[Bug tree-optimization/115082] New: Canonical form for `(a+oddCST)&1` or `1 & ~a`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115082 Bug ID: 115082 Summary: Canonical form for `(a+oddCST)&1` or `1 & ~a` Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement

[Bug rtl-optimization/115081] find thie PR will cause ICE: Modify cost calculation for dealingf with equivalaennces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115081 --- Comment #4 from Zhenyu Zhao --- I apologize for not describing my problem clearly. I'm now trying to import these two PR in gcc in the x86 openEuler OS to test some application. But after introducing them I found out that these two pr's caus

[Bug rtl-optimization/115081] find thie PR will cause ICE: Modify cost calculation for dealingf with equivalaennces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115081 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- You have not provided all of the information needed for this? Can you provide the target which is being used here? Can you provide the exact version of GCC you are using to get the ICE? Also I noticed the I

[Bug target/115058] on target arm -mcpu=cortex-a78ae does not allow use pauth and dot product

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115058 --- Comment #4 from xiaoyong yan --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > This looks like a binutils issue rather a gcc one. It might be already fixed > in binutils too. I am using binutils 2.39.0, GNU assembler version 2.39.0 arm-non

[Bug rtl-optimization/115081] find thie PR will cause ICE: Modify cost calculation for dealingf with equivalaennces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115081 --- Comment #2 from Zhenyu Zhao --- Created attachment 58198 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58198&action=edit Detail info about ICE Sorry for that, I reattach the image.

[Bug rtl-optimization/115081] find thie PR will cause ICE: Modify cost calculation for dealingf with equivalaennces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115081 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-05-14 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug rtl-optimization/115081] find thie PR will cause ICE: Modify cost calculation for dealingf with equivalaennces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115081 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |rtl-optimization --- Comment #1 from An

[Bug c/115081] New: find thie PR will cause ICE: Modify cost calculation for dealingf with equivalaennces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115081 Bug ID: 115081 Summary: find thie PR will cause ICE: Modify cost calculation for dealingf with equivalaennces Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/114303] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE with constexpr if and accessing captures across nested generic lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114303 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47cac09307874ff1d640392e3d986453f34f7bcb commit r13-8767-g47cac09307874ff1d640392e3d986453f34f7bcb Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug debug/115080] New: ICE when generating debug information for lambda in requires expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115080 Bug ID: 115080 Summary: ICE when generating debug information for lambda in requires expression Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug target/115058] on target arm -mcpu=cortex-a78ae does not allow use pauth and dot product

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115058 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- This looks like a binutils issue rather a gcc one. It might be already fixed in binutils too.

[Bug target/115058] on target arm -mcpu=cortex-a78ae does not allow use pauth and dot product

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115058 --- Comment #2 from xiaoyong yan --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #1) > It looks like those messages are coming from the assembler, not the > compiler, but without a testcase it's difficult to be exactly sure what your > problem is

[Bug middle-end/113904] [OpenMP][5.0][5.1] Dynamic context selector 'user={condition(expr)}' not handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113904 --- Comment #7 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- My most recent metadirectives/dynamic selector patch set does include partial support for dynamic selectors. For C/C++ it handles expressions that reference variables/functions that are globally

[Bug target/112109] Missing riscv vectorized strcmp (and other) expanders

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112109 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df15eb15b5f820321c81efc75f0af13ff8c0dd5b commit r15-439-gdf15eb15b5f820321c81efc75f0af13ff8c0dd5b Author: Sergei Lewis Date: Mon May

[Bug target/113578] Incorrect sign printed for -nan on RISC-V

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113578 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Waterman --- For my M1 running Ventura 13.6, NaN payloads _are_ propagated, sign bit included. This test prints fffc0080: int main() { volatile long long ll = 0x8010; volatile double d; memcpy((char*

[Bug c++/115079] New: unexpected error with partial specialization of template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115079 Bug ID: 115079 Summary: unexpected error with partial specialization of template Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/115078] New: ICE with invalid partial specialization of template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115078 Bug ID: 115078 Summary: ICE with invalid partial specialization of template Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug bootstrap/115077] bootstrap fails with in-tree isl-0.25/6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115077 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/86100] Spurious error with -fcheck=bounds and allocatable class(*) array components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug bootstrap/115077] New: bootstrap fails with in-tree isl-0.25/6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115077 Bug ID: 115077 Summary: bootstrap fails with in-tree isl-0.25/6 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug gcov-profile/115047] Inconsistent MC/DC reported by GCC and LLVM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115047 --- Comment #2 from Jørgen Kvalsvik --- > f(1, 0, 0) = false, while f(1, 0, 1) = true Sorry, I meant: f(0, 0, 1) = true f(0, 0, 0) = false and f(1, 0, 1) = true f(1, 0, 0) = false It does not take away from the conclusion when doing masking M

[Bug c++/115061] Compiling gcc failed when using clang 16.0.6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115061 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 CC|

[Bug gcov-profile/115047] Inconsistent MC/DC reported by GCC and LLVM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115047 --- Comment #1 from Jørgen Kvalsvik --- gcc is not wrong here - f(1, 0, 0) = false, while f(1, 0, 1) = true so clearly c has an independent effect on the outcome here, and both its values has been observed. I think clang measures unique-cause a

[Bug other/115076] [OpenMP] "declare variant" scoping rules and visibility

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115076 --- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 58197 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58197&action=edit second test case

[Bug other/115076] New: [OpenMP] "declare variant" scoping rules and visibility

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115076 Bug ID: 115076 Summary: [OpenMP] "declare variant" scoping rules and visibility Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/115053] gcc crashed without back trace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115053 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/115074] incorrect stringop-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115074 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug c++/105644] ICE in a fold expression with a requires expression: in iterative_hash_template_arg, at cp/pt.cc:1805

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105644 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hlewin at gmx dot de --- Comment #4 fro

[Bug c++/115075] internal_compiler_error during compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115075 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Res

[Bug c++/115075] internal_compiler_error during compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115075 --- Comment #1 from Heiko Lewin --- Created attachment 58195 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58195&action=edit gzipped output file of -freport-bug

[Bug c++/115075] New: internal_compiler_error during compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115075 Bug ID: 115075 Summary: internal_compiler_error during compilation Product: gcc Version: 14.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug rtl-optimization/115013] [15 Regression] LRA: PR114810 fix result in ICE in the RISC-V Vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115013 --- Comment #6 from Dimitar Dimitrov --- Created attachment 58194 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58194&action=edit tentative fix for PRU The PRU requires a further target adjustment to fix SMALL_REGISTER_CLASS_P. The attac

[Bug c++/115074] New: incorrect stringop-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115074 Bug ID: 115074 Summary: incorrect stringop-overflow warning Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/111009] [12 regression] -fno-strict-overflow erroneously elides null pointer checks and causes SIGSEGV on perf from linux-6.4.10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111009 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5c3a4a265256535a66f1656d44e143f05d77f66 commit r12-10439-gc5c3a4a265256535a66f1656d44e143f05d77f66 Author: Andrew MacLe

[Bug middle-end/114596] [OpenMP] "declare variant" scoring seems incorrect for construct selectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114596 --- Comment #8 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- This bug is addressed in the metadirective/dynamic selector patch set I posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/650725.html

[Bug c++/115061] Compiling gcc failed when using clang 16.0.6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115061 Ken Matsui changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/115070] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Replacing the scalar argument 'obs' by something with rank > 0 avoids the ICE, but then assumed-rank is not accepted with intent(out). Another bug...

[Bug rtl-optimization/115013] [15 Regression] LRA: PR114810 fix result in ICE in the RISC-V Vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115013 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So this seems to have fixed the RISC-V port. Thanks! I'm still seeing some problems on the PRU port though: Tests that now fail, but worked before (1 tests): pru-sim: gcc: gcc.dg/pr71478.c (test for exc

[Bug c++/115061] Compiling gcc failed when using clang 16.0.6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115061 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Ken Matsui : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30ff6c55ba0f2262cf292c90d7b9d771005305f0 commit r15-437-g30ff6c55ba0f2262cf292c90d7b9d771005305f0 Author: Ken Matsui Date: Sun May

[Bug fortran/115070] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.3.1 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/115072] Memory leak with unlimited polymorphic function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115072 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Memory link with unlimited |Memory leak with unlimited

[Bug c++/114709] [12/13 Regression] Incorrect handling of inactive union member access via pointer to member in constant evaluated context since r12-6425

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114709 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3659e2dfcc6db83391cd2c6d70097cba35eb4b9 commit r13-8765-gd3659e2dfcc6db83391cd2c6d70097cba35eb4b9 Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/113332] [12/13 regression] checking ICE when building fcitx-5.1.6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113332 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/112658] [12/13 Regression] ICE: finish_expr_stmt with casting an temp array to pointer and constructor call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112658 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|12.4

[Bug c++/114903] constraint of CTAD alias deduction guide is evaluated on a wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114903 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c++/114901] GCC internal_error on CTAD alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114901 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.2 CC|

[Bug c++/114974] CTAD; templated inner class of template class seems to be handled incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114974 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.2 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/114903] constraint of CTAD alias deduction guide is evaluated on a wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114903 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57cd8665fea4c339369a43be017583621aa82fed commit r14-10201-g57cd8665fea4c339369a43be017583621aa82fed Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/114901] GCC internal_error on CTAD alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114901 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57cd8665fea4c339369a43be017583621aa82fed commit r14-10201-g57cd8665fea4c339369a43be017583621aa82fed Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/114974] CTAD; templated inner class of template class seems to be handled incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114974 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57cd8665fea4c339369a43be017583621aa82fed commit r14-10201-g57cd8665fea4c339369a43be017583621aa82fed Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug tree-optimization/115073] RISC-V: Gimple fold not honor C[LT]Z_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115073 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Note -fsanitize=undefined does detect this undefinedness at runtime already too.

[Bug tree-optimization/115073] RISC-V: Gimple fold not honor C[LT]Z_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115073 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Or another option is to use C23 , that is well defined for all values. But you need recent glibc (2.39 snapshots or 2.40) & gcc (14) for that.

[Bug rtl-optimization/115013] [15 Regression] LRA: PR114810 fix result in ICE in the RISC-V Vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115013 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44e7855e4e817a7f5a1e332cd95e780e57052dba commit r15-436-g44e7855e4e817a7f5a1e332cd95e780e57052dba Author: Vladimir N. Makarov D

[Bug tree-optimization/115073] RISC-V: Gimple fold not honor C[LT]Z_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115073 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/115073] RISC-V: Gimple fold not honor C[LT]Z_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115073 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/115073] New: RISC-V: Gimple fold not honor C[LT]Z_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115073 Bug ID: 115073 Summary: RISC-V: Gimple fold not honor C[LT]Z_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug target/114988] RISC-V: ICE in intrinsic __riscv_vfwsub_wf_f32mf2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114988 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41b3cf262e61aee9d26380f1c820e0eaae740f50 commit r15-435-g41b3cf262e61aee9d26380f1c820e0eaae740f50 Author: Pan Li Date: Sat May 11 15:25

[Bug analyzer/107750] [13/14/15 Regression] Many gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-*.c tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107750 --- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- I think I've found what's going on: really has #if !defined(_XPG4_2) || defined(__EXTENSIONS__) #ifndef NC_TPI_CLTS #define NC_TPI_CLTS 1 /* must agree with netconfig

[Bug fortran/115072] New: Memory link with unlimited polymorphic function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115072 Bug ID: 115072 Summary: Memory link with unlimited polymorphic function result Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug target/115071] performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using -O3 and _Pragma("GCC unroll 4") on skylake

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115071 --- Comment #2 from Colin Ian King --- Created attachment 58193 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58193&action=edit gcc-14 disassembly

[Bug target/115071] performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using -O3 and _Pragma("GCC unroll 4") on skylake

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115071 --- Comment #1 from Colin Ian King --- Created attachment 58192 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58192&action=edit gcc-13 disassembly

[Bug target/115071] New: performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using -O3 and _Pragma("GCC unroll 4") on skylake

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115071 Bug ID: 115071 Summary: performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using -O3 and _Pragma("GCC unroll 4") on skylake Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug fortran/115070] New: ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with intent(out) statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 Bug ID: 115070 Summary: ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with intent(out) statement Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/109071] -Warray-bounds false positive warnings due to code duplication from jump threading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109071 --- Comment #10 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- with the following added heuristic in array-bound checker: + /* If the stmt is duplicated and splitted, the warning level is not 2, + and the current block is not dominating the exit block

[Bug libstdc++/88545] std::find compile to memchr in trivial random access cases (patch)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88545 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > + using _ValT = typename iterator_traits<_InputIterator>::value_type; > + if constexpr (is_same_v<_ValT, _Tp>) > + if constexpr (__is_byte<_Va

[Bug tree-optimization/113583] Main loop in 519.lbm not vectorized.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583 --- Comment #18 from Robin Dapp --- A bit of a follow-up: I'm working on a patch for reassociation that can handle the mentioned cases and some more but it will still require a bit of time to get everything regression free and correct. What it

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #19 from Martin Jambor --- The following minimized testcase ICEs with r15-312-g36e877996936ab cross-compiler to ppc64le with -O2 nicely: void omp_clause_elt_check(int *, const char *, const char *); enum { C_OMP_CLAUSE_SPLIT_COUNT

[Bug c++/114903] constraint of CTAD alias deduction guide is evaluated on a wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114903 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d31a370e26eeb950c326332633b3e8e84b6630b commit r15-434-g6d31a370e26eeb950c326332633b3e8e84b6630b Author: Patrick Palka Date: Mo

[Bug c++/114974] CTAD; templated inner class of template class seems to be handled incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114974 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d31a370e26eeb950c326332633b3e8e84b6630b commit r15-434-g6d31a370e26eeb950c326332633b3e8e84b6630b Author: Patrick Palka Date: Mo

[Bug c++/114901] GCC internal_error on CTAD alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114901 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d31a370e26eeb950c326332633b3e8e84b6630b commit r15-434-g6d31a370e26eeb950c326332633b3e8e84b6630b Author: Patrick Palka Date: Mo

[Bug libstdc++/115040] Missed optimization opportunity in std::find of std::vector elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115040 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > Then this is partly a dup of bug 88545 Yes, that would manually transform the find_epi8 case into a memchr call, but Clang doesn't need a manual transform in

[Bug target/115069] 8 bit integer vector performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using avx2 target clones on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115069 --- Comment #2 from Colin Ian King --- Created attachment 58190 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58190&action=edit gcc-14 disassembly

[Bug target/115069] 8 bit integer vector performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using avx2 target clones on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115069 --- Comment #1 from Colin Ian King --- Created attachment 58189 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58189&action=edit gcc-13 disassembly

[Bug target/115069] New: 8 bit integer vector performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using avx2 target clones on skylake platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115069 Bug ID: 115069 Summary: 8 bit integer vector performance regression, x86, between gcc-14 and gcc-13 using avx2 target clones on skylake platform Product: gcc Ver

[Bug libstdc++/88545] std::find compile to memchr in trivial random access cases (patch)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88545 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug target/115058] on target arm -mcpu=cortex-a78ae does not allow use pauth and dot product

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115058 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/60276] [4.7 Regression] -O3 autovectorizer breaks on a particular loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60276 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a9b159a86081053289be0c44339623ff59717a2 commit r15-431-g8a9b159a86081053289be0c44339623ff59717a2 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug libstdc++/106852] Implement C++23 P2465R3 Standard Library Modules std and std.compat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106852 --- Comment #4 from Boris Kolpackov --- FWIW, this project contains a subset of module interface files that (reportedly) can be used to build a (probably incomplete) `std` module with `libstdc++` using Clang (the README says it requires `libc++`

[Bug middle-end/54052] [11/12/13 Regression] g++ takes excessive time in opt and generate phase; can lead to Segmentation Fault when not enough memory available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54052 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d629308c699bb8fe90c2afeb7fa1acb12cb5526b commit r13-8763-gd629308c699bb8fe90c2afeb7fa1acb12cb5526b Author: Richard Biener

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 98529, which changed state. Bug 98529 Summary: [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/98529] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.5|15.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98529] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4af8ebdb0318b5e9ed3dfdea5501a3260f3acea commit r15-430-gc4af8ebdb0318b5e9ed3dfdea5501a3260f3acea Author: Rainer Orth Date: Mon Ma

[Bug libstdc++/114958] use __builtin_shufflevector for std::experimental::simd split and concat (at least the common cases) to enable better optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114958 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb1649f8b4ad5043dd0e65e4e3a643a0ced018a9 commit r15-429-gfb1649f8b4ad5043dd0e65e4e3a643a0ced018a9 Author: Matthias Kretz Date:

[Bug c/115068] New: RISC-V: Illegal instruction of vfwadd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115068 Bug ID: 115068 Summary: RISC-V: Illegal instruction of vfwadd Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug middle-end/54052] [11/12/13 Regression] g++ takes excessive time in opt and generate phase; can lead to Segmentation Fault when not enough memory available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54052 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug debug/92387] [11/12/13 Regression] gcc generates wrong debug information at -O1 since r10-1907-ga20f263ba1a76a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92387 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/102250] [11/12/13 Regression] python is not documented as a Prerequisite for building for riscv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102250 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug debug/107169] [13 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure at -O and above since r13-2921-gf1adf45b17f7f1ed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107169 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug debug/107231] [13 Regression] c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-loop-g.c: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107231 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/115010] m68k: invalid subl instruction generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115010 --- Comment #14 from Thorsten Otto --- A bisect between 10.0.0 and 11.4.0 for the 2nd testcase gave me this commit: commit 512c6ba04102295fccc62a173ee0086ca733c920 From: Richard Biener Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:29:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Avo

[Bug analyzer/109077] [11/12/13 Regression] Analyzer headers not installed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109077 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug libstdc++/109772] [13 Regression] Memory layout optimization of std::chrono::hh_mm_ss is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109772 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug analyzer/109802] [13 Regression] ICE using dubious flexible arrays in unions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109802 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/110269] [13 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-4607-g2dc5d6b1e7e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110269 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug sanitizer/110676] [11/12/13 Regression] strlen of array[1] should not be optimized to 0 if using ASAN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110676 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c/111059] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:17253

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111059 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/111249] [12/13 Regression] Aggressive loop optimization reports "iteration 2147483645 invokes undefined behavior"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111249 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug analyzer/111266] [13 Regression] Missing -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds for concrete offset overwrite.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111266 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/111668] [12/13 Regression] vrp2 (match and simplify) introduces invalid wide signed Boolean values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111668 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/112658] [12/13 Regression] ICE: finish_expr_stmt with casting an temp array to pointer and constructor call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112658 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

  1   2   >