https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115763
--- Comment #1 from Li Pan ---
Thanks for reporting this, I can reproduce from today's upstream by the below
command:
../__RV64/bin/riscv64-unknown-elf-gcc pr115763.c -mabi=lp64d
-march=rv64gcv_zfh_zvfhmin -O3 -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115763
Bug ID: 115763
Summary: RISC-V: Use wrong SEW for vfmv.v.f when -march only
has zvfhmin
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115761
--- Comment #5 from Antony Searle ---
> You can get the same size back with `-gdwarf-4` option even.
Substituting -gdwarf-4 for -g only changes the file size by 1 kb of 1.3 Gb
Antony-Air:bug $ ls -l bug.o*
-rw-r--r-- 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115761
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> "f int]::]::]:: >"
>
>
> vs
>
> "f(int):: >(f(int)::)::
> >(f(int)::
> >(f(int)::)::):: >"
> For the DW_AT_name
>
> Clang just uses "f" or "f<(lambda at bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115761
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115761
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |debug
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115750
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 58576
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58576&action=edit
emacs patch to adjust lisp alignment on hppa
Full build in progress. We will have to see if ignoring 14-b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115762
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102061
--- Comment #3 from Peter Damianov ---
diff --git a/gcc/langhooks.cc b/gcc/langhooks.cc
index 61f2b676256..89a89b74535 100644
--- a/gcc/langhooks.cc
+++ b/gcc/langhooks.cc
@@ -223,6 +223,8 @@ lhd_get_alias_set (tree ARG_UNUSED (t))
const char *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115761
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
You know what the difference in gcc 11 vs GCC 12 is actually dwarf 4 vs dwarf
5.
GCC now outputs a lot more debugging information in GCC 12 vs before.
You can get the same size back with `-gdwarf-4` option
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115762
Bug ID: 115762
Summary: [14 Regression] ASAN FPE on unknown address check
missing
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115761
Bug ID: 115761
Summary: Huge .o and compile times related to lambda debug
strings
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Changqing.Li at windriver dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115679
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115735
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
Not trying to bikeshed it though, I'd be fine with us adding "definitely
terrible" functions first.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115679
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> > With -Og it's usually that the always-inline function is called indirectly -
> > that's an unsupported case.
> We can probably add CIF code for functions that we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115735
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #4)
> [...]
... another issue is how we handle extensions (non-standard functions; may
behave differently across impls), or where glibc might say something is safe as
an exte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115760
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115760
Bug ID: 115760
Summary: FPE on unknown address check missing
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
restore 26
ld s11,368(sp)
.cfi_restore 27
.L37:
ld s8,392(sp)
.cfi_restore 24
addisp,sp,464
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 0
jr ra
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size fwr, .-fwr
.ident "GCC: (g0b4fd672bf0) 15.0.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115753
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a float/longlong that fails for both aarch64 and x86_64 (it works on
i686 though):
```
void f(float*);
void
foo1 ()
{
long long t0 = __LONG_LONG_MAX__;
long long t1 = __LONG_LONG_MAX__ - 1;
flo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115758
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115466
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115753
--- Comment #6 from Hu Lin ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Note the correct way to have a testcase that is able to handle float16 is to
> do:
> /* { dg-add-options float16 } */
> /* { dg-require-effective-target float16 } */
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115355
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115758
Bug ID: 115758
Summary: Segmentation fault with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069
--- Comment #51 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca6eea0eb33de8b2e23e0bef3466575bb14ab63f
commit r12-10595-gca6eea0eb33de8b2e23e0bef3466575bb14ab63f
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115355
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13f0528c782c3732052973a5d340769af8182c8f
commit r12-10594-g13f0528c782c3732052973a5d340769af8182c8f
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069
--- Comment #50 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13f0528c782c3732052973a5d340769af8182c8f
commit r12-10594-g13f0528c782c3732052973a5d340769af8182c8f
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115355
--- Comment #24 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca6eea0eb33de8b2e23e0bef3466575bb14ab63f
commit r12-10595-gca6eea0eb33de8b2e23e0bef3466575bb14ab63f
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069
--- Comment #49 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bab38d9271ce3f26cb64b8cb712351eb3fedd559
commit r13-8886-gbab38d9271ce3f26cb64b8cb712351eb3fedd559
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069
--- Comment #48 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffdd377fc07cdc7b62669d354e23f30940eaaffe
commit r13-8885-gffdd377fc07cdc7b62669d354e23f30940eaaffe
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115355
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bab38d9271ce3f26cb64b8cb712351eb3fedd559
commit r13-8886-gbab38d9271ce3f26cb64b8cb712351eb3fedd559
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115355
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffdd377fc07cdc7b62669d354e23f30940eaaffe
commit r13-8885-gffdd377fc07cdc7b62669d354e23f30940eaaffe
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069
--- Comment #46 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e495e8e3fde11e430a77db6b477319ed0ae0b7c
commit r14-10371-g0e495e8e3fde11e430a77db6b477319ed0ae0b7c
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115355
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:052f78d010d224c7289f1cf6eec784ac4eeed351
commit r14-10372-g052f78d010d224c7289f1cf6eec784ac4eeed351
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069
--- Comment #46 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e495e8e3fde11e430a77db6b477319ed0ae0b7c
commit r14-10371-g0e495e8e3fde11e430a77db6b477319ed0ae0b7c
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115355
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e495e8e3fde11e430a77db6b477319ed0ae0b7c
commit r14-10371-g0e495e8e3fde11e430a77db6b477319ed0ae0b7c
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115753
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the correct way to have a testcase that is able to handle float16 is to
do:
/* { dg-add-options float16 } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target float16 } */
This will allow it to work on 32bit x86 and a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115753
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is one testcase that ICEs on aarch64 in the same way at `-O2
-frounding-math` since there is V4HF support there:
```
void f(_Float16*);
void
foo1 ()
{
int t0 = 3967;
int t1 = 3969;
int t2 = 3971;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115312
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:038d64f62271ddc62aa35d0a5dfd3843fdb9e6d7
commit r15-1803-g038d64f62271ddc62aa35d0a5dfd3843fdb9e6d7
Author: Lewis Hyatt
Date: Sat J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115753
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Hu Lin from comment #2)
> Created attachment 58572 [details]
> Untested fix.
>
> Confirmed, I need to check if TYPE_CODE is SSA_NAME before
> SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO.
I think you could make the te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115753
--- Comment #2 from Hu Lin ---
Created attachment 58572
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58572&action=edit
Untested fix.
Confirmed, I need to check if TYPE_CODE is SSA_NAME before SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115757
Bug ID: 115757
Summary: [modules] [[maybe_unused]] not honored in member
function of imported class template
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109812
--- Comment #24 from edison ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #23)
> (In reply to edison from comment #22)
> > for 607.cactuBSSN_s,if use preENV_GOMP_CPU_AFFINITY = 0-23 in CPU2017 .cfg,
> > all p-core(i9-13900k) usage will down to 15%(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109812
--- Comment #23 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to edison from comment #22)
> for 607.cactuBSSN_s,if use preENV_GOMP_CPU_AFFINITY = 0-23 in CPU2017 .cfg,
> all p-core(i9-13900k) usage will down to 15%(the e-core almost 100%), if
> comment out it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115679
Li, Changqing changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58570|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115751
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE building 521.wrf_r |[15 Regression] ICE
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115679
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Li, Changqing from comment #4)
> Created attachment 58570 [details]
> preprocessed source
This is not the preprocessed source.
Please read https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ and try again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115743
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115679
--- Comment #5 from Li, Changqing ---
Hi,
I have attached the preprocessed source. You can also get it from here:
https://cairographics.org/releases/pixman-0.43.4.tar.gz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115679
--- Comment #4 from Li, Changqing ---
Created attachment 58570
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58570&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115743
--- Comment #6 from Ralf Habacker ---
Created attachment 58569
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58569&action=edit
Logfile building gcc without patch
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Can you attach the resulting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109812
edison changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||edison_chan_gz at hotmail dot
com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114990
--- Comment #17 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #16)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #15)
> > But it is not declaration, but definition. The actual implementation
> > duplicates twice.
>
> Definitions are also mer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115743
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you attach the resulting `libstdc++.*-gdb.py` file (without the patch
included) and where it is located?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115743
--- Comment #4 from Ralf Habacker ---
Created attachment 58568
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58568&action=edit
compressed log file
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> How did you configure GCC?
>From the append
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115723
--- Comment #17 from edison ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> Created attachment 58561 [details]
> patch
>
> I have attached it as a patch for your convenience. You can apply it to a
> source tree with the 'patch' utility.
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109130
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
This looks like it was fixed already, back to 355 which is GCC 13 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113859
Pengxuan Zheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like the regression mentioned in comment #0 is fixed. And even the
regression that happened during GCC 14. There is still more from GCC 13 though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114510
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113859
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pengxuan Zheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:895bbc08d38c2aca3cbbab273a247021fea73930
commit r15-1801-g895bbc08d38c2aca3cbbab273a247021fea73930
Author: Pengxuan Zheng
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115735
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115705
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670
Bug 88670 depends on bug 110473, which changed state.
Bug 110473 Summary: vec_convert for aarch64 seems to lower to something which
should be improved
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110473
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110473
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110473
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7ad9cb813063ddf51269910f33b56116c10462c
commit r15-1800-ga7ad9cb813063ddf51269910f33b56116c10462c
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107432
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7ad9cb813063ddf51269910f33b56116c10462c
commit r15-1800-ga7ad9cb813063ddf51269910f33b56116c10462c
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115750
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||helge.deller at sap dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115710
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 115710, which changed state.
Bug 115710 Summary: [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] complex abs does not vectorise
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115710
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115710
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d8fe4f05ef448e6a136398d38c0f2170d3c6bb0d
commit r15-1797-gd8fe4f05ef448e6a136398d38c0f2170d3c6bb0d
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115750
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin ---
I did a build with gcc-14. It fails here:
./temacs --batch -l loadup --temacs=pbootstrap \
--bin-dest /usr/bin/ --eln-dest /usr/lib/emacs/29.4/
Memory exhausted--use M-x save-some-buffers then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115735
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Hi David, I started hacking up a list based on the man pages I had from
`man-pages` & removing the POSIX list of safe functions, but it's kind of
gross. It's not something we could put in the build system.
A fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115735
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
The analyzer's list of functions known to be signal unsafe was introduced in
r10-5959-g4804c5fe965eef and has only gained "exit" since then, in
r11-577-g2221fb6f668a7e.
Is there a wider list of such functio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107996
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-02
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115754
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-02
Blocks|110338
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115747
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110338
Bug 110338 depends on bug 115747, which changed state.
Bug 115747 Summary: [C++26] P3144R2 - Deleting a pointer to an incomplete type
should be ill-formed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115747
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110338
Bug 110338 depends on bug 115745, which changed state.
Bug 115745 Summary: [C++26] P0963R3 - Structured binding declaration as a
condition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115745
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115745
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115754
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1250540a98e0a1dfa4d7834672d88d8543ea70b1
commit r15-1795-g1250540a98e0a1dfa4d7834672d88d8543ea70b1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115747
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:beb7a418aaef2ec8a812712110b007c091a73491
commit r15-1794-gbeb7a418aaef2ec8a812712110b007c091a73491
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115745
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f30bdb1f2d79fd787e0c270039179bf80830161f
commit r15-1793-gf30bdb1f2d79fd787e0c270039179bf80830161f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115700
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115743
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
So for a cross to aarch64-linux-gnu we get:
pythondir =
'/home/apinski/src/upstream-full-cross/install/share/gcc-15.0.0/python'
libdir =
'/home/apinski/src/upstream-full-cross/install/aarch64-linux-gnu/lib/.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115743
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note for native, normally installs under
/home/apinski/upstream-gcc-new/share/gcc-14.0.0/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py
That is:
$prefix/share/gcc-$version/python/libstdcxx/v6/ .
For cross (to *-*-linux)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115629
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115743
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-02
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115724
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from David Malc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Passed without issue. I'll go ahead and ACK the patch here. It's good to go
IMHO.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115756
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115749
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to kim.walisch from comment #4)
> One possible explanation for why GCC's current integer division by a
> constant assembly sequence was chosen back in the day (I guess one or two
> decades ago) is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114936
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114936
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8eb469546f7f32dcec5d3376dfb419c1d4f21e4a
commit r14-10369-g8eb469546f7f32dcec5d3376dfb419c1d4f21e4a
Author: Alex Coplan
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115753
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115749
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-02
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115756
Bug ID: 115756
Summary: default tuning for x86_64 produces shifts for `*240`
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: norma
1 - 100 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
