[Bug c++/113966] New: Internal compiler error in `do_auto_deduction`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113966 Bug ID: 113966 Summary: Internal compiler error in `do_auto_deduction` Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug testsuite/113965] gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_load_3_run.c still fails with qemu due to _Float16 rounding error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113965 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 57443 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57443&action=edit Reduced testcase Attached is the reduced testcase that I was using here.

[Bug testsuite/113965] gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_load_3_run.c still fails with qemu due to _Float16 rounding error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113965 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |testsuite Blocks|53947

[Bug tree-optimization/113965] [14 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_load_3_run.c still fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113965 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, debugging this a little further, this might be a qemu issue with fp16 support

[Bug c++/113958] support visibility attribute for typeinfo symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113958 --- Comment #3 from Noel Grandin --- Andrew, the specific application here is a very large (10MLoc) codebase (LibreOffice), where we have lots of very large classes with tons of methods, where I want to limit symbol visibility to only the symbol

[Bug tree-optimization/113965] [14 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_load_3_run.c still fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113965 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Blocks|

[Bug tree-optimization/113965] New: [14 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_load_3_run.c still fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113965 Bug ID: 113965 Summary: [14 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_load_3_run.c still fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/113964] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] repeat copy of struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113964 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|repeat copy of struct |[11/12/13/14/15 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/113964] New: repeat copy of struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113964 Bug ID: 113964 Summary: repeat copy of struct Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug analyzer/113963] analyzer-null-dereference, analyzer-malloc-leak false alarms in Gnulib savedir.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113963 --- Comment #1 from Paul Eggert --- Created attachment 57442 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57442&action=edit test program without line number directives (also compressed) This is the same program as savedir.i, except with

[Bug analyzer/113963] New: analyzer-null-dereference, analyzer-malloc-leak false alarms in Gnulib savedir.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113963 Bug ID: 113963 Summary: analyzer-null-dereference, analyzer-malloc-leak false alarms in Gnulib savedir.c Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug libgcc/113497] error: implicit declaration of function 'abort' on enable-execute-stack.c on i686-w64-mingw32 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113497 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-17 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/71219] Warn about (struct S*)malloc(n) where n < sizeof(struct S)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71219 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/88687] redundant -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch after -Wimplicit-function-declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88687 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-17 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/87313] attribute malloc not used for alias analysis when it could be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87313 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/83194] Possibly missed simplification with strcmp(s, t) == strcmp(t, s)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83194 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/111935] gcc ICE with risc-v vector intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111935 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/113331] AMDGCN: Compilation failure due to duplicate .LEHB/.LEHE symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113331 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug middle-end/113959] Optimize `__builtin_isnan(x) || __builtin_isinf(x)` to `__builtin_isfinite(x)`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113959 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment

[Bug target/113960] std::map with std::vector as input overwrites itself with c++20, on s390x platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113960 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug c++/113958] support visibility attribute for typeinfo symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113958 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I am not 100% sure if type_visibility is needed here or in general. You can also use -fvisibility-inlines-hidden to hide methods that are declared as inline which I suspect you want really too.

[Bug c++/113958] support visibility attribute for typeinfo symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113958 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- You can use visibility on the type even Like: ``` struct __attribute__ ((visibility("default"))) Foo1{ virtual void some_member() = 0; }; struct __attribute__ ((visibility("default"))) Foo : Foo1 {

[Bug target/113779] Very inefficient m68k code generated for simple copy loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113779 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/113959] Optimize `__builtin_isnan(x) || __builtin_isinf(x)` to `__builtin_isfinite(x)`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113959 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 57440 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57440&action=edit testcase from the godbolt link Next time attach the testcase or put it in line instead of just linking to godb

[Bug middle-end/113959] Optimize `__builtin_isnan(x) || __builtin_isinf(x)` to `__builtin_isfinite(x)`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113959 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug libfortran/107068] Run-time error when reading logical arrays with a namelist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107068 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- After a bit of sleuthing it turns out that the '(' in the name was being ignored and the comma in '(1,2)' was being treated as a delimiter. Since the following '=' was not seen yet, the 2 was seen as a repe

[Bug libgcc/113850] condition variables timed wait does a lot of spurious wakeups on Win32 threading implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113850 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Yong : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5def8fd08976fc2514426ecb1f263f13ba3e2af commit r13-8337-gb5def8fd08976fc2514426ecb1f263f13ba3e2af Author: Matteo Italia

[Bug libgcc/113850] condition variables timed wait does a lot of spurious wakeups on Win32 threading implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113850 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Yong : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05ad8fb55a55f1e201fd781c84682a7c0bbd4d97 commit r14-9042-g05ad8fb55a55f1e201fd781c84682a7c0bbd4d97 Author: Matteo Italia Date: F

[Bug target/113913] [14] RISC-V: suboptimal code gen for intrinsic vcreate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113913 --- Comment #2 from JuzheZhong --- It's the known issue we are trying to fix it in GCC-15. My colleague Lehua is taking care of it. CCing Lehua.

[Bug c++/104836] ice in unify, at cp/pt.cc:24055

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104836 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/57527] [C++11] Nested variadic templates cause internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57527 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/113911] [14 Regression] Length is lost passing deferred-length character to subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113911 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-16 Assigne

[Bug analyzer/109802] [13 Regression] ICE using dubious flexible arrays in unions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109802 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/113934] Switch avr to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug middle-end/113907] [12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #47 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #46) > (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #43) > > > // See discussion here: > > > // https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/571709.html > > Discuss

[Bug analyzer/110285] [13/14 Regression] -Wanalyzer-infinite-recursion false positive involving floating-point values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110285 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-16 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug analyzer/108562] [meta-bug] tracker bug for issues with -Wanalyzer-null-dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108562 Bug 108562 depends on bug 105755, which changed state. Bug 105755 Summary: -Wanalyzer-null-dereference regression compiling Emacs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105755 What|Removed |Added

[Bug analyzer/105755] -Wanalyzer-null-dereference regression compiling Emacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105755 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-16 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug other/113961] [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113961 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Indeed you did, thanks!

[Bug analyzer/109851] [13/14 Regression] False positive va_arg when iterating through format string with for-loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109851 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|False positive va_arg when |[13/14 Regression] False

[Bug analyzer/105755] -Wanalyzer-null-dereference regression compiling Emacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105755 --- Comment #6 from nightstrike --- (In reply to nightstrike from comment #5) > If I open your godbolt links, they aren't using a Windows target compiler, > so they aren't exercising an LLP64 target. For instance: https://godbolt.org/z/4Mx96Wjv

[Bug analyzer/105755] -Wanalyzer-null-dereference regression compiling Emacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105755 --- Comment #5 from nightstrike --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4) > Looks like this was fixed sometime in GCC 13; resolving as WORKSFORME. > > Feel free to reopen if you have a reproducer that triggers on a more recent > GCC. The

[Bug analyzer/109579] -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds false positive in Emacs mapping stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109579 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/109628] -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value false positive on static storage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109628 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug other/113961] [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113961 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/113961] [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113961 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c74131e77f1a6b7afe700d3526a8992dc9744b0c commit r14-9038-gc74131e77f1a6b7afe700d3526a8992dc9744b0c Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/87744] Some valid instantiations of linear_congruential_engine produce compiler errors when __int128 isn't available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87744 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c74131e77f1a6b7afe700d3526a8992dc9744b0c commit r14-9038-gc74131e77f1a6b7afe700d3526a8992dc9744b0c Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c++/97990] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: ‘verify_type’ failed with vector types and non-PODs since r6-5222-gba6a6a1d44c17f25

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97990 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f1438db419c9eb8901d1d1d7f98fb69082aec8e commit r14-9037-g5f1438db419c9eb8901d1d1d7f98fb69082aec8e Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Fr

[Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/109859] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE on concept mis-typed as template type parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109859 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/97990] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: ‘verify_type’ failed with vector types and non-PODs since r6-5222-gba6a6a1d44c17f25

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97990 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE:

[Bug c++/97990] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: ‘verify_type’ failed with vector types and non-PODs since r6-5222-gba6a6a1d44c17f25

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97990 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug analyzer/113923] Segfault in gcc/gcc/tree-diagnostic.cc:265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113923 --- Comment #8 from Antoni --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2) > inlined_call_event's ctor should probably assert that params > tree apparent_callee_fndecl, > tree apparent_caller_fndecl, > are

[Bug c++/111974] internal error: Segmentation fault on Ubuntu 23.10 (x86-64) - compiling RefPerSys

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111974 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/89336] internal compiler error when compiling a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89336 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 89336, which changed state. Bug 89336 Summary: internal compiler error when compiling a constexpr function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89336 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 87536, which changed state. Bug 87536 Summary: Illegal recursive concept leads to compiler ICE https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87536 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/87536] Illegal recursive concept leads to compiler ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87536 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/87331] if delete "node->operator_type = kADD; " will report "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87331 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/85908] Internal error with concepts and polymorphic lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85908 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/29040] missing access control checks in subclasses for nested types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29040 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug c++/26278] ambiguous overload candidates list contains duplicates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26278 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/19073] cp_binding_level::names not returning all decls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19073 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME CC|

[Bug c++/17000] parse error calling member template function of non-lvalue from within template class member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17000 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/113789] [13 Regression] ICE on P2266/C++23 `decltype(throw x)` where x is move-eligible parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113789 --- Comment #10 from Arthur O'Dwyer --- FWIW, I think I agree with your analysis. To reiterate what you already said (and I think GCC already gets the following snippet correct): in X g (X x) try { throw x; } catch (...) {

[Bug c++/111682] [14 regression] valgrind error in tsubst_template_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111682 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug analyzer/113923] Segfault in gcc/gcc/tree-diagnostic.cc:265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113923 --- Comment #7 from Antoni --- I don't know if this helps, but I added a small Rust reproducer that can trigger the segfault when compiled with rustc_codegen_gcc and the corresponding GIMPLE for this Rust reproducer.

[Bug c++/111682] [14 regression] valgrind error in tsubst_template_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111682 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c95dc611a6203f0564722975acff4ad866b9c45e commit r14-9035-gc95dc611a6203f0564722975acff4ad866b9c45e Author: Patrick Palka Date: F

[Bug analyzer/113923] Segfault in gcc/gcc/tree-diagnostic.cc:265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113923 --- Comment #6 from Antoni --- Created attachment 57439 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57439&action=edit Rust reproducer

[Bug analyzer/113923] Segfault in gcc/gcc/tree-diagnostic.cc:265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113923 --- Comment #5 from Antoni --- Created attachment 57438 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57438&action=edit GIMPLE for the Rust reproducer

[Bug c++/113545] ICE in label_matches with constexpr function with switch-statement and converted (nonconstant, cast address) input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113545 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/113545] ICE in label_matches with constexpr function with switch-statement and converted (nonconstant, cast address) input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113545 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e501a279fb4298c9b23637d573287e059b3b06c8 commit r13-8336-ge501a279fb4298c9b23637d573287e059b3b06c8 Author: Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/113158] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Erroneous "looser exception specification" error for class template and depedent noexcept value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113158 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/113789] [13 Regression] ICE on P2266/C++23 `decltype(throw x)` where x is move-eligible parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113789 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Summary|[13/14 Regr

[Bug c++/98388] Throwing move-only parameter results in hard error in SFINAE context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98388 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/113853] implicit move in throw in trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113853 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/113853] implicit move in throw in trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113853 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:254ff3d0e34835b4de93d5e5763a7366dc7d989d commit r14-9034-g254ff3d0e34835b4de93d5e5763a7366dc7d989d Author: Marek Polacek Date: We

[Bug c++/113789] [13/14 Regression] ICE on P2266/C++23 `decltype(throw x)` where x is move-eligible parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113789 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:254ff3d0e34835b4de93d5e5763a7366dc7d989d commit r14-9034-g254ff3d0e34835b4de93d5e5763a7366dc7d989d Author: Marek Polacek Date: We

[Bug middle-end/113907] [12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #46 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #43) > > // See discussion here: > > // https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/571709.html > Discussion says: > > "Once legacy evrp is removed, this won'

[Bug c++/104919] [modules] enum in constexpr function causes "failed to read compiled module cluster 1: Bad file data"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104919 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug other/113961] [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113961 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gc

[Bug middle-end/113907] [12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #45 from Jan Hubicka --- > > "Once legacy evrp is removed, this won't be an issue, as ranges in the IL > > will tell the truth. However, this will mean that we will no longer > > remove the first __builtin_unreachable combo. But

[Bug c++/113929] GCC accepts template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113929 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/113929] GCC accepts template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113929 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5286b0761b5dfac4348d1c5bfdcc162a66f338ee commit r14-9033-g5286b0761b5dfac4348d1c5bfdcc162a66f338ee Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug c++/98752] wrong "error: ‘this’ is not a constant expression" with consteval constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98752 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Comment 5 test was fixed by r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0 commit 99d114c15523e0bfe7a89ef1947f82eb5ff0260b Author: Marek Polacek Date: Fri Nov 17 14:48:44 2023 -0500 c++: P2280R4, Using unknown refs in con

[Bug other/113961] [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113961 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- < previous run: g:1aef0a9b07766d100a218ef3e9576d0a0dd35a2d, r14-9027-g1aef0a9b07766d > this run: g:7f3d900684ad989164114f25eb46a33871c6533d, r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98 < FAIL: 26_numerics/ra

[Bug ipa/108802] [11/12/13/14 Regression] missed inlining of call via pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108802 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- I don't think we can reasonably expect every caller of lambda function to be early inlined, so we need to extend ipa-prop to understand the obfuscated code. I disucussed that with Martin some time ago - I thi

[Bug analyzer/111213] -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds false negative with `return arr[9];` at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111213 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED --- Comment #4 from David Mal

[Bug middle-end/113907] [12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug ipa/111960] [14 Regression] ICE: during GIMPLE pass: rebuild_frequencies: SIGSEGV (Invalid read of size 4) with -fdump-tree-rebuild_frequencies-all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111960 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- hmm. cfg.cc:815 for me is: fputs (", maybe hot", outf); which seems quite safe. The problem does not seem to reproduce for me: jh@ryzen3:~/gcc/build/gcc> ./xgcc -B ./ tt.c -O --param=max-inline-r

[Bug middle-end/113907] [12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #43 from Jan Hubicka --- > // See discussion here: > // https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/571709.html Discussion says: "Once legacy evrp is removed, this won't be an issue, as ranges in the IL will tell the truth.

[Bug other/113961] New: [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113961 Bug ID: 113961 Summary: [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug libstdc++/113841] Can't swap two std::hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113841 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug middle-end/113907] [12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #42 from Jakub Jelinek --- So guess we need to union the ranges and for earlier gccs also the zero bits stuff upon ICF, right?

[Bug middle-end/113907] [12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 regression] ICU |[12/13/14 regression] ICU

[Bug libstdc++/113294] constexpr error from accessing inactive union member in basic_string after move assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113294 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/113294] constexpr error from accessing inactive union member in basic_string after move assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113294 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ebe00c9d3a0436dec5c354a62d98e444d763ff95 commit r13-8335-gebe00c9d3a0436dec5c354a62d98e444d763ff95 Author: Paul Keir Date

[Bug libstdc++/99117] [11/12/13 Regression] cannot accumulate std::valarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99117 --- Comment #24 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a72c717b311ce8093042d927a1f2f2b940a969c commit r13-8334-g3a72c717b311ce8093042d927a1f2f2b940a969c Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug middle-end/113907] [14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #40 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #39) > This testcase > #include > int data[100]; > > __attribute__((noinline)) > int bar (int d, unsigned int d2) > { > if (d2 > 10) > printf ("Bingo\n"); > r

[Bug other/113957] [14 Regression] bad-mapper-1.C hangs on all Darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113957 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |other Keywords|wrong-code

  1   2   >