[Bug web/115391] New: Suggest add current size of git repository to git page

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115391 Bug ID: 115391 Summary: Suggest add current size of git repository to git page Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug tree-optimization/115383] [15 Regression] ICE with TCVC_2 build since r15-1053-g28edeb1409a7b8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115383 --- Comment #6 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kugan from comment #5) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > > Created attachment 58378 [details] > > patch > > > > I'm testing this, but I do not have hardware to test cor

[Bug middle-end/115388] [15 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115388 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-06-07 Keywords|

[Bug fortran/115390] Bogus -Wuninitialized warning when using CHARACTER(*) argument in BIND(C) function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115390 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/115383] [15 Regression] ICE with TCVC_2 build since r15-1053-g28edeb1409a7b8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115383 --- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > Created attachment 58378 [details] > patch > > I'm testing this, but I do not have hardware to test correctness (and qemu > not set up). Thanks. I w

[Bug fortran/115390] New: Bogus -Wuninitialized warning when using CHARACTER(*) argument in BIND(C) function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115390 Bug ID: 115390 Summary: Bogus -Wuninitialized warning when using CHARACTER(*) argument in BIND(C) function Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug target/115389] Invalid ROP hashst offset is emitted when using -mabi=no-altivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115389 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/115389] New: Invalid ROP hashst offset is emitted when using -mabi=no-altivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115389 Bug ID: 115389 Summary: Invalid ROP hashst offset is emitted when using -mabi=no-altivec Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug analyzer/105887] [meta-bug] clang analyzer warnings that GCC's -fanalyzer could implement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105887 Bug 105887 depends on bug 105892, which changed state. Bug 105892 Summary: RFE: -fanalyzer could complain about pointer subtraction of pointers to different memory chunks https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105892 What|R

[Bug analyzer/105892] RFE: -fanalyzer could complain about pointer subtraction of pointers to different memory chunks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105892 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/115386] ice with -g -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115386 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- I tried a git bisect and got this: $ git bisect good 6fa4b0135439d64c 30cfdd6ff56972d9d1b9dbdd43a8333c85618775 is the first bad commit commit 30cfdd6ff56972d9d1b9dbdd43a8333c85618775 Author: Robin Dapp D

[Bug target/113357] [14/15 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap failure in stage2 due to segfault compiling unwind-dw2.c since r14-4664-g04c9cf5c786b94

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113357 --- Comment #14 from Mikael Pettersson --- Since gcc-15 wouldn't build due to an unrelated issue, I applied the fmo patch to gcc-14.1 (which also has this bug) and bootstrapped that. Alas it didn't make any difference, same error in stage2 as in

[Bug analyzer/105892] RFE: -fanalyzer could complain about pointer subtraction of pointers to different memory chunks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105892 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13dcaf1bb6d4f15665a47b14ac0c12cf454e38a2 commit r15-1107-g13dcaf1bb6d4f15665a47b14ac0c12cf454e38a2 Author: David Malcolm Date: F

[Bug bootstrap/54696] Makefile doesn't propagate CPPFLAGS to host libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54696 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug other/15694] fixincl.sh bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15694 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- Also, there's a lot of `shellcheck` output for fixincl.sh, too; should I paste it here?

[Bug other/40789] fixincludes/fixincl.c: duplicate call to close ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40789 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1) > did you discover this with cppcheck or by looking manually? Also does -fanalyzer catch this?

[Bug other/37036] fixincludes does not understand sysroot!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37036 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/105719] RFE: fixincludes should handle Frameworks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105719 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/114019] allocation with source of deferred character length entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114019 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/115388] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

local/gcc-trunk --enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 15.0.0 20240607 (experimental) (GCC) [516] % [516] % gcctk -O2 small.c; ./a.out [517] % gcctk -O3 small.c [518] % ./a.out Aborted

[Bug tree-optimization/115382] Wrong code with in-order conditional reduction and masked loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115382 --- Comment #1 from Robin Dapp --- Would something like this work? The testcase ran successfully with Intel's SME with that change (and aarch64 qemu with SVE). diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc index 028692614bb..f9bf6

[Bug tree-optimization/115387] [15 regression] RISC-V: ICE in iovsprintf.c since r15-1081-ge14afbe2d1c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115387 Edwin Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ewlu at rivosinc dot com,

[Bug c++/107575] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'error_mark' in duplicate_decls, at cp/decl.cc:2605 since r12-8115-g791a968630b3846

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107575 Simon Martin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|12.4

[Bug c++/107575] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'error_mark' in duplicate_decls, at cp/decl.cc:2605 since r12-8115-g791a968630b3846

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107575 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ce138694a6b40708a80691fa4003f6af1defa49 commit r15-1105-g0ce138694a6b40708a80691fa4003f6af1defa49 Author: Simon Martin Date: Tue

[Bug tree-optimization/115387] [15 regression] RISC-V: ICE in iovsprintf.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115387 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[15] RISC-V: ICE in |[15 regression] RISC-V: ICE

[Bug target/115387] New: [15] RISC-V: ICE in iovsprintf.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115387 Bug ID: 115387 Summary: [15] RISC-V: ICE in iovsprintf.c Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug rtl-optimization/115384] [15 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'const_wide_int' in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.cc:4088

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115384 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/115384] [15 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'const_wide_int' in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.cc:4088

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115384 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- r15-1047-g7876cde25cbd2f

[Bug rtl-optimization/115384] [15 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'const_wide_int' in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.cc:4088

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115384 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Version|14.0|15.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/101703] (bool0 + bool1) & 1 and (bool0 + bool1) == 1 can be optimized to bool0 ^ bool1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101703 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv

[Bug c++/115378] [14/15 Regression] ICE with lambda function as a default template argument with variadic templates in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115378 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c761395402a730535983a5e49ef1775561ebc61 commit r15-1103-g5c761395402a730535983a5e49ef1775561ebc61 Author: Patrick Palka Date: F

[Bug target/115353] [14 regression] Missed thumb2 table branch instruction optimisations since r14-4946-g7006e5d2d7b5b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115353 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.2

[Bug debug/115386] ice with -g -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115386 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- meh: ==2441836== Warning: set address range perms: large range [0x59d5f040, 0x78483b50) (undefined) ==2441836== Warning: set address range perms: large range [0x59d5f028, 0x78483b68) (noaccess) ==2441836== Sta

[Bug c/115374] fmod() in x86_64 -O3 not using return value from the glibc's implementation if x87 FPU fprem returns NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115374 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- The bug is mixing MMX with floating point and expecting it to work, it will never work properly, you need manual emms in between, or better yet, avoid MMX altogether, it really isn't worth it. Just use SSE

[Bug c/115374] fmod() in x86_64 -O3 not using return value from the glibc's implementation if x87 FPU fprem returns NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115374 Mario Hros changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|WAITING

[Bug debug/115386] ice with -g -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115386 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > I think it runs out of stack. I tried running it under gdb, and all I got were lots of stack frames, so I agree with your best advice. It doesn't seem all that r

[Bug debug/115386] ice with -g -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115386 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- expand is taking a lot of time but I can't get a stack overflow happening ...

[Bug debug/115386] ice with -g -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115386 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug c/115374] fmod() in x86_64 -O3 not using return value from the glibc's implementation if x87 FPU fprem returns NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115374 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c/115374] fmod() in x86_64 -O3 not using return value from the glibc's implementation if x87 FPU fprem returns NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115374 --- Comment #10 from Mario Hros --- That _.265t.optimized posted matches my observation. So the call into glibc fmod() is made to set errno eventually, ok. But shouldn't the returned value from the glibc call be used instead of returning NaN? I

[Bug c/115386] New: ice with -g -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115386 Bug ID: 115386 Summary: ice with -g -O3 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassig

[Bug target/115302] aarch64-w64-mingw32: wrong value into BUILD_SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115302 Evgeny Karpov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Evgeny.Karpov at microsoft dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/115363] Missing loop vectorization due to loop bound load not being pulled out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115363 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Invariant motion doesn't do versioning for aliasing. But in fact once the > loop iterates array[k] can no longer alias this->size but this is difficult > to ex

[Bug target/115353] [14 regression] Missed thumb2 table branch instruction optimisations since r14-4946-g7006e5d2d7b5b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115353 Richard Ball changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/115353] [14 regression] Missed thumb2 table branch instruction optimisations since r14-4946-g7006e5d2d7b5b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115353 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Ball : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca1924947b5bed8105ae020bef6950bddda448f3 commit r14-10289-gca1924947b5bed8105ae020bef6950bddda448f3 Author: Richard Ball D

[Bug tree-optimization/43565] Missed address comparison folding of DECL_COMMONs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43565 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||user202729 at protonmail dot com --- Co

[Bug tree-optimization/115381] Missed deoptimization opportunity when comparing two different linker symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115381 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/115381] Missed deoptimization opportunity when comparing two different linker symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115381 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/109896] Missed optimisation: overflow detection in multiplication instructions for operator new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109896 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9) > > Created attachment 58374 [details] > > Patch which I am testing > > There were some regressions. I have to go

[Bug c++/115378] [14/15 Regression] ICE with lambda function as a default template argument with variadic templates in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115378 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Keywords|needs-bisec

[Bug target/115351] [14/15 regression] pointless movs when passing by value on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115351 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb3e4c549d16d5050e10114439ad77149f33c597 commit r15-1101-gfb3e4c549d16d5050e10114439ad77149f33c597 Author: Roger Sayle Date: Fri J

[Bug tree-optimization/115385] Peeling for gaps can be optimized more or needs to peel more than one iteration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115385 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/115385] New: Peeling for gaps can be optimized more or needs to peel more than one iteration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115385 Bug ID: 115385 Summary: Peeling for gaps can be optimized more or needs to peel more than one iteration Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug rtl-optimization/115384] New: [15 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'const_wide_int' in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.cc:4088

th-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld --with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --enable-libsanitizer --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r15-1093-20240607103208-ga47b1aaa7a7-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 15.0.0 20240607 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/115253] [14/15 regression] New tests added by r14-10122-gad45086178d833 fail on Cortex M23 and M55 bare metal targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115253 Torbjorn SVENSSON changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |azoff at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/115383] [15 Regression] ICE with TCVC_2 build since r15-1053-g28edeb1409a7b8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115383 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 58378 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58378&action=edit patch I'm testing this, but I do not have hardware to test correctness (and qemu not set up).

[Bug target/115253] [14/15 regression] New tests added by r14-10122-gad45086178d833 fail on Cortex M23 and M55 bare metal targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115253 Torbjörn SVENSSON changed: What|Removed |Added CC||torbjorn.svensson at foss dot st.c

[Bug tree-optimization/115383] [15 Regression] ICE with TCVC_2 build since r15-1053-g28edeb1409a7b8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115383 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug tree-optimization/115383] [15 Regression] ICE with TCVC_2 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115383 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/115383] [15 Regression] ICE with TCVC_2 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115383 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/108438] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:7611

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108438 Simon Martin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/90068] Array Constructor Containing Function Call Leaks Memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90068 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/115383] New: ICE with TCVC_2 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115383 Bug ID: 115383 Summary: ICE with TCVC_2 build Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug fortran/86754] [meta-bug] Memory leaks at run time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86754 Bug 86754 depends on bug 90068, which changed state. Bug 90068 Summary: Array Constructor Containing Function Call Leaks Memory https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90068 What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/115376] ICE with if expression in value setting of a constant declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115376 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/90068] Array Constructor Containing Function Call Leaks Memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90068 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3190756487080a11e819746f00b6e30fd0a0c2e commit r15-1094-gc3190756487080a11e819746f00b6e30fd0a0c2e Author: Andre Vehreschild Da

[Bug fortran/86754] [meta-bug] Memory leaks at run time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86754 Bug 86754 depends on bug 90072, which changed state. Bug 90072 Summary: Polymorphic Dispatch to Polymophic Return Type Memory Leak https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90072 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/90072] Polymorphic Dispatch to Polymophic Return Type Memory Leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90072 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/115352] wrong code with _BitInt() __builtin_sub_overflow_p() at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115352 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/115352] wrong code with _BitInt() __builtin_sub_overflow_p() at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115352 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f616e75f32083e1bc6d08f31e3fbc3dea41fa0c commit r14-10288-g0f616e75f32083e1bc6d08f31e3fbc3dea41fa0c Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/115352] wrong code with _BitInt() __builtin_sub_overflow_p() at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115352 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a47b1aaa7a76201da7e091d9f8d4488105786274 commit r15-1093-ga47b1aaa7a76201da7e091d9f8d4488105786274 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug target/111376] missed optimization of one bit test on MIPS32r1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111376 --- Comment #8 from Siarhei Volkau --- Created attachment 58377 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58377&action=edit condmove testcase Tested with current GCC master branch: - Work with -Os confirmed. - Condmove issue present

[Bug tree-optimization/115382] New: Wrong code with in-order conditional reduction and masked loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115382 Bug ID: 115382 Summary: Wrong code with in-order conditional reduction and masked loops Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/115355] [12/13/14/15 Regression] vectorization exposes wrong code on P9 LE starting from r12-4496

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115355 --- Comment #11 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Jens Seifert from comment #10) > Does this affect loop vectorize and slp vectorize ? > > -fno-tree-loop-vectorize avoids loop vectorization to be performed and > workarounds this issue. Does the s

[Bug go/87589] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] index0-out.go FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87589 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ab90fc627301b1701cf19bf4ca220f02a93d894 commit r15-1091-g9ab90fc627301b1701cf19bf4ca220f02a93d894 Author: Rainer Orth Date: Fri J

[Bug fortran/90072] Polymorphic Dispatch to Polymophic Return Type Memory Leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90072 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51046e46ae66ca95bf2b93ae60f0c4d6b338f8af commit r15-1090-g51046e46ae66ca95bf2b93ae60f0c4d6b338f8af Author: Andre Vehreschild Da