https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111249
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> Bisecting from 11 (good) -> 12 (bad) gave r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011 as the
> breaking commit.
>
> Bisecting from 13 (bad) -> 14 (good) gave r14-2926-gee20be8325f7f2 as t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111249
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110665
Lehua Ding changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111725
Lehua Ding changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101631
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96503
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/systemd/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96503
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111955
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56199|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111955
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 56199
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56199&action=edit
Proposed fix
Here is the proposed patch with a tiny regression test module. It will be
applied once / if the c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111955
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111906
--- Comment #5 from Rimvydas (RJ) ---
ICE reproducible again outside check-gcc-c testing with gcc-14-4902 build:
However it still passes with "-O1 -std=gnu2x" this time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111959
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111957
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85741
Bug 85741 depends on bug 80776, which changed state.
Bug 80776 Summary: -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on integer bounded
by __builtin_unreachable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111970
--- Comment #2 from Li Pan ---
Add more information about how to build and run the test cases.
Build:
../__RISC-V_INSTALL___RV64/bin/riscv64-unknown-elf-gcc -march=rv64imafdcv
-mabi=lp64d -ftree-vectorize -O3 --param riscv-autovec-preference=f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111971
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
But r1 is the argument register.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111971
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
D should be a pair of registers, r0 and r1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108220
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111971
--- Comment #2 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
It seems gcc11 is ok.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111971
--- Comment #1 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
This issue can be reproduced on 'ppc64' BE machine with -m32.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111971
Bug ID: 111971
Summary: ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn
achieved (90)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111970
--- Comment #1 from Li Pan ---
Created attachment 56198
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56198&action=edit
Without this commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111970
Bug ID: 111970
Summary: [tree-optimization] SLP for non-IFN gathers result in
RISC-V test failure on gather
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111923
--- Comment #11 from Stas Sergeev ---
So if I understand correctly, before
your proposal the following code was
conforming:
template
struct B {
static constexpr int off = O();
};
struct A {
char a;
B<[]() static constexpr ->int {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111959
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111895
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6fa7284e2824310bb7204d41b5243c677ecb62d3
commit r14-4902-g6fa7284e2824310bb7204d41b5243c677ecb62d3
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111957
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 56196
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56196&action=edit
patch which I am testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111923
--- Comment #10 from Stas Sergeev ---
OMG, not what I intended to get. :(
All I need is to use offsetof() in templates.
Last time I started to use reinterpret_cast
for that, you disallowed reinterpret_cast in
constexpr context. Now this...
Why i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111923
--- Comment #9 from Richard Smith ---
I don't think we intended for default arguments of class-scope lambdas to get
the same complete-class context treatment as default argument of member
functions, but the standard wording does currently seem t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111969
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
--- Comment #1 from Andr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111969
Bug ID: 111969
Summary: RISC-V rv32gcv: 12 grouped flaky failures
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111957
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
We already have patterns for -a and ~a even:
/* X != C1 ? -X : C2 simplifies to -X when -C1 == C2. */
/* X != C1 ? ~X : C2 simplifies to ~X when ~C1 == C2. */
I will add one to handle abs too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111906
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111968
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111906
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111906
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111929
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111919
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111929
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d80a26cca025877b7657fa355570bc301223b50b
commit r14-4899-gd80a26cca025877b7657fa355570bc301223b50b
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #12 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101590
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
So the test in the end should be:
INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0)) && tree_expr_nonnegative_p (@0)
as it does not matter if @1 has the sign bit set or not. since nonzero & XYZ is
still nonzero and in this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111919
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51f164f76212feaf896d65616f60877d3217b701
commit r14-4898-g51f164f76212feaf896d65616f60877d3217b701
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111964
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
And:
v8/src/heap/base/asm/ia32/push_registers_masm.asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46820
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kloczko.tomasz at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111964
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68131
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > We indeed do not have this optimization, only A + CST CMP CST to A CMP CST'
> > and related. Note that _9 might be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111968
Bug ID: 111968
Summary: ice during GIMPLE pass: dom
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111948
--- Comment #5 from 康桓瑋 ---
It shouldn't be. Is that a compiler bug?
Clang compiles the same libstdc++ code without problems.(In reply to Jonathan
Wakely from comment #2)
> (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #1)
> > _M_size._M_size in the function b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111959
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 56195
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56195&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472
Daniel Melendrez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.melendrezarmada@manc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104131
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104131
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111967
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111967
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r14-4893-20231024164508-g99a6c1065de-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20231024 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111966
Bug ID: 111966
Summary: GCN '--with-arch=[...]' not considered for 'mkoffload'
default 'elf_arch'
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: open
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111963
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The internal functions like __partition could just take forwarding references
to the predicates, at least for C++11 and later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65675
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
libitm needs getenv, and so does libsanitizer:
/home/test/src/gcc/libsanitizer/ubsan/ubsan_flags.cpp: In function ‘const char*
__ubsan::GetFlag(const char*)’:
/home/test/src/gcc/libsanitizer/ubsan/ubsan_fl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111965
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2011-October/325728.html
I don't know if there should be a -fno-debug-cpp option. Maybe we should just
reject that ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111965
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Yes it has been broken since it was added in r0-112466-g847e697a240e6d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111965
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Easy fix replace:
case OPT_fdebug_cpp:
cpp_opts->debug = 1;
break;
With:
case OPT_fdebug_cpp:
cpp_opts->debug = value;
break;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111965
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.7.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111965
Bug ID: 111965
Summary: -fno-debug-cpp does not disable -fdebug-cpp
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: prep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #4)
> Created attachment 56192 [details]
> Fix for this PR
I was thinking of something along these lines, but was wondering:
a) there could be multiple nest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111964
--- Comment #2 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> There are some known issues with top-level inline-asm and lto.
>
> It would be better if folks moved away from toplevel inline-asm really.
May I ask to drop s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111964
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111964
Bug ID: 111964
Summary: 13.2.1: potential GIMPLE bug in inline assempler
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111959
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Floating point could also use the ranger too.
I do wonder if we want to use the global or local ranger here ...
I am going to start with the global one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111963
Bug ID: 111963
Summary: Predicate copied when it could be forwarded in some
STL algorithms
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111962
Bug ID: 111962
Summary: test
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111961
Bug ID: 111961
Summary: test
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
Assignee: unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65675
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111959
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111958
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|11.1.0, 5.1.0, 8.1.0|6.1.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111960
Bug ID: 111960
Summary: ICE: during GIMPLE pass: rebuild_frequencies: SIGSEGV
(Invalid read of size 4) with
-fdump-tree-rebuild_frequencies-all
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111958
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-24
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111948
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111936
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.3|12.4
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111936
--- Comment #9 from vincenzo Innocente ---
Thanks for the second patch.
I was indeed struggling with autoconf versions (1.15 vd 1.16)
Any chance to backport to gcc12 (our current production version)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111959
Bug ID: 111959
Summary: tree_single_nonnegative_warnv_p could use
tree_nonzero_bits for SSA_NAMES and int types
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111958
Bug ID: 111958
Summary: Line number debugging information indicates wrong file
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111948
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This compiles OK:
namespace std::ranges
{
template
class subrange
{
private:
template
struct _Size
{ };
template
struct _Size
{ U _M_size; };
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111957
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111948
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #1)
> _M_size._M_size in the function body is already const.
It shouldn't be. Is that a compiler bug?
Clang compiles the same libstdc++ code without problems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111957
Bug ID: 111957
Summary: `a ? abs(a) : 0` is not simplified to just abs(a)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101590
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
We could use tree_expr_nonnegative_p here .
Though I noticed that tree_single_nonnegative_warnv_p could be improved to use
nonzerobits if it is there to speed up things ...
I will handle that part seperate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101590
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
We should also handle:
int foo(int len, int N) {
len &= 0x;
N &= 0xff;
int newlen = len & ~N;
return newlen <= len;
}
That is
(TREE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@0))
|| (signbi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111936
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Run autoreconf in the libstdc++-v3 dir, but you need the right versions of
automake and autoconf. The effect of doing that would be this additional patch,
which I didn't show (because it's just a generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111956
Bug ID: 111956
Summary: Many powerpc platforms do _not_ have support for
IEEE754 long double
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111951
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111860
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111947
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111955
Bug ID: 111955
Summary: isnan support in Builtins.def is missing
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111929
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
Hit this with libsass too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70417
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
