https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111515
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111467
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111515
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] Missed |[14 Regression] Missed Dead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117286
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117481
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117688
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
--- Comment #3 from Pengcheng Wang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> The real fix is match_operand should have a mode on it. That is what is
> causing the ICE in the first place. Though tightening up the predicates from
> accepti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
--- Comment #2 from Pengcheng Wang ---
Created attachment 5
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5&action=edit
The proposed fix patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
Bug ID: 118241
Summary: RISC-V ICE: internal compiler error: in
int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.cc:407 caused by
prefetch instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116506
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Eric Niebler from comment #5)
> will this fix make it for gcc-15? if not i need to find a workaround for
> stdexec. suggestion welcome.
There is still another 3-4 months for a gcc 15 release. S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117618
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175
Bug 114175 depends on bug 117618, which changed state.
Bug 117618 Summary: mmix: may need adaptation for C23 varargs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117618
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117618
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hans-Peter Nilsson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a4e57e6bc63eba78e5f3b0090e58d48a95dcbc7
commit r15-6463-g8a4e57e6bc63eba78e5f3b0090e58d48a95dcbc7
Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118122
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118205
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118205
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83e291014fff0b3ce1baedf59292390726d67335
commit r15-6462-g83e291014fff0b3ce1baedf59292390726d67335
Author: Lewis Hyatt
Date: Thu D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118240
Bug ID: 118240
Summary: ## ICE Segmentation fault with default non-type
template parameter(on PR103943)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116506
Eric Niebler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric.niebler at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118206
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
I must have just made a typo, I can't reproduce that now either (although I
thought I'd checked on godbolt too).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111814
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116715
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116715
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7cea821aaceeec9a6a960392f49346d52d1bd54a
commit r15-6460-g7cea821aaceeec9a6a960392f49346d52d1bd54a
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sun Dec 29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114423
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118239
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note GCC 6.5.0 used to reject this:
```
: In constructor 'constexpr NoMut3::NoMut3(int, int)':
:4:49: error: call to non-constexpr function 'NoMut1::NoMut1()'
constexpr NoMut3(int a, int b) /*: NoMut1()*/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118193
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118239
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118239
Bug ID: 118239
Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] accepts invalid constexpr
variable definition
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118192
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Better reduced testcase:
> ```
> template struct A
> {
> int i{};
> A() = delete;
> constexpr A(int) : A() {}
> };
>
> constexpr A<0> a{0};
> ```
Sorry:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101903
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117969
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.1.0, 14.2.0, 4.7.1,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118188
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-12-29
Summary|[15 regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118195
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118206
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I should say confirmed for -O1 and above.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118206
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118211
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118211
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118190
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is different from PR 117106 as this one started to ICE since 10 rather
than just 12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118190
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79528
newbie-02 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||newbie-02 at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118228
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-12-29
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118230
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The C++ standard specifies the requirements on hash functions and they must
return std::size_t, so what's the benefit of the reduced return type? Why not
just return size_t?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643
--- Comment #29 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #28)
> --- snip ---
>
> > In iso-c-binding.def, one finds
> >
> > NAMED_CHARKNDCST (ISOCBINDING_CHAR, "c_char",gfc_default_character_kind)
> >
> > so ki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118223
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
-MP option has been around since at least GCC 3.0 even:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.0.4/gcc_3.html#IDX369
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118223
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118223
Thutt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794
Bug 19794 depends on bug 85186, which changed state.
Bug 85186 Summary: jump threading can rotate loops affecting loop form, and
causing vectorization not to happen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85186
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 82090, which changed state.
Bug 82090 Summary: Bogus warning: ‘magic_p’ may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82090
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118179
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82090
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 85186, which changed state.
Bug 85186 Summary: jump threading can rotate loops affecting loop form, and
causing vectorization not to happen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85186
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85186
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91645
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316
Bug 85316 depends on bug 91645, which changed state.
Bug 91645 Summary: Missed optimization with sqrt(x*x)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91645
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118238
Bug 118238 depends on bug 118121, which changed state.
Bug 118121 Summary: [15 Regression] lto-wrapper.cc:1878:20: error: 'mkstemps'
was not declared in this scope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118121
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118121
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118121
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fbf4a6adf6212cfe762c5ade87e6e5066b5b05b
commit r15-6459-g9fbf4a6adf6212cfe762c5ade87e6e5066b5b05b
Author: John David Anglin
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106517
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118238
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] |[15 Regression]
|gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118238
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118189
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118238
Bug ID: 118238
Summary: gcc/lto-wrapper.cc broken on Windows (MinGW-w64) due
to missing mkstemps() and link()
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118184
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118171
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118174
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118233
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>18446744073709551608 and 18446744073709551613
-8 and -3 .
Some how GCC decided the range of new_path.len is [-8, -3].
new_path.type = 2;
new_path.len = pathlen - bMatch - 2;
memcpy(new_path.valu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118232
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-12-29
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118232
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59998
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59998&action=edit
Reduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118236
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-12-29
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105826
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118235
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59863
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dushistov at mail dot ru
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 118237, which changed state.
Bug 118237 Summary: failure to compile constexpr variable initialization with
properly destroyed allocation inside the expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118237
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105826
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hanicka at hanicka dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 22, which changed state.
Bug 22 Summary: local temps from get_nsdmi -> break_out_target_exprs break
constexpr evaluation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118237
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118237
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118237
--- Comment #1 from Hana Dusíková ---
Error I'm getting is:
```
:1:43: error: the value of '' is not usable in a constant
expression
1 | constexpr auto f = (delete new int{42}, 32);
| ^
:1:38:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118237
Bug ID: 118237
Summary: failure to compile constexpr variable initialization
with properly destroyed allocation inside the
expression
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117835
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 117872 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117836
Bug 117836 depends on bug 117872, which changed state.
Bug 117872 Summary: wrong code with -O -maccumulate-outgoing-args
--param=store-forwarding-max-distance=1000 -favoid-store-forwarding
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117872
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117872
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108764
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117906
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118236
Bug ID: 118236
Summary: gcc does not realize ambiguous friend class
declaration with multiple using namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116720
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13/14 Regression] RISC-V:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116720
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b06abe027a78681d29a5e91daa74bf8dba39826
commit r15-6458-g0b06abe027a78681d29a5e91daa74bf8dba39826
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sun Dec 29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118235
Bug ID: 118235
Summary: generate strange code to access const, but not static
array with doubles via index
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118231
--- Comment #2 from newbie-02 ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> User error. D is an extension floating suffix for double constant, not
> _Decimal32.
> DF or df is the standard floating suffix for _Decimal32 constants.
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118234
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
```
Starting program: /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12/gnat1 -quiet
-dumpbase test_json_buffered_pull_reader.adb -dumpbase-ext .adb -gnat2022
-mtune=generic -march=x86-64 test_json_buffered_pull_reader.ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118234
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59996|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118234
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 59996
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59996&action=edit
bug118234-concat.xz
Okay, concatenating all .(adb|ads) into a file then running gnatchop on it to
verify works for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118234
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 59995
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59995&action=edit
bug118234.tar.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118234
Bug ID: 118234
Summary: ICE when building VSS-24.0.0
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118232
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Both addresses are the same. The problem is the warning is dependent on the
form of the address so if say fre uses the 4 one as leader, then the warning
happens. I think there are others like this one alread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118233
Bug ID: 118233
Summary: -Werror=stringop-overflow __builtin___memcpy_chk
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118232
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
Target Milestone|---
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
