https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71414
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110062
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99350
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|87477 |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110126
--- Comment #2 from Thorsten Otto ---
But even if i rewrite it like that, i still get the warning.
I avoided doing anything machine specific in the first example, but if i
actually do, and use something like:
PROCEDURE test;
BEGIN
ASM("movl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97784
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68274
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110117
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110117
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f085e45755643f13d4fa45a12a6ade45be98f95
commit r14-1601-g3f085e45755643f13d4fa45a12a6ade45be98f95
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110117
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e60593f3881c72a96a3fa4844d73e8a2cd14f670
commit r14-1600-ge60593f3881c72a96a3fa4844d73e8a2cd14f670
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Bug 14753 depends on bug 110134, which changed state.
Bug 110134 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] (-unsigned1) != CST is not
optimized to unsigned1 != CST at the gimple level
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110134
Wha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110134
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|10.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110134
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc155ff9c38848a8e6a7125dd0b66ac0aef47880
commit r14-1599-gcc155ff9c38848a8e6a7125dd0b66ac0aef47880
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110151
Bug ID: 110151
Summary: warning: 'strncpy' output truncated copying 10 bytes
from a string of length 26 [-Wstringop-truncation]
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105903
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105903
Bug 105903 depends on bug 89263, which changed state.
Bug 89263 Summary: Simplify bool expression to OR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89263
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94898
Bug 94898 depends on bug 89263, which changed state.
Bug 89263 Summary: Simplify bool expression to OR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89263
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083
Bug 20083 depends on bug 89263, which changed state.
Bug 89263 Summary: Simplify bool expression to OR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89263
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89263
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 94898, which changed state.
Bug 94898 Summary: Failure to optimize compare plus sub of same operands into
compare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94898
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94898
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94898
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64d90d06d2db43538c8a45adbb3d74842f7868ae
commit r14-1597-g64d90d06d2db43538c8a45adbb3d74842f7868ae
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64d90d06d2db43538c8a45adbb3d74842f7868ae
commit r14-1597-g64d90d06d2db43538c8a45adbb3d74842f7868ae
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109957
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64d90d06d2db43538c8a45adbb3d74842f7868ae
commit r14-1597-g64d90d06d2db43538c8a45adbb3d74842f7868ae
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99069
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64d90d06d2db43538c8a45adbb3d74842f7868ae
commit r14-1597-g64d90d06d2db43538c8a45adbb3d74842f7868ae
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89263
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64d90d06d2db43538c8a45adbb3d74842f7868ae
commit r14-1597-g64d90d06d2db43538c8a45adbb3d74842f7868ae
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98105
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced:
```
void f(const int&);
namespace {
struct myFactory
{
static constexpr int s_sList = 1;
};
}
//constexpr int myFactory::s_sList;
void sdi_register_model()
{
f(myFactory::s_sList);
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86257
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104271
--- Comment #14 from cuilili ---
This regression has been fixed with the commit below and we can close this
ticket.
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b9a5cc9ec08e9f239dd2096edcc447b7a72f64a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58208
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15)
> This was a glibc issue.
>
> Fixed by glibc commit 5e49c52efdb37eb0aa315156f39056f25ff9ddaa (
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;
> h=5e49c52efd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58208
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58208
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
movdqa %xmm1, 16(%esp)
movdqa %xmm0, 32(%esp)
Maybe stack alignment for deconstructors.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110038
--- Comment #5 from cuilili ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #4)
> So is this now fixed?
Yes, the attachment case has been fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84377
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81763
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dilfridge at gentoo dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84377
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The gimple level is the same:
```
_5 = 281474976710655 >> j0_20;
_6 = ~_5;
_7 = (long long unsigned int) _6;
_8 = _7 & _35;
qw_u.parts64.msw = _8;
qw_u.parts64.lsw = 0;
```
The place where it cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92407
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for GCC 14 so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92407
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e0b65b239c3a0d68ce94896b236b03de666ffd6
commit r14-1593-g7e0b65b239c3a0d68ce94896b236b03de666ffd6
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e0b65b239c3a0d68ce94896b236b03de666ffd6
commit r14-1593-g7e0b65b239c3a0d68ce94896b236b03de666ffd6
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92407
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b192e2007e1c98b548f4aa878523b485968d24a4
commit r14-1592-gb192e2007e1c98b548f4aa878523b485968d24a4
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58487
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ae5384d457b9c67586de012816dfc71a6943164
commit r14-1594-g2ae5384d457b9c67586de012816dfc71a6943164
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33799
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08cea4e56a094ff9cc7c65fdc9ce8c4d7aff64be
commit r14-1591-g08cea4e56a094ff9cc7c65fdc9ce8c4d7aff64be
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58050
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4fe84e2a4c0b600d2bc01f171b3b9dd1f4357208
commit r14-1589-g4fe84e2a4c0b600d2bc01f171b3b9dd1f4357208
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84377
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC 7.3.0:
```
.loc 1 42 0 discriminator 2
movl$65535, %edi
movl$-1, %esi
movl$0, 48(%esp)
shrdl %edi, %esi
testb $32, %cl
sarx%ecx,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84377
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.4.0, 7.5.0, 8.1.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||85234, 110134
--- Comment #13 from Andre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94898
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch submitted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/620829.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch submitted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/620829.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89263
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110019
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110019
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29c82c6ca929e0f5eccfe038dea71177d814c6b7
commit r14-1588-g29c82c6ca929e0f5eccfe038dea71177d814c6b7
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110019
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #67 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Alexander Klepikov from comment #66)
> (In reply to Alexander Klepikov from comment #65)
> > > I'm thinking of something else.
> >
> > During kernel compile I got few internal errors in different p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109947
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110149
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It looks like I forgot to actually format using 'P' though, I only parsed it
from the format string.
This would fix that, and disable the P2519 changes for -std=c++20 and
-std=c++23:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110149
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
GCC's formatter specialization has:
// _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS
// P2519R3 Formatting pointers
__first = __spec._M_parse_zero_fill(__first, __last);
if (__finished())
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92606
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a x86_64 testcase:
```
typedef __UINT16_TYPE__ T;
#define NI __attribute__((noinline,noclone,no_icf))
static const __seg_fs T xyz_prog[] = { 123, 123, 123 };
static __seg_gs T xyz[] = { 123, 123, 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110149
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
0p is proposed by
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2510r3.pdf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110113
--- Comment #5 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reducing the std module down to the following always produces a crash in
dmd_aaGetRvalue when running debian/ubuntu pre-compiled gdc-13 under gdb.
---
struct Tid
{
MessageBox mbox;
}
struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110150
--- Comment #3 from Steven Xia ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> basically you are getting optional ...
Understood, thanks for the quick reply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110150
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
basically you are getting optional ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110019
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110150
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
--- Comment #1 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92606
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #3)
> Created attachment 47485 [details]
> 123f.c: C test case with address space __flash.
>
> ...and the code is also wrong with address spaces like __flash (and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110150
Bug ID: 110150
Summary: std::optional inside template leads to long
compilation time
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84292
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110085
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110085
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:044ee48215fd7eca1f1680758cd27574ff274417
commit r13-7421-g044ee48215fd7eca1f1680758cd27574ff274417
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110134
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110149
Bug ID: 110149
Summary: std::format for pointer arguments allows a '0' option
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110148
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110113
--- Comment #4 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Test case should deterministically crash when kernel.randomize_va_space=0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71414
Raphael C changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drraph at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110113
ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110148
Bug ID: 110148
Summary: TSVC s242 regression between
g:c0df96b3cda5738afbba3a65bb054183c5cd5530 and
g:e4c986fde56a6248f8fbe6cf0704e1da34b055d8
Product: gcc
Versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110062
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43892
--- Comment #37 from Jakub Jelinek ---
What happened with this patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109610
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106050
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109947
--- Comment #9 from Martin Seemann ---
That's great news, looking forward to the next point release.
Thank you very much for taking this to the committee and getting the process in
motion so quickly!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #66 from Alexander Klepikov
---
(In reply to Alexander Klepikov from comment #65)
> > I'm thinking of something else.
>
> During kernel compile I got few internal errors in different passes. That
> is, additional loop optimization p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110122
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to waffl3x from comment #3)
> Very cool, thanks, since your test case seems to cause problems in GCC 11
> and GCC 12 does that mean the bug goes deeper than I thought?
>
> (In reply to Patrick Pal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110147
--- Comment #1 from lukas.dresel at cs dot ucsb.edu ---
The invocation was `rust_demangle(mangled=0x18140ad "_RYC0.vdj\\lc[kniso,bz",
options=0x103)`.
The original bug report to binutils can be found here with more details:
https://sourceware.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110147
Bug ID: 110147
Summary: UBSAN error in rust-demangle.c: NULL pointer passed to
memcpy
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110141
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Another -fstack-reuse= issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31542
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102974
--- Comment #16 from Mason ---
For the record, the example I provided was intended to show that, with some
help, GCC can generate good code for bigint multiplication. In this situation,
"help" means a short asm template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100765
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc-bugzilla@richardebeling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110140
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110140
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #1 from Andre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110145
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I've tried
struct S {
double value;
constexpr S(double value) : value (value) {}
};
inline constexpr S s[] = { 1e126 };
int
main ()
{
__builtin_printf ("%.32La %.32La\n", (long double) s[0].value, (l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110146
Bug ID: 110146
Summary: ICE in
riscv_vector::function_builder::add_unique_function()
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110145
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Weird, the 1e126 constant shouldn't be with excess precision because it is
> stored into a double field (using ctor).
Yeah, I've fixed nearly all the other te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110145
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109837
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
> (For GCN, enabling unified_address makes sense.)
Now done via commit r14-1584-gf1af7d65ff64fe7102d1490ef46ea491a533e641
> TODO: It does not harm to have some F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110145
Bug ID: 110145
Summary: 20_util/to_chars/double.cc fails for -m32
-fexcess-precision=standard
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79173
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55271|0 |1
is obsolete|
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
