https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107110
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |12.1.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118107
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106438
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116440
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110393
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108629
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106057
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 regression]|[12 Regression] Missed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90151
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80813
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118012
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117119
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-01-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117611
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98138
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98138
>
> --- Comment #19 from Kewen Lin ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118181
Michal Jireš changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115825
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115825
>
> --- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> Trivial stuff is no longer unrolle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118408
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118405
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118181
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Michal Jires :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9100be5741329dfe7bd49d6cf60be1771b9bb3ea
commit r15-6846-g9100be5741329dfe7bd49d6cf60be1771b9bb3ea
Author: Michal Jires
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118418
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106240
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111949
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77622
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Oh, I misunderstood. But we handle the 2nd case from GCC 12+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77622
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105279
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117342
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 f
https://www.lcms.org/partner-church-bodies/lutheran-church-in-korea
https://www.methodist.org.uk/for-churches/global-relationships/partner-churches-and-organisations/global-partners/asia-pacific/korea/
https://www.localchurches.org/churches/
https://www.basel.int/countries/countrycontacts/tabid/134
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118409
--- Comment #26 from Sam James ---
Thanks Alexandre. I'll chuck it in over here as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118409
--- Comment #25 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 60132
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60132&action=edit
candidate patch
Here's what I'm testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98138
--- Comment #19 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #18)
> I think this misses a :s on the negate_expr_p, but I'm not sure this
> "works", so eventually && single_use (@1), given the original expression
> doesn't go awa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105612
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118333
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 118333, which changed state.
Bug 118333 Summary: gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc:24871: Pointless condition ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118333
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60919
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm |arm sh*-*-*
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20514
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19721
Bug 19721 depends on bug 20514, which changed state.
Bug 20514 Summary: hoisting of label out of jumptable would take place at cse,
should happen at trees
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20514
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118415
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117997
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117997
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c387a99a911724546abe99ecd39bfc968ed6333
commit r15-6843-g9c387a99a911724546abe99ecd39bfc968ed6333
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sun J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118415
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c387a99a911724546abe99ecd39bfc968ed6333
commit r15-6843-g9c387a99a911724546abe99ecd39bfc968ed6333
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sun Ja
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118409
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21093
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dizhao at os dot
amperecomputing.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114185
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118398
--- Comment #8 from mauro russo ---
I see, it makes sense.
However, I hope not to be too tedious to ask explicit references for the rules
you stated:
a) ignore requirements on parameters not used in the evaluation of a concept.
b) ignore erro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91459
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60919
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65374
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118444
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113424
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Bug 40883 depends on bug 80188, which changed state.
Bug 80188 Summary: calls.c: reason argument to maybe_complain_about_tail_call
must be marked for translation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80188
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80188
ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ak at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118444
Bug ID: 118444
Summary: [Meta bug] musttail bugs
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118443
Bug ID: 118443
Summary: [Meta bug] Bugs triggered by and blocking more smtgcc
testing
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118438
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118438
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target|s390x-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118438
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118442
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-01-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118442
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60131
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60131&action=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118442
Bug ID: 118442
Summary: -fprofile-generate wrongly adds instrumentation after
musttail call
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115788
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115788
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118441
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118441
Bug ID: 118441
Summary: [15 Regression] [openmp] ICE with assignment of PACK
of string array
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118430
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
This patch fixes the error message but not the missed optimization/reason why
it is rejected:
```
diff --git a/gcc/tree-tailcall.cc b/gcc/tree-tailcall.cc
index d6d7eb4b47c..8e9fa0cca9f 100644
--- a/gcc/tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71884
--- Comment #7 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #5)
> But all other variations, like in comment#0, ICE here.
The code is comment #0 involves source-expr. The code
in comment #1 involves type-spec. These are n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71884
--- Comment #6 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #4)
> (In reply to kargls from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Gerhard Steinmetz from comment #1)
> --- snip ---
> >
> > This now gives
> >
> > % gfcx -c pr71
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118163
--- Comment #4 from Simon Martin ---
Updated patch in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/673394.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118392
--- Comment #5 from Simon Martin ---
Patch submitted in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/673394.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71884
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118429
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60129|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118429
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60124|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118328
--- Comment #4 from Ken Jin ---
I can confirm that in the case of tail calls, GCC does produce
better/equivalent register spilling code than clang 19.1.0, by manual
inspection of call sites.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118429
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60128|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118429
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60127|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118429
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-01-12
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118112
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a236f70617213343f3075ee43e8d9f5882dca400
commit r15-6838-ga236f70617213343f3075ee43e8d9f5882dca400
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115788
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8eda60e12dabaf5e9501104781ef5eba334cff7
commit r15-6837-gf8eda60e12dabaf5e9501104781ef5eba334cff7
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118436
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bogus ".. is used |Bogus ".. is used
|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118409
--- Comment #23 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #18)
> m32r, h8300 and iq2000 are all failing execute/20040709-?.c
...aaand MMIX joins the crowd with results at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118440
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61810
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||disservin.social at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118435
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64867
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wangbopku15 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118435
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Non pod is a conditionally supported according to the standard.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242
--- Comment #48 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3cf0e6ab2aa9e7cb9a406079ff19856a6461d9f0
commit r15-6833-g3cf0e6ab2aa9e7cb9a406079ff19856a6461d9f0
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118438
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|s390x-linux-gnu |s390x-linux-gnu
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118400
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|memory leak of irange at|[14/15 Regression] memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118440
Bug ID: 118440
Summary: Wrong zero initialization with tuple usage
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118400
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 60125
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60125&action=edit
preprocessed source
The following is sligtly reduced from preprocessed gv.c
valgrind --leak-check=full ./gcc
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20250112 on powerpc64-linux-gnu, last successful build on
20250101:
[...]
Comparing stages 2 and 3
Bootstrap comparison
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118409
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #22 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118439
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116447
--- Comment #7 from Torbjorn SVENSSON ---
Indeed, it looks like this could be related.
@Christophe, did you take a look at issue in ticket 117814 or is that still on
your todo list? If you did, do you think these tickets are related?
Priority: P3
Component: d
Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20250112 on s390x-linux-gnu. works with 20250101 trunk:
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=D --mode=compile /<>/build/./gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118437
Bug ID: 118437
Summary: Unable to include arm_fp16.h on a MVE capable Cortex-M
target
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118429
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60121|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118436
Bug ID: 118436
Summary: Bogus Warning in Tuple with empty constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
~~~
/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk-20250112/lib/clang/20/include/__stdarg_va_arg.h:20:47:
note: expanded from macro 'va_arg'
20 | #define va_arg(ap, type) __builtin_va_arg(ap, type)
| ^~~~
1 error generated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118434
--- Comment #1 from Jiang An ---
Corresponding libc++ issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/118560
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118434
Bug ID: 118434
Summary: std::visit should be updated to handle immediate
functions
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118429
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 60122
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60122&action=edit
reduced.ii
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo