[Bug middle-end/118556] size of asm not outputed with -dP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118556 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c/117178] -Wunterminated-string-initialization should ignore trailing NUL byte for nonstring char arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117178 --- Comment #25 from Sam James --- It's not my call, but given it's a new warning in 15, and this is a fairly significant UX issue with it, I think a case could be made. Kees should ping it when he gets a chance.

[Bug gcov-profile/118581] auto_profile can't annotate bb with all debug_stmt which assigned value with constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118581 --- Comment #5 from Hongtao Liu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > Does it have counter info for PHI arguments (aka copies emitted on those > > edges)? > > I think yes, so IMO it

[Bug c/118403] uninitialized warning with automatic union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118403 --- Comment #13 from Sam James --- (In reply to Stephen Hemminger from comment #12) What does `gcc --version` give?

[Bug c/118403] uninitialized warning with automatic union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118403 --- Comment #12 from Stephen Hemminger --- I tried to use the documented flag $ gcc-15 -fzero-init-padding-bits=all gcc-15: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-fzero-init-padding-bits=all’ gcc-15: fatal error: no input files compilation t

[Bug c/117178] -Wunterminated-string-initialization should ignore trailing NUL byte for nonstring char arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117178 --- Comment #24 from Andrew Clayton --- I take it it's too late for this to land in GCC 15? (I have immediate uses for this!).

[Bug target/107827] switch table compression could shrink large tables (but missing), testcase cerf-lib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107827 --- Comment #7 from Andi Kleen --- We need a validator for x86 assembler length indications in the x86 machine descriptions, then it could be easily enabled. This will require patching gas at least for test suite runs.

[Bug c++/116756] ICE from expand_expr_real_1 with recursive lambda and constexpr if

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116756 --- Comment #4 from Huw Rogers --- Thankyou! -Huw On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, 11:57 ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116756 > > Patrick Palka changed: > >What

[Bug tree-optimization/118602] Missed optimization for (0xc0 & c) == 0x80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118602 --- Comment #3 from Peter Damianov --- Clang is also able to figure it out for: bool test(char c) { return ((0xe0 & c) == 0x80); } And signed or unsigned doesn't make a difference.

[Bug c++/116756] ICE from expand_expr_real_1 with recursive lambda and constexpr if

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116756 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/116756] ICE from expand_expr_real_1 with recursive lambda and constexpr if

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116756 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:303cc73182db5ed367b184df813cd50864c55f83 commit r15-7118-g303cc73182db5ed367b184df813cd50864c55f83 Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug tree-optimization/118602] Missed optimization for (0xc0 & c) == 0x80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118602 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/118602] Missed optimization for (0xc0 & c) == 0x80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118602 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60237 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60237&action=edit includes the targeted code

[Bug tree-optimization/118602] Missed optimization for (0xc0 & c) == 0x80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118602 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|

[Bug target/118501] [14 regression] aarch64: ICE in simplify_context::simplify_subreg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118501 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #9) > The test case has caught a bug on LoongArch: Looks like to be a similar issue. loongarch.md contains almost the same code path too: ``` machine_mode lsx_mode

[Bug tree-optimization/118602] New: Missed optimization for (0xc0 & c) == 0x80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118602 Bug ID: 118602 Summary: Missed optimization for (0xc0 & c) == 0x80 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree

[Bug target/118501] [14 regression] aarch64: ICE in simplify_context::simplify_subreg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118501 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 fr

[Bug c++/118590] [14/15 regression] ICE with acc enter data copyin and dependent types since r14-7033-g1413af02d62182

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118590 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14/15 regression] ICE with |[14/15 regression] ICE with

[Bug rtl-optimization/110008] shrink wrapping could be improved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110008 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug rtl-optimization/111673] assign_hard_reg() routine should scale save/restore costs of callee save registers with basic block frequency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111673 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/111673] assign_hard_reg() routine should scale save/restore costs of callee save registers with basic block frequency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111673 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/106210] [12/13/14/15 Regression] missing shrink wrap for simple case since r9-3594-g8d2d39587d941a40

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106210 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/110008] shrink wrapping could be improved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110008 Bug 110008 depends on bug 106210, which changed state. Bug 106210 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] missing shrink wrap for simple case since r9-3594-g8d2d39587d941a40 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106210 What|Remo

[Bug target/118601] New: [15] RISC-V: unrecognizable insn ICE in xtheadvector/pr114194.c on 32bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118601 Bug ID: 118601 Summary: [15] RISC-V: unrecognizable insn ICE in xtheadvector/pr114194.c on 32bit targets Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug modula2/118600] Assigning to a record from a constructor can cause an alignment exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118600 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug modula2/118600] Assigning to a record from a constructor can cause an alignment exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118600 --- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley --- Created attachment 60236 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60236&action=edit PR-118600-Assigning-to-a-record-causes-alignment-exception.patch Proposed fix. This exploratory proposed fix t

[Bug target/107827] switch table compression could shrink large tables (but missing), testcase cerf-lib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107827 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org --- Comm

[Bug target/118252] i386 should implement CASE_VECTOR_SHORTEN_MODE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118252 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug rtl-optimization/106200] Shrink-wrapping opportunity releated to function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106200 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug gcov-profile/118581] auto_profile can't annotate bb with all debug_stmt which assigned value with constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118581 --- Comment #4 from Hongtao Liu --- Note it's from SPEC2017 519.lbm_r

[Bug modula2/118600] New: Assigning to a record from a constructor can cause an alignment exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118600 Bug ID: 118600 Summary: Assigning to a record from a constructor can cause an alignment exception Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug gcov-profile/118581] auto_profile can't annotate bb with all debug_stmt which assigned value with constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118581 --- Comment #3 from Hongtao Liu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > Does it have counter info for PHI arguments (aka copies emitted on those > > edges)? > > I think yes, so IMO it

[Bug preprocessor/118599] unknown escape sequence diagnostic does not have decent line info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118599 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|Incorrect diagno

[Bug c++/118599] New: Incorrect diagnostic on multiline string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118599 Bug ID: 118599 Summary: Incorrect diagnostic on multiline string literal Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/118598] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Shrink-wrapping multiple conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118598 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.5 Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/118598] New: [12/13/14/15 Regression] Shrink-wrapping multiple conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118598 Bug ID: 118598 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] Shrink-wrapping multiple conditions Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimizatio

[Bug c++/84796] ICE in a template parameter pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84796 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/87902] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Shrink-wrapping multiple conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87902 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60235 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60235&action=edit testcase for easier access

[Bug rtl-optimization/87902] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Shrink-wrapping multiple conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87902 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|s390x-linux-gnu |s390x-linux-gnu sh*-*-* --- Comment #17

[Bug tree-optimization/114589] missed optimization: losing bool range information, missed sinking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114589 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/103829] [12/13/14 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103829 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|12.5

[Bug c++/118509] [14 regression] Front-end produced uninitialized memory reference when compiling Nektar since r15-4595-gb25d3201b6338d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118509 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e4f03c6701f6ef9493c78cf3bbf4aa8e41cf04b commit r14-11234-g0e4f03c6701f6ef9493c78cf3bbf4aa8e41cf04b Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/118597] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-fncall-mask.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118597 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug target/118597] New: [15 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-fncall-mask.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118597 Bug ID: 118597 Summary: [15 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-fncall-mask.c fails Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization, testsuite-fail

[Bug rtl-optimization/117506] [15 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at wide-int.h:1049 with -O3 -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117506 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2024-11-11 00:00:00 |2025-1-21 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pi

[Bug target/113059] [15 regression] fftw fails tests for -O3 -m32 -march=znver2 since r14-6210-ge44ed92dbbe9d4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059 --- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek --- I guess so.

[Bug target/113059] [15 regression] fftw fails tests for -O3 -m32 -march=znver2 since r14-6210-ge44ed92dbbe9d4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059 --- Comment #29 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #25) > Worked around for GCC 14, but we should fix this for real for GCC 15. Looks like this was defered again?

[Bug tree-optimization/111148] Missing boolean optimizations due to comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48 Bug 48 depends on bug 118483, which changed state. Bug 118483 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] Missed optimization due to cast being used more than once https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118483 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/118483] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Missed optimization due to cast being used more than once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118483 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/118483] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Missed optimization due to cast being used more than once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118483 Bug 118483 depends on bug 118525, which changed state. Bug 118525 Summary: [14/15 Regression] ICE after error dealing consteval https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118525 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/118525] [14/15 Regression] ICE after error dealing consteval

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118525 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/118525] [14/15 Regression] ICE after error dealing consteval

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118525 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d25d45c9d3a54b21f9dce43beb0b5ced4db0409 commit r15-7113-g0d25d45c9d3a54b21f9dce43beb0b5ced4db0409 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Th

[Bug tree-optimization/118483] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Missed optimization due to cast being used more than once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118483 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dae2b6246c00f4389b617ffaa30459bd22d9fe13 commit r15-7114-gdae2b6246c00f4389b617ffaa30459bd22d9fe13 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: W

[Bug fortran/118571] UTF-8 output and the A edit descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118571 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- If no width is specified w_len comes in as zero so we have to handle that case. diff --git a/libgfortran/io/write.c b/libgfortran/io/write.c index 54312bf67e9..15a0dd5c3e9 100644 --- a/libgfortran/io/write.

[Bug middle-end/118594] expansion of bf16 to float should not produce (subreg (mem ())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118594 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/118582] [15 regression] [modules] Bad file data when building as a header module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118582 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[modules] Bad file data |[15 regression] [modules]

[Bug middle-end/118594] expansion of bf16 to float should not produce (subreg (mem ())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118594 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- The code in expr.cc does: ``` if (to_mode == SFmode && !HONOR_NANS (from_mode) && !HONOR_NANS (to_mode) && optimize_insn_for_speed_p ()) {

[Bug c++/118582] [modules] Bad file data when building as a header module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118582 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/118594] expansion of bf16 to float should not produce (subreg (mem ())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118594 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug target/118594] insn does not satisfy its constraints with __bf16 in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118594 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 118596 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug debug/118596] ICE in adjust_mems, at var-tracking with __bf16 vectors and volatile data access on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118596 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug debug/118596] ICE in adjust_mems, at var-tracking with __bf16 vectors and volatile data access on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118596 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- What is happening here is expand produces: (insn 6 5 7 (set (reg:HI 105) (subreg:HI (mem/v/j/c:BF (reg/f:DI 95 virtual-incoming-args) [1 BIT_FIELD_REF +0 S2 A128]) 0)) "/app/example.cpp":5:26 -1

[Bug debug/118596] ICE in adjust_mems, at var-tracking with __bf16 vectors and volatile data access on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118596 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Rejected in 11/12, started to ICE with 13.

[Bug debug/118596] ICE in adjust_mems, at var-tracking with __bf16 vectors and volatile data access on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118596 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #60233|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/118591] [lra][avr] Wrong code with -mlra in pr43879-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118591 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #1) > Created attachment 60230 [details] > reduced C99 test case In that test case: __attribute__((noipa)) void func2 (long a, long b) { static unsigned char

[Bug c++/118582] [modules] Bad file data when building as a header module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118582 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug debug/118596] New: ICE in adjust_mems, at var-tracking with __bf16 vectors and volatile data access on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118596 Bug ID: 118596 Summary: ICE in adjust_mems, at var-tracking with __bf16 vectors and volatile data access on aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/118594] insn does not satisfy its constraints with __bf16 in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118594 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60232 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60232&action=edit Reduced slightly

[Bug target/118594] insn does not satisfy its constraints with __bf16 in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118594 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Yes this code is 100% undefined.

[Bug target/118594] insn does not satisfy its constraints with __bf16 in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118594 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- The instruction during combine which is causing issues: ``` (insn 47 46 48 2 (set (reg:HI 172) (subreg:HI (mem/v/j/c:BF (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 96 virtual-stack-vars) (const_int -257 [

[Bug target/118595] New: [15 regression] RISC-V: gfortran/c-interop test execution failures on RVV zvl > 128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118595 Bug ID: 118595 Summary: [15 regression] RISC-V: gfortran/c-interop test execution failures on RVV zvl > 128b Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug fortran/118580] Incorrect complex (sp) - real (dp) operation within maxval

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118580 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The issue can be reduced to the case k=1, i.e. 1x1 matrices. I then get: maxval(abs(A - eye)) = -Infinity Looks like the initial condition of the maximum search plays a role.

[Bug sarif-replay/117670] installation of sarif-replay doesn't honor prefix and suffixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117670 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-01-21 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug sarif-replay/117670] installation of sarif-replay doesn't honor prefix and suffixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117670 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Created attachment 60231 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60231&action=edit Candidate patch Does this patch fix it for you? (lightly tested at my end and seems to work)

[Bug c/118592] Add builtins/const folding for the new C23 math functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118592 --- Comment #2 from Joseph S. Myers --- Actually, the _FloatN / _FloatNx functions are only reserved if the user defines __STDC_WANT_IEC_60559_TYPES_EXT__ so maybe DEF_EXT_LIB_FLOATN_NX_BUILTINS is right for them. Excluding built-in functions w

[Bug c/111575] -Wbool-operation mistakenly warns about an int operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111575 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||77876 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug rtl-optimization/118591] [lra][avr] Wrong code with -mlra in pr43879-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118591 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 60230 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60230&action=edit reduced C99 test case Here is a reduced test case that fails with -mlra -mmcu=attiny40 for any optimization

[Bug c/111575] -Wbool-operation mistakenly warns about an int operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111575 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kristoimenov at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug c/118593] False-positive warning about applying bitwise operation to a boolean expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118593 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/118593] False-positive warning about applying bitwise operation to a boolean expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118593 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think the warning is correct here. Otherwise you get ~0/~1 which for most people is not what they are expecting even with the cast to unsigned.

[Bug target/118594] New: insn does not satisfy its constraints with _Float16 in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118594 Bug ID: 118594 Summary: insn does not satisfy its constraints with _Float16 in some cases Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid

[Bug target/116507] [15 Regression] movhi_aarch64 should use fmov if FP16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116507 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|pinskia at gcc d

[Bug c++/118396] [15 regression] -O1+ leads to reading uninitialized data when virtual destructor is present since r15-6369-gfa99002538bc91

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118396 --- Comment #15 from Carlos Galvez --- Thank you for the quick fix! I'll test it right away :)

[Bug c/118593] New: False-positive warning about applying bitwise operation to a boolean expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118593 Bug ID: 118593 Summary: False-positive warning about applying bitwise operation to a boolean expression Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug fortran/118580] Incorrect complex (sp) - real (dp) operation within maxval

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118580 --- Comment #5 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to federico from comment #3) > Sorry, I introduced a typo while editing the post. > Here is a slightly shorter version of the sample: > Given your track record in fortran-lang, I ass

[Bug d/118584] [15 Regression] libphobos fails to build on mips64el-linux-gnu (undefined reference to `fiber_switchContext')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118584 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79186e392c77c1862197a49421f77644e3b8c05d commit r15-7111-g79186e392c77c1862197a49421f77644e3b8c05d Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Tue J

[Bug c/118592] Add builtins/const folding for the new C23 math functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118592 --- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers --- That's just a small subset of the ones coming to C23 via TS 18661-4. There are also all the functions (added to glibc some years ago) that came via TS 18661-1 (we have roundeven, but not most of the rest).

[Bug d/118584] [15 Regression] libphobos fails to build on mips64el-linux-gnu (undefined reference to `fiber_switchContext')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118584 --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw --- Looks like upstream added a new version path to the fiber module. https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/16331

[Bug c/118592] New: Add builtins/const folding for the new C23 math functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118592 Bug ID: 118592 Summary: Add builtins/const folding for the new C23 math functions Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114877 --- Comment #6 from Joseph S. Myers --- I believe the test is valid: an unspecified (non-wobbly) value is stored, so, for each call to frexp executed in the abstract machine, there must be a value of type int (that compares equal to itself, for

[Bug d/118584] [15 Regression] libphobos fails to build on mips64el-linux-gnu (undefined reference to `fiber_switchContext')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118584 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose --- this is what Debian calls mips64el, and was built for gcc-14

[Bug d/118584] [15 Regression] libphobos fails to build on mips64el-linux-gnu (undefined reference to `fiber_switchContext')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118584 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug objc++/118586] [15 Regression] Parsing error with #embed or long method argument list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118586 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug objc++/118586] [15 Regression] Parsing error with #embed or long method argument list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118586 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1911b8cbd78293582b38d938350a7fa6b3c2d5eb commit r15-7108-g1911b8cbd78293582b38d938350a7fa6b3c2d5eb Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug target/116593] internal compiler error: in get_attr_type, at config/riscv/riscv.md:28048 with -O2 -O3 when compiling for risc-v xtheadvector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116593 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3024b12f2cde5db3bf52b49b07e32ef3065929fb commit r15-7107-g3024b12f2cde5db3bf52b49b07e32ef3065929fb Author: Jin Ma Date: Tue Jan 21 10

[Bug d/118584] [15 Regression] libphobos fails to build on mips64el-linux-gnu (undefined reference to `fiber_switchContext')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118584 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Looks like only O32 implementation is done: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/libphobos/libdruntime/config/mips/switchcontext.S

[Bug c++/118590] [14/15 regression] ICE with acc enter data copyin and dependent types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118590 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.3

[Bug c++/118590] [14/15 regression] ICE with acc enter data copyin and dependent types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118590 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- full backtrace: ``` $ g++ p.cxx -fopenacc -c p.cxx: In function ‘void cholesky_decomposition(mdspan&)’: p.cxx:8:60: internal compiler error: in build_omp_array_section, at cp/typeck.cc:4871 8 | #pragma acc

[Bug c++/118590] ICE with acc enter data copyin and dependent types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118590 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug c++/118590] internal compiler error: in build_omp_array_section, bei cp/typeck.cc:4823

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118590 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #60224|0 |1 is obsolete|

  1   2   3   >