https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111078
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98477
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112454
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
-1/~0 has the same issue as mentioned:
```
int finv(int a, int b, int c, int d)
{
return (a == 2 ? -1 : b) + (c == 3 ? -1 : d);
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112454
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112416
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112519
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112518
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Works for me with r14-5566-g841008d3966c0f .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112560
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112560
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This code seems to originally was added with
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2011-April/311365.html
The discussion on the patch continues into May:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2011-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112581
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
I have a patch but I don't like it since it requires to touch
gimple-if-to-switch.cc since that uses init_range_entry. Maybe someone else
can come up with a better patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108865
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106147
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:841008d3966c0fe7a80ec10703a50fbdab7620ac
commit r14-5566-g841008d3966c0fe7a80ec10703a50fbdab7620ac
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112588
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathanieloshead at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112601
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-18
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112581
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Adding -fdisable-tree-reassoc2 causes the problem not to happen so yes it is a
bug in reassoc. If I get some time next week I will look into adding the
support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112581
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
tree-ssa-reassoc.cc needs to call mark_ssa_maybe_undefs and checks
ssa_name_maybe_undef_p similar to the way tree-ssa-ifcombine.cc does it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112581
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Wait a minute, h might be uninitialized.
So the issue is inside reassociate which is must not have recognized that
iftmp.7_30 is defined by a maybe an uninitialized variable ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112581
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
forwprop3 does:
```
_12 = ~iftmp.7_30;
h_40 = (unsigned int) _12;
...
if (h_40 == 4294967295)
```
into:
```
_75 = (unsigned int) iftmp.7_30;
if (iftmp.7_30 == 0)
```
Which as far as I can tell is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112603
--- Comment #1 from Antoni ---
Created attachment 56628
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56628&action=edit
Patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112603
Bug ID: 112603
Summary: Allow setting the personality function
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112581
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looking into what is going wrong.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112602
--- Comment #1 from Antoni ---
Created attachment 56627
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56627&action=edit
Patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112601
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112602
Bug ID: 112602
Summary: Support vector permutation and access
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112596
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-17
Status|UNCONFI
to --disable-libsanitizer
--disable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-libgomp
--disable-libquadmath --disable-libvtv CFLAGS='-O1 -g0' CXXFLAGS='-O1 -g0'
LDFLAGS='-O1 -g0'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.0 20231117 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106650
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112600
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For similar saturating subtraction functions:
unsigned
sub_sat(unsigned x, unsigned y) noexcept
{
unsigned z;
if (!__builtin_sub_overflow(x, y, &z))
return z;
return 0;
}
unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112600
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Similar results for aarch64 with GCC:
add_sat(unsigned int, unsigned int):
addsw0, w0, w1
bcs .L7
ret
.L7:
mov w0, -1
ret
add_sat2(unsigned int, unsigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112600
Bug ID: 112600
Summary: Failed to optimize saturating addition using
__builtin_add_overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Related issues:
128: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583
256: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112597
512: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112598
1024: https://gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112598
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Related issues:
128: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583
256: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112597
512: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112598
1024: https://gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112597
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Related issues:
128: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583
256: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112597
512: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112598
1024: https://gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Related issues:
128: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583
256: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112597
512: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112598
1024: https://gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599
Bug ID: 112599
Summary: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with
rv64gcv_zvl1024b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112598
Bug ID: 112598
Summary: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with
rv64gcv_zvl512b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112597
Bug ID: 112597
Summary: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with
rv64gcv_zvl256b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112578
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112596
Bug ID: 112596
Summary: GCC regex error in
Product: gcc
Version: 9.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112552
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:231bb992592a9e1bd7ce6583131acb1874c8e34e
commit r14-5564-g231bb992592a9e1bd7ce6583131acb1874c8e34e
Author: Robin Dapp
Date: Thu Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112406
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:231bb992592a9e1bd7ce6583131acb1874c8e34e
commit r14-5564-g231bb992592a9e1bd7ce6583131acb1874c8e34e
Author: Robin Dapp
Date: Thu No
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112584
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112590
--- Comment #3 from Janez Zemva ---
Sorry for my last comment. I have prepared a more involved example:
https://github.com/user1095108/ca/blob/master/consttests.cpp
If
test();
is commented out, everything compiles, otherwise not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112590
--- Comment #2 from Janez Zemva ---
Very nice, but if I write:
int main()
{
static constexpr S<10> s;
return 0;
}
there will still be a compile error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112589
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112590
Mital Ashok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mital at mitalashok dot co.uk
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112595
Bug ID: 112595
Summary: ICE on invalid code: Literal class NTTP aggregate
initialized with self-referential pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112594
Bug ID: 112594
Summary: Non-type template parameter created with converting
constructor sometimes has original type
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112591
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ug. The C++20 behaviour is correct, but fixing it for C++17 is an ABI
change. I think we need to do it though.
It should work to change the C++17 variant to use a union of
__aligned_membuf and Emp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112593
Bug ID: 112593
Summary: FAIL:
26_numerics/headers/cmath/equivalent_functions.cc on
Solaris 11.3
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112592
Bug ID: 112592
Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++14
(internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at
internal-fn.cc:216)
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112591
--- Comment #1 from Barry Revzin ---
Basically, in C++17, Sub looks like this:
struct Sub17 : Empty {
aligned_membuf storage;
unsigned char index;
};
But in C++20 it turns into:
struct Sub20 : Empty {
union { Empty storage; };
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112591
Bug ID: 112591
Summary: variant allows for creating multiple empty objects at
same address
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112590
Bug ID: 112590
Summary: structural constexpr class fails to instantiate
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107571
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107571
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52eedfa00960f2d255ec542626e3531a65aa8bb8
commit r14-5561-g52eedfa00960f2d255ec542626e3531a65aa8bb8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112589
Bug ID: 112589
Summary: man gcc does not specify the default behavior of
-fcf-protection when used without arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112588
Bug ID: 112588
Summary: ICE in make_decl_rtl when returning str literal when
string header imported in module
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112374
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83171
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6dd4c703be17fa5dd56136d067e7fdc4a61584b3
commit r14-5557-g6dd4c703be17fa5dd56136d067e7fdc4a61584b3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112566
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6dd4c703be17fa5dd56136d067e7fdc4a61584b3
commit r14-5557-g6dd4c703be17fa5dd56136d067e7fdc4a61584b3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112374
--- Comment #48 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:172a72da368146e0fe34194020eb7a6636db4438
commit r14-5556-g172a72da368146e0fe34194020eb7a6636db4438
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112281
Bug 112281 depends on bug 112585, which changed state.
Bug 112585 Summary: [14 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r14-5444
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112585
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112585
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112585
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04abafe9831f6867af1211ecae853ff373235b2d
commit r14--g04abafe9831f6867af1211ecae853ff373235b2d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] wrong|[12/13/14 Regression] wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111657
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> I'd say it is a user error to invoke memcpy/memset etc. with pointers to
> non-default address spaces, and for aggregate copies the middle-end should
> ensure that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112537
--- Comment #13 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
Before we can consider any costs, we first have to know what they are. Is
there any manual for a hardware implementation that specifies costs?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112537
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53372
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||addr-space
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53372
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:adb1f8b0eda99e8a1d21bda5955cbe1df5517e63
commit r13-8080-gadb1f8b0eda99e8a1d21bda5955cbe1df5517e63
Author: Georg-Johann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112587
--- Comment #2 from Nick Begg ---
Created attachment 56621
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56621&action=edit
Full output from invocation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112587
--- Comment #1 from Nick Begg ---
Created attachment 56620
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56620&action=edit
preprocessed source
ic causes a crash. It seems to crash
before a bug report is written out.
This is the version -
GNU C++23 (GCC) version 14.0.0 20231117 (experimental) (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
(git rev ba3f5b8465ef7b278ea33ff94cd85b9638058635)
This is the cmdline used to launch gcc (launched from cmake/ninja) -
/hom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111657
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53372
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68221c54a9752dbf131c231413edfd21046f8dad
commit r14-5552-g68221c54a9752dbf131c231413edfd21046f8dad
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112578
--- Comment #2 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> I've made a patch and it's under testing.
>
> I've seen some "random" gcc.dg/torture/builtin-fp-int-inexact.c failures
> recently but maybe it's not related, we don't e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112578
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-17
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112581
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112585
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||112281
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112585
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Confirmed. In .optimized all loops are unrolled and we have
e.0_103 = e;
_105 = (int) e.0_103;
a[2] = _105;
...
_7 = a[2];
if (_7 != 1)
goto ; [0.00%]
else
goto ; [100.00%]
[count:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112585
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|wrong code at -O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112586
Bug ID: 112586
Summary: [F2023] Add "A statement shall not have more than one
million characters." warning
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.0 20231117 (experimental) (GCC)
[564] %
[564] % gcctk -O2 small.c; ./a.out
[565] %
[565] % gcctk -O3 small.c
[566] % ./a.out
Aborted
[567
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112572
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In any case, it would be useful to narrow it to a single CU, if you know
libLLVMCodeGen.so.17 is bad and have trees built by good vs. bad revision, take
the link line of that library, amend all .o objects wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112584
Bug ID: 112584
Summary: Suboptimal stack usage on third memcpy
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112581
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> It might be one of the x86 specific target patches ...
I don't think so, these patches deal specifically with high registers, and:
$ grep %.h pr112581.s
finds n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111449
HaoChen Gui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111449
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd295a80c91040fd4d826528c8e8e07fe909ae62
commit r14-5548-gcd295a80c91040fd4d826528c8e8e07fe909ae62
Author: Haochen Gui
Date: Fri N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112568
Kostadin Shishmanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56602|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112568
Kostadin Shishmanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56603|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112568
Kostadin Shishmanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56614|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112568
Kostadin Shishmanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56613|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112568
--- Comment #11 from Kostadin Shishmanov ---
I think the gcc builds might be a bit more different than just the commit
reverted, so I am going to redo everything and upload the attachments again
with just that difference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583
Bug ID: 112583
Summary: RISC-V regression testsuite errors with
rv64gcv_zvl128b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112568
--- Comment #10 from Kostadin Shishmanov ---
Created attachment 56614
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56614&action=edit
dump of the first bad pass with the commit reverted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112568
--- Comment #9 from Kostadin Shishmanov ---
Created attachment 56613
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56613&action=edit
dump of the first bad pass with the problematic commit
97 matches
Mail list logo
