https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110593
Bug ID: 110593
Summary: The std::ratio meta arithmetic can accept
non-std::ratio
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110592
Bug ID: 110592
Summary: [SPARC] GCC should default to TSO memory model when
compiling for sparc32
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106389
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-08
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98540
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97990
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 98540 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110582
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Another testcase:
```
int a, b;
int main() {
char a = 0;
int t = 0;
for (; t <253; t ++){
int d = 2;
d ^= 2 && a;
b = a == 0 ? d : d / a;
a = b;
}
for (; (1 + 95 << 24) + b + 1 + 68
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110582
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> It works with -fno-tree-loop-optimize but the difference from loop opts is
> just
So changing it to what -ftree-loop-optimize, it still passes with
-fno-tree-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110539
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110423
--- Comment #3 from Vineet Gupta ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #2)
> This is derived heavily from Click's work in the 90s.
> This would happen in gimple most likely, though I guess one could do it in
> RTL if they have a high pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105526
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103511
--- Comment #5 from Louis Dionne ---
Note that my claim about TriviallyCopyable is taken from the Standard here, for
reference (even though Jason probably knows this by heart :-).
https://eel.is/c++draft/class.prop#1:
> A trivially copyable cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110590
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
... and testsuite/gcc.dg/unroll-7.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107397
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This PR is half a zombie.
Jerry, do you plan to backport the fixes in comment#8 and comment#11 so that
we can finally close this one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82580
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108842
ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108842
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eef069fe8b9509a783c9ecb2eb659df4f5ab
commit r11-10898-geef069fe8b9509a783c9ecb2eb659df4f5ab
Author: Iain Buclaw
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91681
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43644
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bdf2737cda53a83332db1a1a021653447b05a7e7
commit r14-2386-gbdf2737cda53a83332db1a1a021653447b05a7e7
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110533
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bdf2737cda53a83332db1a1a021653447b05a7e7
commit r14-2386-gbdf2737cda53a83332db1a1a021653447b05a7e7
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106895
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> I guess that would be annoying if you couldn't have modifiers on constraints
There is no such thing as "operand modifiers". There are *output* modifiers:
they change how an operand is *printed*, th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108842
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0444c2065aef569aa16e43cffc564c202a59af33
commit r12-9759-g0444c2065aef569aa16e43cffc564c202a59af33
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108842
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:acd679a7944a4fde8a7ed9ac739749deff9f71ba
commit r13-7547-gacd679a7944a4fde8a7ed9ac739749deff9f71ba
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108842
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f934c5753849f7c48c6a3abfcd73b8f6008e8371
commit r14-2385-gf934c5753849f7c48c6a3abfcd73b8f6008e8371
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Fri J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110585
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105526
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109154
--- Comment #59 from Tamar Christina ---
I've sent two patches upstream this morning to fix the remaining ifcvt issues:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/623848.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/623849.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55499|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 09:34:02PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796
>
> Jerry DeLisle changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89479
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||javier.martinez.bugzilla@gm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110589
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103511
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Jason, your call on this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103511
Louis Dionne changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ldionne.2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110590
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
Forgot about
gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-unroll-2.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110591
Bug ID: 110591
Summary: [i386] (Maybe) Missed optimisation: _cmpccxadd sets
flags
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110590
Bug ID: 110590
Summary: Failing CFG consistency testcases
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86005
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick at rivosinc dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110589
Bug ID: 110589
Summary: Missed optimization with call-clobbered restrict
qualified references
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51041
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I believe it is the same problem as PR110215 which was solved recently by
checking whether pseudo values are used in the exception handler and the
handler does not return control flow back to the function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110559
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110559
--- Comment #1 from Robin Dapp ---
This can be improved in parts by enabling register-pressure aware scheduling.
The rest is due to the default issue rate of 1. Setting proper instruction
latency will then obviously cause a bit more reordering
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55482|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110372
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f7e5a7b91862b999aab88ee0319052aaf00f0f1
commit r14-2380-g1f7e5a7b91862b999aab88ee0319052aaf00f0f1
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54179
--- Comment #34 from mmokrejs at gmail dot com ---
Thank you all. Just to clarify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54179#c31 , I did not show the Oom
error itself nor the cmd killed dut to that but you can see details at
https://bugs.g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110311
--- Comment #49 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #48)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #47)
> > However, when I use -O2 together with an -march= flag, the code works.
> > I've tested -march=sandybridge, -march=haswell, -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110392
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:980666fbaf24f444a4cc7e78eb19aae00f296fdb
commit r13-7544-g980666fbaf24f444a4cc7e78eb19aae00f296fdb
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #97 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Alexander Klepikov from comment #96)
>
> Not really. 'expand_ashiftrt' could emit
>
> mov #imm, r1
> shad r1, r0
>
> and 'mov' instruction would be loop invariant if there's a loop. It looks
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110316
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
Bug 84402 depends on bug 54179, which changed state.
Bug 54179 Summary: please split insn-emit.c !
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54179
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110079
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109918
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45e950b542ca598eb8a4a69305fdd96dcb603353
commit r13-7546-g45e950b542ca598eb8a4a69305fdd96dcb603353
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109823
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110515
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d20f9dbbd69a9bf43a6324128d8c08175e6eab6
commit r13-7545-g0d20f9dbbd69a9bf43a6324128d8c08175e6eab6
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110381
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32c7f05f8bc6d45dee374fe22be3f0e19836278a
commit r13-7543-g32c7f05f8bc6d45dee374fe22be3f0e19836278a
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108975
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #18 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108042
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107475
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107443
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107397
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #13 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107321
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110582
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107176
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #11 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106982
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106399
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105988
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105917
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105838
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #24 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #96 from Alexander Klepikov
---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #95)
> The infinite loop is in splitting of the 'ashrsi3_n_call' pattern with the
> constant 1. This is because 'ashrsi3_n_call' match overlaps with the 'shar'
> pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110386
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110295
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105653
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110294
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105630
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110238
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105453
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109432
Bug 109432 depends on bug 109439, which changed state.
Bug 109439 Summary: RFE: Spurious -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value tagging
along -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109439
What|Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105452
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109439
Benjamin Priour changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105244
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105180
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109967
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105168
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109925
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #13 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109876
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #12 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105126
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109381
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110392
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104961
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109184
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #14 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108933
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54179
--- Comment #33 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #32)
> I'll tentatively reopen as IIRC tamar mentioned they've had some ideas about
> this, apologies if I'm misremembering.
Hello, yes I have a patch locally that I ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110176
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109958
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104717
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|11.5
--- Comment #13 from Richard Bien
1 - 100 of 881 matches
Mail list logo