[Bug rtl-optimization/107057] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.cc:2692

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107057 --- Comment #11 from Hongtao.liu --- Fixed in GCC13, and open a separate bug PR107487 for #c9.

[Bug middle-end/107487] New: Issue an error for illegal digit constraint.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107487 Bug ID: 107487 Summary: Issue an error for illegal digit constraint. Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: mid

[Bug rtl-optimization/107057] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.cc:2692

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107057 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4acc4c2be84d66075d60736623c3a7134d129eaa commit r13-3587-g4acc4c2be84d66075d60736623c3a7134d129eaa Author: liuhongt Date: Tue Oct

[Bug analyzer/107486] New: [13 Regression] ICE in deref_rvalue, at analyzer/region-model.cc:3317

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107486 Bug ID: 107486 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in deref_rvalue, at analyzer/region-model.cc:3317 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-v

[Bug c++/107484] [13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in decls_match)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107484 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug middle-end/107485] [10 Regression] gcc-10 ICE with -fnon-call-exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > Yes expand_vector_condition needs a similar fix just as PR 104450 did. Basically the bug is latent even on the trunk still. Something like: diff --git a/gcc/t

[Bug middle-end/107485] [10 Regression] gcc-10 ICE with -fnon-call-exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Yes expand_vector_condition needs a similar fix just as PR 104450 did.

[Bug middle-end/107485] [10 Regression] gcc-10 ICE with -fnon-call-exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug middle-end/107485] [10 Regression] gcc-10 ICE with -fnon-call-exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|gcc-10 ICE with

[Bug middle-end/107485] gcc-10 ICE with -fnon-call-exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Wait is broken on the GCC 10 branch? Or broken just for GCC 10.1.0? Can you update known to work and known to fail? Because the patch for PR 95171 is on the GCC 10 branch and was only included for G

[Bug target/55583] Extended shift instruction on x86-64 is not used, producing unoptimal code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55583 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c5ef2f9ab545b680cd4bb6c540a9dadb12ead86 commit r13-3586-g5c5ef2f9ab545b680cd4bb6c540a9dadb12ead86 Author: liuhongt Date: Thu Oct 2

[Bug middle-end/107485] New: gcc-10 ICE with -fnon-call-exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485 Bug ID: 107485 Summary: gcc-10 ICE with -fnon-call-exception Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug c/105499] inconsistency between -Werror=c++-compat and g++ in __extension__ block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105499 --- Comment #8 from Vincent Lefèvre --- It is bad that __extension__ does two completely different things: 1. Disable warnings associated with GNU extensions, like ({ ... }). 2. Disable compatibility warnings that do not correspond to GNU extens

[Bug rtl-optimization/107482] out-of-bounds heap access in IRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107482 --- Comment #4 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org --- The original ASAN report from the unmodified code: ==3761891==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x603000450ef8 at pc 0x01a78e5c bp 0x7ffdcf35f2a0 sp 0x7ffdcf35f298 RE

[Bug c++/107484] New: [13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in decls_match)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107484 Bug ID: 107484 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in decls_match) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/107483] c++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus due to out of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107483 --- Comment #4 from Tiezhu Yang --- https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/lldb/unittests/Instruction/RISCV/TestRISCVEmulator.cpp This issue is introduced in the following commit: $ git log -p lldb/unittests/Instruction/RISCV/TestRISCV

[Bug c++/107483] c++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus due to out of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107483 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-11-01 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/107483] c++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus due to out of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107483 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you attach the preprocessed source of which file gcc is failing out of memory on?

[Bug c++/107483] c++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus due to out of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107483 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Which file is it happening?

[Bug middle-end/106725] LTO semantics for __attribute__((leaf))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106725 --- Comment #7 from Daniel Thornburgh --- Correction: A compilation line was missed: +$ gcc -flto -c -O2 main.c lto.c $ gcc -c -O2 ext.c

[Bug c++/107483] c++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus due to out of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107483 Tiezhu Yang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seehearfeel at 126 dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/107483] New: c++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus due to out of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107483 Bug ID: 107483 Summary: c++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus due to out of memory Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug middle-end/106725] LTO semantics for __attribute__((leaf))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106725 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Thornburgh --- I spent a little more time on this, and here's a more concrete reproducer of GCC's current behavior. The setup again has 3 files: main.c, lto.c, and ext.c. lto.c is a simple getter-setter interface wrap

[Bug target/105522] [powerpc-darwin] ICE: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:3059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105522 --- Comment #8 from Sergey Fedorov --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #6) > it seems to fail "forever" (at least back to 5.5) Any chance of fixing this before the next update of GCC?

[Bug target/106602] riscv: suboptimal codegen for zero_extendsidi2_shifted w/o bitmanip

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106602 --- Comment #6 from Vineet Gupta --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > (In reply to Vineet Gupta from comment #3) > > Interestingly, if one builds for -march=rv64gc_zbs # single bit extension > > > > then the optimal code seq for b

[Bug target/106602] riscv: suboptimal codegen for zero_extendsidi2_shifted w/o bitmanip

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106602 --- Comment #5 from Vineet Gupta --- Gimple for the test is _1 = a_2(D) << 6; _3 = _1 & 274877906880; // 0x3f__ffc0 And 0x3f__ffc0 = 0x40__ - 0x40 For !TARGET_ZBA there's a combiner pattern to match the seq of instructi

[Bug target/106602] riscv: suboptimal codegen for zero_extendsidi2_shifted w/o bitmanip

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106602 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Vineet Gupta from comment #3) > Interestingly, if one builds for -march=rv64gc_zbs # single bit extension > > then the optimal code seq for bitmanip is generated, while no zbs > instructions a

[Bug target/106602] riscv: suboptimal codegen for zero_extendsidi2_shifted w/o bitmanip

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106602 Vineet Gupta changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com,

[Bug tree-optimization/105423] Bogus -Werror=maybe-uninitialized with definitely initialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105423 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/106649] [C++23] P2448 - Relaxing some constexpr restrictions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106649 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/39060] [4.4 regression] ICE with lots of invalid member functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39060 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- >The testcase is a little fragile, it looks like some memory access is not OK. Looks like it is still not fixed in the end: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604748.html The patch whic

[Bug rtl-optimization/107482] out-of-bounds heap access in IRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107482 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2022-October/239794.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/107482] out-of-bounds heap access in IRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107482 jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|microblazeel-linux-gnu |microblazeel-linux-gnu,

[Bug target/90620] Microblaze: ICE similar to bug 16267

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90620 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-10-31 Keywords|

[Bug target/90620] Microblaze: ICE similar to bug 16267

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90620 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- src/proto_htx.c:463:1: error: VOIDmode on an output } ^ (insn 1768 4216 1773 339 (parallel [ (reg:SI 5 r5 [1471]) (const_int 0 [0]) (mem/v:SI (reg/f:SI 8 r8 [orig:696 _1

[Bug middle-end/107482] out-of-bounds heap access in IRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107482 --- Comment #1 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 53807 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53807&action=edit color-check.patch

[Bug c++/107124] Reference template parameter refers to a temporary object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107124 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever co

[Bug middle-end/107482] New: out-of-bounds heap access in IRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107482 Bug ID: 107482 Summary: out-of-bounds heap access in IRA Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug c++/105511] [12/13 Regression] Spurious warning: "expected 'template' keyword..." when lt and gt compare over ternary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105511 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/107481] New: bpf: add __builtin_preserve_enum_value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107481 Bug ID: 107481 Summary: bpf: add __builtin_preserve_enum_value Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/107480] New: bpf: add __builtin_preserve_type_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107480 Bug ID: 107480 Summary: bpf: add __builtin_preserve_type_info Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/107479] New: bpf: add __builtin_btf_type_id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107479 Bug ID: 107479 Summary: bpf: add __builtin_btf_type_id Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug tree-optimization/105431] ICE: SIGSEGV in powi_as_mults_1 (tree-ssa-math-opts.cc:1512) with -Ofast and __builtin_pow()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105431 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4

[Bug tree-optimization/105432] [13 regression] bootstrap build error in mpfr in stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug c++/105353] __builtin_shufflevector with value dependent constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105353 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug target/106583] Suboptimal immediate generation on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106583 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug testsuite/105706] [13 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr78604.c fails after r13-707-g68e0063397ba82

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105706 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug c++/71424] std::initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71424 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug c++/78244] Narrowing conversion is accepted in a function template, but it should be rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78244 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug target/107456] std::atomic::fetch_xxx generate LOCK CMPXCHG instead of simpler LOCK instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107456 Thiago Macieira changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago at kde dot org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/105663] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE (segfault) in operator_bitwise_not::fold_range with O1/O2/O3/Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/106878] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed at -O2 with pointers and bitwise caluclation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc-hbfypl at hansdejong dot eu --- Com

[Bug fortran/107331] Extension and assigning of type results in GNU internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107331 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug tree-optimization/107478] ICE compiling for arm-none-eabi during GIMPLE pass: dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107478 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- The code which is causing the ICE: pNewNode->LinkRegisters[cllr_offset] = ((uint32_t)pQList->Head & (0x3FFFUL << (2U))) | cllr_mask;

[Bug tree-optimization/107478] ICE compiling for arm-none-eabi during GIMPLE pass: dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107478 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/106878] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed at -O2 with pointers and bitwise caluclation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwhitakera at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/107478] ICE compiling for arm-none-eabi during GIMPLE pass: dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107478 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.2.1 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinsk

[Bug tree-optimization/107478] ICE compiling for arm-none-eabi during GIMPLE pass: dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107478 --- Comment #2 from Jacob Abrams --- I mean to say it similarly reproduces with: GNU C11 (GNU Toolchain for the Arm Architecture 11.2-2022.02 (arm-11.14)) version 11.2.1 20220111 (arm-none-eabi)

[Bug tree-optimization/107478] ICE compiling for arm-none-eabi during GIMPLE pass: dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107478 --- Comment #1 from Jacob Abrams --- Created attachment 53805 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53805&action=edit preprocessed file

[Bug c/107478] New: ICE compiling for arm-none-eabi during GIMPLE pass: dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107478 Bug ID: 107478 Summary: ICE compiling for arm-none-eabi during GIMPLE pass: dom Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug tree-optimization/107477] spurious -Wrestrict warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107477 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Adding: if (s < 0) __builtin_unreachable(); "fixes" the warning.

[Bug c/107477] New: spurious -Wrestrict warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107477 Bug ID: 107477 Summary: spurious -Wrestrict warning Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assign

[Bug c++/96004] Copy elision with conditional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96004 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-10-31 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/105550] Missing copy elision with conditional operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105550 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug c++/107466] [12/13 Regression] invalid -Wnarrowing error with std::subtract_with_carry_engine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107466 --- Comment #3 from Mara Sophie Grosch --- Standard explicitly allows using unsigned short though: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random/subtract_with_carry_engine

[Bug libstdc++/107471] mismatching constraints in common_iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107471 --- Comment #2 from Hannes Hauswedell --- Great, thanks!

[Bug c/107476] Spurious stringop-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107476 --- Comment #1 from pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org --- I should mention that I reproduced this (a) on an M1 Mac running gcc (GCC) 13.0.0 20220827 (experimental), and also on an x86 Linux running gcc (GCC) 12.2.0.

[Bug ada/107475] [10/11/12/13 Regression] libgnat fails to link libgnat.so on systems with older glibc on x86_64-linux-gnux32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107475 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 107474 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug ada/107474] [10/11/12/13 Regression] libgnat fails to link libgnat.so on systems with older glibc on x86_64-linux-gnux32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107474 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c/107476] New: Spurious stringop-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107476 Bug ID: 107476 Summary: Spurious stringop-overflow warning Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c A

[Bug target/107453] New stdarg tests in r13-3549-g4fe34cdcc80ac2 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107453 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/96830] GCC does not complain about redeclaration with inconsistent requires clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96830 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||h2+bugs at fsfe dot org --- Comment #11

[Bug c++/107470] GCC falsely accepts friend declaration with mismatching requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107470 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug libstdc++/107471] mismatching constraints in common_iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107471 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/99670] IPA CP and SRA pass order issue?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99670 --- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor --- I don't think this is a problem with interaction in between the two passes, IPA-SRA obscures the picture a bit but is not really involved. The lost opportunity here is that IPA-CP cannot propagate the consta

[Bug target/105464] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -Og -fharden-compares -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105464 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This is very similar to PR 107183. It looks like reg-stack is causing the difference too.

[Bug tree-optimization/105490] unvectorized loop due to bool condition loaded from memory and different size data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105490 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug ada/107474] New: [10/11/12/13 Regression] libgnat fails to link libgnat.so on systems with older glibc on x86_64-linux-gnux32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107474 Bug ID: 107474 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] libgnat fails to link libgnat.so on systems with older glibc on x86_64-linux-gnux32 Product: gcc Version: 13.0

[Bug ada/107475] New: [10/11/12/13 Regression] libgnat fails to link libgnat.so on systems with older glibc on x86_64-linux-gnux32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107475 Bug ID: 107475 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] libgnat fails to link libgnat.so on systems with older glibc on x86_64-linux-gnux32 Product: gcc Version: 13.0

[Bug c/105499] inconsistency between -Werror=c++-compat and g++ in __extension__ block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105499 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- __extension__ is supposed to disable compatibility warnings since they are written in GNU C. Just happens that you enabled compatibility warnings to C++ which are also disabled. This is the misunderstanding

[Bug c/107473] New: Unexpected warning / error with strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107473 Bug ID: 107473 Summary: Unexpected warning / error with strncpy Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/107331] Extension and assigning of type results in GNU internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107331 --- Comment #1 from d.mentock at mpie dot de --- Created attachment 53802 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53802&action=edit test program that triggers the reported bug with gcc 10.3.0

[Bug analyzer/107472] Support for the Linux kernel's memory-management APIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107472 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0) > In particular, note the GPF flags GFP, even

[Bug c/105499] inconsistency between -Werror=c++-compat and g++ in __extension__ block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105499 --- Comment #6 from Vincent Lefèvre --- To be clear... I'm not sure about what kind of compatibility warnings one can get, but it is OK to silence valid extensions, i.e. those that will not give an error. But invalid extensions, i.e. those that

[Bug analyzer/106140] RFE: analyzer could complain about misuses of socket APIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106140 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Depends on|

[Bug analyzer/107472] New: Support for the Linux kernel's memory-management APIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107472 Bug ID: 107472 Summary: Support for the Linux kernel's memory-management APIs Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug libstdc++/107471] New: mismatching constraints in common_iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107471 Bug ID: 107471 Summary: mismatching constraints in common_iterator Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lib

[Bug c++/107470] New: GCC falsely accepts friend declaration with mismatching requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107470 Bug ID: 107470 Summary: GCC falsely accepts friend declaration with mismatching requirements Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/107362] Internal compiler error for recursive class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107362 --- Comment #3 from Bálint Aradi --- > I'm getting the same issue on a recursive tree structure, I will post my > testcase here instead of opening a new bug. I am not sure, whether the two bugs are identical. If I understand correctly, you can

[Bug target/107432] __builtin_convertvector generates inefficient code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107432 --- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > I think we do support FIX_TRUNC_EXPR or FLOAT_EXPR for float <-> int > conversion of vectors like we now support {CONVERT,NOP}_EXPR for > just wi

[Bug c/105499] inconsistency between -Werror=c++-compat and g++ in __extension__ block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105499 --- Comment #5 from Vincent Lefèvre --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > __extension__ disables all compatibility warnings. > > This is by design really as headers sometimes needs to be written using C > code and need to turn off t

[Bug d/107469] New: Build of GDC on FreeBSD 14 fails due to outdated value of __FreeBSD_version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107469 Bug ID: 107469 Summary: Build of GDC on FreeBSD 14 fails due to outdated value of __FreeBSD_version Product: gcc Version: 11.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/107468] New: std::from_chars doesn't always round to nearest

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107468 Bug ID: 107468 Summary: std::from_chars doesn't always round to nearest Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/107362] Segfault for recursive class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107362 federico changed: What|Removed |Added CC||federico.perini at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug preprocessor/80755] __has_include_next: internal compiler error: NULL directory in find_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80755 Helmut Grohne changed: What|Removed |Added CC||helmut at subdivi dot de --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/103212] requires expression with lambda inside causes a parse error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103212 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.1.0 Known to work|

[Bug c++/105494] syntax error with requires { []{}(); };

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105494 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/105495] `__atomic_compare_exchange` prevents tail-call optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105495 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization --- Comment #6 from A

[Bug c/105499] inconsistency between -Werror=c++-compat and g++ in __extension__ block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105499 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|diagnostic |documentation --- Comment #4 from Andre

[Bug c/105499] inconsistency between -Werror=c++-compat and g++ in __extension__ block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105499 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |c Status|UNCONFIRMED

  1   2   >