https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115225
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |sanitizer
Summary|[11/12/13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115223
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |15.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115220
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115214
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115240
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115241
Bug ID: 115241
Summary: header-tools scripts not compatible to python3
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115240
Bug ID: 115240
Summary: [alias] Does we assume the math function have pure
attribute ?
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115239
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58294|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115239
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58294
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58294&action=edit
Reduced further
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Bug 40883 depends on bug 79646, which changed state.
Bug 79646 Summary: Typos in vax.opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79646
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79646
Maciej W. Rozycki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||macro at orcam dot me.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115239
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: internal compiler |[14/15 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115239
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115239
Bug ID: 115239
Summary: ICE: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115238
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79646
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7f6543f21303583356fd2d2d1805bffbecc1bc5
commit r15-843-ga7f6543f21303583356fd2d2d1805bffbecc1bc5
Author: Abe Skolnik
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110137
user202729 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||user202729 at protonmail dot
com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115146
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115146
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Levy Hsu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0022064649d0ec40e97df24279c48842e278fedc
commit r15-841-g0022064649d0ec40e97df24279c48842e278fedc
Author: Levy Hsu
Date: Tue May 21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
--- Comment #12 from YunQiang Su ---
You are right: the decision to use $6 is too late.
So let's force to use it in expand pass.
```
diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/mips.cc b/gcc/config/mips/mips.cc
index b63d40a357b..84ff29cd62b 100644
--- a/gcc/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
--- Comment #11 from YunQiang Su ---
(In reply to YunQiang Su from comment #8)
> Ohh, In fact we should use $28 if TARGET_USE_GOT.
>
> Can you help to test this patch?
>
> ```
> diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/mips.cc b/gcc/config/mips/mips.cc
> i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115224
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115161
--- Comment #25 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #17)
> I don't think the cost of using UNSPEC would be significant if the backend
> tried to constant fold more target builtins. Anyway, with the proposed
> changes pe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115238
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-26
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115238
Bug ID: 115238
Summary: bitwise_inverted_equal_p should handle
uniform_integer_cst_p
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115236
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115237
Bug ID: 115237
Summary: -Wsuggest-attribute=pure false positive for obviously
non-pure function
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115236
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115236
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] Wrong code |[15 regression] Wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115236
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|wrong code at -O1 and above |[15 regression] Wrong code
cking=yes --prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20240526 (experimental) (GCC)
[534] %
[534] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93487
--- Comment #5 from Petr Skocik ---
Another case of a missed tailcall which might warrant a separate mention:
struct big{ long _[10]; };
void takePtr(void *);
void takeBigAndPassItsAddress(struct big X){ takePtr(&X); }
This should i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #16 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #15)
> Quick update:
>
> Software stack and model build with gnu/13.3.0 was clear from all previous
> issues! So issue with the gnu/13.x.0 compiler coul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109914
--- Comment #6 from Paul Eggert ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5)
> yes, however both const and pure attributes allows compiler to also
> remove the call if return value is unused. So here finiteness matters.
Thanks for mentioning t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115235
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115235
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy R. ---
Ope, my bad, it appears the section is generated properly with -gsplit-dwarf
-gdwarf-5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115235
Bug ID: 115235
Summary: Non-standard .debug_addr section
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115231
--- Comment #5 from huangqinjin at gmail dot com ---
It is currently impossible to use `export using` style like libc++ to implement
`import std`, for example
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/expected/unexpected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115234
Bug ID: 115234
Summary: Wnull-dereference false-positive on address of local
variable
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115208
Haochen Jiang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115189
--- Comment #4 from Bill Zissimopoulos ---
The lrealpath function on Windows uses the GetFinalPathNameByHandleW function
with the VOLUME_NAME_DOS flag.
I do not currently have access to a Windows system with dev tools, but my
recollection is th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109914
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> > The reason why gcc warns is that it is unable to prove that the function is
> > always finite.
>
> I don't see why finiteness matters. If a pure function return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115157
--- Comment #2 from Martin Uecker ---
PATCH: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/652669.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115233
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-26
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115233
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
It also compiles fine with MSVC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111654
--- Comment #7 from Julian Waters ---
I recently stumbled upon -Wno-attributes, which can apparently take a parameter
like -Wno-attributes=vendor:: and I think that's appropriate for this
particular situation. How does -Wno-invalid-noreturn,
-Wn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115233
Bug ID: 115233
Summary: constexpr RVO result is not determined as constant
epression
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115232
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115232
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115232
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58292
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58292&action=edit
Slightly reduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115232
Bug ID: 115232
Summary: [14 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115231
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115231
--- Comment #4 from huangqinjin at gmail dot com ---
g++ -fmodules-ts -std=c++20 module.cpp main.cpp
main.cpp: In function 'int main()':
main.cpp:11:15: error: class template argument deduction failed:
11 | A b(B{}, 1);
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115231
--- Comment #3 from huangqinjin at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 58291
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58291&action=edit
main.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115231
--- Comment #2 from huangqinjin at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 58290
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58290&action=edit
module.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115231
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115231
Bug ID: 115231
Summary: [C++20] [Modules] deduction guides reachability
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115208
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod ---
> Created attachment 58287
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58287&action=edit
> proposed patch
>
> I'm testing this patch,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Schiffer ---
(In reply to YunQiang Su from comment #8)
> Ohh, In fact we should use $28 if TARGET_USE_GOT.
>
> Can you help to test this patch?
>
> ```
> diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/mips.cc b/gcc/config/mips/mips.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105645
--- Comment #5 from Julian Waters ---
Hopefully that was enough to draw more attention to this bug. Any ideas why
this might be happening?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115230
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105645
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 115230 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115230
Bug ID: 115230
Summary: -fvisibility=hidden does not hide Template
Specializations from being exported
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69654
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104048
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
The "fix" in comment 5 no longer does the job. It's on my TODO list.
Paul
66 matches
Mail list logo
