https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116823
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a reduced testcase for fold-const.cc case:
```
struct s2
{
int i;
s2(const int &a) : i (a) {}
};
int h(s2 b);
int g(int l, int r)
{
return h(l > r ? l : r);
}
```
Which shows up since r6-68
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116076
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
While it might be interesting to investigate why making unaligned loads and
stores costed faster than aligned ones the fix will be not restoring
behavior to before the change.
Given it's with LTO and only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #42 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f9dfe8dea31bf5c56aa7798a0905707faf9e7ec4
commit r15-3818-gf9dfe8dea31bf5c56aa7798a0905707faf9e7ec4
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116823
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
And yes this shows up in GCC itself.
>From fold-const.cc:
```
if (lr_bitpos.2401_412 < rr_bitpos.2402_413)
goto ; [INV]
else
goto ; [INV]
:
:
# iftmp.2400_515 = PHI <&lr_bitpos(196), &r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #313 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #312)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #298)
> > Here is one ICE I have run into while building webkit2gtk with the latest
> > patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116819
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note this testcase might go latent if we fix PR 116821, PR 116823 and PR
116824.
If those get fixed beforehand, then `-fdisable-tree-phiprop1
-fdisable-tree-phiprop2` will be needed to reproduce the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116821
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I will get to this tomorrow as the other 2 issues are easier and don't
need a little more thought about what is "cheaply".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116825
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116825
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This all depends on the context of the tbl and uzp1.
If this was inside a loop, then the load might/will be hoisted and GCC code
generation of one TBL vs 2 uzp1 might be better.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116825
Bug ID: 116825
Summary: aarch64: unnecessary vector perm combination
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104957
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5ee372b012594830f6d5f7f4b7e01bae810b1da
commit r15-3816-gf5ee372b012594830f6d5f7f4b7e01bae810b1da
Author: Prathamesh Kulkar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116824
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116824
Bug ID: 116824
Summary: phiprop gets confused with vop phi
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116823
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a testcase for a well defined case:
```
void f(int *);
int g(int i, struct f *ff)
{
const int t = 10;
const int *a;
{
int b;
f(&b);
if (t < i)
a = &t;
else
a = &i;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #312 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #298)
> Here is one ICE I have run into while building webkit2gtk with the latest
> patches on top of an older GCC snapshot:
Although not tested well,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #311 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Created attachment 59185
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59185&action=edit
a reduced test case for c#298
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116805
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116823
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I have a simple patch which allows for this.
> Basically we need to ignore clobbers in 2 places.
Even though clobbers have a vdef, they have no effect on aliasi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99274
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at richy dot net
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 116804, which changed state.
Bug 116804 Summary: module order dependency with chrono and vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116804
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116804
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116823
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116823
Bug ID: 116823
Summary: phiprop should ignore clobbers
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116822
Bug ID: 116822
Summary: [15 regression] RISC-V: ICE in compute_nregs_for_mode,
at config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116820
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116821
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
We do handle:
```
struct f
{
int i;
};
int g(int i, int c, struct f *ff)
{
int *t;
if (c)
t = &i;
else
t = &ff->i;
return *t;
}
```
(from PR 21463), just because we have an ADDR_EXPR there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116821
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116821
Bug ID: 116821
Summary: phiprop could be improved to handle PHI<&a, ssa_name>
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116819
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116819
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note this code is undefined:
prephitmp_52 = _44 ? _17 : _16(D);
This is due to lifetime of the temp being bound for the call to second call of
c ends after the variable initialization and NOT extended aft
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116819
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99571
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106358
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116820
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I tried to reproduce it on aarch64 but it works there even with all extra
possible options:
That is I tried: `-O1 -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model -march=armv9-a+sve
--param aarch64-autovec-preference=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116820
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116754
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4fc6d2aa809d0c4b5b1825af17bed4a601a3d7f
commit r14-10707-gf4fc6d2aa809d0c4b5b1825af17bed4a601a3d7f
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116798
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116798
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4700ad1c78ccd7767f846802fca148b2ea9a1852
commit r15-3812-g4700ad1c78ccd7767f846802fca148b2ea9a1852
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116529
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d88724c2d804e126d63aed77fa8c2c333e99396
commit r14-10708-g4d88724c2d804e126d63aed77fa8c2c333e99396
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116777
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74f67ba3dcfd09209bed6265772d5fd9007ea605
commit r14-10706-g74f67ba3dcfd09209bed6265772d5fd9007ea605
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81967
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74f67ba3dcfd09209bed6265772d5fd9007ea605
commit r14-10706-g74f67ba3dcfd09209bed6265772d5fd9007ea605
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108619
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1be3e4e43839d313364ffa99012ada41b4fae8da
commit r14-10705-g1be3e4e43839d313364ffa99012ada41b4fae8da
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116815
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116789
--- Comment #10 from Slobodkins, Arkadijs ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> .
That's go(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> > The important part is the type alias ali1.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116820
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] RISC-V: ICE |[15 regression] RISC-V: ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116686
--- Comment #5 from Edwin Lu ---
Created attachment 59183
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59183&action=edit
tree output
Here's the tree output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116686
--- Comment #4 from Edwin Lu ---
Created attachment 59182
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59182&action=edit
verbose output
Here's the verbose output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116820
Bug ID: 116820
Summary: [15 regression] RISC-V: ICE verify_ssa failed for
c-c++-common/torture/pr101636.c
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116798
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116798
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-23
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116076
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116819
Bug ID: 116819
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116799
--- Comment #5 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
It looks like we are increasing pat once too often, i.e., the loop body
while (pat[0] == '*' && pat < pat_end - 1)
pat++;
is executed twice instead of only once. Prior loop2, IL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116761
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116760
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-23
Assignee|unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113954
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Claudiu Zissulescu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffd861c808f307c865659b556dd5a8c922bd6a51
commit r15-3798-gffd861c808f307c865659b556dd5a8c922bd6a51
Author: Claudiu Zissulescu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116760
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116817
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
Waiting for regression testing to finish and will submit.
The condition used before to check for loop invariant is !internal_def.
This of course fails when it's a reduction, which is what happened here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116571
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Stubbs ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #4)
> > The GCN target FAILs that I originally had reported here:
> >
> > > [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.dg/vect/slp-11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111926
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116818
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116740
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603
Bug 101603 depends on bug 109790, which changed state.
Bug 109790 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE while trying to mangle
operators and their ptmf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109790
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109790
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116818
Bug ID: 116818
Summary: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/strided_load_5.c fails since
gcc-15-3735-g664e0ce580a8
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100632
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|15.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109790
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a030fcad4f9f490a08db0a4cad4c22635a0585c1
commit r15-3797-ga030fcad4f9f490a08db0a4cad4c22635a0585c1
Author: Simon Martin
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100632
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a030fcad4f9f490a08db0a4cad4c22635a0585c1
commit r15-3797-ga030fcad4f9f490a08db0a4cad4c22635a0585c1
Author: Simon Martin
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116722
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116722
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7bf5e53887a467b8c5c8439e5aae3ad4e11e62e
commit r15-3796-gd7bf5e53887a467b8c5c8439e5aae3ad4e11e62e
Author: Simon Martin
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116571
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #4)
> The GCN target FAILs that I originally had reported here:
>
> > [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.dg/vect/slp-11a.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
> > "vectorizing stmt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116817
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
I see,
I haven't checked that the value being compared is actually loop invariant.
In this case it's a reduction value and it can't be lifted out of the loop.
Basically in GCC 14 and earlier this was a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116571
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
The GCN target FAILs that I originally had reported here:
> [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.dg/vect/slp-11a.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
> "vectorizing stmts using SLP" [-0-]{+1+}
> [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 116661, which changed state.
Bug 116661 Summary: Undefined behavior when compiling interop-1.f90 gomp test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116661
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116661
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115873
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #310 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Hmm, I just realized I performed the tests without enabling LRA by default. I
just noticed that because with LRA enabled, Ada actually fails with:
/<>/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/<>/build/./gcc/
-B/usr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116810
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c04f175de4f3985d783511662375d52f2cf4ad8
commit r15-3794-g2c04f175de4f3985d783511662375d52f2cf4ad8
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116810
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 116810, which changed state.
Bug 116810 Summary: [15 Regression] tree-vect-slp.cc:3721:18: runtime error:
insufficient space for an object of type 'bool'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116810
Wha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116817
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116796
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e97c75d668bacd8a2e901b819e00156f6e9f4c6c
commit r15-3793-ge97c75d668bacd8a2e901b819e00156f6e9f4c6c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116796
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116812
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116817
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #41 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 59181
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59181&action=edit
unrtested patch sorting threadable paths
The performance improvement with this patch is:
** mainline
Time v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116817
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116812
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09892448ebd8c396a26b2c09ba71f1e5a8dc42d7
commit r15-3792-g09892448ebd8c396a26b2c09ba71f1e5a8dc42d7
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116791
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116817
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Bisect landed on r15-3768-g4150bcd205ebb6 "middle-end: lower COND_EXPR into
gimple form in vect_recog_bool_pattern"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #40 from Aldy Hernandez ---
For the record, I still think adjust_paths_after_duplication() isn't giving us
much for all the hassle it's causing.
I compared the number of threaded paths with and without it and the difference
is:
* m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116813
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #0)
> Note that the std::vector -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
> wiring is new in trunk.
Yes, since r15-1689-g8fd84bc009b307
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #39 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I'm going to step away from this PR for a few weeks so I'll do a brain dump on
where I am, just in case someone wants to poke at it some more.
This problem in adjust_paths_after_duplication() boils down t
sanitizer
--disable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-libgomp
--disable-libquadmath --disable-libvtv CFLAGS='-O1 -g0' CXXFLAGS='-O1 -g0'
LDFLAGS='-O1 -g0'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20240923 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116795
Li Pan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #10 from Li Pan ---
Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116309
--- Comment #1 from Filip Kastl ---
This ICE no longer occurs. If no one objects, I'll close this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116791
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:723f7b6db841c1a101a2f5b3b6273d8449dae39e
commit r15-3791-g723f7b6db841c1a101a2f5b3b6273d8449dae39e
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115966
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115966
--- Comment #5 from Filip Kastl ---
This miscompilation no longer happens. If no one objects, I'll close this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116669
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
Last rec
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
