] [12/13/14/15 Regression] wrong code at -O2 with "-fno-tree-fre -fno-inline -fselective-scheduling2" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114796 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4

[Bug middle-end/113525] [12/13/14/15 Regression] GCC does not recognize "-fdump-rtl-sibling" command line option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113525 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4

[Bug target/115817] [AVR] Suboptimal code for zeroing SRAM byte from ISR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115817 --- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay --- What can be used as a kind of work-around (and may be even better than the code with improved Binutils as proposed above), is to hide the value of 0 from the compiler: volatile uint8_t var; __attribute(

[Bug fortran/113997] Bogus 'Warning: Interface mismatch in global procedure' with C binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113997 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/107266] Reject kind=4 characters for BIND(C) – it invalid and generates wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107266 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/104100] Passing an allocated array to a C bind function alters the bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104100 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/100916] Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-stdcheck Blocks|

[Bug fortran/84591] Compiling gfortran.dg/bind_c_usage_10.f03 with -fdefault-integer-8 gives errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84591 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org B

[Bug target/115817] [AVR] Suboptimal code for zeroing SRAM byte from ISR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115817 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay --- See https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32704

[Bug target/115817] [AVR] Suboptimal code for zeroing SRAM byte from ISR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115817 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ul...@t-online.de --- Comment #7 fro

[Bug target/118880] bug 81268, which was supposedly fixed with gcc v8 is still present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118880 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|documentation, needs-source |missed-optimization Resoluti

[Bug target/118880] bug 81268, which was supposedly fixed with gcc v8 is still present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118880 --- Comment #3 from Uwe Lohmann --- Example attached. Compilation with: avr-gcc -Os -fwhole-program -mrelax -Wall -Wextra -mmcu=attiny861 -DF_CPU=100 main.c -o main.elf Interestingly, if the variable 'overflowState' in the attached exampl

[Bug target/118288] Using new crc builtins on i386 leads to ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118288 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- As of r15-7573-g11902be7a57c0c, ICE still happens.

[Bug target/118880] bug 81268, which was supposedly fixed with gcc v8 is still present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118880 --- Comment #2 from Uwe Lohmann --- Created attachment 60511 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60511&action=edit example

[Bug c++/118319] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault in friend declaration with default argument assigned to an empty lambda expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118319 Simon Martin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yihan4845 at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug c++/117324] [12/13/14/15 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in break_out_target_exprs(tree_node*, bool)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117324 Simon Martin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Known to work|

[Bug c++/117324] [12/13/14/15 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in break_out_target_exprs(tree_node*, bool)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117324 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6302f478433166f71464bc06caf5701c1800a7e7 commit r15-7574-g6302f478433166f71464bc06caf5701c1800a7e7 Author: Simon Martin Date: Sun

[Bug fortran/105310] ICE when UNION is after the 8th field in a DEC STRUCTURE with -finit-derived -finit-local-zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105310 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/88688] Incorrect association in SELECT TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88688 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Resol

[Bug fortran/55978] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #36 from Thomas Koen

[Bug fortran/109624] dump-parse-tree prints attributes with unbalanced braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109624 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/116829] Missing default initialization of finalizable non-polymorphic intent(out) arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116829 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/118895] [15 regression] ICE: during GIMPLE pass: pre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118895 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/118895] [15 regression] ICE: during GIMPLE pass: pre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118895 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/118895] ICE: during GIMPLE pass: pre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118895 --- Comment #1 from Yunbo Ni --- The function name should be `b`, to be consistent with the backtrace. Apologies for the oversight.

[Bug tree-optimization/118895] New: ICE: during GIMPLE pass: pre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118895 Bug ID: 118895 Summary: ICE: during GIMPLE pass: pre Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug fortran/48958] Add runtime diagnostics for SIZE intrinsic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48958 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/31059] bounds-check does not detect nonconforming assignment arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #13 from Thomas Koen

[Bug fortran/88052] Format contravening constraint C1002 permitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88052] Format contravening constraint C1002 permitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #