https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110978
--- Comment #2 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
Thank you for the clarification.
Now I can be conscious about that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110966
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > > I think matmul is fine with avx512f or avx, so requiring/using only the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111008
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111008
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a C++11 testcase that also fails in a similar way:
```
typedef int b;
templatestruct F1{};
F10)}> a;
F10}> a0;
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Weeks ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #6)
> (In reply to Nathan Weeks from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Brad Richardson from comment #3)
> > > Was there any more progress on this? I've just run into it.
> > >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111008
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
A related non-lambda testcase:
```
struct b{int a;};
templatestruct F1{};
F10)}> a;
F10}> a0;
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111008
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111008
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #1 from Andre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111008
Bug ID: 111008
Summary: '>' in a lambda as a template argument causes a syntax
error
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110966
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > I think matmul is fine with avx512f or avx, so requiring/using only the base
> > ISA level sounds fine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88286
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110957
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110996
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Nathan Weeks from comment #5)
> (In reply to Brad Richardson from comment #3)
> > Was there any more progress on this? I've just run into it.
> >
> > FYI I'm trying implement a polymo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111000
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-08-13
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110954
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwzeng at nuaa dot edu.cn
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111007
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110779
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111007
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this was fixed by r14-3140 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110867
--- Comment #10 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus from comment #9)
> It looks like as if the first fix didn't entirely solve the problem. It
> turns out that the normal form of const_int is not a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111007
Bug ID: 111007
Summary: [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O0 on
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Weeks ---
(In reply to Brad Richardson from comment #3)
> Was there any more progress on this? I've just run into it.
>
> FYI I'm trying implement a polymorphic send/receive:
> https://gitlab.com/everythingfunctional/c
22 matches
Mail list logo
