https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117809
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117825
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #5 from And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117825
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117825
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59734
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59734&action=edit
C++11 testcase that fails all the way back to GCC 4.5.3 but worked in 4.4.7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114897
--- Comment #3 from Marcus Hähnel ---
My apologies. Wrong bug report. Please ignore my comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117825
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on template with|[12/13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117823
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao Liu ---
> Whether it needs -ffast-math depends on how it behaves with respect to
> rounding I guess. If (float)bf16 * (float)bf16 + (float)bf16 * (float)bf16
> performs the float add without intermediate rounding for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117825
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://godbolt.org/z/j666o |
|4z5e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117825
--- Comment #1 from Marcus Hähnel ---
Another note: Having the return type of the wrap template not using decltype
(and hard-coding it to int) will make this work and not have an ICE.
So this seems to trigger when all of this is met:
* A templ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114897
Marcus Hähnel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marcus.haehnel@kernkonzept.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116743
--- Comment #18 from Eugene Rozenfeld ---
Hi Rama.
I started looking at this. Below is what the info looks like for
ha_innobase::build_template in the gcov file you shared. If you look near the
end, you can see counts for calls to build_templat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78492
--- Comment #8 from federico ---
Amazing, thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117817
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117825
Bug ID: 117825
Summary: ICE on template with -Wformat-security (error
reporting routines re-entered.)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117814
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|arm/MVE: regressions after |[15 Regression] arm/MVE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78492
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29670
Bug 29670 depends on bug 78492, which changed state.
Bug 78492 Summary: [OOP] Compiler segfault with non_overridable function in
generic interface
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78492
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117810
--- Comment #3 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Not sure what this has to do with constexpr, but allowing expressions should be
possible. WG21 is working on contracts to specify pre-. and postprocessing, but
I am not sure advanced this is.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117824
Bug ID: 117824
Summary: ipa-modref isn't documented ingccint
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117823
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao Liu ---
The vectorization maybe need ffast-math.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117823
Bug ID: 117823
Summary: sdot_prod pattern extended to floating point?
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117734
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117765
--- Comment #10 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
On 11/25/24 09:50, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117765
>
> --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> The patch catches functions but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117822
Bug ID: 117822
Summary: [C++23] basic_stacktrace allocator-extended move
constructor uses _Allocator instead of _AllocTraits
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117821
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117821
Bug ID: 117821
Summary: ~(unsigned smaller type)var_type, the ~ should prop
over the truncation (nop too)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117782
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117350
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117782
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #10 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117782
--- Comment #9 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> Can you try again now that PR 117350 has actually been pushed?
Thanks. This fixes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117757
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117757
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24dac1eab9c3b650826bbaa84dd64310910e647c
commit r15-5741-g24dac1eab9c3b650826bbaa84dd64310910e647c
Author: Joseph Myers
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115644
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24dac1eab9c3b650826bbaa84dd64310910e647c
commit r15-5741-g24dac1eab9c3b650826bbaa84dd64310910e647c
Author: Joseph Myers
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117820
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117820
Bug ID: 117820
Summary: Formatted output gives wrong result.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117819
Bug ID: 117819
Summary: Formatted READ with BZ in format fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117819
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86590
--- Comment #37 from Jonathan Wakely ---
_M_create is at line 144 of basic_string.tcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116675
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #6)
> The test is broken:
>
> +UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/i386/pr116675.c scan-assembler-times pand 4
> +UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/i386/pr116675.c scan-assembler-times pandn 4
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88109
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
Bug 104552 depends on bug 104896, which changed state.
Bug 104896 Summary: Messages use %<%s%> instead of the idiomatic %qs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104896
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117815
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> Created attachment 59732 [details]
> Candidate patch
>
> Patch seems to work, but not yet bootstrapped, and doesn't have automated
> test coverage.
Successfull
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104896
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87850
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82892
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82892
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5341eb669658c7c73d55021b10a4765bf4ce3078
commit r15-5739-g5341eb669658c7c73d55021b10a4765bf4ce3078
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87850
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5336b63fe81029cfd790208fbc69a08c70b82b01
commit r15-5738-g5336b63fe81029cfd790208fbc69a08c70b82b01
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104896
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f06b910a840d8ed06e27942bc23f260a0e0ccf3
commit r15-5737-g9f06b910a840d8ed06e27942bc23f260a0e0ccf3
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86590
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at suse dot cz
--- Comment #36 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117810
--- Comment #2 from felix-gcc at fefe dot de ---
Hmm, now that you mention it explicitly... Just like C++ iterators, max does
not actually point at the last element in the array but at the first element
behind the array.
That appears to be more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117472
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117815
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117815
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91193
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91193
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87492fb3fd5e7510983e0275a38ba95769335018
commit r15-5734-g87492fb3fd5e7510983e0275a38ba95769335018
Author: Joseph Myers
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117210
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117650
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95215
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 97122, which changed state.
Bug 97122 Summary: Spurious FINAL ... must be in the specification part of a
MODULE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100094
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.5.0
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46532
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> I don't know what the C4 constructor is for, but we should probably export
> it.
Well I tried with -static-libstdc++ and it fails with that option too. So I a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43374
--- Comment #12 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Janis Johnson from comment #4)
> The tests also fail on powerpc64-linux, although the first one gets the same
> error with and without optimization.
>
> elm3c105% cat 43374-1.c
> int func(_Deci
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117650
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17db5742a555d4f8fd5fa324adb6d1e5c55374be
commit r15-5732-g17db5742a555d4f8fd5fa324adb6d1e5c55374be
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> I don't know what the C4 constructor is for, but we should probably export
> it.
So C4/C5 are internal and should always be inlined I think So maybe this is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117178
--- Comment #18 from Paul Eggert ---
(In reply to uecker from comment #17)
> Fairly limited, but if you only have specific cases where you need
> this, this worked for me as a workaround:
>
> #define TRUNC4(x) { x[0], x[1], x[2], x[3] }
> stati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117655
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Mathias Stearn from comment #2)
> It looks like a similar optimization would make sense for
> operator=(string&&): https://godbolt.org/z/Wo19fjKeK.
I think this is missing the fix up, althoug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117818
--- Comment #2 from Steven Munroe ---
Same issues compiled for power9/10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100097
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paal at levold dot net
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102275
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116212
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ah yes I see it on 14. The warning is nonsense, none of the vectors used have a
length greater than 4, and the largest size is sizeof(std::string). 4 * 32 is
not in the range [18446744071562067968, 1844674
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117818
--- Comment #1 from Steven Munroe ---
May be related to 117007
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117178
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117818
Bug ID: 117818
Summary: vec_add incorrectly generates vadduwm for vector char
const inputs.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117810
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117791
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117812
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117178
Paul Eggert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eggert at cs dot ucla.edu
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116212
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
It looks fixed on trunk but I can hit it with 14 at least.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36503
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:093584abb854559393e36cd4cdcf9dc4862dd046
commit r15-5731-g093584abb854559393e36cd4cdcf9dc4862dd046
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117817
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117797
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last rec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117798
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117724
--- Comment #8 from Andres Freund ---
FWIW, a few of postgres' CI instances (which intentionally track a snapshot
gcc) are hitting this (see e.g. [1]). I reproduced the failure locally, applied
the patch from [2], after which the build succeeds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117817
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-27
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |ipa
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117817
Bug ID: 117817
Summary: Compile error when taking address of temporary array
in sizeof operator
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ipa |libstdc++
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84211
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
fix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-20241127062712-r15-5717-g32f6485849c826-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241127 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117750
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117806
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117806
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59729
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59729&action=edit
Reduced testcase
This reduced testcase has no errors and is valid C23 as far as I can tell.
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo