https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109385
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||c++-lambda,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104707
rvalue changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i at rvalue dot moe
--- Comment #8 from rvalue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109385
Bug ID: 109385
Summary: decltype in lambda causes internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104707
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
> since all modern operating systems have a large enough parameter space (all
> of them have 262k at least).
Windows still does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104707
Tan xc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |other
Version|11.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109384
Bug ID: 109384
Summary: unquoted keyword 'float' in format
[-Werror=format-diag]
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0580ea4b7a6dc8ee981b08f936b3ce62c6dfe200
commit r13-6981-g0580ea4b7a6dc8ee981b08f936b3ce62c6dfe200
Author: Haochen Gui
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109383
Bug ID: 109383
Summary: [QoI] std::type_index::operator<=> should not call
__builtin_strcmp twice
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103663
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90508
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the older gccs even get the line even more wrong, take:
```
template struct a {
int t;
virtual b g() { return 0; }
};
a t;
int tt;
a t1;
int tt1;
```
The error points to the line containing a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109382
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90508
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90508
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109382
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109382
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang gives:
:7:8: error: member reference base type 'int' is not a structure or
union
T().waldo();
~~~^~
:11:10: note: in instantiation of member function 'C::f' requested
here
C obj;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109382
Bug ID: 109382
Summary: Error inside virtual function of class template does
not show point of instantiation
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44126
--- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey ---
I happened to be looking in this area and I see that gcc still
generates the old, incorrect form.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109381
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109381
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.5.0
Summary|Ambiguous memb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109381
Bug ID: 109381
Summary: Ambiguous member lookup with this-> accepted when it
should be rejected
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: acc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100607
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109378
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109378
g.peterh...@t-online.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #11 from g.p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109380
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note there are not many folks working on mingw support for GCC these days.
Also I don't work on that port, I work on other ports and try to triage bug
reports which is why I commented here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109380
--- Comment #2 from Vittorio Romeo ---
Hmm, you might be correct. Seeing that the issue has not been looked at since
2017, are you aware of any workaround besides `-Wl,--export-all-symbols`?
The issue is preventing me from applying explicit te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109380
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109378
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
>This would have the advantage that std::sqrt would not "contaminate" the
>calling function with conditional jumps and thus inflate it.
Also what do you mean by inflate it? do you mean code size? Or do yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109378
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Summary|improve __bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109380
Bug ID: 109380
Summary: inline member function symbol not exported with
explicit template instantiation declaration on MinGW
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109378
--- Comment #8 from g.peterh...@t-online.de ---
But I don't want and can't use a version of std::sqrt that requires compiler
specific flags/options/__builtins and injects internals of
std::sqrt/__builtin_sqrt into the calling context/function.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89088
Vittorio Romeo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vittorio.romeo at outlook dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109378
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also you could do:
template
inline constexpr Type my_sqrt(const Type x) noexcept
{
if (std::isless(x, 0.0)) __builtin_unreachable();
return std::sqrt(x);
}
And GCC will optimize away the check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109378
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
>Wouldn't it be better to rewrite __builtin_sqrt so that these tests are done
>inside __builtin_sqrt and not already in the calling context?
NO, in fact it is designed this way to better optimize sqrt in t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109378
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109378
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to g.peterhoff from comment #4)
> Hm. Maybe we misunderstood each other or I don't understand. I don't want to
> set -fno-math-errno or any other compiler-specific flag. My intention is
> that __bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109378
--- Comment #4 from g.peterh...@t-online.de ---
Hm. Maybe we misunderstood each other or I don't understand. I don't want to
set -fno-math-errno or any other compiler-specific flag. My intention is that
__builtin_sqrt doesn't "contaminate" the ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109375
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109375
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f989fe879ddc2753ac9fa580b2b0a1024c98f0f
commit r13-6978-g8f989fe879ddc2753ac9fa580b2b0a1024c98f0f
Author: John David Anglin
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109378
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-linux-gnu
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109378
--- Comment #2 from g.peterh...@t-online.de ---
But this is of no use if I want to compile something "normally" without
compiler specific options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109379
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
and doing it inline is not going to help that much as the overhead is not due
to not being inlined; it is just an expensive operation as it has to be done
using soft-float.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109379
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109379
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109379
Bug ID: 109379
Summary: improve __builtin_fmal
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109378
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
-fno-math-errno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109378
Bug ID: 109378
Summary: improve __builtin_sqrt
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104272
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109376
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109376
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e35503833c0418fb6a0475f6e927cbcf64814c1e
commit r13-6977-ge35503833c0418fb6a0475f6e927cbcf64814c1e
Author: John David Anglin
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64654
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-12-17 00:00:00 |2023-4-2
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109336
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5bb27a1bb2f1c0533e1dda6c4a326e50756830f1
commit r13-6976-g5bb27a1bb2f1c0533e1dda6c4a326e50756830f1
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103931
--- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernhard Reutner-Fischer from comment #11)
> Both the original testcase as well as the reduced testcase from comment #2
> compile fine for me with trunk from earlier today at r13-697
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109306
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109306
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1719fa40c4ee4def60a2ce2f27e17f8168cf28ba
commit r13-6975-g1719fa40c4ee4def60a2ce2f27e17f8168cf28ba
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109374
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-04-02 12:54 p.m., ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>> I believe hppa-linux can unwind through signal frames. VDSO support was
>> added fairly recently.
> Does the unwinder compensate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109078
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109281
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109377
Bug ID: 109377
Summary: FAIL: gdc.test/runnable/nan.d execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109374
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcaz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109374
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
I believe hppa-linux can unwind through signal frames. VDSO support was added
fairly recently.
The unwind tests in glibc all pass.
GDB needs an update to unwind through signal frames with rece
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109376
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
I would judge the test should be skipped on hppa.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109372
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109376
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Component|ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109375
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ada |target
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109374
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-04-02
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109372
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109376
Bug ID: 109376
Summary: FAIL: gnat.dg/prot7.adb (test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103931
--- Comment #11 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ---
(In reply to Bernhard Reutner-Fischer from comment #10)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #9)
> > The reduced testcase compiles for me with today's 13-trunk, but not
> > 12-branch.
> > However,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109375
Bug ID: 109375
Summary: FAIL: gnat.dg/opt39.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized
"tmp"
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109374
Bug ID: 109374
Summary: FAIL: gnat.dg/div_zero.adb execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706
--- Comment #14 from John David Anglin ---
Executing on host:
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/./libgfortran/
/ho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94384
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Also:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_g_default_field_width_3.f90 -O (test for errors, line
36)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109373
Bug ID: 109373
Summary: remove --enable-intermodule from libgfortran configure
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94384
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Test still fails with version 13.0.1 20230330 but fail is different:
Executing on host:
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56781
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66054
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98531
--- Comment #18 from John David Anglin ---
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_a.H
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109372
Bug ID: 109372
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/pipe-glibc.c (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108722
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98531
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i386-pc-solaris2.11,|i386-pc-solaris2.11,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109363
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Status|UNCONFIRME
81 matches
Mail list logo
