https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113042
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Blah, adding popcountti2 does not work as the middle-end (in
fold_builtin_bit_query) splits it into 2 __builtin_popcountll already ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103781
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113043
Bug ID: 113043
Summary: ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4246
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96461
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113031
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39f9c426f58448d6df340cdccd84e05721a20921
commit r14-6619-g39f9c426f58448d6df340cdccd84e05721a20921
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113034
--- Comment #1 from Jiajie Chen ---
As pointed out by @lrzlin, the expected output should be:
```
1 -1 0
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113042
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113042
Bug ID: 113042
Summary: popcount of 8bits and 128bits can be improved for
!TARGET_CSSC
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113041
Bug ID: 113041
Summary: misleading diagnostic for variable of non-literal type
in constexpr function in C++20 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 98792, which changed state.
Bug 98792 Summary: Fail to use SHRN instructions for narrowing shift on aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98792
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98792
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113039
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> This may be caused by r14-2692-g1c6231c05bdcca
This commit changes the behavior of -fcf-protection -fcf-protection=branch.
Workaround is to use -fcf-protection -fcf-protect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113039
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-12-16
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113040
Bug ID: 113040
Summary: [14 Regression] libmvec test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113039
Bug ID: 113039
Summary: [14 Regression] -fcf-protection -fcf-protection=branch
doesn't work
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112727
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b8f9636c1b19fff7723995f2d58d41f3d30c46d
commit r12-10056-g2b8f9636c1b19fff7723995f2d58d41f3d30c46d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4bf040fcd23aaa7d8c4873d1170776ab117bc213
commit r12-10055-g4bf040fcd23aaa7d8c4873d1170776ab117bc213
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112816
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0246a37ebdef4ffc863fe4c56e812c0614026e02
commit r12-10052-g0246a37ebdef4ffc863fe4c56e812c0614026e02
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112845
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87d013f7c877f944adbbaa4e94244baf990cb9f2
commit r12-10054-g87d013f7c877f944adbbaa4e94244baf990cb9f2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112837
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d02372f39dc6506a4ff88a7f01fb5570a82606c0
commit r12-10053-gd02372f39dc6506a4ff88a7f01fb5570a82606c0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112339
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:029b826f62d2d193e93539749a534b9a13ade728
commit r12-10048-g029b826f62d2d193e93539749a534b9a13ade728
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112795
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1761303c77219281c22ab50b4a9ce65920c4023
commit r12-10051-gf1761303c77219281c22ab50b4a9ce65920c4023
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111408
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9cb9cecdb582b44b04e9c49532ddf0065b5c3612
commit r12-10050-g9cb9cecdb582b44b04e9c49532ddf0065b5c3612
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111967
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:327713d54122ab5635f3c385aecf113e5afe190c
commit r12-10049-g327713d54122ab5635f3c385aecf113e5afe190c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110731
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a93c334865af18ce2fd50cd77a9e90939f3c231
commit r12-10046-g9a93c334865af18ce2fd50cd77a9e90939f3c231
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 86970, which changed state.
Bug 86970 Summary: Rejected constexpr expression involving lambdas and
inheritance, "use of this in a constant expression"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86970
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86970
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113038
Bug ID: 113038
Summary: [14 regression] Excess errors for
g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C after
r14-6569-gfe54b57728c09a
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97592
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112896
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ewlu at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105733
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #33 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #32)
> commit a1f0d227481fe143f8c15b3f268e2d5964a3c90a (HEAD -> master,
> origin/master, origin/HEAD)
> Author: Jerry DeLisle
> Date: Fri Dec 15 13:05:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110201
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110201
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:082835836cf763e74ed2fdf9645ac4f1f94d6d4f
commit r14-6607-g082835836cf763e74ed2fdf9645ac4f1f94d6d4f
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Fri Dec 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112783
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #32 from Jerry DeLisle ---
commit a1f0d227481fe143f8c15b3f268e2d5964a3c90a (HEAD -> master, origin/master,
origin/HEAD)
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date: Fri Dec 15 13:05:18 2023 -0800
fortran: Update degree trigs documentation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112783
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1f0d227481fe143f8c15b3f268e2d5964a3c90a
commit r14-6606-ga1f0d227481fe143f8c15b3f268e2d5964a3c90a
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112792
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112944
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112918
--- Comment #12 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've been working on the PR this week. The problem for this case is in that
for subreg reload LRA can not narrow reg class more from ALL_REGS to
GENERAL_REGS and then to data regs or address regs.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109796
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 109796, which changed state.
Bug 109796 Summary: 548.exchange2_r compiled with -O2 -flto regressed by 5% on
aarch64 between r14-135-gd06e9264b0192c and r14-192-g636e2273aec555
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113021
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like it is the uninitialized field pointer which is causing the issues.
Looks like GCC does not currently fully support that for const variables inside
a constexpr/consteval . The linked PRs are about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113009
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113037
Bug ID: 113037
Summary: GNAT BUG DETECTED when instantiating generic package
with Type_Invariant on a type derived from a generic
type
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113036
Bug ID: 113036
Summary: GNAT BUG DETECTED ICE box triggered by a default value
that is a nested iterated aggregate
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113035
Bug ID: 113035
Summary: RISC-V: -mtune=sifive-7-series additional dump
failures found with bitmanip, zicond, and vector
targets
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113034
Bug ID: 113034
Summary: Miscompilation of __m128 ne comparison on LoongArch
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113032
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83417
waffl3x changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||waffl3x at protonmail dot com
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113033
Bug ID: 113033
Summary: GCC 14 (20231203 snapshot) ICE when building LSX
vector rotate code on LoongArch
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113032
Bug ID: 113032
Summary: RISCV linker relaxation leaves redundant addi (from
load immediate)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
--- Comment #5 from gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com ---
many thanks for the bug report - all fixed in gcc master branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d7a480eedf0a195318d0fce2c9c57acae43ec9d
commit r14-6596-g7d7a480eedf0a195318d0fce2c9c57acae43ec9d
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 56886
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56886&action=edit
Proposed fix
Here is the proposed fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70435
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea7bebff7cc5a5eb780a6ca646cb77cad1b625d6
commit r14-6595-gea7bebff7cc5a5eb780a6ca646cb77cad1b625d6
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88061
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea7bebff7cc5a5eb780a6ca646cb77cad1b625d6
commit r14-6595-gea7bebff7cc5a5eb780a6ca646cb77cad1b625d6
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109715
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46984fa259436ad50afb50a46a0a16e83bdf7172
commit r14-6594-g46984fa259436ad50afb50a46a0a16e83bdf7172
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44179
--- Comment #3 from Zack Weinberg ---
It's come to my attention that people fairly often write `sizeof('x')` (or some
other character constant), _expecting_ it to evaluate as `sizeof(char)`. But
this is only true in C++. In C, `sizeof('x')` eval
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112727
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a982b9cb690a163434f1ac5a0901548b594205f2
commit r13-8160-ga982b9cb690a163434f1ac5a0901548b594205f2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c0ea9320ce4d2381ebf043cd20a0afce88da880
commit r13-8159-g8c0ea9320ce4d2381ebf043cd20a0afce88da880
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107699
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Carlos Galvez from comment #11)
> Consider this more realistic example:
>
> https://godbolt.org/z/jbbqbe8d9
>
> The compiler has all the information available to ensure that
> getCount().get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113013
--- Comment #6 from Siddhesh Poyarekar ---
Sorry I misread the reproducer as void *reallocarray(void)
__attribute__((__alloc_size__(1)));
Your fix looks fine to me, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113031
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113031
--- Comment #2 from Nathaniel Shead ---
Reduced to:
template class variant;
template
auto __variant_cast(_Tp __rhs) { return static_cast&&>(__rhs);
}
template
struct _Move_assign_base : _Types {
void operator=(_Move_assign_base __rhs) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107986
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
We now diagnose
std::__insertion_sort.isra (&a, &MEM [(void *)&a + 64B]);
the reason is still the same, failure to compute a range for 'qa' which
we fail to SCEV analyze. There's a duplicate bug about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99919
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-11-30 00:00:00 |2023-12-15
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113013
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111080
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c3ab44771d0524140cf2ce5de594fcf7fefcd6f
commit r12-10044-g5c3ab44771d0524140cf2ce5de594fcf7fefcd6f
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e35556c61bdeb9f41b4111fffb423a705232ab9c
commit r12-10043-ge35556c61bdeb9f41b4111fffb423a705232ab9c
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111253
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e26608db3c2b2644decca5f49dab1e6846a9d1b0
commit r12-10041-ge26608db3c2b2644decca5f49dab1e6846a9d1b0
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113026
--- Comment #4 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Drive by comments as it's been a while since I looked at this. I'm also
surprised we didn't adjust the bounds. But why do we only subtract VF? Like you
say, if there's no loop around edge, can't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111613
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And another testcase which ICEs:
unsigned _BitInt(495) f1 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { unsigned _BitInt(539) y = x;
return y; }
unsigned _BitInt(495) f2 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { unsigned _BitInt(539) y =
x;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107857
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> See also https://stackoverflow.com/a/77515095/981959
And my comment there:
This seems like a bug in winpthreads. The INITIALIZER macro should not exist if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107857
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See also https://stackoverflow.com/a/77515095/981959
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113022
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Stubbs ---
This is what I get for trying to get this done before vacation. :(
Yes, there's probably something in mkoffload that has to match the default
change from -mxnack=any to -mxnack=off on the older ISAs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111917
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111614
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110116
Bug 110116 depends on bug 111614, which changed state.
Bug 111614 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE at -O2: verify_gimple failed since
r14-2282-gf703d2fd3f0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111614
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111614
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.4.1
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111764
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111818
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110182
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110295
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110298
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111917
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec8d0c33211c5e92c220483d6fe9f0a2391d2d6d
commit r11-11145-gec8d0c33211c5e92c220483d6fe9f0a2391d2d6d
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111614
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03b5888abc9fe9a81df77125a8d4975ab8695c8c
commit r11-11144-g03b5888abc9fe9a81df77125a8d4975ab8695c8c
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111764
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7473b2742aa1637d14a64505e855aa09452536b1
commit r11-11143-g7473b2742aa1637d14a64505e855aa09452536b1
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111818
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45c296f2d81f6259e268e07707b4aa87dffba20a
commit r11-11142-g45c296f2d81f6259e268e07707b4aa87dffba20a
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110295
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01f088741bec84f8fa86f87fdb73db07d5febb0a
commit r11-11140-g01f088741bec84f8fa86f87fdb73db07d5febb0a
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110298
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e332ee568739448a9439c7074d2a29badba60f2
commit r11-11141-g0e332ee568739448a9439c7074d2a29badba60f2
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107857
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Could you please run this and paste the output here?
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
unsigned long
muh_handles()
{
unsigned long n = 0;
if (GetProcessHandleCount(GetCurrentProce
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
