https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114526
--- Comment #7 from Kaz Kylheku ---
Also, it would be useful for the documentation to list all the -W-* options
that are implied by -Wpedantic.
The function/object pointer conversion diagnostics, unfortunately, are tied to
-Wpedantic itself, wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114528
Bug ID: 114528
Summary: (0x0001ULL - 0x00123000) constant forming
could be done in 2 instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114527
Bug ID: 114527
Summary: [meta-bug] missed sccp (final value) optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114172
Wojciech Mula changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wojciech_mula at poczta dot
onet.p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114526
--- Comment #6 from Harald van Dijk ---
(In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #5)
> The -pedantic documentation was updated to reflect reality - that the option
> is about more than just when diagnostics are required by ISO C ("forbidden
> e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114526
--- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers ---
The -pedantic documentation was updated to reflect reality - that the option is
about more than just when diagnostics are required by ISO C ("forbidden
extensions" can be taken, in the C case, as meaning t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114514
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Confirmed.
>
> Note non sign bit can be improved too:
> ```
I assume you're talking about broadcast from imm or directly from constant
pool. GCC chooses the forme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114518
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32}'
powerpc.exp=gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c"
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c scan-assembler-not \\msrawi\\M
# of expected passe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114526
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114514
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
For non constant clang produces:
```
signedshiftright:
movzbl %dil, %eax
movd%eax, %xmm1
psrlw %xmm1, %xmm0
pcmpeqd %xmm2, %xmm2
psrlw %xmm1, %xmm2
mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114514
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114518
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It fails with -m32 only for me?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83584
Kaz Kylheku changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkylheku at gmail dot com
--- Comment #22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100667
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114526
--- Comment #3 from Kaz Kylheku ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Actually it is a required diagnostic. See PR 11234 for explanation on how.
> This was changed a little over 20 years ago explictly to reject this because
> it is i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11234
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkylheku at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114526
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114526
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg00599.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114513
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like r9-332-g43d0a8ee88460a added the ? there and caused the regression
I do think it should be ^ since the reload (spill) case should use w while
normally it try both, w and r. But I could be wrong.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99829
--- Comment #9 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Hello Vladimir,
Sorry for the delay in getting back to this.
(In reply to GCC Commits from comment #8)
> The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c91f8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114526
Bug ID: 114526
Summary: ISO C does not prohibit extensions: fix misconception.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114513
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.5.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114519
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-28
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
--- Comment #13 from Jose E. Marchesi ---
Thanks. The new title is way better. And thank you for the further analysis
and the reproducer that also makes clang to generate the no-verifiable code!
I wonder, is the issue also there when -mno-alu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |14.0
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113652
--- Comment #19 from Michael Meissner ---
When I wrote the VSX support many years ago, I intended that -mvsx enable all
of ISA 2.06, which includes ISA 2.05, etc.
My intentions were there 2 options for power7, one is the base ISA 2.07 support
f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54412
--- Comment #44 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Thank you, Dmitry, but that particular solution may not be possible for me.
> When I try compiling with -mstackrealign -mpreferred-stack-boundary=5
> -mincoming-stack-boundary=5 instead of forcing unaligne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114525
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.4.7
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114525
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114525
Bug ID: 114525
Summary: Incorrect code generated when setting a value through
a pointer-to-member on a ternary returning an object
reference
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
The bpf verifier is just plain broken when it comes to subreg usage. So after
every 32bit usage you need to output a zero extend. To fix that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
The only way to fix this is to add extra zero extends all the time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114431
Bug 114431 depends on bug 114523, which changed state.
Bug 114523 Summary: bpf: ssa-phiopt optimization generates unverifiable code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
Jose E. Marchesi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111289
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86b0b1bec6790f84b7a56fcef2a0a6c8cd91ffef
commit r14-9714-g86b0b1bec6790f84b7a56fcef2a0a6c8cd91ffef
Author: John David Anglin
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100667
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bb3ef3f6e335e8794590fb712a2661d11d21973
commit r14-9713-g8bb3ef3f6e335e8794590fb712a2661d11d21973
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> The problem is the verifier:
> Mär 26 23:57:12 H systemd[1]: 17: (ac) w0 ^= w3 ;
> R0_w=scalar()
> R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
The problem is the verifier:
Mär 26 23:57:12 H systemd[1]: 17: (ac) w0 ^= w3 ;
R0_w=scalar() R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=1,var_off=(0x0;
0x1))
Mär 26 23:57:12 H syst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114431
Bug 114431 depends on bug 114523, which changed state.
Bug 114523 Summary: bpf: ssa-phiopt optimization generates unverifiable code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114524
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
here is one which makes similar code for both gcc and clang:
```
int foo2 ()
{
int quux = bar ();
unsigned long t3 = (unsigned int)quux;
t3+=-1;
asm("":"+r"(t3));
t3 = t3>>63;
unsigned char t =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114524
Bug ID: 114524
Summary: Use less expensive expression when expressions are
equal
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
```
int foo2 ()
{
int quux = bar ();
unsigned long t3 = (unsigned int)quux;
t3+=-1;
t3 = t3>>63;
unsigned char t = t3;
unsigned long t4 = (unsigned int)baz;
t4 = -t4;
t4 = t4>>63;
unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
```
int foo1 ()
{
int quux = bar ();
_Bool t = quux == 0;
_Bool t1 = baz != 0;
int t2 = t;
t2 ^= t1;
return t2;
}
```
Produces the same resulting asm.
The way clang produces comparisons is:
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
> - Disable the optimization for BPF until the verifier fixes the limitation if
> possible.
NO.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
There is nothing magical about phiopt (in this case) is doing that can't be
produced by an user.
What does the final code from the backend looks like?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112723
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
>
> So what's missing is a simplification pattern that ignores ops that only
> alter
> bits that are dont-care in a later operation. That fits the backprop pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114521
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.4.1, 12.1.0
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114523
Bug ID: 114523
Summary: bpf: ssa-phiopt optimization generates unverifiable
code.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114474
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bbb7c513dddc5c9b2d5e9b78bc1c2f85a0cfe07e
commit r14-9712-gbbb7c513dddc5c9b2d5e9b78bc1c2f85a0cfe07e
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54412
--- Comment #43 from Avraham Adler ---
Thank you, Dmitry, but that particular solution may not be possible for me.
When I try compiling with -mstackrealign -mpreferred-stack-boundary=5
-mincoming-stack-boundary=5 instead of forcing unaligned move
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114522
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112723
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
gimple-ssa-strength-reduction definitely should be improved to handle this case
where it should understand that (a+CSTWITHLASTBITSET)*2 can be done as
a*2+NEWCST if the type can wrap. Only can do that if wra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114521
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114522
Bug ID: 114522
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.target/arm/aes_xor_combine.c
scan-assembler-not veor fails after
r14-9692-g839bc42772ba7a
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112723
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114520
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114520
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aeee63ffbf4f4fbc4d90d8aae808d6b67f0148a3
commit r14-9710-gaeee63ffbf4f4fbc4d90d8aae808d6b67f0148a3
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114520
--- Comment #3 from Gaius Mulley ---
The fix is not elegant, but it is accurate:
$ gm2 localmodule2.mod
localmodule2.mod:13:3: error: In inner module ‘local’: an IMPORT statement must
preceed an EXPORT statement
13 | IMPORT mult2 ;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114520
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 57832
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57832&action=edit
Proposed fix
The error recovery causes misleading error messages to appear if an EXPORT
and IMPORT statement ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110987
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114521
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
Summary|aarch64: wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103716
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114521
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
g:66f206b85395c273980e2b81a54dbddc4897e4a7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103716
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48d23749534ca96b3f0883579b44700a17e83d15
commit r13-8503-g48d23749534ca96b3f0883579b44700a17e83d15
Author: Paul Thomas
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114521
Bug ID: 114521
Summary: aarch64: wrong code with Neon ld1/st1x4 intrinsics
gcc-11 and earlier
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114520
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53392
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114520
Bug ID: 114520
Summary: Incorrect ordering of import/export statements cause
confusing error messages
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114519
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: janisozaur+gcc at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 57830
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57830&action=edit
failure log gcc 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114517
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114517
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114517
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04799f03e8d01b903295ef3a100a0117b7ddbf5e
commit r14-9709-g04799f03e8d01b903295ef3a100a0117b7ddbf5e
Author: Gaius Mulley <(no_default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112303
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5a3b4afcdf4d517334a2717dbb65ae0d2c26507
commit r14-9707-gd5a3b4afcdf4d517334a2717dbb65ae0d2c26507
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114518
Bug ID: 114518
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c fails
after r14-9692-g839bc42772ba7a
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114517
Bug ID: 114517
Summary: gm2 does not allow comparion operator # in the first
column
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114307
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114307
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Maxim Kuvyrkov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8e7aaaf350a4584d9b76e8dd69daa2203bac339
commit r14-9706-gb8e7aaaf350a4584d9b76e8dd69daa2203bac339
Author: Maxim Kuvyrkov
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114511
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114515
--- Comment #5 from Richard Sandiford ---
For the record, the associated new testsuite failures are:
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/ashltidisi.c scan-assembler-times asr 3
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/asimd-mull-elem.c scan-assembler-times
\\s+fmul\\tv[0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
--- Comment #69 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0923fe2d4808c16b72c1d1bfe28220dd326d8b76
commit r14-9705-g0923fe2d4808c16b72c1d1bfe28220dd326d8b76
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 114414, which changed state.
Bug 114414 Summary: 15-18% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on Zen2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114414
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114414
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98842
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to GCC Commits from comment #3)
> Adding that constrain completely breaks std::optional comparisons,
> because it causes constraint recursion. To avoid that, an additional
> check that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112723
--- Comment #3 from Yi <652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
https://godbolt.org/z/zKq3dsqW3
This is a regression since gcc-7.3. If the bisection right:
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/540b5cb6c70.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113372
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109925
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109925
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7942558f27038461f948ca10140a156ae678cdf8
commit r14-9704-g7942558f27038461f948ca10140a156ae678cdf8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114506
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111781
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f233feafd657250340be3b3500d2697948ae3ed
commit r14-9703-g7f233feafd657250340be3b3500d2697948ae3ed
Author: Mikael Morin
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114475
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f233feafd657250340be3b3500d2697948ae3ed
commit r14-9703-g7f233feafd657250340be3b3500d2697948ae3ed
Author: Mikael Morin
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114414
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] 15-18% exec |15-18% exec time slowdown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114481
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] 14% exec|14% exec time slowdown of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114515
--- Comment #4 from Richard Sandiford ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Btw, why does forwprop not do this?
Not 100% sure (I wasn't involved in choosing the current heuristics). But
fwprop can propagate across blocks, so there
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114516
Bug ID: 114516
Summary: RISC-V: TSVC2 s315 has spill with dynamic lmul
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114515
--- Comment #3 from Richard Sandiford ---
In RTL terms, the dup is vec_duplicate. The combination is:
Trying 10 -> 13:
10: r107:V4SF=vec_duplicate(r115:SF)
REG_DEAD r115:SF
13: r110:V4SF=r111:V4SF*r107:V4SF
REG_DEAD r111:V4SF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 57829
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57829&action=edit
smaller testcase
Smaller testcase, shows the same compile-time issue at -O0. At -O1 it's a lot
less bad but
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
