[Bug fortran/113883] allocatable length parameter used but is undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113883 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/118894] get_addr_base_and_unit_offset and get_addr_base_and_unit_offset_1 could be consolidated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118894 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/118894] New: get_addr_base_and_unit_offset and get_addr_base_and_unit_offset_1 could be consolidated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118894 Bug ID: 118894 Summary: get_addr_base_and_unit_offset and get_addr_base_and_unit_offset_1 could be consolidated Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/109780] [12/13/14 Regression] csmith: runtime crash with -O2 -march=znver1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/118867] [12/13/14/15 regression] -Wfree-nonheap-object false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118867 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/118288] Using new crc builtins on i386 leads to ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118288 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2025-01-04 00:00:00 |2025-2-15 Status|REOPENED

[Bug rtl-optimization/110093] [12/13/14/15 Regression][avr] Move frenzy leading to code bloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110093 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4

[Bug target/109780] [12/13/14/15 Regression] csmith: runtime crash with -O2 -march=znver1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780 --- Comment #41 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So is this fixed on the trunk now? If so, let's remove the "15" from the regression marker set.

[Bug tree-optimization/105867] [12 Regression] incorrect dangling-pointer warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105867 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12 Regression] incorrect

[Bug rtl-optimization/105952] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in sel_redirect_edge_and_branch, at sel-sched-ir.cc:5680

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105952 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4

[Bug fortran/104826] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gimple_range_global, at value-query.cc:424 – with deferred-length character variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104826 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2022-03-08 00:00:00 |2025-2-15 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey

[Bug middle-end/103616] Improve LRA's to use literal pool more often wnen profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103616 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|Improve LRA's to use

[Bug target/101882] modulus with input and output set to a hard register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101882 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] |modulus with input and

[Bug target/101882] [12/13/14 Regression] modulus with input and output set to a hard register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101882 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression]

[Bug ipa/94762] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in is_tm_irrevocable) since r7-1710-g849a76a5a20db383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94762 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4

[Bug target/109093] [15 regression] csmith: a February runtime bug ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/94853] [12/13/14/15 regression] excess errors in gfortran.dg/analyzer/pr93993.f90 since r10-8012

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94853 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4

[Bug target/109093] [15 regression] csmith: a February runtime bug ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093 --- Comment #38 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11902be7a57c0ccf03786aa0255fffaf0f54dbf9 commit r15-7573-g11902be7a57c0ccf03786aa0255fffaf0f54dbf9 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Mar 14 1

[Bug target/109780] [12/13/14/15 Regression] csmith: runtime crash with -O2 -march=znver1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780 --- Comment #40 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11902be7a57c0ccf03786aa0255fffaf0f54dbf9 commit r15-7573-g11902be7a57c0ccf03786aa0255fffaf0f54dbf9 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Mar 14 1

[Bug c/100789] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE with __transaction_relaxed and left shift signed overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100789 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law

[Bug tree-optimization/98028] [12/13/14 Regression] __builtin_sub_overflow_p not folded to const when some constraints are known

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98028 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/98028] [12/13/14/15 Regression] __builtin_sub_overflow_p not folded to const when some constraints are known

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98028 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42a22b801d4ad654e420495fafc4d29d113f00eb commit r15-7571-g42a22b801d4ad654e420495fafc4d29d113f00eb Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Sat Fe

[Bug c++/118893] New: ICE (internal compiler error) on building a literal object by using an ill-formed static operator of a lambda (coerce_template_parms)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118893 Bug ID: 118893 Summary: ICE (internal compiler error) on building a literal object by using an ill-formed static operator of a lambda (coerce_template_parms) Product: gcc

[Bug c/118005] Diagnostic for mixing noipa and inline mentions nonline rather noipa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118005 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/118288] Using new crc builtins on i386 leads to ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118288 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/118891] [14/15 regression] gcc 14 fails to build from source on aarch64_be: "error: ‘dynamic_cast’ not permitted with ‘-fno-rtti’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118891 --- Comment #5 from marcus at mc dot pp.se --- > So stage 1 compiler is miscompiling stage 2. Hm, isn't it the stage 2 compiler which is miscompiling libstdc++? It's running .../build/./gcc/xgcc, not .../build/./prev-gcc/xgcc

[Bug target/118891] [14/15 regression] gcc 14 fails to build from source on aarch64_be: "error: ‘dynamic_cast’ not permitted with ‘-fno-rtti’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118891 --- Comment #12 from marcus at mc dot pp.se --- If it's just a lack of hardware, a regular Raspberry Pi 3 can be used. Compiling gcc on one takes 18.5 hours though... :-) But yeah, if it's a miscompilation of the compiler, then it's probably no

[Bug c++/117620] Problem passing rvalue to co_yield (maybe?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117620 Michael Duggan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/118891] [14/15 regression] gcc 14 fails to build from source on aarch64_be: "error: ‘dynamic_cast’ not permitted with ‘-fno-rtti’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118891 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to marcus from comment #10) > Ok. I did a build with STAGE1_CFLAGS="-O0" STAGE1_CXXFLAGS="-O0" before > (mentioned in the Gentoo bug, but not here, sorry) and got the same error, > but I can make

[Bug c/118043] -Wattributes: [[gnu::access(wo, n)]]: False positive with VLA since r11-3303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118043 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Su

[Bug target/118891] [14/15 regression] gcc 14 fails to build from source on aarch64_be: "error: ‘dynamic_cast’ not permitted with ‘-fno-rtti’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118891 --- Comment #10 from marcus at mc dot pp.se --- Ok. I did a build with STAGE1_CFLAGS="-O0" STAGE1_CXXFLAGS="-O0" before (mentioned in the Gentoo bug, but not here, sorry) and got the same error, but I can make a new build like that if you want t

[Bug target/118891] [14/15 regression] gcc 14 fails to build from source on aarch64_be: "error: ‘dynamic_cast’ not permitted with ‘-fno-rtti’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118891 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- One more thing, you can without setting STAGE1_* options to make sure that stage1 is not miscompiled in the first place? With STAGE1_* env set it could be stage1 is being miscompiled which is causing stage 2

[Bug target/118891] [14/15 regression] gcc 14 fails to build from source on aarch64_be: "error: ‘dynamic_cast’ not permitted with ‘-fno-rtti’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118891 --- Comment #8 from marcus at mc dot pp.se --- Ah, now I see what you mean. Yes, that sounds right. stage1 was built using gcc 13.3.1 and can compile libstdc++ just fine.

[Bug target/118891] [14/15 regression] gcc 14 fails to build from source on aarch64_be: "error: ‘dynamic_cast’ not permitted with ‘-fno-rtti’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118891 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection, |

[Bug target/118891] [14/15 regression] gcc 14 fails to build from source on aarch64_be: "error: ‘dynamic_cast’ not permitted with ‘-fno-rtti’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118891 --- Comment #6 from marcus at mc dot pp.se --- Oh, and you asked for the make invocation as well. It's make --output-sync=line -j2 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed' LIBPATH=/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64_be-unknown-linux-gnu/14 'STAGE1_CFLAGS= -pipe -O2'

[Bug target/118891] [14/15 regression] gcc 14 fails to build from source on aarch64_be: "error: ‘dynamic_cast’ not permitted with ‘-fno-rtti’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118891 --- Comment #4 from marcus at mc dot pp.se --- I added the complete build log xz compressed (it's 8 megabytes uncompressed :). The configure arguments are: --host=aarch64_be-unknown-linux-gnu --build=aarch64_be-unknown-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr -

[Bug target/118891] [14/15 regression] gcc 14 fails to build from source on aarch64_be: "error: ‘dynamic_cast’ not permitted with ‘-fno-rtti’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118891 --- Comment #3 from marcus at mc dot pp.se --- Created attachment 60509 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60509&action=edit Complete build log

[Bug target/118288] Using new crc builtins on i386 leads to ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118288 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/118892] [14/15 Regression] ICE (segfault) in rebuild_jump_labels on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118892 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60507 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60507&action=edit Cleaned up reduced testcase

[Bug target/118892] [14/15 Regression] ICE (segfault) in rebuild_jump_labels on aarch64-linux-gnu since r14-5289

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118892 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Summary|[14/15 Regression]

[Bug target/118892] [14/15 Regression] ICE (segfault) in rebuild_jump_labels on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118892 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- ``` (insn 11 10 12 2 (set (reg:V2DI 107) (const_vector:V2DI [ (const_int -9223372036854775808 [0x8000]) repeated x2 ])) "/app/example.cpp":7:10 -1 (nil))

[Bug target/118892] [14/15 Regression] ICE (segfault) in rebuild_jump_labels on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118892 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-02-15 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/118892] [14/15 Regression] ICE (segfault) in rebuild_jump_labels on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118892 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #60507|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/118892] [14/15 Regression] ICE (segfault) in rebuild_jump_labels on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118892 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note with my reduced testcase -O2 is enough.

[Bug fortran/118080] OPTIONAL, VALUE mishandled: type(c_ptr) – hidden argument missing, ICE with derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118080 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8859dce9037bcb242819305f02e16edbea38923c commit r15-7570-g8859dce9037bcb242819305f02e16edbea38923c Author: Harald Anlauf Date: S

[Bug target/118892] [14/15 Regression] ICE (segfault) in rebuild_jump_labels on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118892 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.3 Keywords|

[Bug target/118892] New: [14/15 Regression] ICE (segfault) in rebuild_jump_labels on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118892 Bug ID: 118892 Summary: [14/15 Regression] ICE (segfault) in rebuild_jump_labels on aarch64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug rtl-optimization/118887] Missed CSE of symbolic address computation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118887 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- The funny thing is I'd been pondering if it was worth cherry picking that patch into our tree.

[Bug fortran/118862] UBSAN: shift exponent too large since r15-7345-gc2a0ee58865c5a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118862 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 60505 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60505&action=edit Patch that should fix the issue I think the attached patch, based on Jakub's patch, should fix the issue. I t

[Bug rtl-optimization/118887] Missed CSE of symbolic address computation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118887 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Even with -march=rv64gcv, it looks like it is fixed on the trunk: lui a5,%hi(s) addia5,a5,%lo(s) addia3,a5,2047 lui a4,%hi(.LANCHOR0) addia3,a3,160

[Bug target/118880] bug 81268, which was supposedly fixed with gcc v8 is still present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118880 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug rtl-optimization/118887] Missed CSE of symbolic address computation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118887 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/118887] Missed CSE of symbolic address computation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118887 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- # RANGE [irange] unsigned long [8, +INF] MASK 0xfff8 VALUE 0x0 _21 = (unsigned long) &sD.2327; # RANGE [irange] unsigned long [0, 0][8, 47][49, +INF] MASK 0xfff8 VALUE 0x0 ivt

[Bug rtl-optimization/118887] Missed CSE of symbolic address computation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118887 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |14.2.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk

[Bug fortran/117430] gfortran allows type(C_ptr) in I/O list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117430 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12771b1d77aef71f9eceead9b46323292f3dd7e4 commit r15-7569-g12771b1d77aef71f9eceead9b46323292f3dd7e4 Author: Jerry DeLisle Date: T

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- Thanks Thomas. I was just getting ready to get lapack set up here for future testing.

[Bug middle-end/17951] Dominance info is incorrect for entry and exit blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17951 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-12-24 19:53:44 |2025-2-15 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pin

[Bug target/118891] [14/15 regression] gcc 14 fails to build from source on aarch64_be: "error: ‘dynamic_cast’ not permitted with ‘-fno-rtti’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118891 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.3 Summary|gcc 14 fails to

[Bug target/118891] gcc 14 fails to build from source on aarch64_be: "error: ‘dynamic_cast’ not permitted with ‘-fno-rtti’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118891 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you supply the exact command linebyou use to configure and invoke make? Second you provide the full build log instead of just what is failing? Do you know what stage this is? It could be something mis

[Bug c++/118574] [15 regression] Crashes with coroutines in KDE Plasma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118574 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b

[Bug c++/101759] #pragma omp declare simd/variant or oacc routine parsing bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101759 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug target/116594] [meta-bug] xtheadvector brokeness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116594 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/118891] New: gcc 14 fails to build from source on aarch64_be: "error: ‘dynamic_cast’ not permitted with ‘-fno-rtti’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118891 Bug ID: 118891 Summary: gcc 14 fails to build from source on aarch64_be: "error: ‘dynamic_cast’ not permitted with ‘-fno-rtti’" Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCO

[Bug target/118890] usbsan failure for powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118890 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||63426 Target|

[Bug target/118890] New: usbsan failure for powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118890 Bug ID: 118890 Summary: usbsan failure for powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/118889] New: attribute "common" ignored with -fdata-sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118889 Bug ID: 118889 Summary: attribute "common" ignored with -fdata-sections Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug sarif-replay/96032] RFE: add a way to use output from --fdiagnostics-format=json or sarif as input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96032 --- Comment #11 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #8) > Where can one get the sarif-replay tool? It does not seem to be included in > gcc-latest. Kamil: in the "official" Fedora builds of gcc for F42 onwards, sarif-re

[Bug sarif-replay/118881] sarif-replay doesn't yet handle "annotations" (§3.28.6)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118881 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 --- Comment #11 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #10) > Fixed with r15-7552-gfd00010ba21c04bddb20aef52f62de5636075067 . Thanks for the quick fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/118852] [15 regression] Train run of 502.gcc_r compiled with -Ofast -fprofile-generate -march=x86_64-v3 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 118852, which changed state. Bug 118852 Summary: [15 regression] Train run of 502.gcc_r compiled with -Ofast -fprofile-generate -march=x86_64-v3 fails https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852 What

[Bug sarif-replay/118881] sarif-replay doesn't yet handle "annotations" (§3.28.6)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118881 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1f63ea36e9c9f2f66980dccc76d18cf781716a7 commit r15-7561-ga1f63ea36e9c9f2f66980dccc76d18cf781716a7 Author: David Malcolm Date: S

[Bug c++/118846] [modules] Unbound template arguments considered TU-local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118846 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f1f4efc06f43b1ba8c1cf5a31d5b73d6a2bb12d commit r15-7560-g9f1f4efc06f43b1ba8c1cf5a31d5b73d6a2bb12d Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug c++/118053] [14 Regression] Only -Ox -std=c++2x internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/constexpr.cc:5954 since r14-1624

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118053 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||15.0 Summary|[14/15 Regressi

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 118846, which changed state. Bug 118846 Summary: [modules] Unbound template arguments considered TU-local https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118846 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/118053] [14/15 Regression] Only -Ox -std=c++2x internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/constexpr.cc:5954 since r14-1624

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118053 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:741073460b9a850ca85b01509e08bf72900b6c8a commit r15-7559-g741073460b9a850ca85b01509e08bf72900b6c8a Author: Jason Merrill Date: Sa

[Bug c++/118846] [modules] Unbound template arguments considered TU-local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118846 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/118159] link from Fortran documentation, coco is now an online casino

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118159 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/118053] [14/15 Regression] Only -Ox -std=c++2x internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/constexpr.cc:5954 since r14-1624

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118053 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de66529f2e7bb24fb2b61b82e6a953f3f6c12902 commit r15-7558-gde66529f2e7bb24fb2b61b82e6a953f3f6c12902 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Sa

[Bug fortran/118845] [15 regression] ICE when building lapack-3.12.0 on x86 (compare_parameter, at fortran/interface.cc:2521)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118845 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/118880] bug 81268, which was supposedly fixed with gcc v8 is still present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118880 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-02-15 Status|UNCONF

[Bug libstdc++/100612] std::jthread can't be initialized with a pointer to a member function taking a std::stop_token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100612 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e9ed0a05fddaba4e5257beaddb7cbaf31607a784 commit r15-7555-ge9ed0a05fddaba4e5257beaddb7cbaf31607a784 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- Fixed with r15-7552-gfd00010ba21c04bddb20aef52f62de5636075067 .

[Bug c++/118053] [14/15 Regression] Only -Ox -std=c++2x internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/constexpr.cc:5954 since r14-1624

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118053 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #8) > Hmm.. .the type should not be BT_UNKNOWN. > > Reduced test caes: > > SUBROUTINE CGET24 > EXTERNAL CSLECT > LOGOCAL CSLECT > > CALL CGE

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- Hmm.. .the type should not be BT_UNKNOWN. Reduced test caes: SUBROUTINE CGET24 EXTERNAL CSLECT LOGOCAL CSLECT CALL CGEESX(CSLECT) IF (CSLECT() KNTEIG = KNTEIG + 1 CALL

[Bug target/118888] GCC only optimize 1 bits-manipulation function out of many despite having the same implementations.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/118872] RISCV: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4636 for rvv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118872 Jin Ma changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/118872] RISCV: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4636 for rvv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118872 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Ma Jin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25a103feb3056bc483a1558af315be452060035b commit r15-7550-g25a103feb3056bc483a1558af315be452060035b Author: Jin Ma Date: Fri Feb 14 14:58

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #6) > I forgot to mention this is a good hint for Thomas regarding how to tweak > the previous fix. Yes, if the argument is of unknown type, the test can be skipped,