[Bug fortran/116668] A very strange error when trying to copy substrings from a select type generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116668 kargls at comcast dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargls at comcast dot net --

[Bug fortran/116668] A very strange error when trying to copy substrings from a select type generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116668 Jordan <8e3g6jay6 at mozmail dot com> changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

[Bug fortran/117381] -fmax-identifier-length= is completely ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381 Jordan <8e3g6jay6 at mozmail dot com> changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

[Bug fortran/117381] -fmax-identifier-length= is completely ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381 --- Comment #16 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to Jordan from comment #15) > I do not mean to burst your bubble, but Vulkan 1.1 released in 2018 and > ChatGPT came out in 2022 lol. Snarky comments are a proven method to deter those

[Bug target/29838] should an option to disable use of TLS for -fstack-protector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29838 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/117389] std::string that is value-captured by lambda cannot be deconstruct correctly when the lamda is passed as a coroutine argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117389 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.1.0 Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/117149] GCC's optimizer intermittently generates erroneous thread-local storage code, causing segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117149 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pi

[Bug target/29838] -fstack-protector shouldn't use TLS in freestanding mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29838 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||devraymondsh at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/39437] Support for automatic linking via pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-04-16 20:48:09 |2024-10-31 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pi

[Bug c++/117390] Error message for trying to call an constructor with template arguments should be improved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117390 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/117389] std::string that is value-captured by lambda cannot be deconstruct correctly when the lamda is passed as a coroutine argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117389 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug testsuite/100272] some incomplete dg-commands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100272 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/117389] std::string that is value-captured by lambda cannot be deconstruct correctly when the lamda is passed as a coroutine argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117389 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > Actually it is a dup of bug 101367. And it describes what you found with lambda captures (of strings) to the tee too.

[Bug c++/101367] [coroutines] destructor for capture in lambda temporary operand to co_yield expression called twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101367 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug c++/101367] [coroutines] destructor for capture in lambda temporary operand to co_yield expression called twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101367 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sunsijie at buaa dot edu.cn --- Comment

[Bug c++/117389] std::string that is value-captured by lambda cannot be deconstruct correctly when the lamda is passed as a coroutine argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117389 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Actually it is a dup of bug 101367. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 101367 ***

[Bug c++/99576] [coroutines] destructor of a temporary called too early within co_await expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99576 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sunsijie at buaa dot edu.cn --- Comment

[Bug c++/117390] New: Error message for trying to call an constructor with template arguments should be improved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117390 Bug ID: 117390 Summary: Error message for trying to call an constructor with template arguments should be improved Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/117389] std::string that is value-captured by lambda cannot be deconstruct correctly when the lamda is passed as a coroutine argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117389 --- Comment #1 from 孙思杰 --- I cannot reproduce this bug on gcc13+ and clang. but I also cannot find any related bug report.

[Bug c++/117389] New: std::string that is value-captured by lambda cannot be deconstruct correctly when the lamda is passed as a coroutine argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117389 Bug ID: 117389 Summary: std::string that is value-captured by lambda cannot be deconstruct correctly when the lamda is passed as a coroutine argument Product: gcc

[Bug middle-end/35603] branch reordering with FDO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35603 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/117381] -fmax-identifier-length= is completely ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381 --- Comment #15 from Jordan <8e3g6jay6 at mozmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #14) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #9) > --- snip --- > > So do we want a limit close to > > > > 6.3.2.6 ... A statement shall not have

[Bug preprocessor/117166] [15 regression] ICE when building lxml-5.3.0 with LTO (linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.cc:949)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117166 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug preprocessor/117166] [15 regression] ICE when building lxml-5.3.0 with LTO (linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.cc:949)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117166 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- (Not forgot about this, will come back to it soon, just reproducing it is slow.)

[Bug fortran/117381] -fmax-identifier-length= is completely ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381 --- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #9) --- snip --- > So do we want a limit close to > > 6.3.2.6 ... A statement shall not have more than one million characters. > > ? This ridiculous number seems to be t

[Bug testsuite/28032] gfortran.dg tests use dg-options with -On even though it is already torture tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28032 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 59515 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59515&action=edit Example illustrating kicker This simple patch adds a custom procedure to be run on a test case. I am using in

[Bug lto/117388] New: Mangled name in 'In function' note before warning with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117388 Bug ID: 117388 Summary: Mangled name in 'In function' note before warning with LTO Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug middle-end/117387] Incorrect n_named_args in expand_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117387 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Like this? diff --git a/gcc/calls.cc b/gcc/calls.cc index f67067acad4..1df064dcef6 100644 --- a/gcc/calls.cc +++ b/gcc/calls.cc @@ -2992,8 +2992,6 @@ expand_call (tree exp, rtx target, int ignore) Normally,

[Bug middle-end/117387] Incorrect n_named_args in expand_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117387 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > But then later on it does: > /* Now possibly adjust the number of named args. > Normally, don't include the last named arg if anonymous args follow. > We do

[Bug debug/46240] [4.6 Regression] ice in maybe_register_def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46240 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sam James : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a287ff2697f0788856a21c99098611a5ae0a4749 commit r15-4827-ga287ff2697f0788856a21c99098611a5ae0a4749 Author: Sam James Date: Tue Oct 29

[Bug debug/15736] [4.0 Regression] internal compiler error: in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:12441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15736 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sam James : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a287ff2697f0788856a21c99098611a5ae0a4749 commit r15-4827-ga287ff2697f0788856a21c99098611a5ae0a4749 Author: Sam James Date: Tue Oct 29

[Bug c++/90313] [8 Regression] Is an assignment elided with gcc7.3 -O2?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90313 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sam James : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6df5c49452a1fcf66cc1d15ab50d9de83d01cf1c commit r15-4825-g6df5c49452a1fcf66cc1d15ab50d9de83d01cf1c Author: Sam James Date: Tue Oct 2

[Bug tree-optimization/111520] [14 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: probability of edge 3->8 not initialized) with -O -fsignaling-nans -fharden-compares -fnon-call-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111520 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sam James : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57d4ec18f577bad60e7f8bc9c0e4b14eb6d03fd0 commit r15-4826-g57d4ec18f577bad60e7f8bc9c0e4b14eb6d03fd0 Author: Sam James Date: Tue Oct 2

[Bug target/66655] [5/6 Regression] miscompilation due to ipa-ra on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66655 --- Comment #36 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sam James : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ef0239da9dc5e3326ee5e928f2c5fe1bc2f4ffd commit r15-4824-g1ef0239da9dc5e3326ee5e928f2c5fe1bc2f4ffd Author: Sam James Date: Fri Nov 1

[Bug middle-end/117387] Incorrect n_named_args in expand_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117387 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- But then later on it does: /* Now possibly adjust the number of named args. Normally, don't include the last named arg if anonymous args follow. We do include the last named arg if targetm.cal

[Bug target/66655] [5/6 Regression] miscompilation due to ipa-ra on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66655 --- Comment #35 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sam James : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14e2f3233bf0ef27e3cbf28478c63c0335cf514c commit r15-4823-g14e2f3233bf0ef27e3cbf28478c63c0335cf514c Author: Sam James Date: Tue Oct 2

[Bug other/42965] no "warnings being treated as errors" for individual -Werror=x options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42965 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sam James : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e58db990113ef756970a83de16754563076e701 commit r15-4822-g6e58db990113ef756970a83de16754563076e701 Author: Sam James Date: Fri Oct 25

[Bug tree-optimization/105820] [13 Regression] ICE in invert, at value-range.cc:1971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105820 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sam James : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31ec0b0360e2cae5cf927924713757ad7a7c669c commit r15-4821-g31ec0b0360e2cae5cf927924713757ad7a7c669c Author: Sam James Date: Fri Oct

[Bug middle-end/117387] New: Incorrect n_named_args in expand_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117387 Bug ID: 117387 Summary: Incorrect n_named_args in expand_call Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug target/47333] [4.8 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2 with SUN as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 --- Comment #47 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sam James : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bedd308c25ac00466bc4921a99279659cff8df51 commit r15-4820-gbedd308c25ac00466bc4921a99279659cff8df51 Author: Sam James Date: Fri Oct 2

[Bug libstdc++/96088] Range insertion into unordered_map is less effective than a loop with insertion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96088 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- There are so many ways to break our current optimizations that try to avoid creating temporaries: #include #include #include struct K { explicit K(int) noexcept { } bool operator==(const K&) const

[Bug c++/95677] undefined reference to `(anonymous namespace)::xx'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95677 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sam James : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:778863eab72fdef226b8ac999b13a6ee71f397c0 commit r15-4819-g778863eab72fdef226b8ac999b13a6ee71f397c0 Author: Sam James Date: Fri Oct 2

[Bug target/33532] extra escapes in ia64.md after conversion to use braced strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33532 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation, |

[Bug target/114759] Power: multiple issues with -mrop-protect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114759 --- Comment #21 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4d4b86aebe1314a145732150d59a7b9ba066032 commit r14-10860-gb4d4b86aebe1314a145732150d59a7b9ba066032 Author: Peter Bergner

[Bug libstdc++/96088] Range insertion into unordered_map is less effective than a loop with insertion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96088 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/89044] libstdc++-6.dll is installed in the wrong directory cross-compiling with a multilib configuration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89044 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski -

[Bug libstdc++/89044] libstdc++-6.dll is installed in the wrong directory cross-compiling with a multilib configuration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89044 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 100427 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/100427] canadian compile for mingw-w64 copies the wrong dlls for mingw-w64 multilibs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100427 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/100016] multilib mingw-w64 links to the wrong multilib path because of libtool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100016 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/89044] libstdc++-6.dll is installed in the wrong directory cross-compiling with a multilib configuration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89044 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 100016 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libstdc++/89044] libstdc++-6.dll is installed in the wrong directory cross-compiling with a multilib configuration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89044 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > Most likely a dup of bug 39947 too. But libgcc does not use libtool

[Bug target/115094] x86_64-w64-mingw32 multilib overrides libraries for 64 and 32 since they both copy to bin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115094 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/89044] libstdc++-6.dll is installed in the wrong directory cross-compiling with a multilib configuration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89044 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libstdc++/89044] libstdc++-6.dll is installed in the wrong directory cross-compiling with a multilib configuration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89044 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||unlvsur at live dot com --- Comment #7 f

[Bug c++/40261] confusing diagnostic on ill-formed template definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40261 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-08-09 00:00:00 |2024-10-31 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pi

[Bug tree-optimization/107503] tail call missed with struct wrapper

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107503 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- I wonder if the late (return/argument) SRA pass that would provide this information or not ...

[Bug tree-optimization/101353] missed tail call with constructor to global data and RSO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101353 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > ??? In some situations (when the struct is returned in memory via > invisible argument) we could deal with this, e.g. by passing 'p' > itself as t

[Bug bootstrap/117361] [15 Regression] GCC build fails with "gcc/opts-diagnostic.cc:599: test_output_arg_parsing: FAIL: ASSERT_STREQ (pt.get_diagnostic_text ()" when using some locales

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117361 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- BTW: In PR115203 it was solved differently compared to the proposal, i.e. by setting disable_event_localization See https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=2dbb1c124c1e585dc413132d7a8d4be62c6b7baa

[Bug tree-optimization/101353] missed tail call with constructor to global data and RSO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101353 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||FIXME --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug other/116948] bootstrap-ubsan should set UBSAN_OPTIONS to abort on error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116948 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- Po

[Bug bootstrap/117361] [15 Regression] GCC build fails with "gcc/opts-diagnostic.cc:599: test_output_arg_parsing: FAIL: ASSERT_STREQ (pt.get_diagnostic_text ()" when using some locales

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117361 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug fortran/117381] -fmax-identifier-length= is completely ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/117386] -funsigned-bitfields support for the C++ front-end should be removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117386 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/19501] Redundant "template" keyword rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19501 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/117386] -funsigned-bitfields support for the C++ front-end should be removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117386 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note cwg675 is considered a dup of cwg 739.

[Bug fortran/117381] -fmax-identifier-length= is completely ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381 --- Comment #12 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #11) > (In reply to kargls from comment #10) > > (In reply to anlauf from comment #9) > > > (In reply to kargls from comment #8) > > > > One could set GFC_MAX_SYM

[Bug c++/31158] wrong line number in warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/40530] Suggestion: -Wsignless-bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40530 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note this only useful for C since C++ has decided with that there is no difference between using plain int vs signed int (partly due to temp

[Bug c++/117386] -funsigned-bitfields support for the C++ front-end should be removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117386 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/117386] New: -funsigned-bitfields support for the C++ front-end should be removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117386 Bug ID: 117386 Summary: -funsigned-bitfields support for the C++ front-end should be removed Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-i

[Bug rtl-optimization/14504] Missed Bit Twiddling Optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14504 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|kazu at gcc dot g

[Bug fortran/117381] -fmax-identifier-length= is completely ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargls from comment #10) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #9) > > (In reply to kargls from comment #8) > > > One could set GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN to a value larger than 63, but what >

[Bug target/109494] inline const variables interfere with source_location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109494 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|2023-04-13 00:00:00

[Bug ipa/108040] -fdevirtualize causes part of function to be missing in output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108040 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/31158] wrong line number in warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.0|9.0

[Bug c++/88375] Vague source location for bad initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88375 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug c++/88375] Vague source location for bad initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88375 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/57342] [C++11] Warning for narrowing conversion has ugly formatting for floating point number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57342 Bug 57342 depends on bug 31158, which changed state. Bug 31158 Summary: wrong line number in warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug c++/31158] wrong line number in warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Looks fixed in GCC 9, Let me see if I can find the commit.

[Bug fortran/117381] -fmax-identifier-length= is completely ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381 --- Comment #10 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #9) > (In reply to kargls from comment #8) > > One could set GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN to a value larger than 63, but what > > value makes sense? (Note it will be less

[Bug tree-optimization/19831] Missing DSE/malloc/free optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Keyword

[Bug middle-end/31980] ICE in cancel_option() for Negative marked options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31980 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/117381] -fmax-identifier-length= is completely ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargls from comment #8) > One could set GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN to a value larger than 63, but what > value makes sense? (Note it will be less than 1, which is the > longest statement

[Bug testsuite/38833] RFE - Need Makefile to test coverage of Testsuite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38833 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- --enable-coverage has been there (and documented) since r0-44516-g22aa533ee7d277 (which was in 2002, 7 years before this bug was filed). So the first part of this bug was already existing. The second part o

[Bug fortran/117381] -fmax-identifier-length= is completely ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381 --- Comment #8 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #6) > This begs the question whether we should support longer symbols as an > extension. This likely would require a big change to the frontend. There are

[Bug fortran/117381] -fmax-identifier-length= is completely ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381 --- Comment #7 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #5) > While Nvidia and flang seem to allow the sample code, even the latest > Intel ifx 2025.0 rejects it: > > pr117381.f90(5): error #6439: This symbol has too m

[Bug tree-optimization/115274] [14/15 regression] Bogus -Wstringop-overread in SQLite source code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115274 --- Comment #15 from Sam James --- On the original with Qing's v3 patch, quoting output from bundled copy in nodejs but it happens with upstream too: ``` ../../deps/sqlite/sqlite3.c:35003:28: warning: ‘strlen’ reading 1 or more bytes from a regi

[Bug testsuite/117183] gcc.dg/c23-constexpr-2a.c: comment mismatch with dg-do

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117183 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug testsuite/117183] gcc.dg/c23-constexpr-2a.c: comment mismatch with dg-do

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117183 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- Pa

[Bug testsuite/117183] gcc.dg/c23-constexpr-2a.c: comment mismatch with dg-do

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117183 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/117183] gcc.dg/c23-constexpr-2a.c: comment mismatch with dg-do

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117183 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sam James : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a4ee57b04398e54284e3d6b5ed4f8842ee26a5c commit r15-4813-g2a4ee57b04398e54284e3d6b5ed4f8842ee26a5c Author: Sam James Date: Thu Oct 3

[Bug target/100165] fmov could be used to zero out the upper bits instead of movi/zip or movi/ins with __builtin_shuffle and zero vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100165 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug c/100420] unspecified VLA bound formatted as [0] instead of [*] in -Wvla-parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100420 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9eae9268e41463927c9383004e58708048ec379f commit r15-4812-g9eae9268e41463927c9383004e58708048ec379f Author: Martin Uecker Date: T

[Bug c/117145] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.cc:355 at -O1 and above with vector_size and VLA in struct argument since r14-1143-g42d1612eb5c3b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117145 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9eae9268e41463927c9383004e58708048ec379f commit r15-4812-g9eae9268e41463927c9383004e58708048ec379f Author: Martin Uecker Date:

[Bug ipa/117350] [15 Regression] ICE with autoprofiledbootstrap and bootstrap-lto after r15-4610-gbf43fe6aa966ea

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117350 --- Comment #21 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks. I'll see if this patch is enough: diff --git a/gcc/tree.cc b/gcc/tree.cc index b4c059d3b0db..92f99eaccd72 100644 --- a/gcc/tree.cc +++ b/gcc/tree.cc @@ -787,8 +787,9 @@ need_assembler_name

[Bug c/117245] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 2 follows the use) with VLA types in struct with a vector type rebuild and nested functions since r13-6128-g4782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117245 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9eae9268e41463927c9383004e58708048ec379f commit r15-4812-g9eae9268e41463927c9383004e58708048ec379f Author: Martin Uecker Date: T

[Bug fortran/112459] gfortran -w option causes derived-type finalization at creation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112459 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/117381] -fmax-identifier-length= is completely ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/117381] -fmax-identifier-length= is completely ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- While Nvidia and flang seem to allow the sample code, even the latest Intel ifx 2025.0 rejects it: pr117381.f90(5): error #6439: This symbol has too many characters. [VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_PHYSICAL

[Bug c/117380] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in get_unwidened, at tree.cc:8019

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117380 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

  1   2   >