https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
--- Comment #3 from Vineet Gupta ---
Indeed the constraint already exists
(define_insn "*movdf_hardfloat_rv64"
[(set (match_operand:DF 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=f,f,f,m,m,*f,*r,
*r,*r,*m")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110749
Bug ID: 110749
Summary: wrong show float
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
--- Comment #2 from Kito Cheng ---
And seems we already has such constraint for a while, not sure why GCC 13 did
that, I saw the status has changed to ASSIGNED, so I assume Vineet you are
already spending time on that, so I will just stop there
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kito at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
Bug ID: 110748
Summary: optimize store of DF 0.0
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110740
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110747
Bug ID: 110747
Summary: GCC rejects the syntax for an immediately invoked
lambda as a template argument in a requires-clause
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
--- Comment #7 from Li Pan ---
Thanks a lot for the explanation, Kewen.
Looks you are taking care of this already, anything is required from my-side
please feel free to let me know.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
--- Comment #6 from Kewen Lin ---
The root cause is that the length and bias handling about LEN_STORE in sccvn
was missed to be updated, the below diff can fix the failure.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc
index 11061a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
--- Comment #5 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Li Pan from comment #2)
> Hi there,
>
> Just try to reproduce this bug with powerPC cross compiler (sorry we don't
> have a real powerPC) with the below options. Unfortunately, I failed to
> reprod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
--- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong ---
Kewen from IBM will soon send a patch to fix it.
Sorry for causing this issue.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2cfe5233e682fc04a9b6fc91f3d30685515630b
commit r14-2665-gb2cfe5233e682fc04a9b6fc91f3d30685515630b
Author: Lewis Hyatt
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||freebsd
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |pch
Summary|gcc-12 and gcc-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
--- Comment #7 from Yuri ---
gcc-13 has the same problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
--- Comment #6 from Yuri ---
FAILED:
src/plugins/score-plugin-avnd/CMakeFiles/score_plugin_avnd.dir/__/__/__/midiscaler_avnd.cpp.o
/usr/local/libexec/ccache/g++13 -DBOOST_ASIO_DISABLE_CONCEPTS=1
-DBOOST_MATH_DISABLE_FLOAT128=1 -DBOOST_NO_RTTI=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
--- Comment #2 from Li Pan ---
Hi there,
Just try to reproduce this bug with powerPC cross compiler (sorry we don't have
a real powerPC) with the below options. Unfortunately, I failed to reproduce
this bug as above mentioned.
Could you please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902
--- Comment #10 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
(In reply to Lewis Hyatt from comment #9)
> Thanks, sorry about that, I need to replace "unsigned long" with "size_t".
> Will fix it.
No problem. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902
--- Comment #9 from Lewis Hyatt ---
Thanks, sorry about that, I need to replace "unsigned long" with "size_t". Will
fix it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108179
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
This patch caused PR110566.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-20
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
--- Comment #4 from Yuri ---
This happens during the build of the Ossia Score project:
https://github.com/ossia/score
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Or it is while creating pch.
Please mention what you were doing when the message came up.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
It means pch is not fully supported due to pie. This has been improved/fixed in
gcc 13 though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
--- Comment #1 from Yuri ---
OS: FreeBSD 13.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
Bug ID: 110746
Summary: gcc-12 fails: sorry, unimplemented: PCH allocation
failure
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110593
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109921
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.3|13.2
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109921
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd2f934bb09c04e62beb8eb5421467184598983b
commit r13-7593-gcd2f934bb09c04e62beb8eb5421467184598983b
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
I am really sorry for causing the inconvience.
Working on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110077
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I hope this is fixed now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110077
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0867d30a68de68f4c809757348447bef94ef1491
commit r14-2661-g0867d30a68de68f4c809757348447bef94ef1491
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109921
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0867d30a68de68f4c809757348447bef94ef1491
commit r14-2661-g0867d30a68de68f4c809757348447bef94ef1491
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110593
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d614822e9ea2a3d8800045d66e3220743753d09
commit r14-2660-g2d614822e9ea2a3d8800045d66e3220743753d09
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110737
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
build_atomic_assign does not handle this in a reasonable fashion.
Note there is code like :
if (modifycode != NOP_EXPR)
add_stmt (rhs);
/* NOP_EXPR indicates it's a straight store of the RHS. Simply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110745
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110745
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e92ca8d3b4cab96a9f79466b5158381cb3103f9d
commit r14-2659-ge92ca8d3b4cab96a9f79466b5158381cb3103f9d
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110700
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Should be fixed on trunk by the above patch. Keeping open to track backporting
to branches for gcc 12 and gcc 13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110700
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b86c0fe327a5196a316bd698d12765b08de5dce7
commit r14-2658-gb86c0fe327a5196a316bd698d12765b08de5dce7
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110737
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
You can also get ICE with _Atomic int with a similar testcase:
```
_Atomic int c;
void f(void);
int g(void)
{
return (c += f());
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #10 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Thank you very much for digging into this!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110737
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||6.1.0, 8.1.0
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110737
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
7137 /* TARGET_EXPR temps aren't part of the enclosing block, so add
it
7138 to the temps list. Handle also variable length TARGET_EXPRs.
*/
7139 if (!poly_int_tree_p (DECL_SI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110064
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110064
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1ae46bdd19fc2aaea41bc894168bdaf4799be80
commit r14-2657-gb1ae46bdd19fc2aaea41bc894168bdaf4799be80
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110077
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I now think the right fix is:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/floating_from_chars.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/floating_from_chars.cc
@@ -1325,24 +1325,14 @@ _ZSt10from_charsPKcS0_RDF128_St12chars_format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110745
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110745
Bug ID: 110745
Summary: Improve printing of base classes
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80578
--- Comment #5 from Marc Mutz ---
Still in GCC 11 and GCC 13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110284
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110535
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 110535, which changed state.
Bug 110535 Summary: Internal error when performing a surrogate call with
unsatisfied constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110535
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101832
--- Comment #14 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
since it's opened again GCC12, the patch need to be backported to GCC12. then
will be closed at that time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110284
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01f6e8b013237041adeac370f8d229aea6304591
commit r14-2654-g01f6e8b013237041adeac370f8d229aea6304591
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110535
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92f6240baf80f998ca6c1408c3ee09d5d2ae68d7
commit r13-7592-g92f6240baf80f998ca6c1408c3ee09d5d2ae68d7
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109921
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110387
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-19
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110432
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110432
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61bf34d17473d611bb2695329808810dbd5af478
commit r13-7591-g61bf34d17473d611bb2695329808810dbd5af478
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110315
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod ---
I think the difference is actually Aldys work to reduce the size of Value_Range
rather than other stack saving changes. I think I can make some adjustments so
that our usage of Value_Range are on leaf func
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101832
--- Comment #13 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
the fix has been committed into GCC14.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101832
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110122
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110122
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33a84d438883b5d6616048636a5fc47f6dd4ed28
commit r13-7590-g33a84d438883b5d6616048636a5fc47f6dd4ed28
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Backtrace and some debug:
Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception.
0x01d00dd2 in multiple_p (a=2, b=0) at
../../gcc/poly-int.h:2123
2123 return a % b == 0;
(gdb) bt
#0 0x01
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||14.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110315
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #4)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > Confirmed. Not sure whether it's possible to backport any of the stack
> > usage reduction in ranger from tru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Removed reference to g:08b99fe8ad6 in the summary since the ICE is in SLP and
just happens to be compiling the code that was changed with g:08b99fe8ad6 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-19
Host|armv8l-un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55585
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55585&action=edit
Reduced testcase
options required:
`-O2 -fprofile-generate-march=armv8-a+simd -mfpu=neon-fp-armv8
-mfloat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110566
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99832
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110593
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110315
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Confirmed. Not sure whether it's possible to backport any of the stack
> usage reduction in ranger from trunk or whether it's other recursion
> limiting that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110634
Clément Léger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cleger at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110731
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12 Regression]
|W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110725
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||14.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91951
Nick Desaulniers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndesaulniers at google dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110728
--- Comment #8 from John McCall ---
> Let me clarify. If GCC were change behavior of `asm goto` to
> invoke the destructor/cleanup function before the backwards edge
> of `asm goto`, I would submit a patch to clang to implement that
> behavior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109106
--- Comment #5 from Geoffrey ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> Thanks for filing this, and for the comments; marking it as a dup of PR
> 107017
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 107017 ***
Hi, David. I want
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109558
--- Comment #2 from David Faust ---
Patches for btf_type_tag WIP, but DWARF for type_tags in certain cases is
incorrect seemingly due to PR debug/110439. I am still investigating.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110439
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I can reproduce this via a cross compiler:
./cc1plus t.ii -nostdinc -O2 -fprofile-generate -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
-march=armv8-a+simd -mfpu=neon-fp-armv8 -mfloat-abi=hard -mthumb
/home/thiago.bauerma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109558
--- Comment #1 from David Faust ---
v1 patch series for btf_decl_tag:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/624156.html
This also adds infrastructure which will be used for btf_type_tag.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110728
--- Comment #7 from Nick Desaulniers ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I suspect PR 91951 is the same really.
PR 91951 seems to be about a missing diagnostic dependent on optimization
level. This bug report is more so a questio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37722
Nick Desaulniers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndesaulniers at google dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
Bug ID: 110744
Summary: [14 regression] cc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c fails after
r14-2267-gb8806f6ffbe72
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.0|---
Keywords|wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110410
Bug 110410 depends on bug 110252, which changed state.
Bug 110252 Summary: [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2/3/s on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110252
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110252
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110252
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c79b49cd4fa742f7be739dd21fd2aa040cc1ba3
commit r14-2650-g8c79b49cd4fa742f7be739dd21fd2aa040cc1ba3
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110726
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110726
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf20b770d9aabb15faf2644b5e3106249cb175f3
commit r14-2648-gbf20b770d9aabb15faf2644b5e3106249cb175f3
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
Keywords|ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |rtl-optimization
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110284
--- Comment #14 from Gaius Mulley ---
The first patch was pushed on 2023-06-18 and the second one hasn't been pushed
yet. It has been tested though - I'll re-test it against master and push.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108402
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnd at linaro dot org
--- Comment #7 f
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
