https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #209 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
OK, I can confirm that the Ada problem is a regression due to the LRA switch.
Not sure about the Go problem yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116547
Bug ID: 116547
Summary: FTBFS on x86_64-unknown-freebsd11 due to implicit
declaration of 'alloca'
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116546
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116546
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this is a dup ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116546
Bug ID: 116546
Summary: Missed optimization of redundant comparison
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116098
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59029
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59029&action=edit
Simplified C++ testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109095
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103811
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115852
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114911
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-30
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116544
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|12.3.0 |
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1765a5737f011bfd992c6ab78018d6e9042f074
commit r15-3326-gb1765a5737f011bfd992c6ab78018d6e9042f074
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116544
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95298
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86960
--- Comment #19 from Marek Polacek ---
The ICE was fixed by r15-3195. I'm not sure it's valid code so this may be
fixed now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608
Bug 65608 depends on bug 115616, which changed state.
Bug 115616 Summary: c++20: Friend-injecting a template function causes an ICE
if you inject after trying to instantiate that function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115616
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115616
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115616
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffd56dcc11e32033a1f3a964af584dc32321a125
commit r15-3325-gffd56dcc11e32033a1f3a964af584dc32321a125
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98454
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116535
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Namely, the following seems to be problematic if the code is run concurrently.
The FORK part is actually quite old r207515 (Feb 2014) as is the following code
with flag_wpa, which was added in r217489 (No
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116529
--- Comment #5 from Halalaluyafail3 ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> Do you have an actual use case for this, or are you just reporting it
> because there's divergence between implementations?
>
> I raised it with the standar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66944
--- Comment #10 from Silver Zachara ---
The TLS wrapper isn't correctly implemented, still reproducible on v14.2.1.
Clang also had a lot of problems with the TLS wrapper but they fixed
everything. +1 for fixing this; it has existed for too long.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116535
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
I have problems reproducing it fully reliably – and my impression is that a
global variable is not atomically set.
The difference between -flto=1 and -flto=2 with -flto-partition=max is rather
small. In eit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116545
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116239
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116545
Bug ID: 116545
Summary: Support old style statement attributes
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80943
Artyom Kolpakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ddvamp007 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116544
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Forgot to add - found via fuzzer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116544
Bug ID: 116544
Summary: [15] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115523
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
As it appears, the test case gives resonable code now; but only for trunk.
On v14, the code is still bloat.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116239
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
We never call duplicate_decls -> validate_constexpr_redeclaration because
decls_match doesn't look at decl-specifiers like constexpr/consteval.
for (ovl_iterator iter (binding); iter; ++iter)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116530
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116098
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59028
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59028&action=edit
semi-cleaned up testcase
For this testcase you need to compile with -DBROKEN=1 to see the broken code.
It bec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98454
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b222122d4e93de2238041a01b1886c7dfd9944da
commit r15-3323-gb222122d4e93de2238041a01b1886c7dfd9944da
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116530
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5999dd8a610acbaff9dfb6bdeb67f33380336132
commit r14-10621-g5999dd8a610acbaff9dfb6bdeb67f33380336132
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116543
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116543
Bug ID: 116543
Summary: [PDT] pdt_26.f03 is invalid
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116326
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #8)
> (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #7)
> > What about the following line in reload1.h:
> >
> > // Used during roload -> LRA transition because EL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116326
--- Comment #8 from Richard Sandiford ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #7)
> What about the following line in reload1.h:
>
> // Used during roload -> LRA transition because ELIMINABLE_REGS may depend
> // on command line options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116326
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #6)
> I don't think we should make any permanent changes to support this kind of
> manipulation, since it's only needed during the transition.
What about the fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116326
--- Comment #6 from Richard Sandiford ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #5)
> > But either way, I think we should start with the assumption that the entry
> > should be removed and make everything else work to that. Unfortunately t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116541
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116239
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116539
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-30
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104707
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97304
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104707
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3fb90724cec7e76b60fb910fa98b4ebec9912a31
commit r15-3321-g3fb90724cec7e76b60fb910fa98b4ebec9912a31
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97304
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3fb90724cec7e76b60fb910fa98b4ebec9912a31
commit r15-3321-g3fb90724cec7e76b60fb910fa98b4ebec9912a31
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116537
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116537
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d2cbe2bbedbdbc609683f7fb491b3e02add15b3
commit r15-3320-g4d2cbe2bbedbdbc609683f7fb491b3e02add15b3
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116326
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #4)
> (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #3)
> > It was due to problems with multi-reg frame-pointer. (AFAIR, using a
> > hard-frame-poiner besides fram
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116181
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87ce8172f0bf649a8a79ef7481fb3bf35882083f
commit r15-3318-g87ce8172f0bf649a8a79ef7481fb3bf35882083f
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116542
Bug ID: 116542
Summary: [avr] Missed post increment optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116326
--- Comment #4 from Richard Sandiford ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #3)
> It was due to problems with multi-reg frame-pointer. (AFAIR, using a
> hard-frame-poiner besides frame-poiner didn't resolve the issues.)
>
> My problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116326
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #2)
> This is caused by the final entry in ELIMINABLE_REGS:
>
> { FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM + 1, STACK_POINTER_REGNUM + 1 }
>
> I guess this was added to work ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116140
--- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan ---
I think all except the first patch in the series (C++ patch) have been approved
now, so the rest are waiting on review for that:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/661559.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116219
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112687
--- Comment #3 from Filip Kastl ---
I just revisited this problem and thought of another solution: We could just
tell (early) vrp to not throw out the default case when it finds that it never
gets executed. Instead, vrp could just make sure the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116525
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think the scripts allow tests to be omitted entirely from ChangeLog entries,
which Andrew is suggesting could be the cause here.
But I don't think that's the case. If I omit the description for a non-te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116326
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116529
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Do you have an actual use case for this, or are you just reporting it because
there's divergence between implementations?
I raised it with the standards committee and everybody agrees that we should
not s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116541
Bug ID: 116541
Summary: [14/15 Regression] Inefficient missing use of reg+reg
addressing modes
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116540
Bug ID: 116540
Summary: sh ignores asm operand modifier %c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116539
Bug ID: 116539
Summary: internal compiler error: in sh_print_operand, at
config/sh/sh.cc:1360
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527
--- Comment #18 from Sunil Dora ---
Thank you, Sam.
I have addressed the feedback and submitted the revised V2 patch. You can
review it at the following link:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/661842.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110345
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b748e2eed0df9e691a530a0b8faea9f673bdf2b5
commit r15-3315-gb748e2eed0df9e691a530a0b8faea9f673bdf2b5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
68 matches
Mail list logo
