https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115294
--- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
I've identified the problem and tested a patch. Will commit shortly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115297
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] alpha: ICE |[14/15 regression] alpha:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115294
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115292
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Version|9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115290
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115277
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115298
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115282
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115299
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao Liu ---
> Maybe r14-53-g675b1a7f113adb .
Probably, current cost model may need adjustment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115299
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
Summary|[14 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115299
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-31
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115157
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:867d1264fe71d4291194373d1a1c409cac97a597
commit r15-933-g867d1264fe71d4291194373d1a1c409cac97a597
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115177
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:867d1264fe71d4291194373d1a1c409cac97a597
commit r15-933-g867d1264fe71d4291194373d1a1c409cac97a597
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115299
Bug ID: 115299
Summary: [14 regression] pr86722.c failed to eliminate branch.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115298
Bug ID: 115298
Summary: [15 Regression] Various targets failing DSE tests
after recent changes
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115127
--- Comment #4 from Bi6c ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Can you attach the preprocessed source?
Yes. I attached the preprocessed source file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719
Hongyu Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Hongyu Wang
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:173f8763a66622f2a70ad66f60573fcff7d6b49e
commit r13-8811-g173f8763a66622f2a70ad66f60573fcff7d6b49e
Author: Hongyu Wang
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Hongyu Wang
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd161b335c2723d0dce1cab00ad216b423ec2767
commit r14-10262-gcd161b335c2723d0dce1cab00ad216b423ec2767
Author: Hongyu Wang
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115297
Bug ID: 115297
Summary: [14 regression] alpha: ICE in simplify_subreg, at
simplify-rtx.cc:7554 with -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
]] auto _1 = std::span{s};
[[maybe_unused]] auto _2 = array_view{s};
}
```
Error:
```
In file included from :1:
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20240530/include/c++/15.0.0/span: In function
'void fun(std::span)':
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20240530/include/c++/15.0.0/span:45
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115291
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
See https://libeigen.gitlab.io/docs/TopicPitfalls.html
section "C++11 and the auto keyword" explictly.
"In short: do not use the auto keywords with Eigen's expressions, unless you
are 100% sure about what y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115102
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e715204f203d318524ae86f3f2a1e8d5d7cb08dc
commit r15-930-ge715204f203d318524ae86f3f2a1e8d5d7cb08dc
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109452
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115277
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
> What about gcc 13?
GCC 13 also misoptimizes.
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115295
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Component: d
Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Between 20240529 (18f477980c8597fe3dca2c2e8bd533c0c2b17aa6) and 20240530
(71899d6b4e18145f005046681208db0137c95ede),
quite a number of gdc.* tests regressed:
+FAIL: gdc.dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115294
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Between 20240529 (18f477980c8597fe3dca2c2e8bd533c0c2b17aa6) and 20240530
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508
--- Comment #27 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #26)
> (In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #25)
> > (In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #22)
> > > Why are we adding an alignment requirement to _mm_storel_pd, the i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115292
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115284
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #9)
> > --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE > Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> >> --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
> [...]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115281
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] aarch64 |[14 Regression] aarch64 ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115281
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46d931b3dd31cbba7c3355ada63f155aa24a4e2b
commit r15-929-g46d931b3dd31cbba7c3355ada63f155aa24a4e2b
Author: Richard Sandiford
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115288
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-30
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115288
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Summary|File label-text
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115290
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|tree check fail in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115289
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115293
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115293
--- Comment #2 from Siddhesh Poyarekar ---
Oh, I had overlooked -Whardened; so it looks like we already do this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115293
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
We have -Whardened already which is maybe a good fit?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115293
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|13.0|14.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115293
Bug ID: 115293
Summary: Warn if a compiler flag downgrades protection provided
by -fhardened
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115031
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115031
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32f99225bcaae9b792aec143239d17f2b7e2c54b
commit r15-927-g32f99225bcaae9b792aec143239d17f2b7e2c54b
Author: Rainer Orth
Date: Thu Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115292
Bug ID: 115292
Summary: [15 Regression] i686-darwin17 bootstrap fails for Ada
(between r15-856 and r15-889)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115277
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> Reproduces on 14 and trunk. GCC 12 is not able to determine the loop bound
> during early optimizations
What about gcc 13?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114803
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
-fsigned-char works around the fail on affected targets. I couldn't trigger it
on arm-eabi, alas, not even with -funsigned-char.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115284
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
>> --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
[...]
>> versions.) BTW, it'd be nice to know it it reprod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109849
--- Comment #35 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #31)
> Bisection points to r14-5831-gaae723d360ca26cd9fd0b039fb0a616bd0eae363 for
> that remaining FAIL as well (and it isn't fixed by the new patch).
>
> It int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115285
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
When deciding whether a key already exists in the hash set we use these
overloads:
template
static __conditional_t<
__and_<__is_nothrow_invocable<_Hash&, const key_type&>,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115285
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> I am suspecting it was
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;
> h=2c43f5ec9db163696de8691eb529df06c4999bcc which caused the issue.
Ah no, I think you'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115102
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> though on x86 there's no high word preserving swap of the lower 2 bytes.
There is, please try:
asm ("xchgb %h0, %b0" : "+Q" (val));
like:
--cut here--
#incl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115285
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Or r12-6272-ge3ef832a9e8d6a
I think the testcase is invalid. The unordered_set uses
std::equal_to to decide if a key already exists in the container,
and that just uses operator== which is not defined for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115291
Bug ID: 115291
Summary: armv8-a GCC emits float32x2_t loads from uninitialized
stack
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115284
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
> BTW, I see the target list says sparc*-sun-solaris2.11 which seems a cutnpasto
> from some ancient template: that particular version is in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115284
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #2)
>
>> You should use cfarm216 instead: it's way faster than the others and
>> r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115102
--- Comment #3 from Paul Cercueil ---
Created attachment 58313
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58313&action=edit
Proposed fix
Attached is the proposed fix.
Credits go to Oleg for the original solution.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114803
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115290
Bug ID: 115290
Summary: tree check fail in c_tree_printer, at
c/c-objc-common.cc:330
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115289
Bug ID: 115289
Summary: PPC: Document the machine constraint 'Y' and make it
non-internal
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
: plugins
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I have just tried a linux kernel build with this morning's gcc trunk compiler
and I got this:
home/dcb40b/gcc/results.20240530.asan.ubsan/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101169
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac5c6c90a7f1f432fe19bc058d70b08967c25e3e
commit r15-923-gac5c6c90a7f1f432fe19bc058d70b08967c25e3e
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:
65 matches
Mail list logo