https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117873
Bug ID: 117873
Summary: Spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings with -O3 for
static const std::regex
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117866
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117845
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114948
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |15.0
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117872
Bug ID: 117872
Summary: wrong code with -O -maccumulate-outgoing-args
--param=store-forwarding-max-distance=1000
-favoid-store-forwarding
Product: gcc
Version: 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117831
Huaqi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fanghuaqi at vip dot qq.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117860
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117006
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |liuhongt at gcc dot
gnu.org
Las
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117869
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117871
Bug ID: 117871
Summary: cfg_hooks variables should be const at least and maybe
a virtual functions
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117871
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117866
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56314
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikulas at artax dot
karlin.mff.cu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117870
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37994
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80677
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117870
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117870
Bug ID: 117870
Summary: Suggestion - make the flags -ffixed, -fcall-used and
-fcall-saved per function
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117834
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Gleb Mazovetskiy from comment #8)
> > If you want to make progress, and help keep it alive, then the best way is
> > to test regularly - in this case you need to bisect to find what change
> > c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117718
--- Comment #6 from Steven Munroe ---
Another issues with vector loads from .rodata
Some times the compiler will generate this sequence for power8
addis 9,2,.LC69@toc@ha
addi 9,9,.LC69@toc@l
rldicr 9,9,0,59
lxv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117869
Bug ID: 117869
Summary: rust fails to build for me
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build, documentation
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 59760
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59760&action=edit
Preprocessed source.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #7 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117868
Bug ID: 117868
Summary: [avr][lra] Wrong code with -mlra in simd-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117860
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Confirmed.
>
> I think it should be easy to support it with a slight change to this pattern:
> ```
> (define_insn "addcarry"
> [(set (reg:CCC FLAGS_REG)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117857
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe ---
so, in this case, it might work - and we could probably arrange to set that
flag by default for darwin8 (and maybe 9) on 32b hosts [64b is always UNIX03
already].
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117857
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---
it looks like this ...
#if !defined(__DARWIN_UNIX03)
#if defined(_APPLE_C_SOURCE) || defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE) ||
defined(_POSIX_C_SOURCE) || defined(__LP64__)
#if defined(_NONSTD_SOURCE)
#error "Can't define b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117857
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #10)
> I think just ensuring that -D__DARWIN_UNIX03=1 is always passed to the
> preprocessor ought to be enough...
You can try it .. but the Darwin SDK headers are fie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116425
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Wouldn't these cases be better handled doing the scalar load, then splat it
across the vector, then the stores? No gather needed at all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117857
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager ---
I think just ensuring that -D__DARWIN_UNIX03=1 is always passed to the
preprocessor ought to be enough...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117389
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117389
--- Comment #6 from 孙思杰 ---
This bug seems very serious but still not fixed in the gcc 12.4 which is
released in 2024.6.20.
I'm not sure does this mean c++20 coroutine is an immature and unstable feature
for gcc. We are trying using c++20 corou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117857
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Gleb Mazovetskiy from comment #8)
> > The warning was changed to an error by default for GCC 14
>
> Ah, makes sense, thanks for explaining. I'm guessing it went unnoticed
> because the failure co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117857
--- Comment #8 from Gleb Mazovetskiy ---
> The warning was changed to an error by default for GCC 14
Ah, makes sense, thanks for explaining. I'm guessing it went unnoticed because
the failure conditions for `ttyname_r` must be quite rare.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117834
--- Comment #8 from Gleb Mazovetskiy ---
> If you want to make progress, and help keep it alive, then the best way is to
> test regularly - in this case you need to bisect to find what change caused
> the problem - and hopefully that will sugg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #431 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #430)
>
> If you could merge 59432 and 59550 into your tree and rebase, I can test now
> that a fix for PR 117770 has landed.
I don't think there is anythin
38 matches
Mail list logo