[Bug tree-optimization/95284] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95284 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug target/14907] bogus sign/zero extension when relaying parameters with regparm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14907 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nicholas Miell from comment #4) > This also occurs on AMD64 without any special attributes (the ABI passes > params in registers already). > > When compiling: > extern char c2(char); > char c1(char c)

[Bug c/117265] RFE: support for assembly macros/assembly headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117265 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- Maybe what you want is really a builtin does the load/store and the ability to output the register # that the address is formed into instead of this inline-asm. This might be better than what you are asking

[Bug c/112716] LTO optimization with struct with variable size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-10-27 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/98171] adaint.c doesn't compile on AIX 7.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98171 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|WAITING

[Bug middle-end/117313] [15 regression] ICE when building linux-6.11.5 (output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.cc:5672)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117313 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59452|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/117313] [15 regression] ICE when building linux-6.11.5 (output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.cc:5672)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117313 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Created attachment 59452 [details] > Reduced testcase This is rejected by GCC 14: /tmp/f.c:2:23: error: flexible array member in a struct with no named members

[Bug c/117266] RFE: builtin 2N/N -> N div/mod

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117266 --- Comment #16 from H. Peter Anvin --- Well, if that is the way you feel about it. It is certainly different from the messages we get in other situations, so it is a bit confusing to me. It isn't *that* unusual that you know a priori that the

[Bug c/117311] Documentation request: __builtin_frame_address(0) and inline assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117311 --- Comment #3 from H. Peter Anvin --- It does, in fact, work just fine under -O0, although it will redundantly manifest the frame pointer in a different register (which is not a problem.) Now, it would seem to me that if this *isn't* something

[Bug middle-end/117313] [15 regression] ICE when building linux-6.11.5 (output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.cc:5672)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117313 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 59452 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59452&action=edit Reduced testcase

[Bug middle-end/117313] [15 regression] ICE when building linux-6.11.5 (output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.cc:5672)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117313 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-10-27 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/117312] RFE: x86 (and perhaps others): inline assembly: "red-zone" clobber

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117312 --- Comment #2 from H. Peter Anvin --- I did state that the current kernel ABI doesn't *currently* use the red zone. However, in the future, FRED exception handling *would* allow the kernel to use the red zone. There isn't really a good alterna

[Bug c/117266] RFE: builtin 2N/N -> N div/mod

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117266 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to H. Peter Anvin from comment #14) > A bigger, philosophical question: we are always told that builtins are > better for the compiler than inline assembly, as it gives the compiler more > informa

[Bug middle-end/117313] [15 regression] ICE when building linux-6.11.5 (output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.cc:5672)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117313 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Keywords|

[Bug c/117311] Documentation request: __builtin_frame_address(0) and inline assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117311 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pins

[Bug c/117311] Documentation request: __builtin_frame_address(0) and inline assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117311 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/117312] RFE: x86 (and perhaps others): inline assembly: "red-zone" clobber

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117312 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/117265] RFE: support for assembly macros/assembly headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117265 --- Comment #12 from H. Peter Anvin --- Certainly. This is *not* only used by copy_*_user (or {get,put}_user for that matter), here is an example from msr.h: static inline unsigned long long native_read_msr_safe(unsigned int msr,

[Bug middle-end/117313] New: [15 regression] ICE when building linux-6.11.5 (output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.cc:5672)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117313 Bug ID: 117313 Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building linux-6.11.5 (output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.cc:5672) Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug middle-end/117009] Wall should be in common.opt rather than the language specific .opt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117009 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59448|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/117265] RFE: support for assembly macros/assembly headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117265 --- Comment #14 from H. Peter Anvin --- Note: comment 13 is not intended to be rhetorical but is a genuine question.

[Bug c/117265] RFE: support for assembly macros/assembly headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117265 --- Comment #13 from H. Peter Anvin --- When you say "should be done in an exceptional way", could you please clarify what you mean? I'm not sure I follow you there? Are you saying we should be asking for compiler support?

[Bug c/117266] RFE: builtin 2N/N -> N div/mod

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117266 H. Peter Anvin changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|RFE: builtins for N*N -> 2N |RFE: builtin 2N/N -> N

[Bug target/117312] New: RFE: x86 (and perhaps others): inline assembly: "red-zone" clobber

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117312 Bug ID: 117312 Summary: RFE: x86 (and perhaps others): inline assembly: "red-zone" clobber Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/117311] New: Documentation request: __builtin_frame_address(0) and inline assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117311 Bug ID: 117311 Summary: Documentation request: __builtin_frame_address(0) and inline assembly Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c/117265] RFE: support for assembly macros/assembly headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117265 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- Your example is not a full example on how you use _ASM_EXTABLE_TYPE_REG .

[Bug c/117265] RFE: support for assembly macros/assembly headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117265 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- Plus your example is only for copy_{to,from}_user which itself is an exceptional part of the kernel and should be done in an exceptional way in the first place. Do you have other examples that is not from

[Bug c/117265] RFE: support for assembly macros/assembly headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117265 --- Comment #9 from H. Peter Anvin --- Created attachment 59450 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59450&action=edit Proposed assembly header implementation

[Bug c/117265] RFE: support for assembly macros/assembly headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117265 --- Comment #8 from H. Peter Anvin --- Created attachment 59449 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59449&action=edit Current code

[Bug c/117265] RFE: support for assembly macros/assembly headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117265 --- Comment #7 from H. Peter Anvin --- I have included a concrete example from the Linux kernel (with other parts of the code stripped for clarity.) The file asm_header.s shows how it could be implemented as an assembly header. As you can see,

[Bug target/117310] Unnecessary zero-extension for tailcall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117310 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/117310] New: Unnecessary zero-extension for tailcall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117310 Bug ID: 117310 Summary: Unnecessary zero-extension for tailcall Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug middle-end/117009] Wall should be in common.opt rather than the language specific .opt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117009 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 59448 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59448&action=edit Patch which I am testing

[Bug testsuite/117300] guality tests always complain about debuginfod on Fedora 41 due to DEBUGINFOD_URLS being set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117300 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9) > Created attachment 59447 [details] > A patch > > This seems to work. This looks good. Are you going to submit it? If so please add: Co-authored-by: Andrew Pinski

[Bug testsuite/117300] guality tests always fail on Fedora 41 due to DEBUGINFOD_URLS being set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117300 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 59447 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59447&action=edit A patch This seems to work.

[Bug tree-optimization/117282] Miss optimization to eliminate strlen computation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117282 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/117308] Undocumented implementation limits of C++ specification (ISO/IEC 14882)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117308 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug target/117304] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4633 with -mavx10.1 and __builtin_ia32_cvtudq2ps512_mask()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117304 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE: in emit_move_insn, at |ICE: in emit_move_insn, at

[Bug ada/62230] aggregate incorrectly rejected as ancestor part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62230 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/117308] Undocumented implementation limits of C++ specification (ISO/IEC 14882)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117308 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > (In reply to Thomas Kieß from comment #0) > > the current implementation limits overview > > (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/cpp/Implementation-li

[Bug c++/117308] Undocumented implementation limits of C++ specification (ISO/IEC 14882)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117308 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Thomas Kieß from comment #0) > the current implementation limits overview > (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/cpp/Implementation-limits.html) N.B. this page is for cpp the C preproce

[Bug c++/117309] [Docs] C++23 is not mentioned on the "supported standards" doc page

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117309 --- Comment #2 from Madarpok . --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Well c++23 was only published within the last month. Hmm, fair enough. -std=c++2b has been supported for quite a while, but I see your point.

[Bug c++/117308] Undocumented implementation limits of C++ specification (ISO/IEC 14882)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117308 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't think there is any particular limit, it's only limited by your available RAM when compiling. You will probably experience unacceptably slow compile times long before you reach a physical limit, but

[Bug c++/117309] [Docs] C++23 is not mentioned on the "supported standards" doc page

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117309 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Well c++23 was only published within the last month. Within the last week!

[Bug ada/64556] Aspect Preelaborate is ignored on library-level subprogram

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64556 --- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org --- Agreed, fixed.

[Bug tree-optimization/117234] A few tree codes are marked as trapping when they can't

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117234 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/117234] A few tree codes are marked as trapping when they can't

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117234 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5596572b6bf72031de888301ebfe8e984df04dc9 commit r15-4698-g5596572b6bf72031de888301ebfe8e984df04dc9 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Sa

[Bug target/117007] Poor optimization for small vector constants needed for vector shift/rotate/mask generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117007 --- Comment #6 from Steven Munroe --- I am starting to see pattern and wonder if the compiler is confused by assuming the sihft count must match the width/type of the shift/rotate target. This is implied all the way back to the Altivec-PIM and

[Bug c++/117309] [Docs] C++23 is not mentioned on the "supported standards" doc page

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117309 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|web |c++ --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug web/117309] New: [Docs] C++23 is not mentioned on the "supported standards" doc page

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117309 Bug ID: 117309 Summary: [Docs] C++23 is not mentioned on the "supported standards" doc page Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/18765] illegal program not detected, "/=" when "=" is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18765 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- The key is of course the declaration of the "boolean" subtype, so probably: diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch6.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch6.adb index 8cf191d751b..9c02ad6ff4f 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch6.adb +++ b/gcc/ad

[Bug target/117007] Poor optimization for small vector constants needed for vector shift/rotate/mask generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117007 Steven Munroe changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59323|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/116979] [12/13/14/15 regression] fma not always used in complex product

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116979 --- Comment #9 from Paul Caprioli --- I would like to offer two suggestions for your consideration: 1. For the reason of improving accuracy, the mul_fma code should be generated for complex operator* regardless of how the flag -ffp-contract is

[Bug ada/98171] adaint.c doesn't compile on AIX 7.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98171 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazo

[Bug ada/15819] support for alternate exec-prefix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15819 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com --- Comment

[Bug ada/38493] Ada compiler does not work with --exec-prefix configuration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38493 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug ada/106031] ICE on container map empty aggregate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106031 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug ada/37309] tasking is not implemented on NetBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37309 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug ada/82746] strange error on BIP function returning private type with Disable_Controlled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82746 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Resolution|---

[Bug ada/106169] Error with iterated element association in aggregate.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106169 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/117234] A few tree codes are marked as trapping when they can't

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117234 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug ada/62042] Missing optimization of copying non-limited objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62042 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Assignee|unassigned at gc

[Bug ada/17321] Illegal program not detected, name hidden by use clauses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17321 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- The error is still missing.

[Bug ada/99358] Ada2020 assignment target name as return value triggers bug box

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99358 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug ada/95664] link failure with abstract equality operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95664 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ada/82639] Legal program rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82639 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug ada/90958] Recent versions of GCC raise CONSTRAINT_ERROR at runtime for iterator loops with nested constrained records.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90958 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Resolution|---

[Bug ada/93702] Bug box when using Indefinite_Holders.To_Holder in expression function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93702 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2023-05-11 00:00:00 |2024-10-26 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botc

[Bug ada/32318] GNAT.Calendar.Time_IO "%c" incorrectly claims to be reporting the time zone

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32318 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bib_aab at hotmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug ada/90051] Error in spec comments - g-caliio.ads (%Z)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90051 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug ada/89178] equality for composed types failt when a component has a discriminant and redefines equality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89178 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Status|NEW

[Bug ada/71674] missing overflow detection in Ada.Strings.Search

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71674 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ada/89742] Ada2020 target assignment in generic renders a type invisible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89742 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2023-05-11 00:00:00 |2024-10-26 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botc

[Bug ada/89609] bug box caused by access to function as a record component via a limited with

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89609 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2019-03-09 00:00:00 |2024-10-26 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botc

[Bug ada/78066] Misleading error message about redundant Dynamic_Predicate incorrectly mentions "Valid"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78066 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0 Status|NEW

[Bug ada/89159] limited with, tagged record and access to function confuse the linker

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89159 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2023-05-11 00:00:00 |2024-10-26 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botc

[Bug ada/82638] Legal program rejected with a weird error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82638 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0 Status|NEW

[Bug ada/87170] compiler complains about not referenced character literals if they are only used in string literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87170 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2023-05-11 00:00:00 |2024-10-26 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botc

[Bug ada/82529] Missing warning on with_clause for predefined unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82529 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ada/83188] A class-wide type is considered different than itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83188 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2023-05-11 00:00:00 |2024-10-26 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botc

[Bug ada/84320] Program_Error exp_util.adb:4352 explicit raise related to lock-free protected type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84320 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2018-02-12 00:00:00 |2024-10-26 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botc

[Bug ada/84198] Illegal program accepted, storing an anonymous access-to-subprogram value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84198 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug ada/81919] type derived from instantiation of Ada.Iterator_Interfaces wrongly rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81919 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug ada/83310] Compiler crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83310 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ada/66162] segfault on code using controlled types in -gnatc mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66162 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Status|NEW

[Bug ada/82637] Compiler crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82637 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0 Resolution|---

[Bug ada/81328] error messages not in expected order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81328 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|REOPENED

[Bug ada/79445] Address clause on named number gives Assert_Failure in the compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79445 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Status|NEW

[Bug ada/77793] ICE on "&" operator from Ada.Containers.Vectors with expression functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77793 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Resolution|---

[Bug ada/72740] gnat.dg/specs/access[12].ads ICE when compiling with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72740 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug ada/78175] segfault/assertion failure on package instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78175 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-11-03 00:00:00 |2024-10-26 Keywords|

[Bug ada/68179] Default_Component_Value aspect wrongly ignored on derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68179 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-11-03 00:00:00 |2024-10-26 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botc

[Bug ada/69926] compiler crash on invalid Range attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69926 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-02-28 00:00:00 |2024-10-26 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botc

[Bug ada/70015] missing or additional call to finalizer depending on scope hierarchy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70015 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazo

[Bug other/116613] RFE: support outputting diagnostics in *multiple* formats

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613 --- Comment #34 from Kamil Dudka --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #33) > Note that the "2.2-prerelease" stuff does almost nothing at this stage and > is experimental; you should probably leave "version" unset so that it uses > the def

[Bug ada/68171] Default value in record for component with predicate causes bug box

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68171 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ada/66608] gnat 5.1 fails with compilation abandoned, minimal testcase included

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66608 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ada/62193] some Ada time functions fail on the MinGW 32-bit platform .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62193 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|There is a bug in the Ada |some Ada time functions

[Bug c/117145] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.cc:355 at -O1 and above with vector_size and VLA in struct argument since r14-1143-g42d1612eb5c3b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117145 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59404|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ada/62122] GNAT RM: flaw in example of @node Attribute Unrestricted_Access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62122 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

  1   2   3   >