[Bug middle-end/109449] false positive stringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109449 --- Comment #3 from pionere at freemail dot hu --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > I am not 100% sure if this is not a incorrect warning. The question that > needs to be answered is the object located at &drlg.transDirMap[0][0] can

[Bug tree-optimization/104288] [11/12 Regression] EVRP null pointer check removal for strcmp (and maybe others) is not flow senative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104288 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #14) > (In reply to Christian Prochaska from comment #13) > > I found the "Register non-null side effects properly." commit with git > > bisect while debugging a page

[Bug tree-optimization/104288] [11/12 Regression] EVRP null pointer check removal for strcmp (and maybe others) is not flow senative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104288 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Christian Prochaska from comment #13) > I found the "Register non-null side effects properly." commit with git > bisect while debugging a page fault in the Genode OS framework built with > GCC

[Bug tree-optimization/104288] [11/12 Regression] EVRP null pointer check removal for strcmp (and maybe others) is not flow senative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104288 Christian Prochaska changed: What|Removed |Added CC||christian.prochaska@genode-

[Bug c/109450] Wrong code for VLA in struct sithe size expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109450 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, |

[Bug fortran/109453] [REGRESSION] UBOUND incorrect when used in declartion of another array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109453 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/108131] [10/11 Regression] Incorrect bound calculation when bound intrinsic used in size expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108131 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/109453] [REGRESSION] UBOUND incorrect when used in declartion of another array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109453 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- Correction, this must be a duplicate of something. With gfortran gcc version 12.2.1 20221121 I get the error. With gfortran gcc version 12.2.1 20230327 it is fixed. As far as I can tell it has been fixed

[Bug fortran/109453] [REGRESSION] UBOUND incorrect when used in declartion of another array

13.0.1 20230407 (experimental) (GCC) > > So that makes this a regression I believe. I get the expected output with GNU Fortran (GCC) 13.0.1 20230408 (experimental) that I built this morning with Paul's large patch. It definitely fails with GNU Fortran (FreeBSD Ports Collection) 11.3.0 I don't have 12.x installed to test.

[Bug fortran/109453] [REGRESSION] UBOUND incorrect when used in declartion of another array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109453 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|UBOUND incorrect when used |[REGRESSION] UBOUND |

[Bug libfortran/109454] Possible memory leak after using random_number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109454 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/109454] Possible memory leak after using random_number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109454 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this is a bogus leak from valgrind. Specifically not supporting pthread_getspecific, pthread_setspecific .

[Bug libfortran/109454] New: Possible memory leak after using random_number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109454 Bug ID: 109454 Summary: Possible memory leak after using random_number Product: gcc Version: 11.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/109453] UBOUND incorrect when used in declartion of another array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109453 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #1) > Works for me. > > gfcx -o z -O a.f90 -fcheck=all && ./z GNU Fortran (GCC) 13.0.1 20230310 (experimental) This is with the above. So the change is in the l

[Bug fortran/109453] UBOUND incorrect when used in declartion of another array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109453 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/109453] New: UBOUND incorrect when used in declartion of another array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109453 Bug ID: 109453 Summary: UBOUND incorrect when used in declartion of another array Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/109324] Genrecog reports "source missing a mode?" for H8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109324 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jan Dubiec from comment #2) > It seems that msp430-elf has similar problem: It is similar but since the sources are different between the two targets, you should file a seperate bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/109448] [12/13 Regression] wrong uninitialized warning with std::variant of an empty class and std::exception_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109448 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|_M_exception_object’ may be |[12/13 Regression] wrong

[Bug middle-end/109449] false positive stringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109449 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I am not 100% sure if this is not a incorrect warning. The question that needs to be answered is the object located at &drlg.transDirMap[0][0] can only validly be accessed to offset 80 or not.

[Bug middle-end/109449] false positive stringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109449 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- The trunk provides extra information: : In function 'void func()': :51:47: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=] 51 | tdp[(2 * i + 1) * DSIZEY + 2 * j] = tpm;

[Bug libgomp/109452] New: omp_init_lock_with_hint() and omp_init_nest_lock_with_hint() are undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109452 Bug ID: 109452 Summary: omp_init_lock_with_hint() and omp_init_nest_lock_with_hint() are undefined Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/109451] New: ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor with ASSOCIATE and substrings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109451 Bug ID: 109451 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor with ASSOCIATE and substrings Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/46532] [OMP] missing error for loop bounds missing an attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46532 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from a

[Bug fortran/96084] ICE in free_expr0, at fortran/expr.c:446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96084 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug fortran/106856] [12 Regression][OOP] CLASS attribute handling / ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:1977 since r12-4346-geb92cd57a1ebe7cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856 --- Comment #18 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 96084 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/107441] optional arguments are identified as "present" when missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107441 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/91196] Interface generated for proc with VALUE, OPTIONAL misses hidden is-present argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91196 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|

[Bug fortran/56818] [meta-bug] fortran-dev bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818 Bug 56818 depends on bug 57611, which changed state. Bug 57611 Summary: [Fortran-Dev Regression] Too much memory allocated (gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_alloc_2.f90) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57611 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/57611] [Fortran-Dev Regression] Too much memory allocated (gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_alloc_2.f90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57611 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME CC

[Bug tree-optimization/109392] [12/13 Regression] ICE in tree_vec_extract, at tree-vect-generic.cc:177 since r12-117-gb972e036f40c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109392 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:101380a8394c22a7a2ea70de2060ee93716156e2 commit r13-7126-g101380a8394c22a7a2ea70de2060ee93716156e2 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Sat Ap

[Bug libffi/109447] test case libffi.closures/cls_align_longdouble_split.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109447 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.0, 13.0 --- Comment #6 from Peter Be

[Bug testsuite/94384] FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_f_default_field_width_3.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94384 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libffi/109447] test case libffi.closures/cls_align_longdouble_split.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109447 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||green at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug libffi/109447] test case libffi.closures/cls_align_longdouble_split.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109447 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libffi/109447] test case libffi.closures/cls_align_longdouble_split.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109447 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-4-8 CC|

[Bug c++/109356] Enhancement idea to provide clearer missing brace line number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109356 --- Comment #6 from Jonny Grant --- Tried a few other compilers on godbolt. ICC gets the warning on line 6 https://godbolt.org/z/fYb9c8f61 nvc++ gives the warning on line 6 https://godbolt.org/z/xvh67odzY MSVC and Clang don't.

[Bug c/105628] [12/13 Regression] False positive with -Waddress

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105628 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug analyzer/109190] GCC Static Analyzer cannot handle the initialization of an array with a for loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109190 --- Comment #3 from Geoffrey --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2) > With -O0 GCC does not attempt to analyze any loops. I doubt if "-O0 > -fanalyzer" really makes sense. Maybe we should just emit a warning when > -fanalyzer is used with

[Bug rtl-optimization/105715] [13 Regression] missed RTL if-conversion with COND_EXPR change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105715 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/105832] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105832 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug tree-optimization/105834] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O2 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105834 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug target/106240] [13 Regression] missed vectorization opportunity (cond move) on mips since r13-707-g68e0063397ba82

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106240 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/106511] [13 Regression] New -Werror=maybe-uninitialized since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106511 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug target/107270] [10/11/12/13 Regression] return for structure is not as good as before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107270 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug tree-optimization/107823] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os (trunk vs. 12.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107823 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug tree-optimization/108197] [12/13 Regression] -Wstringop-overread emitted on simple boost small_vector code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108197 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug tree-optimization/108351] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 since r13-4240-gfeeb0d68f1c708

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108351 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/108355] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O2 since r13-2772-g9baee6181b4e42

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108355 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug tree-optimization/108358] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os since r13-3378-gf6c168f8c06047

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108358 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug tree-optimization/108360] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os since r13-2048-g418b71c0d535bf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108360 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug libgomp/108895] [13.0.1 (exp)] Fortran + gfx90a !$acc update device produces a segfault.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108895 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug target/108947] [13 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-forward-propagate and vector compare on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108947 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law

[Bug target/109104] [13 Regression] ICE: in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.cc:1171 with -fzero-call-used-regs=all -march=rv64gv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109104 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug c++/109381] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Ambiguous member lookup with this-> accepted when it should be rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109381 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/109434] [12/13 Regression] std::optional weird -Wmaybe-unitialized and behaviour with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109434 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Prior

[Bug target/109402] v850: non-v850e version of __muldi3() in /libgcc/config/v850/lib1funcs.S operates sp in reversed direction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109402 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Resolut

[Bug target/109402] v850: non-v850e version of __muldi3() in /libgcc/config/v850/lib1funcs.S operates sp in reversed direction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109402 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79fb2de020c499bd01708e1418965a11166b7d5b commit r13-7123-g79fb2de020c499bd01708e1418965a11166b7d5b Author: Tetsuma Hoshino Date: Sat

[Bug fortran/102111] Segfault with associate to derived type with allocatable component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102111 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 102111, which changed state. Bug 102111 Summary: Segfault with associate to derived type with allocatable component https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102111 What|Removed |Add

[Bug target/109324] Genrecog reports "source missing a mode?" for H8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109324 --- Comment #2 from Jan Dubiec --- It seems that msp430-elf has similar problem: build/genrecog.exe ../../../gcc/gcc/common.md ../../../gcc/gcc/config/msp430/msp430.md \ insn-conditions.md > tmp-recog.cc ../../../gcc/gcc/config/msp430/msp430.

[Bug fortran/106918] Cannot use structure constructor with component allocatable character array of deferred length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106918 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/105205] Incorrect assignment of derived type with allocatable, deferred-length character component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105205 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/98408] Character lengths for allocatable character arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98408 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 102106, which changed state. Bug 102106 Summary: Freeing unallocated memory, with associate to derived type with polymorphic component https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102106 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/102106] Freeing unallocated memory, with associate to derived type with polymorphic component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102106 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 100948, which changed state. Bug 100948 Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9069 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/100948] [12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9069

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 93813, which changed state. Bug 93813 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_select_type_cases, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:2874 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93813 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/93813] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_select_type_cases, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:2874

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93813 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 93339, which changed state. Bug 93339 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2830 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93339 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/93339] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2830

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93339 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 92779, which changed state. Bug 92779 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_funcall, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:4225 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92779 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/92779] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_funcall, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:4225

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92779 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 91941, which changed state. Bug 91941 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7336 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91941 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/91941] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7336

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91941 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 88247, which changed state. Bug 88247 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in get_array_ctor_var_strlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:2068 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/88247] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in get_array_ctor_var_strlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:2068

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 88247, which changed state. Bug 88247 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in get_array_ctor_var_strlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:2068 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/85686] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3385

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85686 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 85686, which changed state. Bug 85686 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3385 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85686 What|Removed

[Bug c/109450] New: Wrong code for VLA in struct sithe size expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109450 Bug ID: 109450 Summary: Wrong code for VLA in struct sithe size expression Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug fortran/106918] Cannot use structure constructor with component allocatable character array of deferred length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106918 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 commit r13-7121-geac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sat A

[Bug fortran/93813] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_select_type_cases, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:2874

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93813 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 commit r13-7121-geac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sat Ap

[Bug fortran/105205] Incorrect assignment of derived type with allocatable, deferred-length character component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105205 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 commit r13-7121-geac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sat A

[Bug fortran/98408] Character lengths for allocatable character arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98408 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 commit r13-7121-geac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sat Ap

[Bug fortran/93339] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2830

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93339 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 commit r13-7121-geac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sat Ap

[Bug fortran/91941] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7336

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91941 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 commit r13-7121-geac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sat Ap

[Bug fortran/102106] Freeing unallocated memory, with associate to derived type with polymorphic component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102106 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 commit r13-7121-geac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sat A

[Bug fortran/88247] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in get_array_ctor_var_strlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:2068

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 commit r13-7121-geac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sat A

[Bug fortran/92779] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_funcall, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:4225

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92779 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 commit r13-7121-geac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sat Ap

[Bug fortran/100948] [12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9069

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 commit r13-7121-geac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sat

[Bug fortran/85686] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3385

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85686 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 commit r13-7121-geac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sat A

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 commit r13-7121-geac493851f07df98213ecf67a5e9ab41a7babcd2 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sat Ap

[Bug middle-end/109449] New: false positive stringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109449 Bug ID: 109449 Summary: false positive stringop-overflow Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end