https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116601
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #30 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 4 Sep 2024, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
>
> --- Comment #29 from Andrew Macleod ---
> Huh. Do we calculate *all* paths ahead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116608
Bug ID: 116608
Summary: i386/xorsign.c, i386/vect-double-2.c fail with
-march=x86-64-v2(-msse4).
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116607
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-05
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116607
Bug ID: 116607
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected tree_list, have integer_cst
in has_active_contract_condition, at
cp/contracts.cc:1505 with no_sanitize attribute and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116600
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
>From the dump file:
```
Inconsistent CFI state!
SHOULD have:
.cfi_def_cfa 31, 32
.cfi_offset 29, -32
.cfi_offset 30, -24
DO have:
.cfi_def_cfa 31, 32
.cfi_offset 19,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116506
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116606
Bug ID: 116606
Summary: unavailable attribute on virtual function causes error
on object construction
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116605
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116605
Bug ID: 116605
Summary: __builtin_object_size and
__builtin_dynamic_object_size in mode 1 fall back to
mode 0 for rows of multidimensional arrays
Product: gcc
Ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116598
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97624
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
C++20 produces:
$ xg++ -c 97624.C -Wall -W -pedantic -std=c++20
97624.C: In function ‘void bar(Tagged&& ...)’:
97624.C:10:9: warning: ISO C++ does not allow C99 designated initializers
[-Wpedantic]
10 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116488
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 116579 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116579
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116604
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116604
Bug ID: 116604
Summary: [15 regression] regressions on aarch64 since
r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So the m68k bootstrap with LRA enabled blows up. It looks like the stage1
compiler is mis-compiling the stage2 compiler. The result is a metric ton of
errors building the stage2 libgcc.
A .o bisection la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116601
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] during |[12/13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116601
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59051
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59051&action=edit
Cleaned up testcase
`-O1 -fnon-call-exceptions`
This cleaned up testcase fails since GCC 7 even.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116381
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.0|14.3
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113663
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec1bcd176339d43fd1ab3211f65915824ba1f26b
commit r14-10639-gec1bcd176339d43fd1ab3211f65915824ba1f26b
Author: Lennox Shou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116549
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee37d750262579a81799c5b56fe1ab936a840120
commit r14-10638-gee37d750262579a81799c5b56fe1ab936a840120
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116381
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b8a67b0cfc072f027eab24fb72d48d10cc890b4
commit r14-10636-g3b8a67b0cfc072f027eab24fb72d48d10cc890b4
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116601
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The fix which I am testing:
```
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.cc
index 44711018e0e..3cd385f476b 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.cc
@@ -4325,8 +4325,15 @@ pass_fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116603
Bug ID: 116603
Summary: SARIF schema URL gives 404 not found
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: SARIF
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116602
Bug ID: 116602
Summary: RFE: capture GCC backtraces in SARIF output for ICEs
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: SARIF
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100273
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch that fixes the ICE:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc
index 6692ac7ef4c..ee41d66e6d2 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116601
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The bug is in optimize_memcpy or maybe after the call to optimize_memcpy. It
has been a latent issue since r7-5443-g7b45d0dfeb5f85 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116601
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107522
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116601
Bug ID: 116601
Summary: [15 Regression] during GIMPLE pass: fab ICE:
verify_gimple failed: statement marked for throw, but
doesn't with -O -fnon-call-exceptions
Product: gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80943
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116492
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112108
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Andrew Carlotti
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9899be7d5380c732b56ba155d4a9e192a2c483b1
commit r14-10635-g9899be7d5380c732b56ba155d4a9e192a2c483b1
Author: Andrew Carlo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112108
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Andrew Carlotti
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a3a0d4a5e32e9b914b5c5cc283ee485adc6cd11
commit r14-10633-g0a3a0d4a5e32e9b914b5c5cc283ee485adc6cd11
Author: Andrew Carlo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112108
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Andrew Carlotti
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8485606056ed3ca0d0acf6e0d943975e9173e7cd
commit r14-10634-g8485606056ed3ca0d0acf6e0d943975e9173e7cd
Author: Andrew Carlo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116600
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116477
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116600
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116600
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am 99% sure this is related to the asm goto.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116600
Bug ID: 116600
Summary: internal compiler error: in maybe_record_trace_start,
at dwarf2cfi.cc:2584
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113108
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Fixed in 15. Planning backport to 14.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3506
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116599
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115616
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
See Also|https://gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113108
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c755c7a32590e2eef5a8b062b9756c1513910246
commit r15-3455-gc755c7a32590e2eef5a8b062b9756c1513910246
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112288
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116599
Bug ID: 116599
Summary: volatile generates unexpected RMW on global
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97477
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #230 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #229)
> Will try other languages now.
Building with Fortran, Objective-C and Objective-C++ enabled works fine.
Will test D and M2 now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113798
corentinjabot at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||corentinjabot at gmail d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #29 from Andrew Macleod ---
Huh. Do we calculate *all* paths ahead of time?
I tried running valgrind, which died, but up to that point it showed 77% of the
time spend in the body of
back_jt_path_registry::adjust_paths_after_duplica
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116598
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116598
Bug ID: 116598
Summary: gcc.dg/c23-attr-reproducible-1.c and
gcc.dg/c23-attr-unsequenced-1.c ICEs on aarch64 due to
searching for attributes
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54140
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46457
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81665
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
This patch for bug 46457 looks kind of related:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/662214.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97477
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eyalroz1 at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106973
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #10 from Arsen Ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83324
--- Comment #34 from Eric Gallager ---
Yeah I think GCC should support the __attribute__ style syntax for this
attribute, too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108620
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Arsen Arsenovic :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:858918ef4233c837ab85819ad159bf452df3a7fb
commit r15-3454-g858918ef4233c837ab85819ad159bf452df3a7fb
Author: Arsen ArsenoviÄ
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106973
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Arsen Arsenovic :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b7ad3f4b2455072f42e7884b93fd96ebb920bc8
commit r15-3453-g7b7ad3f4b2455072f42e7884b93fd96ebb920bc8
Author: Arsen ArsenoviÄ
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114592
Magne Oestlyngen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mskybert+gccbugs at gmail dot
com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116567
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE when using lamdba as|[14/15 Regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116361
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0562522e1290da08bc5a89182b9ae80c3cc9d1db
commit r14-10630-g0562522e1290da08bc5a89182b9ae80c3cc9d1db
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116361
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66eb7b752ab61c02348d6af10945af3ff92b6d77
commit r14-10629-g66eb7b752ab61c02348d6af10945af3ff92b6d77
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116594
Cooper Qu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cooper.qu at linux dot
alibaba.com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116592
Jin Ma changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jinma at linux dot alibaba.com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116592
Cooper Qu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cooper.qu at linux dot
alibaba.com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116597
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rearnsha at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116597
Bug ID: 116597
Summary: [arm] indirect tailcalls with incomplete prototypes
generate wrong code when using PACM
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116587
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For the :DI !TARGET_64BIT, perhaps *insvdi_lowpart_1, *adddi3_doubleword_zext,
*adddi3_doubleword_concat, *adddi3_doubleword_concat_zext
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116587
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For the m vs. o, there are quite a few (grepped just for the :TI cases because
:DI doesn't necessarily mean double-word):
grep 'match_operand:TI . ([^)]*).*m' tmp-mddump.md
(set (match_operand:TI 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60797
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9be3113a9365e8380397abb23abc71f049cf4f1
commit r15-3446-gb9be3113a9365e8380397abb23abc71f049cf4f1
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104957
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9be3113a9365e8380397abb23abc71f049cf4f1
commit r15-3446-gb9be3113a9365e8380397abb23abc71f049cf4f1
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116587
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> E.g. *adddi3_doubleword, *adddi3_doubleword_zext (that one even has &r,rm,r),
> ...
This one is not the problematic one since "m" is with word-mode operand. But
th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116587
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> But in that case, why doesn't LRA consider simply forcing the complex memory
> address into a single register and with that needing one less register?
> &r,ro,r or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104957
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a89321c890b96c583671b73fc802e87545e4a2b1
commit r15-3445-ga89321c890b96c583671b73fc802e87545e4a2b1
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116587
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
But in that case, why doesn't LRA consider simply forcing the complex memory
address into a single register and with that needing one less register?
&r,ro,r or &r,r,ro is something that happens in various pl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116587
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: in |[14/15 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116587
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105018
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2022-07-22 00:00:00 |2024-9-4
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104957
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97102
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104957
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116588
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116582
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> > Just for completeness the codegen for parest sparse matrix multiply is:
> >
> > 0.31 │320: kmovb %k1,%k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116587
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #28 from Richard Biener ---
Just to clarify what the "handcuffs" in the backwards threader do and what
they don't. There is no limit on the number of cond/switch stmts (thus
basic-blocks) we consider as the exit of paths, but for ea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116596
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116596
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 59047
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59047&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 slp-11a.c.180t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116596
Bug ID: 116596
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/slp-11a.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
93 matches
Mail list logo
