https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117197
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117195
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Note this tree code (and optab) is useful only for reductions since it is left
unspecified which of the 2x number of input lanes are accumulated to which
output lane (even accumulating _all_ input lanes to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117185
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #4)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > > I would suggest to change reload_in_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117198
--- Comment #2 from hanwei (K) ---
However, if only the weak attribute is declared, warning of redundant
redeclaration is generated regardless of the order, and the
link:https://godbolt.org/z/e5aY7zYMh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117198
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
alias changes the name underneath and is not redundant .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-18
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59379|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59379
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59379&action=edit
Reduced testcase
`-O3 -flto -shared -fPIC -march=znver2` reproduces it with this testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
```
/home/apinski/upstream-gcc/bin/gcc -O3 -shared -fPIC -Wl,--whole-archive
mceliece6688128f.i -Wl,--no-whole-archive -flto=auto -mtls-dialect=gnu2
-march=znver2 -fno-semantic-interposition
```
Is enough.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
;; MEM [(void *)&reversal] = *.LC1;
(insn 35 34 36 (set (reg:DI 667)
(symbol_ref/f:DI ("*.LC11") [flags 0x2] ))
"/var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/libgcrypt-1.11.0-r1/work/libgcrypt-1.11.0/cipher/mceliece
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
The function which seems to go wrong is butterflies_tr .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117197
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Also looked like it worked with r15-4403-ge020116db05635 unless I am doing
> something wrong. I had to remove the -lgpg-error library from the link
> commend tho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117200
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117200
Bug ID: 117200
Summary: [15 Regression] wrong code with vector compare / mask
/ shift at -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also looked like it worked with r15-4403-ge020116db05635 unless I am doing
something wrong. I had to remove the -lgpg-error library from the link commend
though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Worked with r15-4331-g8c56d697b35d3d .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
'x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-15 -O3 -shared -fPIC libgcrypt_la-visibility.i
libgcrypt_la-misc.i libgcrypt_la-global.i libgcrypt_la-sexp.i
libgcrypt_la-hwfeatures.i libgcrypt_la-stdmem.i libgcrypt_la-secmem.i
libgcry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I have not seen an undefined local symbol in a long time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
Bug ID: 117199
Summary: [15 regression] libgcrypt-1.11.0 fails to link
(warning: relocation against `.LC11' in read-only
section `.text')
Product: gcc
Version: 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115879
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||6.1.0
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115879
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59376
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59376&action=edit
Reduced c++ testcase
` -O -fnon-call-exceptions`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115879
--- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 59375
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59375&action=edit
testcase using memcpy
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O -fharden-control-flow-redundancy
-fnon-call-exceptions testc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115879
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 59374
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59374&action=edit
testcase using memset
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O -finstrument-functions -fnon-call-exceptions
testcase2.c
te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117198
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117198
Bug ID: 117198
Summary: Why are there differences using -Wredundant-decls, is
bug or not?
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115242
Alisa Sireneva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me at purplesyringa dot moe
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #403 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #402)
> I've opened PR 117182 for a wrong fldi0/1 issue. Looks target + RA issue.
>
> FYI, with the patches in PR 116932, PR 117111 and PR 117182 on top of
> devel/sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117182
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
Thanks! I've added the patch to the stash
https://github.com/olegendo/gcc/tree/devel/sh-lra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117197
Bug ID: 117197
Summary: ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed with vector_size
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #14 from cuilili ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12)
> Created attachment 59373 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> Patch in testing.
Sorry, I made a mistake here, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117196
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The documentation for GCC's no_sanitize_address attribute is at least clear
that it does not disable it for hwasan:
"when compiling with the -fsanitize=address option."
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117196
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
"I believe this is a compiler bug, as there doesn't seem to be a
separate attribute to prevent instrumentation in this mode.
"
At least the above is not true.
`__attribute__((no_sanitize("hwaddress")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117196
Bug ID: 117196
Summary: Should no_sanitize_address turn off hwaddress too?
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116506
--- Comment #4 from Dan Klishch ---
SerenityOS's on-host tests seem to work fine with the patch attached here (this
was the original reproducer) and one from PR116914. Without the later, I hit
ICE similar to one outlined in the gimplify_var_or_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115879
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #2)
> _BitInt() is not needed, this can be also triggered at least by memset() and
> memcpy() with the memory operand having negative offset to address to a
> variable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117195
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117195
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The tree code represents the following obtab:
@cindex @code{widen_ssum@var{m}3} instruction pattern
@cindex @code{widen_usum@var{m}3} instruction pattern
@item @samp{widen_ssum@var{m}3}
@itemx @samp{widen_us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117195
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117195
Bug ID: 117195
Summary: Invalid IR after vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104826
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104827
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117194
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
;; vect_iftmp.29_100 = .BIT_ANDN ({ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 }, _68);
(insn 33 32 34 (set (reg:V8QI 128)
(mem/u/c:V8QI (symbol_ref/u:DI ("*.LC2") [flags 0x2]) [0 S8 A64])) -1
(expr_list:REG_EQUA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117194
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117194
Bug ID: 117194
Summary: [15 Regression] Wrong code on highway-1.2.0
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585
Bug 20585 depends on bug 105361, which changed state.
Bug 105361 Summary: Incorrect end-of-file condition for derived-type I/O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
>
> > The andn is swapped.
> Indeed:
>
> +(define_expand "andn3"
> + [(set (match_operand:MMXMODEI 0 "register_oper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> Yes but in this case the mask will 0 forcing it all to 0 . But the mask is
> swapping around to -1 for some reason.
Also if you are worried about that, you can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> The andn is swapped.
Indeed:
+(define_expand "andn3"
+ [(set (match_operand:MMXMODEI 0 "register_operand")
+(and:MMXMODEI
+ (not:MMXMODEI (matc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> > before is before r15-4397-g70f59d2a1c51bd
> > - movq16(%rsp), %xmm2
> > + movq16(%rsp), %xmm1
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Another option would be to revert r15-4402 and r15-4377 and reapply once this
fix is tested and approved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> before is before r15-4397-g70f59d2a1c51bd
> - movq16(%rsp), %xmm2
> + movq16(%rsp), %xmm1
Isn't this reading from uninitialized stack slot?
m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 59372
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59372&action=edit
gcc15-pr117190.patch
Untested fix.
As the ICE shows, I think we need to use bitsize_int instead of size_int (o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6604a05fa27bc21c3409e767552daca3fcf43964
commit r15-4419-g6604a05fa27bc21c3409e767552daca3fcf43964
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
before is before r15-4397-g70f59d2a1c51bd
--- before.s2024-10-17 20:17:06.172435278 +
+++ after.s 2024-10-17 20:15:24.703424849 +
@@ -15,21 +15,21 @@ main:
movlc(%rip), %eax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
--- Comment #4 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] wrong code |[15 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183
Bug 56183 depends on bug 116779, which changed state.
Bug 116779 Summary: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at
cfgrtl.cc:1303
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116779
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117191
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
*** Bug 116779 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934
Bug 113934 depends on bug 116779, which changed state.
Bug 116779 Summary: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at
cfgrtl.cc:1303
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116779
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116779
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
--- Comment #15 from andi at firstfloor dot org ---
An upper limit has the problem that very large switches may never get
the bitmasks or the jump clusters. Would be good to have a heuristic
that still works for them.
Bit clustering always wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
--- Comment #14 from andi at firstfloor dot org ---
On 2024-10-17 05:59, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
>
> --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de de> ---
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, phee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117188
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117193
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117193
Bug ID: 117193
Summary: Missing (a < b) < (b < a) transformation at gimple
level
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117188
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117183
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am thinking r15-4397-g70f59d2a1c51bd .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|wrong code at -O3 with |[15 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Bug ID: 117192
Summary: wrong code at -O3 with "-fno-unswitch-loops" on
x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116725
Antoni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59199|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117191
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71386491ff601fba3566376d90dfdc0530df2680
commit r15-4418-g71386491ff601fba3566376d90dfdc0530df2680
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934
Bug 113934 depends on bug 117189, which changed state.
Bug 117189 Summary: [avr][lra] DSE removing instruction that is not dead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117189
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117191
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117189
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117186
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|9.5.0 |
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117191
Bug ID: 117191
Summary: [avr][dse2][lra] wrong dead store elimination
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuite-fail, wrong-code
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117186
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
x86_64 works on this combine:
```
Trying 10, 8 -> 11:
10: r106:QI=flags:CCGC>0
REG_DEAD flags:CCGC
8: r104:QI=flags:CCGC<0
11: flags:CC=cmp(r104:QI,r106:QI)
REG_DEAD r106:QI
REG_D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117186
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117054
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117054
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c468a0051a5ff3f91498d955edb8f684d27afe0d
commit r14-10801-gc468a0051a5ff3f91498d955edb8f684d27afe0d
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117186
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|aarch64 wrong code for (a < |[12/13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117189
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
For example, run the following command in $builddir/gcc (using AVRtest):
$ make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=atmega128-sim
--tool_opts='-mlra' avr-torture.exp=pr117189.c"
[...]
Target is avr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77608
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #10 from Siddhe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115854
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.3|13.4
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117094
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116549
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
In case the minimal example is too mangled original code looks this way:
-
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/font.h#n74
-
https://git.kernel.org/pub/
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
