https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111267
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111267
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:578c7b91f418ebbef1bf169117815409e06f5197
commit r14-8413-g578c7b91f418ebbef1bf169117815409e06f5197
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113520
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #8)
> I think the ipa-cp summaries should be used only when types match. At least
> Martin added type streaming for all the jump functions. So we are missing
> some ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao Liu ---
maybe
diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc
index 1fd957288d4..6d321f9baef 100644
--- a/gcc/fold-const.cc
+++ b/gcc/fold-const.cc
@@ -8035,6 +8035,9 @@ native_encode_vector_part (const_tree exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113570
--- Comment #5 from JuzheZhong ---
It seems that we don't have any bugs in current SPEC 2017 testing.
So I strongly suggest "full coverage" testing on SPEC 2017 which I mentioned
in PR: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113087
-marc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113588
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao Liu ---
diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc
index 1fd957288d4..33a8d539b4d 100644
--- a/gcc/fold-const.cc
+++ b/gcc/fold-const.cc
@@ -8032,7 +8032,7 @@ native_encode_vector_part (const_tree expr, unsign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110934
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113592
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao Liu ---
This testcase is probably not a good example for typical partail sum which
relies on unroll loops.
double
foo (double* p, int n)
{
double sum = 0;
for (int i = 0; i != n; i++)
sum += p[i] * p[i]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113592
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao Liu ---
*** Bug 113594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113594
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113592
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao Liu ---
*** Bug 113593 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113593
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113594
Bug ID: 113594
Summary: Missing partial sum optimziation in the vectorizer.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113593
Bug ID: 113593
Summary: missed partial sum optimization in vectorizer
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113592
Bug ID: 113592
Summary: missed partial sum optimization in vectorizer
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113405
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ff54cc0be8dfa9d9bd5922ec65e86c9eb644711
commit r14-8408-g6ff54cc0be8dfa9d9bd5922ec65e86c9eb644711
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100707
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b433a6f5a0617dcbb28f2462b31198f86aadecaa
commit r14-8407-gb433a6f5a0617dcbb28f2462b31198f86aadecaa
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583
--- Comment #5 from JuzheZhong ---
Both ICC and Clang X86 can vectorize SPEC 2017 lbm:
https://godbolt.org/z/MjbTbYf1G
But I am not sure X86 ICC is better or X86 Clang is better.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583
--- Comment #4 from JuzheZhong ---
OK. Confirm on X86 GCC failed to vectorize it, wheras Clang X86 can vectorize
it.
https://godbolt.org/z/EaTjGbPGW
X86 Clang and RISC-V Clang IR are same:
%12 = tail call <8 x double> @llvm.masked.gather.v8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113591
Bug ID: 113591
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-ice15.C
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80036
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70730
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113590
Bug ID: 113590
Summary: The vectorizer introduces signed overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao Liu ---
Another potential buggy place is
240 vexit_reduc_67 = mask_patt_43.28_62 & mask_patt_43.28_63;
241 if (vexit_reduc_67 == { -1, -1, -1, -1 })
242goto ; [94.50%]
243 else
is expanded to
319(insn 69
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113548
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106127
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106127
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|experimental::filesystem::p |experimental::filesystem::p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113589
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112755
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112754
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112798
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112757
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113589
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I actually think this is a dup of bug 106127.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112756
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112598
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112597
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112799
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112800
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112797
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113589
Bug ID: 113589
Summary: FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/absolute.cc
on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88950
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|11.1.0 |
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113588
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113588
Bug ID: 113588
Summary: The vectorizer is introducing out-of-bounds memory
access
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113582
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
The reason I'm not doing simply
TREE_USED (label) = TREE_USED (decl);
in the pt.cc/LABEL_EXPR hunk is that I think we still want the warning in the
second function, what with the goto being a discarded s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113582
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79193
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105275
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
I have re-checked this year again (using master revision
r14-7200-g95440171d0e615) but this time on a high-frequency Zen3 CPU (EPYC
75F3). Run-time of 525.x264_r built with master with PGO and -O2 improved
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105688
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100204
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Assignee|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100212
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113087
--- Comment #44 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #43)
> (In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #42)
> > I kicked off a run roughly 10 hours ago with your memory-hog fix patch
> > applied to a1b2953924c451ce90a3fdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112969
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113529
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fecb45a936d62ca24dd8b4985ea0555c28edefa8
commit r14-8402-gfecb45a936d62ca24dd8b4985ea0555c28edefa8
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113010
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #8)
> From the CI run here:
> https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/20240116221914.267015-1-
> g...@rivosinc.com/
>
> It looks like this issue also aff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113087
--- Comment #43 from Patrick O'Neill ---
(In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #42)
> I kicked off a run roughly 10 hours ago with your memory-hog fix patch
> applied to a1b2953924c451ce90a3fdce6841b63bf05f335f. I'll post the results
> here
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113309
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113010
--- Comment #8 from Patrick O'Neill ---
>From the CI run here:
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/20240116221914.267015-1-...@rivosinc.com/
It looks like this issue also affects ARM since the testcase fails.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113582
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|incorrect warning about |incorrect warning about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113582
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-01-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113572
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113579
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113572
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113088
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103185
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103185
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89e4f3304ad45d2251bfaf66d2a355cebf87310b
commit r11-11208-g89e4f3304ad45d2251bfaf66d2a355cebf87310b
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aedfdd340cbb4a97a8f6d432720a4df374c1e467
commit r14-8401-gaedfdd340cbb4a97a8f6d432720a4df374c1e467
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:050fc885a6e324a03a6397d86134ab4b68aac944
commit r12-10112-g050fc885a6e324a03a6397d86134ab4b68aac944
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103185
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0da4402bd4b350691b2301003de62268f865d91c
commit r12-10111-g0da4402bd4b350691b2301003de62268f865d91c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33799
--- Comment #30 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0605cd4a12e9162cc56abc69ca1048947c72689
commit r12-10110-gb0605cd4a12e9162cc56abc69ca1048947c72689
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92407
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:193321d2649a818c3b322c8db79a2805cfdd7095
commit r12-10109-g193321d2649a818c3b322c8db79a2805cfdd7095
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113088
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0605cd4a12e9162cc56abc69ca1048947c72689
commit r12-10110-gb0605cd4a12e9162cc56abc69ca1048947c72689
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:713fbaff8b17a01d3b72110f89112851ed43a90a
commit r13-8249-g713fbaff8b17a01d3b72110f89112851ed43a90a
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103185
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fcc06cf83a9571a0745fcde83d955eb7d7f16910
commit r13-8248-gfcc06cf83a9571a0745fcde83d955eb7d7f16910
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33799
--- Comment #29 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60bfd373a1891ae2349dc67313d104079ce8c706
commit r13-8247-g60bfd373a1891ae2349dc67313d104079ce8c706
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113088
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60bfd373a1891ae2349dc67313d104079ce8c706
commit r13-8247-g60bfd373a1891ae2349dc67313d104079ce8c706
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110422
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b7204c52392c1c0da9c91a5feae0c44018a6f37
commit r13-8246-g2b7204c52392c1c0da9c91a5feae0c44018a6f37
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113575
--- Comment #12 from Robin Dapp ---
Created attachment 57209
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57209&action=edit
Tentative
I tested the attached "fix". On my machine with 13.2 host compiler it reduced
the build time for insn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113377
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:186ae6d2cb93ad2e07117cff7e11def21fe285ae
commit r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad2e07117cff7e11def21fe285ae
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105688
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112616
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
Fixed on trunk. I did not want to backport this but because this variant does
not require disabling DCE, I will probably do after a few weeks on master, if
there are no issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108007
--- Comment #22 from Martin Jambor ---
Fixed on trunk. I did not want to backport this but because of PR 112616 I
will probably do after a few weeks on master, if there are no issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90276
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2019-04-29 00:00:00 |2024-1-24
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106358
Bug 106358 depends on bug 112977, which changed state.
Bug 112977 Summary: -Wanalyzer-tainted-offset false positive seen on Linux
kernel's drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112977
What|Rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106358
Bug 106358 depends on bug 112927, which changed state.
Bug 112927 Summary: -Wanalyzer-tainted-size false positive seen in Linux
kernel's drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_devintf.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112927
What|Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112927
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112977
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104908
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 100942, which changed state.
Bug 100942 Summary: ccmp is not used if the value is used later
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100942
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100942
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109705
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6fbc3cc786a74a098352868348e187877bfbc8b
commit r14-8399-ge6fbc3cc786a74a098352868348e187877bfbc8b
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109705
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Also aarch64 as reported by Christophe. We need vect_long_mult for the
> scatter but the effective target looks incomplete.
I think the only thing left is up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108007
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9a8426e534760b8d3a250e9bd3cff4db131a2be
commit r14-8398-ga9a8426e534760b8d3a250e9bd3cff4db131a2be
Author: Martin Jambor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112616
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9a8426e534760b8d3a250e9bd3cff4db131a2be
commit r14-8398-ga9a8426e534760b8d3a250e9bd3cff4db131a2be
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: W
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo