https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108654
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108654
--- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong ---
FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109098
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #7)
> The invalid UTF-8 in the patch seems to have broken the server-side script:
Maybe the not-really-utf8 files need to be marked in some way in the git repo
t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
--- Comment #13 from Vineet Gupta ---
Ok it seems I missed _some_ improvement with prev change, although not ideal
still.
With 2e886eef7f2b
li a0,0x0101_
addia0,a0,0x0101
sllia0,a0,16
addia0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109098
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is something to look into:
#define const1 0x0101010101010101ULL
#define const2 0x0080402010080400ULL
#define const0 const1
unsigned long long g(unsigned long long occ, const unsigned int sq) {
retu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
--- Comment #11 from Vineet Gupta ---
With change suggested by @pinksia, I do see that in split1,
riscv_move_integer() -> riscv_split_integer() is now called.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
--- Comment #10 from Vineet Gupta ---
I tried removing the in_splitter check (in 2 places), but no change in
results.
@@ -1313,7 +1313,7 @@ riscv_force_temporary (rtx dest, rtx value, bool
in_splitter)
- if (can_create_pseudo_p () && !in_spl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
The comment in riscv.cc:
/* We can't call gen_reg_rtx from a splitter, because this might realloc
the regno_reg_rtx array, which would invalidate reg rtx pointers in the
combine undo buffer. */
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106465
--- Comment #4 from Martin Uecker ---
This version works with 4.1.2
https://godbolt.org/z/x4v6aTv87
int h(void)
{
int g(int m, struct { char (*p)[m]; }* b) { return sizeof *b->p; }
return g(5, 0);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109280
Dirk-Willem van Gulik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||air
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109280
Bug ID: 109280
Summary: Very significant increase in code size (gcc-avr)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
oh right this is because can_create_pseudo is false
This code is just so broken ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
riscv_split_integer does something similarlly to what I was suggesting but for
some reason it is not kicking in for this case ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-03-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Vineet Gupta from comment #4)
> But this is not so much about code bloat, we see 3.5% additional dynamic
> icount on qemu which will affect perf even if we didn't care about code size
> at all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
--- Comment #4 from Vineet Gupta ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> If this was about -Os, then I would say yes this is a big code bloat but
> this is about -O2.
But this is not so much about code bloat, we see 3.5% additional dy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
--- Comment #3 from Vineet Gupta ---
We start off with following:
(insn 18 17 19 2 (set (reg:DI 154)
(mem/u/c:DI (reg/f:DI 155) [0 S8 A64])) "...":9:8 179 {*movdi_64bit}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/f:DI 155)
(expr_list:REG_EQU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
If this was about -Os, then I would say yes this is a big code bloat but this
is about -O2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I think this really depends on the micro-arch if loading from memory is
faster than doing instructions for constant forming.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
Bug ID: 109279
Summary: [13 Regression] RISC-V: complex constants synthesized
vs. fetching from constant pool
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109258
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0849a188d539d78101a32deea63db4cb39fb55ac
commit r13-6858-g0849a188d539d78101a32deea63db4cb39fb55ac
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109278
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109278
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107560
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The BOZ memleak should be fixed with r13-6857-g833233a4aefc99.
There is another FE memleak which is the same for z1.f90 and z2.f90:
==16805== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss rec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85775
--- Comment #3 from markus ---
Worked until 7.5, fails since 8.1 and still fails in 12.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109277
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, looks undefined at first glance. We don't have to diagnose bad uses of
type traits (but we don't have to ignore them either, which means both gcc 12
and gcc 13 are correct).
The question is whether t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107560
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> Yep. It was missed by the guy that did the BOZ rework. ;-)
I think the BOZ rework was a greater step for mankind than the missing fix ...
> If it passed reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85775
markus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus-t314 at gmx dot de
--- Comment #2 from m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109277
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I filed the note without a warning at PR 109278.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109278
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 54751
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54751&action=edit
compressed preprocessed source
Semi reduced testcase, just removing what was afterwards rather than anything
e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107560
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109278
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Sorry the compressed source is still too big.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109278
Bug ID: 109278
Summary: a note without a warning
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, needs-reduction
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109277
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
I know cppreference is not the standard but usually it has a good summary.
From: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/is_convertible :
```
>From and To shall each be a complete type, (possibly cv-qualifi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107560
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.3.1, 12.2.1, 13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109277
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase that shows the compiling difference between GCC 12 and 13:
```
#include
struct a;
struct b{};
bool c = std::is_convertible::value;
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109277
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> The difference is is_convertible definition.
> 12:
> template
> struct is_convertible
> : public __is_convertible_helper<_From, _To>::type
> { };
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109277
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Though the code might be undefined ...
20.15.6/5 says:
```
The predicate condition for a template specialization is_convertible
shall be satisfied if and
only if the return expression in the following code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109277
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109277
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109277
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109175
--- Comment #7 from Jan Wassenberg ---
Thanks, I will be changing the code to add a nullptr check.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109275
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-03-24
Ever confirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109277
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109277
Bug ID: 109277
Summary: [13 Regression] type_traits:1417:30: error: invalid
use of incomplete type ‘class v8::internal::WasmArray’
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106969
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] member |[12 Regression] member
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106969
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bbf2424c57c2e13d1a972c4ef4e871c3119b9cb4
commit r13-6856-gbbf2424c57c2e13d1a972c4ef4e871c3119b9cb4
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109175
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced all the way removing all of the classes showing exactly what I thought
it was:
```
void *ao();
float *aq(long t) {
if (t)
return nullptr;
return static_cast(ao());
}
float v;
void at(long t)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109186
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85877
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32630
Bug 32630 depends on bug 85877, which changed state.
Bug 85877 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at
fold-const.c:2449
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85877
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109186
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9f6e7e234bab6ef8b5425c3e8b88bf8dfbc5089
commit r10-11265-gb9f6e7e234bab6ef8b5425c3e8b88bf8dfbc5089
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85877
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dca8e28c990547648543175de9b6e05356f77e8a
commit r10-11264-gdca8e28c990547648543175de9b6e05356f77e8a
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99036
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99036
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2055702e8d492be6e978fa93a7bfefd358d5d9e3
commit r11-10596-g2055702e8d492be6e978fa93a7bfefd358d5d9e3
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109186
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b722050fe8e7f06a3e653f290a39ccdc4d03174
commit r11-10595-g4b722050fe8e7f06a3e653f290a39ccdc4d03174
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85877
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0257ba766443f11cf61c52db9b480337e44b48c8
commit r11-10594-g0257ba766443f11cf61c52db9b480337e44b48c8
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> This started to ICE with r11-508-gdfa4fcdba374ed44 in the newly added pass
> there,
> and since r11-2259-g0a9d711df36b42b6494b73 it ICEs similarly like on the
> trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109175
--- Comment #5 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
c-reduce(d) ugly version:
% cat demo3.cc
struct d {
using b = float &;
};
template using c = d::b;
struct e {
using b = c;
};
template struct j;
template using h = typename j::b;
template struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
A workaround is to do:
long long int digit __attribute__((aligned(8)));
Note manually setting the digit alignment to 4 does not cause an ICE for GCC
10.4 either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.1.0, 13.0
Summary|ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
Max Aehle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #54745|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #5 from Max Aehle ---
Created attachment 54750
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54750&action=edit
produced with -save-temps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #4 from Max Aehle ---
Created attachment 54749
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54749&action=edit
produces with -save-temps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #3 from Max Aehle ---
Created attachment 54748
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54748&action=edit
preprocessed source produced with -freport-bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #2 from Max Aehle ---
Created attachment 54747
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54747&action=edit
output with additional flag -v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #1 from Max Aehle ---
Created attachment 54746
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54746&action=edit
source code of minimal example
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
Bug ID: 109276
Summary: ICE: in assign_stack_local_1, at function.cc:429 with
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069
--- Comment #36 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #34)
> What is the state of this PR? I see patches posted in August, but don't see
> anything committed...
I've seen some patch submissions and pings in February an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108891
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108891
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Wilco Dijkstra :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f641d6aba284e0c277e6684cd6b2c73591cd14d
commit r13-6855-g1f641d6aba284e0c277e6684cd6b2c73591cd14d
Author: Wilco Dijkstra
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105481
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e2cdb1ddb5f6ace909358775e94bfe23046ad5a
commit r13-6853-g4e2cdb1ddb5f6ace909358775e94bfe23046ad5a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069
--- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ping again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104949
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e8fec6998b656dac02d4bc6c69b35a0fb5611e87
commit r13-6852-ge8fec6998b656dac02d4bc6c69b35a0fb5611e87
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105980
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |[11/12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
A C++14 version that's more similar to the original testcase using a generic
lambda and dependent initializer:
struct A {
constexpr const int* get() const { return &m; }
private:
int m = 42;
} a;
struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105685
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109163
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f1e15f743357e037d7c4f6f6000863c26f3dfc3
commit r13-6851-g7f1e15f743357e037d7c4f6f6000863c26f3dfc3
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #54742|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103628
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to HaoChen Gui from comment #5)
> The memory representation of IBM long double is not unique. It's actually
> the sum of two 64-bit doubles.
Yes, and the first of those two DP numbers is req
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109265
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109275
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109265
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Adjusted testcase:
module pr109265
integer, parameter :: r8 = selected_real_kind (12)
contains
subroutine foo (b, c, d, e, f)
implicit none
logical :: b
real (kind = r8) :: c, d, e, f, i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107769
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109265
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
My PR109274 patch fixes this too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109238
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109270
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108865
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jdx at o2 dot pl
--- Comment #30 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109188
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think:
--- gcc/gimple-range-gori.cc.jj 2023-03-23 15:25:47.060741116 +0100
+++ gcc/gimple-range-gori.cc2023-03-24 14:30:38.272043631 +0100
@@ -632,10 +632,11 @@ gori_compute::compute_operand_range (vra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109238
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0409aa5a2de9ce3164933814a4a7adc91f6acb96
commit r13-6850-g0409aa5a2de9ce3164933814a4a7adc91f6acb96
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109137
--- Comment #20 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #19)
> The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d9e52675c009139a14182d92ddb446ba2feabce
>
> commit r13-6846-g0d9e52675c0091
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231
--- Comment #21 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Tried valgrind on the cross d21 on x86_64 and didn't see anything.
> Perhaps modify the makefiles such that it uses -fdump-tree-all -da alrea
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
