https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107041
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #14 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105322
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107424
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #13 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107038
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107815
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #20 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105258
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #16 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106977
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #31 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105167
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #12 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106879
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107231
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105081
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106634
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106955
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #10 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106511
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106887
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #18 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106375
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #24 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103771
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #41 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106293
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #13 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105568
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106315
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103457
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104162
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106227
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101912
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #14 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104167
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105325
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #14 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103429
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100157
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #13 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99919
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105217
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #36 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #30 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99187
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81122
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90857
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #30 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97747
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79700
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68350
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56139
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101096
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
For foo, after supporting downconvert instruction, below it's difference for
codegen.
@@ -6,15 +6,17 @@
foo:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
- movl$255, %eax
- vpbroadcastw%eax, %xmm0
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109610
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
One solution is add an peephole for handle such redudancy.
+;; Peephole to catch memory loads to VSX_REG and then moves to GENERAL_REGS.
+(define_peephole2
+ [(set (match_operand:VSX_M 0 "vsx_register_operan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109626
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109625
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108758
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108758
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33a44e3aa81f9fdf8f6b87018abd4c664e545b53
commit r14-240-g33a44e3aa81f9fdf8f6b87018abd4c664e545b53
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Wed Apr 26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109069
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd75f6ae5625f087980ff4a7e76cc6284cfe5a3e
commit r14-239-gfd75f6ae5625f087980ff4a7e76cc6284cfe5a3e
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Wed Apr 26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109272
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109272
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8d5e14f524283484c2a466353f92f7eaadae9f7
commit r14-235-ga8d5e14f524283484c2a466353f92f7eaadae9f7
Author: Pan Li
Date: Tue Apr 25 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109610
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
> 1 unit cost is aligned with what's did in recog_reg_class
>
> /* If the alternative actually allows memory, make
>things a bit cheaper since we won't need an extra
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100958
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 54923
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54923&action=edit
Patch which is under testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Linus from comment #18)
> By the way, same code didn't survive aarch64 gcc 9.3.1, but did survive X86
> gcc 9.3.1 -- devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.
> Do you have any clue about it?
Yes i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #18 from Linus ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #17)
> (In reply to Linus from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15)
> > > Already fixed.
> > >
> > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Linus from comment #16)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15)
> > Already fixed.
> >
> > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 98136 ***
>
> Thanks.
>
> 1. 98136 was fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #16 from Linus ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15)
> Already fixed.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 98136 ***
Thanks.
1. 98136 was fixed for gcc 9.2.0. So original gcc 10 includes the fix, right
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98136
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linus.zhu at mavenir dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #14 from Linus ---
devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.2.el7.aarch64
devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.el7.x86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #13 from Linus ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12)
> (In reply to Linus from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > > /* If we have a length attribute, this instruction should have
> > >been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Linus from comment #10)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > /* If we have a length attribute, this instruction should have
> >been split in shorten_branches, to ensure that we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #11 from Linus ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> (In reply to Linus from comment #8)
> > hi Andrew, thanks. And before raising another ticket for attaching the
> > second half of ccdNSTWA.out, I did try to add one mor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #10 from Linus ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> /* If we have a length attribute, this instruction should have
>been split in shorten_branches, to ensure that we would have
>valid length info for the splitees
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108121
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68201409bc2867da45791331e385198826fa4576
commit r14-232-g68201409bc2867da45791331e385198826fa4576
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Linus from comment #8)
> hi Andrew, thanks. And before raising another ticket for attaching the
> second half of ccdNSTWA.out, I did try to add one more attachment to this
> bug, but it hinted t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #8 from Linus ---
hi Andrew, thanks. And before raising another ticket for attaching the second
half of ccdNSTWA.out, I did try to add one more attachment to this bug, but it
hinted that previous one will be obsolete.
Anyway it's no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Linus from comment #4)
> due to 1M-attachment limit, I'll raise another bug and attach ccdNSTWA.out.2
The limit is just per-attachment, not per bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 109630 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109630
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
/* If we have a length attribute, this instruction should have
been split in shorten_branches, to ensure that we would have
valid length info for the splitees. */
gcc_assert (!HAVE_ATTR_length);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109630
Bug ID: 109630
Summary: internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1, at
final.c:3078 6480 | }, to attach another half
/tmp/ccdNSTWA.out
Product: gcc
Version: 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #4 from Linus ---
due to 1M-attachment limit, I'll raise another bug and attach ccdNSTWA.out.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
--- Comment #3 from Linus ---
Created attachment 54921
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54921&action=edit
ccdNSTWA.out.1
ccdNSTWA.out.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108121
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Gaius Mulle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109629
Bug ID: 109629
Summary: internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1, at
final.c:3078 6480 | }
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108121
--- Comment #6 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 54920
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54920&action=edit
Proposed fix for TestLong4.mod (ZTYPE fix)
Here is a proposed patch to allow testLong4.mod to compile without w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109628
Bug ID: 109628
Summary: -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value false positive
on static storage
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109627
--- Comment #1 from keithp at keithp dot com ---
This patch was submitted to the mailing list here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-August/600452.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109627
Bug ID: 109627
Summary: [PATCH] driver: Extend 'getenv' function to allow
default value
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109625
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Folly should not use internal functions which is not designed for other than
libstdc++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109625
--- Comment #2 from Arsen Arsenović ---
almost certainly started with r14-92-g58b7dbf865b146, of course
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109625
--- Comment #1 from Arsen Arsenović ---
related code (folly/Traits.h)
#if FOLLY_HAS_BUILTIN(__type_pack_element)
template
using type_pack_element_t = __type_pack_element;
#else
template
using type_pack_element_t = traits_detai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109626
Bug ID: 109626
Summary: forwprop introduces new signed multiplication UB
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109625
Bug ID: 109625
Summary: [14 regression] 'error: use of built-in trait
‘__type_pack_element’
in function signature; use library traits instead'
when building folly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108851
--- Comment #3 from Pali Rohár ---
Or do you have any other suggestions?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108975
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d674e29d7f89bf93fcfcc963ff0248c6347586d
commit r14-228-g3d674e29d7f89bf93fcfcc963ff0248c6347586d
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105523
--- Comment #30 from Konrad Rosenbaum ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #28)
> (In reply to Wilhelm M from comment #26)
> > As you can see in my opening bug report, there is no nullptr reference nor
> > dereferencing a pointer with val
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103931
--- Comment #22 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here another invalid example which ICEs because the clash is not detected:
module AModule
implicit none
type, bind(C) :: c_ptr
private
integer(8) :: c_address
end type c_ptr
end
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo