https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114982
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
Assignee|unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114968
--- Comment #11 from LIU Hao ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #10)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> > Created attachment 58123 [details]
> > gcc15-pr114968.patch
> >
> > This is what I'd do, but completely untested...
>
> I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114982
Bug ID: 114982
Summary: [15 Regression] New test
g++.dg/tree-ssa/cxa_atexit-6.C fails on Darwin.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114981
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #0)
> ... due to PR11093 ...
PR110093
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114981
Bug ID: 114981
Summary: [avr] Improve powi implementation
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114968
--- Comment #10 from LIU Hao ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Created attachment 58123 [details]
> gcc15-pr114968.patch
>
> This is what I'd do, but completely untested...
It does not solve the issue.
Side note: Although I th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114980
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #9 from Xi Ruoyao ---
ht
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114967
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I had a patch for this which I didn't finish up and I hope to get it done for
GCC 15.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114969
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114967
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114980
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112392
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114980
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-08
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89224
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.4.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670
Bug 88670 depends on bug 89224, which changed state.
Bug 89224 Summary: [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] subscript of const vector has
the wrong type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89224
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89224
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:046aeffba336295fbdaf0e1ecf64b582d08f0aa6
commit r11-11419-g046aeffba336295fbdaf0e1ecf64b582d08f0aa6
Author: Andrew Pinski
del: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20240507 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-fdiagnostics-urls=never' '-Wtarget-lifetime' '-B' 'gcc'
'-v' '-c' '-mtune=generic' '-marc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114980
--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> -fdiagnostics-plain-output does:
> /* If you have changed the default diagnostics output, and this new
> output is not appropriately "plain" (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114980
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
-fdiagnostics-plain-output does:
/* If you have changed the default diagnostics output, and this new
output is not appropriately "plain" (e.g., the change needs to be
undo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114980
--- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I have not seen this failure ...
Yes it's strange. I didn't see the failures building 14.1.0-RC1 but I saw them
building 14.1.0, though RC1 definitely outputs the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114980
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I have not seen this failure ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114980
--- Comment #1 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Also happens for "command-line option ... is valid for ... but not for ..."
warnings:
$ env -i PATH=$PATH TERM=xterm-256colors cc hw.c -fdiagnostics-urls=never
-Wtarget-lifetime
cc1: warning: command-line optio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114980
Bug ID: 114980
Summary: [14/15 Regression] -fdiagnostics-urls=never does not
suppress URLs in `'-Werror=' argument '-Werror=...'
not valid for ...` warnings
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89224
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:315f8a474eb1a9b2d213aa650bdb132c78546264
commit r12-10420-g315f8a474eb1a9b2d213aa650bdb132c78546264
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114978
--- Comment #5 from chenglulu ---
I will verify it on multiple machines to see if the problem can be reproduced.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114968
--- Comment #9 from LIU Hao ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Created attachment 58123 [details]
> gcc15-pr114968.patch
>
> This is what I'd do, but completely untested...
Thanks. I am gonna give it a run.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89224
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5d9eef6507f36692066c0934d9f8c9d462e698f
commit r13-8713-gf5d9eef6507f36692066c0934d9f8c9d462e698f
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89224
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cacc48014c7fdb888b4449830b567e5375dfb4e3
commit r14-10183-gcacc48014c7fdb888b4449830b567e5375dfb4e3
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114856
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 114856, which changed state.
Bug 114856 Summary: [14/15 regression][modules] ICE (segfault)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114856
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114856
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61a095b05c244a6e0b1aec36ee1607def00654ab
commit r14-10182-g61a095b05c244a6e0b1aec36ee1607def00654ab
Author: Nathaniel Sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114856
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e60032b382364897a58e67994baac896bcd03327
commit r15-310-ge60032b382364897a58e67994baac896bcd03327
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114972
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114974
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89224
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89224
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4421d35167b3083e0f2e4c84c91fded09a30cf22
commit r15-309-g4421d35167b3083e0f2e4c84c91fded09a30cf22
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114872
--- Comment #22 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Trying again to catch more precise place for SIGABRT.
Beginning at the start of the possibly aborting function:
(gdb) break __pyx_pf_4sage_4libs_3gap_7element_19GapElement_Function_2__call__
(gdb) co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84411
Bug 84411 depends on bug 19661, which changed state.
Bug 19661 Summary: unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with
empty destructors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c9dd853680b12d9c9def5de61abde5d057c526ba
commit r15-308-gc9dd853680b12d9c9def5de61abde5d057c526ba
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61110
Bug 61110 depends on bug 114894, which changed state.
Bug 114894 Summary: `a == 0 ? 0 : a * b` -> `a * b` likewise for `a & b`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114894
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114894
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114894
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e472527c7b45d23e8dfd0fb767a6e663b4bc136e
commit r15-307-ge472527c7b45d23e8dfd0fb767a6e663b4bc136e
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114854
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
I'm using this slightly modified test:
```
class Vector {
int m_size;
};
struct S {
const Vector &vec{};
};
void spawn(S);
void test() { spawn({}); }
```
To initialize S we generate:
D.2848 = {.vec=(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114970
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|32-bit ARM gcc-14.1 new |[14/15 Regression] 32-bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608
Bug 65608 depends on bug 114459, which changed state.
Bug 114459 Summary: [C++26] P2893R3 - Variadic friends
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114459
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110338
Bug 110338 depends on bug 114459, which changed state.
Bug 114459 Summary: [C++26] P2893R3 - Variadic friends
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114459
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114459
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114459
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17458d2bc74b904968e6bdc12527eb040c8d2370
commit r15-304-g17458d2bc74b904968e6bdc12527eb040c8d2370
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114979
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jorge Acereda from comment #2)
> Thanks for the prompt reply. I understand the behaviour for external
> functions, but for static functions, isn't it a missed opportunity for
> optimization?
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114979
--- Comment #2 from Jorge Acereda ---
Thanks for the prompt reply. I understand the behaviour for external functions,
but for static functions, isn't it a missed opportunity for optimization?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114907
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Should be fixed for 14.2+ for now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114956
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14/15 Regression] |[11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114907
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f43f346f19889a15a171a10c6ae1b1fe0a5bc038
commit r14-10181-gf43f346f19889a15a171a10c6ae1b1fe0a5bc038
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114956
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aca573ea64ccfd54d4447e9a3200acd7a9157082
commit r14-10180-gaca573ea64ccfd54d4447e9a3200acd7a9157082
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114907
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28ee13db2e9d995bd3728c4ff3a3545e24b39cd2
commit r15-303-g28ee13db2e9d995bd3728c4ff3a3545e24b39cd2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114956
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4e25cf4f7c1f51a8824cc62bbb85a81a41b829a
commit r15-302-gd4e25cf4f7c1f51a8824cc62bbb85a81a41b829a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
--- Comment #31 from Florian Weimer ---
Fixed via r7-1272. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114968
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 58123
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58123&action=edit
gcc15-pr114968.patch
This is what I'd do, but completely untested...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|SUSPENDED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114133
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113768
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113768
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07dab3f6b56c711dcd737d856cf01a597a2e1626
commit r14-10179-g07dab3f6b56c711dcd737d856cf01a597a2e1626
Author: Gaius Mulley
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114133
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07dab3f6b56c711dcd737d856cf01a597a2e1626
commit r14-10179-g07dab3f6b56c711dcd737d856cf01a597a2e1626
Author: Gaius Mulley
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114952
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I don't think this is a `False positive` exactly because GCC has no
knowledge that errno could be non-zero after a fail call to open.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110908
--- Comment #6 from zach-gcc at cs dot stanford.edu ---
I've resumed using GCC for this project, where I am instrumenting assembly and
require that x30 only ever contain addresses (not arbitrary data). I ran into a
case where GCC was storing data
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114979
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114133
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:76e591200f54226290ddb49b8ac6231a694bf882
commit r15-300-g76e591200f54226290ddb49b8ac6231a694bf882
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114979
Bug ID: 114979
Summary: Spurious eax clears
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114978
--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao ---
s/suspicious/skeptical/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114978
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||loongarch64-*-*
Component|fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114978
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114978
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114971
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114931
--- Comment #20 from Sam James ---
*** Bug 114971 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114978
Bug ID: 114978
Summary: 548.exchange2_r 14%-28% regressions on Loongarch64
after gcc 14 snapshot 20240317
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114973
--- Comment #4 from Ozkan Sezer ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> This a different incarnation of PR114931, fixed on trunk as well already (I
> just checked).
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 114931 ***
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114971
--- Comment #7 from Ozkan Sezer ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> Please check if trunk works, as a fix for that PR was committed not long ago.
Confirmed that trunk has it fixed.
Fix hopefully gets backported soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114977
Bug ID: 114977
Summary: C++20 parenthesized aggregate initialization
copy-inits from {} instead of value-init
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114976
Bug ID: 114976
Summary: MIPS64: get double high part can use mfhc1
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114965
--- Comment #12 from Paul Eggert ---
Thanks for fixing GCC.
I installed into Gnulib a patch that clarifies strftime's implementation, and
this also works around the GCC bug. It'll take some time for this to propagate
out, though, as Gnulib is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114965
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 58121
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58121&action=edit
gcc15-pr114965.patch
Full untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109822
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d7a770f2d1dc9d7e7b79788c201ba22bd52cf06
commit r13-8706-g4d7a770f2d1dc9d7e7b79788c201ba22bd52cf06
Author: Matthias Kretz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114750
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4505045dadaa58b0f165479d038d8f0247aea8cc
commit r13-8709-g4505045dadaa58b0f165479d038d8f0247aea8cc
Author: Matthias Kretz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110050
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6b19675fb3397992a8f88ef031d57c4dcd73cd6
commit r13-8703-ge6b19675fb3397992a8f88ef031d57c4dcd73cd6
Author: Matthias Kretz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110054
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:63b73f14be97a9fe8621ec1a523b6dd19bde72dc
commit r13-8705-g63b73f14be97a9fe8621ec1a523b6dd19bde72dc
Author: Matthias Kretz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114803
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6663f2a04c16288124d5ef918c661260e4f66284
commit r13-8712-g6663f2a04c16288124d5ef918c661260e4f66284
Author: Matthias Kretz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114876
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114876
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1c8ae15d9df0caa839b47c8631571a1ec27e367
commit r14-10177-ga1c8ae15d9df0caa839b47c8631571a1ec27e367
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114968
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #6)
> I suspect this isn't correct. I am getting strange errors like 'ld exited
> with code 5' not sure what could cause it (possibly also recent MSYS2
> updates):
>
> ```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114968
--- Comment #6 from LIU Hao ---
I suspect this isn't correct. I am getting strange errors like 'ld exited with
code 5' not sure what could cause it (possibly also recent MSYS2 updates):
```
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
index 2a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114835
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Wolfgang Hospital from comment #0)
> When establishing the "popcount" of an uint8_t, I've seen GCC to widen the
> value to "half int" and use __popcountqi2 twice.
This is a different issue,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114835
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114975
Bug ID: 114975
Summary: [AVR] Using popcounthi2 for 8-bit values despit
popcountqi2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112868
--- Comment #15 from jeevitha at linux dot ibm.com ---
On 07/05/24 1:53 am, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> That said, Jeevitha, now that we're in stage1, can you please post your patch?
>
Sure Peter.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 114889, which changed state.
Bug 114889 Summary: [modules] ICE in friend_accessible_p with imported class
template specialization befriending class template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114889
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114889
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114889
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:390bd23fd9c98dc40856beef05364f5d1c7b9d04
commit r14-10176-g390bd23fd9c98dc40856beef05364f5d1c7b9d04
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108189
--- Comment #14 from Daniel Xu ---
Yeah, I saw that. But that only makes the build not
fail right? For bpftrace we are trying hard to be
warning-free.
FWIW I tried adding `-std=gnu2x` and it didn't help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114835
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d2c93fcfe1afc5291bbbe162c3b7ad5764f6d8d
commit r15-286-g8d2c93fcfe1afc5291bbbe162c3b7ad5764f6d8d
Author: Wolfgang Hospital
Dat
1 - 100 of 297 matches
Mail list logo
