https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111900
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117335
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Last re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77723
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101125
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93677
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80653
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37820
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to brian from comment #1)
> To list predefined macros, use -dM with an empty input file, e.g. "gcc
> -dM -E -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117340
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117341
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117341
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59484
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59484&action=edit
C++98 testcase without double
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117340
Bug ID: 117340
Summary: gdb-interface problem? on deferred-length character
array
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116768
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||newsigma at 163 dot com
--- Comment #13 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117341
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59483
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59483&action=edit
Semi-self contained testcase
Still uses prints but no headers are in use now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117338
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117339
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117341
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
10.5: 1 1 0 0
11.5: 1 1 0 0
12.4.1: 1 1 1 0
13.3.1: 1 1 1 0
14.2.1: 1 1 1 1
15.0.0: 1 1 1 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117341
Bug ID: 117341
Summary: GCC 13.2.0 and 14.2.0 generate wrong code with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 117340, which changed state.
Bug 117340 Summary: gdb-interface problem? on deferred-length character array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117340
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101826
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||furutaka.kazuyoshi at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117339
Bug ID: 117339
Summary: Missing ccmp in the case of addition in the inner
condition
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117338
Bug ID: 117338
Summary: VRP changing `(a & 1) == 0` into `(bool)~a` gets in
the way of ccmp generation
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28032
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11)
> It needs to be on a line on its own, and start with dg-
>
> So:
>
> ! { dg-gfortran-onepass }
>
> And rename the proc to match.
Did this:
! { dg-do run
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116415
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:507ed9118b29d7a5a2b751876bec9a1f5009de01
commit r13-9154-g507ed9118b29d7a5a2b751876bec9a1f5009de01
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94174
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85605
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116415
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab74b2d86471cdb5b8a327e734630f1288125d9e
commit r14-10849-gab74b2d86471cdb5b8a327e734630f1288125d9e
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117007
--- Comment #8 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #1)
> Jeff, did any of your recent constant patches help with this or is this
> something different?
Vector constant runs into different paths as DImode. Those patches a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114326
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
I wonder where this is from.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102793
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note for the testcase in comment #0, noccmp is missing a VRP here.
if bar != 0, then `d != b` is also true.
For ccmp, GCC trunk (15) does notice that even due to r15-3866-ga88d6c6d777ad7
.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117335
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28032
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think you should also do:
set DO_ONE_PASS 0
After checking it, so that it doesn't remain set between tests.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28032
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It needs to be on a line on its own, and start with dg-
So:
! { dg-gfortran-onepass }
And rename the proc to match.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85605
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59482
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59482&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28032
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117337
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61379
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k4lizen at proton dot me
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117337
Bug ID: 117337
Summary: Wreturn-type false positive on [[noreturn]] override
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85605
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-06-04 00:00:00 |2024-10-28
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117336
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117336
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98171
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from dje.gcc at gmail dot com ---
> IBM AIX has changed libintl and older versions are not in the default
> path. There may be other versions installed on the system in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97695
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
Testcase was added in r11-4701-g2e391ceb77bda0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117336
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||14.1.0
Keywords|
-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20241028/configure
--prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging
--enable-libstdcxx-backtrace=yes --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-bootstrap
--enable-multiarch --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117252
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110721
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.5.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* |
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e20ced2cb83c015ad1f934957002a2874b6f7c93
commit r15-4726-ge20ced2cb83c015ad1f934957002a2874b6f7c93
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110009
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
So now there is an open question here.
which is more Canonical:
```
_1 = v < 0;
a_4 = (int) _1;
b_5 = -a_4;
_9 = b_5 | 1;
```
or
```
_t1 = v >> 31
_9 = _t1 | 1
```
or
```
_tb = v < 0
_9 = _tb ? -1 :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117335
Bug ID: 117335
Summary: new test case gfortran.dg/pr115070.f90 from
r15-4702-ged8ca972f88578 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117263
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |middle-end
Summary|genautoma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26374
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19779
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mueller at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88204
Bug 88204 depends on bug 26374, which changed state.
Bug 26374 Summary: Compile failure on long double
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26374
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
--- Comment #14 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> I will commit the testcase in a little bit.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #416 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Currently tracking testing the LRA-enabled backend here:
https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/gcc-15-sh-lra.txt
Will regularly update the list once new results come in.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6247aae35faaf04de48c5f3d9c4e4af6f7e3789c
commit r14-10847-g6247aae35faaf04de48c5f3d9c4e4af6f7e3789c
Author: Sam James
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
--- Comment #12 from Frank Scheiner ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> Looks to be fixed by r15-4713-g0942bb85fc5573 .
Indeed, that fixes it!
Using a cross-compiler based on r15-4713-g0942bb85fc5573:
```
# ia64-linux-gcc -c -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117327
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 59480
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59480&action=edit
Tentative fix
To be properly tested.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117327
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
The problem is in find_end_label, namely:
/* Otherwise, see if there is a label at the end of the function. If there
is, it must be that RETURN insns aren't needed, so that is our return
label
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117331
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
As noted in PR 19779, using -ffast-math or -funsafe-math-optimizations allows
your examples to compile.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107467
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6247aae35faaf04de48c5f3d9c4e4af6f7e3789c
commit r14-10847-g6247aae35faaf04de48c5f3d9c4e4af6f7e3789c
Author: Sam James
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f0d109bd871d11b5b93468f271aa6dc34ef88d8
commit r14-10845-g2f0d109bd871d11b5b93468f271aa6dc34ef88d8
Author: Sam James
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107467
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f0d109bd871d11b5b93468f271aa6dc34ef88d8
commit r14-10845-g2f0d109bd871d11b5b93468f271aa6dc34ef88d8
Author: Sam James
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e09ae37dbe0a10f48490214f50ff733cc92280a
commit r15-4723-g4e09ae37dbe0a10f48490214f50ff733cc92280a
Author: Sam James
Date: Mon Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107467
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e09ae37dbe0a10f48490214f50ff733cc92280a
commit r15-4723-g4e09ae37dbe0a10f48490214f50ff733cc92280a
Author: Sam James
Date: Mon Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117331
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is one of many reasons that the world is moving to -mabi=ieeelongdouble
instead of ibmlongdouble
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
--- Comment #11 from Frank Scheiner ---
Created attachment 59479
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59479&action=edit
reduced source
cvise reduced it to:
```
enum psi_states {
PSI_IO_SOME,
PSI_NONIDLE,
NR_PSI_STATES
} *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117283
--- Comment #7 from Yibo He ---
(In reply to Yibo He from comment #6)
`__riscv_vsseg7e32_v_i32m1x7(ptr_d, vb, vl);` will change the first four
elements of c after 126 iterations (on qemu with VLEN=128, found by gdb)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing this too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
Bug ID: 117330
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE on Linux 6.12-rc5: in
vect_get_operand_map, at tree-vect-slp.cc:552
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-testcase
--- Comment #9 from Andr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117283
--- Comment #6 from Yibo He ---
(In reply to xu...@eswincomputing.com from comment #3)
> (In reply to Yibo He from comment #1)
> > The data initialization is long, because I find that this bug is triggered
> > when long data input. If anyone has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
--- Comment #8 from Frank Scheiner ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #7)
> The testcase will be useful irrespective of the bisect result. richi added
> the asserts to find testcases, even :)
Yeah, I somehow did overlook that the addition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117021
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] ICE on |[15 Regression] ICE on
|L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
--- Comment #6 from Frank Scheiner ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> r15-4695-gd17e672ce82e69
I'm reducing now, it's at:
```
00:05:53 INFO (26.4%, 2952452 bytes, 47018 lines)
```
Should I stop it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
--- Comment #4 from Frank Scheiner ---
The shortest commandline to reproduce this is:
```
# ia64-linux-gcc -c -O2 ccQVSPLJ.i
during GIMPLE pass: vect
In file included from kernel/sched/build_utility.c:96:
kernel/sched/psi.c: In function 'collec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108434
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98171
--- Comment #5 from dje.gcc at gmail dot com ---
IBM AIX has changed libintl and older versions are not in the default
path. There may be other versions installed on the system in different
paths (/usr/lib, /opt/cfarm, etc.) that could work with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98171
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
> gcc119 now is AIX 7.3. If this doesn't work it won't be fixed.
How do you mean? What won't be fixed? Ada on AIX 7.2? Ada on AIX 7.3?
Ada o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117324
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-28
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117334
Bug ID: 117334
Summary: structure copy with flexible array member (2)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117333
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117333
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
Summary|struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117333
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Please file one of the issues separately. Let's use this bug for the ICE.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117333
Bug ID: 117333
Summary: structure copy with flexible array member
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117275
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Looks like this might have introduced some noise into "make selftest-valgrind":
==2462086== 160 (56 direct, 104 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost
in loss record 248 of 352
==2462086==at 0x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19779
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev at umlaeute dot mur.at
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117331
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117317
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117332
Bug ID: 117332
Summary: ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn
achieved (90) with custom flags
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117331
--- Comment #1 from IOhannes m zmölnig ---
ouch, i've actually posted my initial test-case that uses templates.
The original code looked like
```C++
template
T test(void) {
constexpr auto one = T (1);
constexpr auto oneThird = one / (T)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117331
Bug ID: 117331
Summary: constexpr with "long double" fails on ppc64el
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117330
--- Comment #3 from Frank Scheiner ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> Please try to minimise the command to reproduce as well with the
> preprocessed sources, and then consider using cvise or delta or ... to
> minimise the source code
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
