[Bug target/114224] popcount RTL cost seems wrong with cssc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114224 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug sanitizer/114217] -fsanitize=alignment false positive with intended unaligned struct member access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114217 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- BTW, with compilers from the last decade or so, it would be much better idea to just use standard memcpy for get_unaligned/put_unaligned rather than messing around with pointers to packed types. The compil

[Bug tree-optimization/114151] [14 Regression] weird and inefficient codegen and addressing modes since r14-9193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114151 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #7) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > > (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #5) > > > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) > > > > >

[Bug sanitizer/114217] -fsanitize=alignment false positive with intended unaligned struct member access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114217 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug middle-end/94787] Failure to detect single bit popcount pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94787 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/90693] Missing popcount simplifications

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90693 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Piotr Siupa from comment #11) > However, I've noticed that: > bool foo(unsigned x) > { > if (x == 0) > return true; > else > return std::has_single_bit(x); > } Oh that

[Bug target/114224] New: popcount RTL cost seems wrong with cssc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114224 Bug ID: 114224 Summary: popcount RTL cost seems wrong with cssc Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal P

[Bug sanitizer/114217] -fsanitize=alignment false positive with intended unaligned struct member access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114217 --- Comment #8 from Akihiko Odaki --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > GCC actually doesn't diagnose on mere pointer assignment, but what triggers > the alignment check is > &entry->offset > even when the code later on just takes it

[Bug rtl-optimization/110369] [14 Regression] wrong code on x86_64-linux-gnu with sel-scheduling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110369 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug rtl-optimization/110390] [13/14 regression] ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with sel-scheduling: in av_set_could_be_blocked_by_bookkeeping_p, at sel-sched.cc:3609 since r13-3596-ge7310e24b1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110390 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug fortran/110725] [13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.cc:10897

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110725 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/110841] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression since r14-2675-gef28aadad6e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110841 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Resolut

[Bug tree-optimization/110942] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 since r14-1165-g257c2be7ff8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110942 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Resolut

[Bug target/111600] [14 Regression] RISC-V bootstrap time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug other/113575] [14 Regression] memory hog building insn-opinit.o (i686-linux-gnu -> riscv64-linux-gnu)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113575 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/84402] [meta] GCC build system: parallelism bottleneck

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402 Bug 84402 depends on bug 113575, which changed state. Bug 113575 Summary: [14 Regression] memory hog building insn-opinit.o (i686-linux-gnu -> riscv64-linux-gnu) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113575 What|Removed

[Bug c++/112301] [12/13/14 regression] Double destruction of returned object when exiting the scope causes an exception which gets rethrown since r12-6333-gb10e031458d541

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112301 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Resolut

[Bug target/112871] [14 Regression] RISCV ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2804 (unrecognizable insn) with -01 rv32gc_zicond

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112871 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rust/113461] [14 Regression] rust-proc-macro.cc:174:15: error: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'long long unsigned int' [-Werror=format=]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113461 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/113001] [14 Regression] RISCV Zicond ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 with -O2 rv64gcv_zicond

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113001 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug middle-end/113179] [11/12/13/14 Regression] MIPS: INS is used for long long, before SLL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113179 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug target/113226] [14 Regression] testsuite/std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc fails for cris-elf after r14-6888-ga138b99646a555

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113226 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug target/113346] [14 Regression] epiphany-elf build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113346 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 CC|

[Bug fortran/113384] [14 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_reference_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113384 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug rtl-optimization/113533] [14 Regression] Code generation regression after change for pr111267

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113533 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug other/113575] [14 Regression] memory hog building insn-opinit.o (i686-linux-gnu -> riscv64-linux-gnu)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113575 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #16

[Bug target/113790] [14 Regression][riscv64] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.cc:4294 since r14-4944-gf55cdce3f8dd85

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113790 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/113790] [14 Regression][riscv64] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.cc:4294 since r14-4944-gf55cdce3f8dd85

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113790 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfir

[Bug libstdc++/77776] C++17 std::hypot implementation is poor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 Jiang An changed: What|Removed |Added CC||de34 at live dot cn --- Comment #14 from Jian

[Bug target/114000] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in force_nonfallthru_and_redirect, at cfgrtl.cc:1556 with -O2 -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fPIC -mexplicit-relocs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114000 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/114000] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in force_nonfallthru_and_redirect, at cfgrtl.cc:1556 with -O2 -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fPIC -mexplicit-relocs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114000 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug web/114223] Utilize filtering for git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114223 Frank Ch. Eigler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/100523] [11/12/13/14 Regression] armv8.1-m.main -fcompare-debug failure with -O -fmodulo-sched -mtune=cortex-a53

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100523 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug rtl-optimization/110317] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE at -O2 and -O3 with "-fno-tree-pre -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse -fselective-scheduling2": in move_exprs_to_boundary, at sel-sched.cc:5228

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110317 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/110391] [12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 with "-fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110391 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug c++/111224] modules: xtreme-header-1_a.H etc. ICE (in core_vals, at cp/module.cc:6108) on AArch64 with SVE types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111224 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Nathaniel Shead from comment #7) > Created attachment 57586 [details] > Untested patch to implement POLY_INT_CST in modules > > Here's a potential fix for this issue. But I only have access to

[Bug testsuite/114182] gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-complex-method-2.c fails for H8/300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114182 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jan Dubiec from comment #3) > Wait a minute, shouldn't the conditions be opposite? I.e.: > > /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "__(?:gnu_)?divdc3" "optimized" { target { > large_double } } } } */

[Bug testsuite/114182] gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-complex-method-2.c fails for H8/300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114182 --- Comment #3 from Jan Dubiec --- Wait a minute, shouldn't the conditions be opposite? I.e.: /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "__(?:gnu_)?divdc3" "optimized" { target { large_double } } } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "__(?:gnu_)?divsc3"

[Bug rtl-optimization/112758] [13/14 Regression] Inconsistent Bitwise AND Operation Result between int and long long int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112758 --- Comment #19 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Fixed by Jakub's patch on the trunk.

[Bug target/114187] [14 regression] bizarre register dance on x86_64 for pass-by-value struct since r14-2526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114187 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d35b5b0e0a0727cfdaba5f859e44116c33648639 commit r14-9287-gd35b5b0e0a0727cfdaba5f859e44116c33648639 Author: Roger Sayle Date: Mon M

[Bug target/112868] GCC passes -many to the assembler for --enable-checking=release builds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112868 --- Comment #9 from Sam James --- (In reply to Jeevitha from comment #8) > Created attachment 57584 [details] > Removed -many from the options passed by default to the assembler. > > Sam James, can you do a practice distro build using this patc

[Bug target/101893] There is no vgbbd on p7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101893 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/105522] [powerpc-darwin] ICE: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:3059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105522 --- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe --- fixed on trunk, intending to backport it.

[Bug target/113010] [RISCV] sign-extension lost in comparison with constant embedded in comma-op expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113010 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/113010] [RISCV] sign-extension lost in comparison with constant embedded in comma-op expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113010 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24975a9195743e8eb4ca213f35b9221d4eeb6b59 commit r14-9284-g24975a9195743e8eb4ca213f35b9221d4eeb6b59 Author: Greg McGary Date: Sun Mar

[Bug target/101893] There is no vgbbd on p7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101893 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/105522] [powerpc-darwin] ICE: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:3059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105522 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug web/114223] Utilize filtering for git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114223 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug web/114223] New: Utilize filtering for git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114223 Bug ID: 114223 Summary: Utilize filtering for git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug target/113720] [14 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 targeting alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113720 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned at gc

[Bug target/113720] [14 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 targeting alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113720 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:318e0d44fe66ade59edb16a94565b3bfdc1883c6 commit r14-9282-g318e0d44fe66ade59edb16a94565b3bfdc1883c6 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Sun M

[Bug rtl-optimization/101523] Huge number of combine attempts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- Yeah. Without a testcase we do not know what is going on. Likely it is a testcase with some very big basic block, which naturally gives very many combination opportunities: the problem by nature is at

[Bug sanitizer/114217] -fsanitize=alignment false positive with intended unaligned struct member access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114217 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC actually doesn't diagnose on mere pointer assignment, but what triggers the alignment check is &entry->offset even when the code later on just takes its address, entry must be sufficiently aligned, other

[Bug c++/114220] False positive warning: possibly dangling reference to a temporary [-Wdangling-reference]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114220 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Дилян Палаузов from comment #3) > > The warning is designed this way explictly because you are returning a > > reference and taking a reference as an argument and in the case of b2, the > > te

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 114219, which changed state. Bug 114219 Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] [expr.const] lvalue-to-rvalue conversion is not diagnosed to disqualify constant expressions for empty classes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Bug c++/114219] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [expr.const] lvalue-to-rvalue conversion is not diagnosed to disqualify constant expressions for empty classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114219 Jan Schultke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/114222] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c fails for H8/300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114222 Bug ID: 114222 Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c fails for H8/300 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug testsuite/114182] gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-complex-method-2.c fails for H8/300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114182 --- Comment #2 from Jan Dubiec --- Unfortunately, large_double does not work.

[Bug testsuite/114221] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c fails for H8/300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114221 Bug ID: 114221 Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c fails for H8/300 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug target/114100] [avr] Inefficient indirect addressing on Reduced Tiny

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114100 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0f5b6caff669037444506cb6008a378356ec209 commit r14-9281-gc0f5b6caff669037444506cb6008a378356ec209 Author: Georg-Johann Lay Dat

[Bug middle-end/113680] Missed optimization: Redundant cmp/test instructions when comparing (x - y) > 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113680 Ken Matsui changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kmatsui at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/114207] [12/13/14 Regression] modref gets confused by vecotorized code ` -O3 -fno-tree-forwprop` since r12-5439

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114207 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug lto/85432] Wodr can be more verbose for C code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85432 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/92729] [avr] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept in future releases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729 --- Comment #65 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dae3456965064c9664c097c785ae9bf9fa203fa0 commit r14-9280-gdae3456965064c9664c097c785ae9bf9fa203fa0 Author: Georg-Johann Lay Dat

[Bug c++/114220] False positive warning: possibly dangling reference to a temporary [-Wdangling-reference]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114220 --- Comment #3 from Дилян Палаузов --- > The warning is designed this way explictly because you are returning a > reference and taking a reference as an argument and in the case of b2, the > tempory is `std::string("u")` . > In GCC 14+ (since

[Bug c++/114220] False positive warning: possibly dangling reference to a temporary [-Wdangling-reference]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114220 --- Comment #2 from Дилян Палаузов --- Is my reading correct, that the warning is triggered, when a function receives as parameter a reference to a temporary and returns a reference? If this is the only criterion, then it is a wrong assumption,

[Bug c++/114220] False positive warning: possibly dangling reference to a temporary [-Wdangling-reference]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114220 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/114219] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [expr.const] lvalue-to-rvalue conversion is not diagnosed to disqualify constant expressions for empty classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114219 --- Comment #4 from Jan Schultke --- I don't see how lvalue-to-rvalue conversion would be bypassed here. https://eel.is/c++draft/conv.lval#:conversion,lvalue-to-rvalue has no special provision for empty classes. https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.ini

[Bug c++/114220] New: False positive warning: possibly dangling reference to a temporary [-Wdangling-reference]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114220 Bug ID: 114220 Summary: False positive warning: possibly dangling reference to a temporary [-Wdangling-reference] Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/114219] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [expr.const] lvalue-to-rvalue conversion is not diagnosed to disqualify constant expressions for empty classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114219 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/114219] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [expr.const] lvalue-to-rvalue conversion is not diagnosed to disqualify constant expressions for empty classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114219 --- Comment #2 from Jan Schultke --- Corresponding LLVM bug: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/83712

[Bug c++/114219] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [expr.const] lvalue-to-rvalue conversion is not diagnosed to disqualify constant expressions for empty classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114219 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #1 from And

[Bug c++/114219] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [expr.const] lvalue-to-rvalue conversion is not diagnosed to disqualify constant expressions for empty classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114219 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[expr.const]|[11/12/13/14 Regression]

[Bug c++/114219] New: [expr.const] lvalue-to-rvalue conversion is not diagnosed to disqualify constant expressions for empty classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114219 Bug ID: 114219 Summary: [expr.const] lvalue-to-rvalue conversion is not diagnosed to disqualify constant expressions for empty classes Product: gcc Version: 14.0