[Bug c/115587] [14/15 Regression] Possible uninitialized variable (decl) in c_parser_omp_loop_nest

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115587 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Possible uninitialized |[14/15 Regression] Possible

[Bug c/115587] New: Possible uninitialized variable (decl) in c_parser_omp_loop_nest

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115587 Bug ID: 115587 Summary: Possible uninitialized variable (decl) in c_parser_omp_loop_nest Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: internal-impr

[Bug libstdc++/115585] --disable-libstdcxx-verbose causes undefined symbol: _ZSt21__glibcxx_assert_failPKciS0_S0_, version GLIBCXX_3.4.30

2024-06-21 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115585 --- Comment #6 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.1.0/libstdc++/manual/manual/configure. > html > > > --disable-libstdcxx-verbose > By default, the library is configured to wri

[Bug libstdc++/115585] --disable-libstdcxx-verbose causes undefined symbol: _ZSt21__glibcxx_assert_failPKciS0_S0_, version GLIBCXX_3.4.30

2024-06-21 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115585 --- Comment #5 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > Hmm, why was libcppdap.so compiled with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG turned on in the > first place? i don't know. That was a packaging thing from arch. I just got the raw binary

[Bug c++/115586] c++26: with 2 or more name-independent declarations (anonymous structure bindings) with for loop

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115586 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-06-22 Summary|name-inde

[Bug c++/115586] name-independent declarations causing an internal compiler error (c++26)

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115586 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://godbolt.org/z/7vdoj | |7z3j

[Bug c++/115586] name-independent declarations causing an internal compiler error (c++26)

2024-06-21 Thread amuly.jain at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115586 --- Comment #1 from Amulya Jain --- Created attachment 58485 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58485&action=edit The preprocessed file I am unable to attach the preprocessed file due to the 1000kb limit (my file is 1040kb). S

[Bug c++/115586] New: name-independent declarations causing an internal compiler error (c++26)

2024-06-21 Thread amuly.jain at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115586 Bug ID: 115586 Summary: name-independent declarations causing an internal compiler error (c++26) Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug libstdc++/115585] --disable-libstdcxx-verbose causes undefined symbol: _ZSt21__glibcxx_assert_failPKciS0_S0_, version GLIBCXX_3.4.30

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115585 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, why was libcppdap.so compiled with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG turned on in the first place?

[Bug libstdc++/115585] --disable-libstdcxx-verbose causes undefined symbol: _ZSt21__glibcxx_assert_failPKciS0_S0_, version GLIBCXX_3.4.30

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115585 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.1.0/libstdc++/manual/manual/configure.html --disable-libstdcxx-verbose By default, the library is configured to write descriptive messages to standard error for certai

[Bug libstdc++/115585] --disable-libstdcxx-verbose causes undefined symbol: _ZSt21__glibcxx_assert_failPKciS0_S0_, version GLIBCXX_3.4.30

2024-06-21 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115585 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/655427.html patch is here

[Bug libstdc++/115585] --disable-libstdcxx-verbose causes undefined symbol: _ZSt21__glibcxx_assert_failPKciS0_S0_, version GLIBCXX_3.4.30

2024-06-21 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115585 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- cqwrteur@otsiningo:~/toolchains_build/build/native/mold$ cmake -GNinja ../../../mold -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_INTERPROCEDURAL_OPTIMIZATION=On -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ -DCMAK

[Bug libstdc++/115585] New: --disable-libstdcxx-verbose causes undefined symbol: _ZSt21__glibcxx_assert_failPKciS0_S0_, version GLIBCXX_3.4.30

2024-06-21 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115585 Bug ID: 115585 Summary: --disable-libstdcxx-verbose causes undefined symbol: _ZSt21__glibcxx_assert_failPKciS0_S0_, version GLIBCXX_3.4.30 Product: gcc Version:

[Bug rtl-optimization/63384] scheduler loops on endless fence list with -fselective-scheduling2 on x86

2024-06-21 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63384 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/85099] [meta-bug] selective scheduling issues

2024-06-21 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85099 Bug 85099 depends on bug 63384, which changed state. Bug 63384 Summary: scheduler loops on endless fence list with -fselective-scheduling2 on x86 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63384 What|Removed

[Bug c/71176] trunk/fixincludes/fixincl.c:162: bad % specifier

2024-06-21 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71176 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/98819] Wall Wformat-signedness suggests %u for %u

2024-06-21 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98819 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/28492] -Wsuggest-attribute=format points to vsnprintf() or related functions instead of the function that needs the attribute added

2024-06-21 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28492 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|-Wmissing-format-attribute |-Wsuggest-attribute=format

[Bug tree-optimization/115484] [13/14/15 regression] if-to-switch prevents AVX vectorization

2024-06-21 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115484 --- Comment #6 from Andi Kleen --- As an interesting but irrelevant side comment clang seems to have the same bug.

[Bug bootstrap/115584] Boot strap comparison failure on trunk with --enable-checking=release

2024-06-21 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115584 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/115564] -Wanalyzer-infinite-loop false negative when there are no source locations

2024-06-21 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115564 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug c++/115557] Invalid NSDMI accepted for templates classes for a aggregate that binds to a temp

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115557 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|initializing reference |Invalid NSDMI accepted for

[Bug ipa/115533] [12/13/14/15 regression] flac miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fipa-pta -fno-vect-cost-model since r12-3893-g6390c5047adb75

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115533 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/115583] [14/15 Regression] C++23: Call to consteval function in `if consteval` immediate function context rejected at -O1 since r14-4140

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115583 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/115583] [14/15 Regression] C++23: Call to consteval function in `if consteval` immediate function context rejected at -O1 since r14-4140

2024-06-21 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115583 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||14.1.0, 15.0 Known to work|

[Bug ipa/115533] [12/13/14/15 regression] flac miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fipa-pta -fno-vect-cost-model since r12-3893-g6390c5047adb75

2024-06-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115533 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #58481|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/114243] [13/14/15 Regression][avr] -fsplit-wide-types bloats code by more than 50%

2024-06-21 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114243 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 58483 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58483&action=edit sfmode.c: C test case This is a test case with simpler functions like float add2 (float a, float b) {

[Bug target/114846] powerpc: epilogue in _Unwind_RaiseException corrupts return value due to __builtin_eh_return

2024-06-21 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114846 --- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #10) > (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9) > > (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #8) > > > Should be fixed on trunk, it's not a regression, but we probably want

[Bug bootstrap/115584] New: Boot strap comparison failure on trunk with --enable-checking=release

2024-06-21 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115584 Bug ID: 115584 Summary: Boot strap comparison failure on trunk with --enable-checking=release Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/115567] Internal Compiler Error: Segmentation Fault during build

2024-06-21 Thread jjleksmi at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115567 --- Comment #4 from Jayalekshmi Jayakumar --- Created attachment 58482 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58482&action=edit Preprocessed file There are multiple preprocessed files in the package this is one of them.

[Bug ipa/115533] [12/13/14/15 regression] flac miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fipa-pta -fno-vect-cost-model since r12-3893-g6390c5047adb75

2024-06-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115533 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14

[Bug ipa/115533] [12/13/14/15 regression] flac miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fipa-pta -fno-vect-cost-model since r12-3893-g6390c5047adb75

2024-06-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115533 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #58480|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/115567] Internal Compiler Error: Segmentation Fault during build

2024-06-21 Thread jjleksmi at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115567 --- Comment #3 from Jayalekshmi Jayakumar --- I have downgraded to gcc 11.4.0 gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/lto-wrapper OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none:amdgcn-amdhsa OFFLOAD_TA

Your payroll calendar for June 2024 is now available to you

2024-06-21 Thread Sandi Gillilan via Gcc-bugs
Your payroll calendar for June 2024 is now available to you. Take me to my calendar Greeting

[Bug middle-end/115581] could remove copy of struct if original otherwise not used

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115581 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Barnabás Pőcze from comment #3) > Isn't your testcase a bit different? I guess my question is, why does gcc > feel the need to make a local copy of a by-value argument when calling a > function

[Bug middle-end/115581] could remove copy of struct if original otherwise not used

2024-06-21 Thread pobrn at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115581 --- Comment #3 from Barnabás Pőcze --- Isn't your testcase a bit different? I guess my question is, why does gcc feel the need to make a local copy of a by-value argument when calling a function with a reference to it, but seemingly only in a fu

[Bug target/115576] [14/15 regression] Worse code generated for simple struct conversion

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115576 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |target --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinsk

[Bug c++/115580] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] null pointer warning from an unevaluated context

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115580 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-06-21 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug middle-end/115581] could remove copy of struct if original otherwise not used

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115581 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note it looks like clang does some front-end optimization for converting the lambda into a function pointer because my example in comment #1 has the copy still there for clang/LLVM.

[Bug middle-end/115581] could remove copy of struct if original otherwise not used

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115581 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug middle-end/115581] could remove copy of struct if original otherwise not used

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115581 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|other

[Bug ipa/115533] [12/13/14/15 regression] flac miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fipa-pta -fno-vect-cost-model since r12-3893-g6390c5047adb75

2024-06-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115533 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #58479|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/115579] [15 regression] wrong code at -Os with "-fno-tree-sra" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r15-1391-g4b75ed33fa5fd6

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115579 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- So looking into the code. The problem is the ordering. That is if the store to b is first things will just work. The loop to call execute_sm: execute_sm (loop, ref, aux_map, true, !first_p); Exce

[Bug ipa/115533] [12/13/14/15 regression] flac miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fipa-pta -fno-vect-cost-model since r12-3893-g6390c5047adb75

2024-06-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115533 --- Comment #11 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #10) > Created attachment 58479 [details] > test.c > > Another checkpoint Ugh, lout became uninitialised. I'll try again.

[Bug ipa/115533] [12/13/14/15 regression] flac miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fipa-pta -fno-vect-cost-model since r12-3893-g6390c5047adb75

2024-06-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115533 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #58471|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/115583] C++23: Call to consteval function in `if consteval` immediate function context rejected at -O1

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115583 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/115579] [15 regression] wrong code at -Os with "-fno-tree-sra" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r15-1391-g4b75ed33fa5fd6

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115579 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Zhendong Su from comment #3) > Perhaps the same or a related issue. It reproduces for -O{s,2,3}. It is the same due to -fno-tree-ch . -Os has a very restrictive version of that.

[Bug tree-optimization/115579] [15 regression] wrong code at -Os with "-fno-tree-sra" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r15-1391-g4b75ed33fa5fd6

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115579 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-06-21 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/115583] New: Call to consteval function in `if consteval` immediate function context rejected at -O1

2024-06-21 Thread mital at mitalashok dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115583 Bug ID: 115583 Summary: Call to consteval function in `if consteval` immediate function context rejected at -O1 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/115579] [15 regression] wrong code at -Os with "-fno-tree-sra" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r15-1391-g4b75ed33fa5fd6

2024-06-21 Thread zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115579 --- Comment #3 from Zhendong Su --- Perhaps the same or a related issue. It reproduces for -O{s,2,3}. Compiler Explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/x779P9b5a [570] % gcctk -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcctk COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/local/suz-

[Bug target/115342] [14/15 Regression] AArch64: Function multiversioning initialization incorrect

2024-06-21 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115342 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/115342] [14/15 Regression] AArch64: Function multiversioning initialization incorrect

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115342 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Wilco Dijkstra : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9421f02916676d27e24fcda918f85e359329ac69 commit r14-10338-g9421f02916676d27e24fcda918f85e359329ac69 Author: Wilco Dijkstr

[Bug libstdc++/115454] std::experimental::find_last_set is buggy on x86-64-v4

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115454 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b5bdeb8aa2c2f6dbd448a8f7d500d9eaece48e1 commit r12-10574-g8b5bdeb8aa2c2f6dbd448a8f7d500d9eaece48e1 Author: Matthias Kret

[Bug libstdc++/115575] experimental/simd/pr115454_find_last_set.cc FAILs

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115575 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:169d4d1addaac7eef6cde4049aa8b4f3d81c28b0 commit r12-10575-g169d4d1addaac7eef6cde4049aa8b4f3d81c28b0 Author: Matthias Kre

[Bug libstdc++/115575] experimental/simd/pr115454_find_last_set.cc FAILs

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115575 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c335e34ff89ec9aec1ba874dc5cece9c2303c906 commit r13-8862-gc335e34ff89ec9aec1ba874dc5cece9c2303c906 Author: Matthias Kretz

[Bug libstdc++/115454] std::experimental::find_last_set is buggy on x86-64-v4

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115454 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbd088a069b172cae4e268abe2d38e567ef97990 commit r13-8861-gfbd088a069b172cae4e268abe2d38e567ef97990 Author: Matthias Kretz

[Bug libstdc++/115575] experimental/simd/pr115454_find_last_set.cc FAILs

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115575 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87cda03e707f9f3e049905a0f698221f3c7db148 commit r11-11531-g87cda03e707f9f3e049905a0f698221f3c7db148 Author: Matthias Kret

[Bug libstdc++/115497] [15 Regression] __is_pointer doesn't compile with clang since 014879ea4c86b3b8ab6b61a1226ee5b31e816c8b

2024-06-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115497 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/115559] [OpenMP] 'link' clause of 'declare target' causes link errors

2024-06-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115559 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus --- Fortran patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/655386.html FOLLOW-UP ISSUES: * OFFSET issues with LINK clause: arr = [(i, i=1,N)] map(arr(10:N) and then in a device func

[Bug libstdc++/109150] std::fill should use __gnu_cxx::__is_scalar overloads for all scalars

2024-06-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109150 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk for now, but I think this should be backported because the current code on the branches is non-conforming.

[Bug libstdc++/115497] [15 Regression] __is_pointer doesn't compile with clang since 014879ea4c86b3b8ab6b61a1226ee5b31e816c8b

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115497 --- Comment #21 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51cc77672add517123ef9ea45335b08442e8d57c commit r15-1552-g51cc77672add517123ef9ea45335b08442e8d57c Author: Jonathan Wakely Date

[Bug libstdc++/115575] experimental/simd/pr115454_find_last_set.cc FAILs

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115575 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a851931bc0d7a2b39ccc1f236015aabf24ee51f9 commit r14-10337-ga851931bc0d7a2b39ccc1f236015aabf24ee51f9 Author: Matthias Kret

[Bug fortran/115559] [OpenMP] 'link' clause of 'declare target' causes link errors

2024-06-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115559 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus --- Created attachment 58478 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58478&action=edit COMMON block testcase

[Bug libstdc++/115497] [15 Regression] __is_pointer doesn't compile with clang since 014879ea4c86b3b8ab6b61a1226ee5b31e816c8b

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115497 --- Comment #22 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52a82359073653e312aaa5703f7e0ce339588961 commit r15-1553-g52a82359073653e312aaa5703f7e0ce339588961 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date

[Bug libstdc++/115497] [15 Regression] __is_pointer doesn't compile with clang since 014879ea4c86b3b8ab6b61a1226ee5b31e816c8b

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115497 --- Comment #20 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f10547e021db3a4a34382cd067668f9ef97fdeb commit r15-1551-g5f10547e021db3a4a34382cd067668f9ef97fdeb Author: Jonathan Wakely Date

[Bug libstdc++/115497] [15 Regression] __is_pointer doesn't compile with clang since 014879ea4c86b3b8ab6b61a1226ee5b31e816c8b

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115497 --- Comment #19 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:139d65d1f5a60ac90479653a4f9b63618509f3f9 commit r15-1550-g139d65d1f5a60ac90479653a4f9b63618509f3f9 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date

[Bug libstdc++/115497] [15 Regression] __is_pointer doesn't compile with clang since 014879ea4c86b3b8ab6b61a1226ee5b31e816c8b

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115497 --- Comment #18 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3743181899c5490a94c4dbde56a69ab77a40f11 commit r15-1549-gb3743181899c5490a94c4dbde56a69ab77a40f11 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date

[Bug libstdc++/109150] std::fill should use __gnu_cxx::__is_scalar overloads for all scalars

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109150 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3743181899c5490a94c4dbde56a69ab77a40f11 commit r15-1549-gb3743181899c5490a94c4dbde56a69ab77a40f11 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/115575] experimental/simd/pr115454_find_last_set.cc FAILs

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115575 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77f321435b4ac37992c2ed6737ca0caa1dd50551 commit r15-1548-g77f321435b4ac37992c2ed6737ca0caa1dd50551 Author: Matthias Kretz Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/115582] [15 regression] wrong code when accessing members of incompatible type structure

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115582 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug testsuite/109360] RFE: check that generated .sarif files validate against the SARIF schema

2024-06-21 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109360 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-06-21 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug other/112425] Invalid SARIF output when column number is zero

2024-06-21 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112425 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/115582] [15 regression] wrong code when accessing members of incompatible type structure

2024-06-21 Thread tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115582 --- Comment #4 from tangyixuan --- Thanks for your concerns. The type of "a.x" is converted to char in "(char *)a + 1", and it may be confused in clang under -O0 vs -O{2,3}. gcc-15 outputs the "int" value, but the previous versions like gcc-5.3

[Bug c/115552] wrong code at -O2 and above when strict-aliasing with uint128 and double

2024-06-21 Thread davidhu0903ex3 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115552 --- Comment #3 from davidhcefx --- Thanks for your explanation, we now understand the problem.

[Bug libstdc++/108760] ranges::iota is not included in

2024-06-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108760 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/115527] -ftrivial-auto-var-init appears to clobber explicit initializer

2024-06-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115527 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/111775] -Wstrict-flex-arrays missing diagnostics with unions

2024-06-21 Thread qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111775 qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED Resolution|F

[Bug middle-end/111775] -Wstrict-flex-arrays missing diagnostics with unions

2024-06-21 Thread qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111775 qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug tree-optimization/115582] [15 regression] wrong code when accessing members of incompatible type structure

2024-06-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115582 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/115582] [15 regression] wrong code when accessing members of incompatible type structure

2024-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115582 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/115580] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] decltype of nullptr error with -Werror=nonnull

2024-06-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115580 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|decltype of nullptr error |[11/12/13/14/15 regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/115582] [15 regression] wrong code when accessing members of incompatible type structure

2024-06-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115582 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[regression 15] wrong code |[15 regression] wrong code

[Bug tree-optimization/115579] [15 regression] wrong code at -Os with "-fno-tree-sra" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r15-1391-g4b75ed33fa5fd6

2024-06-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115579 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Summa

[Bug tree-optimization/115582] New: [regression 15] wrong code when accessing members of incompatible type structure

2024-06-21 Thread tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115582 Bug ID: 115582 Summary: [regression 15] wrong code when accessing members of incompatible type structure Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug other/115581] New: missed argument forwarding in lambda

2024-06-21 Thread pobrn at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115581 Bug ID: 115581 Summary: missed argument forwarding in lambda Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug libstdc++/108760] ranges::iota is not included in

2024-06-21 Thread mlevine55 at bloomberg dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108760 --- Comment #7 from Michael Levine --- This bug can be marked as fixed now that the patch has been merged.

[Bug c++/115580] New: decltype of nullptr error with -Werror=nonnull

2024-06-21 Thread marcpawl at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115580 Bug ID: 115580 Summary: decltype of nullptr error with -Werror=nonnull Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/114243] [13/14/15 Regression][avr] -fsplit-wide-types bloats code by more than 50%

2024-06-21 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114243 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/115578] wrong code at -Os with " on x86_64-linux-gnu

2024-06-21 Thread zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115578 --- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su --- Sorry for this; not sure what happened

[Bug testsuite/109360] RFE: check that generated .sarif files validate against the SARIF schema

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109360 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a84fe222029ff21903283cc8ee4bc760ebf80ec2 commit r15-1541-ga84fe222029ff21903283cc8ee4bc760ebf80ec2 Author: David Malcolm Date: F

[Bug testsuite/109360] RFE: check that generated .sarif files validate against the SARIF schema

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109360 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f4fdc3acebcf6b045edea1361570658da4bc0ab commit r15-1540-g9f4fdc3acebcf6b045edea1361570658da4bc0ab Author: David Malcolm Date: F

[Bug tree-optimization/115579] [15 regression] wrong code at -Os with "-fno-tree-sra" on x86_64-linux-gnu

2024-06-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115579 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|wrong code at -Os with |[15 regression] wrong code

[Bug tree-optimization/115578] wrong code at -Os with " on x86_64-linux-gnu

2024-06-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115578 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/115579] wrong code at -Os with "-fno-tree-sra" on x86_64-linux-gnu

2024-06-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115579 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- *** Bug 115578 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/115579] New: wrong code at -Os with "-fno-tree-sra" on x86_64-linux-gnu

2024-06-21 Thread zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115579 Bug ID: 115579 Summary: wrong code at -Os with "-fno-tree-sra" on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/115578] New: wrong code at -Os with " on x86_64-linux-gnu

2024-06-21 Thread zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115578 Bug ID: 115578 Summary: wrong code at -Os with " on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/109989] RISC-V: Missing sign extension with int to float conversion with 64bit soft floats

2024-06-21 Thread orehovpasha at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109989 Pash Osh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||orehovpasha at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/115508] [14 regression] ICE when building flac with -O2 -march=znver1 since r14-5603-g2b59e2b4dff421

2024-06-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115508 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/115278] [13/14 Regression] -ftree-vectorize optimizes away volatile write on x86_64 since r13-3219

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:272e8c90af527fc1d0055ad0f17f1d97bb0bd6cb commit r14-10335-g272e8c90af527fc1d0055ad0f17f1d97bb0bd6cb Author: Richard Bien

[Bug tree-optimization/115508] [14 regression] ICE when building flac with -O2 -march=znver1 since r14-5603-g2b59e2b4dff421

2024-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115508 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65e25860f49ee7a2cfd4872db06d94ed7675e12e commit r14-10334-g65e25860f49ee7a2cfd4872db06d94ed7675e12e Author: Richard Bien

  1   2   >