https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106886
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C code seems to be:
rl2GeomExport64_little_endian, rl2GeomExport64_little_endian_arch;
rl2GeomExport64(unsigned char *p, double value) {
union {
unsigned char byte[8];
double double_valu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106886
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Git range seems to be 2985049049f12b0a..0b0a3cdbff64d97e, from near the start
of the month.
There are 29 commits in that range.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106886
Bug ID: 106886
Summary: ice in vect_schedule_slp_node
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103499
--- Comment #3 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #2 and #1)
Since my example shows that std::is_nothrow_constructible_v<. . .>
can run into the problem, adding bugzilla 99227 ("[meta] [modules]
Bugs relating to header
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99426
Mark Millard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markmigm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83052
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89289
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106876
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89289
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 106876 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106876
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106876
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||8.1.0
Summary|[13 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106876
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106877
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Started with r12-248-gb58dc0b803057c0e.
Obvious this just exposed the issue ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106885
Bug ID: 106885
Summary: -(a-b) is folded to b-a before the UBSAN pass is run
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106884
Bug ID: 106884
Summary: ifcombine may move shift so it shifts more than
bitwidth
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106883
Bug ID: 106883
Summary: SLSR may generate signed wrap
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106820
--- Comment #5 from Mark Millard ---
I probably should have reported the backtrace when fancy_abort
has been called (stopped there via breakpoint):
(lldb) bt
* thread #1, name = 'cc1plus', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
* frame #0: 0x02
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106806
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-09-07
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106820
--- Comment #4 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #3)
> . . .
> And in a debugger I see:
>
> (lldb) print node->decl->decl_with_vis.weak_flag
> (unsigned int) $2 = 1
> (lldb) print node->decl->decl_with_vis.comdat_fla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106820
--- Comment #3 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #2)
I managed to build lang/gcc12 with -g -O0 in use and so
can report:
The failing assert looks like:
gcc_assert ((!DECL_WEAK (node->decl)
&&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106882
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106882
Bug ID: 106882
Summary: passing X as 'this' argument discards qualifiers
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106877
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106876
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-09-07
Summary|[11/12/13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Are you sure this was not already fixed by r13-2518-ga262f969d6fd936f4fb5
> (aka PR 106866)
Pretty sure. The git range I gave includes this commit.
Feel free
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106829
Ye Luo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ice in |[13 Regression] ice in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C code seems to be:
inline auto_free(void *a) {
void **p = a;
l_free(*p);
}
eap_gtc_check_settings() {
char *identity __attribute__((cleanup(auto_free)));
char password __attribute__((clea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Git range seems to be d6582c662ca0da05..cdcc27c1ca9c485c, i.e. since yesterday.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881
Bug ID: 106881
Summary: ice in init_from_control_deps, at
gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1740
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106880
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106880
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106880
Bug ID: 106880
Summary: [12/13 Regression] "error: use of deleted function"
printed twice
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106607
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106695
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106248
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104443
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.2|11.4
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106248
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d17eaabb3e771472d7bfa1f654564a5db57f5ef
commit r11-10241-g3d17eaabb3e771472d7bfa1f654564a5db57f5ef
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106607
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d023d805d9e20c3f46654dc7ea96c9228d650ddb
commit r11-10243-gd023d805d9e20c3f46654dc7ea96c9228d650ddb
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106695
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da67352690c8ed7f3045487e6e1ea391aeab7fc8
commit r11-10242-gda67352690c8ed7f3045487e6e1ea391aeab7fc8
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104443
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5038b792525fedeb0297189516d0157ba98c1d1
commit r11-10240-gc5038b792525fedeb0297189516d0157ba98c1d1
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106863
--- Comment #2 from jehova at existiert dot net ---
I'm not sure if 'ice-on-valid-code' is appropriate here, since the example code
is *not* valid.
It is if 'void{}' is replaced by 'void()' (which is perfectly accepted by GCC).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
Summary|ICE: verify_gim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106793
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9cb441c98f265bff86a1c228932524c5fd37dd3
commit r13-2527-gb9cb441c98f265bff86a1c228932524c5fd37dd3
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106793
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106879
Bug ID: 106879
Summary: [13 regression] new test case
gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-layout-19.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
20220907 (experimental) (GCC)
$ cat t.c
int a;
void b(const int *c) {
unsigned d = ((long)c | (long)&a) & 65535 << 16;
long e = (long)c;
if (d != (e & 65535 << 16))
return;
}
$ gcc/xgcc -B gcc -c t.c -O2 -S -o /dev/null
t.c: In function ‘b’:
t.c:7:1: error: invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106877
Bug ID: 106877
Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE in move_for_stack_reg, at
reg-stack.cc:1076
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106876
Bug ID: 106876
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
Bug ID: 106875
Summary: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in
ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at
config/i386/i386.cc:8343
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106874
Bug ID: 106874
Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] out of memory allocating
9223372036854453969 bytes after a total of 462848
bytes
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #2 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106873
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Read https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/object#Alignment (for C) and
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/object#Alignment (for C++).
Instead of filing bugs like this and PR 106869, please fin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106873
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Kemal Akcam from comment #3)
> I did not report as if unsigned short was different than 2 bytes.
>
> Please check the output and explain
> 1. why output values changes?
> 2. why it reads/advan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106873
--- Comment #3 from Kemal Akcam ---
I did not report as if unsigned short was different than 2 bytes.
Please check the output and explain
1. why output values changes?
2. why it reads/advances 10 bytes instead of 8 bytes?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106873
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Which I think is what you are missing is that the ABI is layed out this way.
The reason why it is layout this way is for alignment reasons. In many ABIs,
the al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106873
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106873
Bug ID: 106873
Summary: unsigned short skips byte when used for memory mapping
depending on position in structure
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Surya Kumari Jangala
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bec35caafae8db0278e1d037a7ba00c3e6899bbd
commit r13-2525-gbec35caafae8db0278e1d037a7ba00c3e6899bbd
Author: Surya Kumari Jang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106793
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106872
Bug ID: 106872
Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/uninit-pred-12.c fails after
r13-2500-g0a4a2667dc115c
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106713
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a961ad1b13b9c294d4565344912b8e35ba71b369
commit r13-2524-ga961ad1b13b9c294d4565344912b8e35ba71b369
Author: Arsen ArsenoviÄ
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106188
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a961ad1b13b9c294d4565344912b8e35ba71b369
commit r13-2524-ga961ad1b13b9c294d4565344912b8e35ba71b369
Author: Arsen ArsenoviÄ
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106695
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47f0bd269403762ddb71b8c6165b30ace4f70a8b
commit r12-8747-g47f0bd269403762ddb71b8c6165b30ace4f70a8b
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106607
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87da20c6e280925d885c5472de9189515f46880b
commit r12-8746-g87da20c6e280925d885c5472de9189515f46880b
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106870
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
gcc.dg/torture/pr57036-2.c shows how inlining and non-local gotos come into
play here.
Note the flag was specifically invented to not make CFG verification ICE
when a function in the middle of a block beco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106833
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #10)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #9)
> > Although, preferably we should not allow assigning one opaque type to
> > another
> > opaque type just b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106854
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Alejandro Colomar from comment #6)
> timerfd_create() might not be important if the timer is not correctly
> deleted. pthread_mutex_init() is another one that is quite more important,
> as leak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100824
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100824
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98978
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to andysem from comment #3)
> Is there no way to improve standard components implementation? I'd imagine
> you could provide the new implementation in the new version inline namespace
> and still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88101
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106855
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106855
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7abcdb06e31d82d4933cb6e0a626c3ccb28fa0c3
commit r13-2519-g7abcdb06e31d82d4933cb6e0a626c3ccb28fa0c3
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106866
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106866
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a262f969d6fd936f4fb5d9e1d5756b0dcbc925b2
commit r13-2518-ga262f969d6fd936f4fb5d9e1d5756b0dcbc925b2
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106861
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106859
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-09-07
Summary|[10/11/12/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106858
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cltang at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106857
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE in |[12/13 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56551
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
As I just wrote on the duplicate bug:
I've looked into this and I don't think it can be done without an ABI break.
Objects constructed in old code compiled by an older GCC would still have a
null pointer,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106863
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106871
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56551
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rockeet at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106871
Bug ID: 106871
Summary: std::function should not check func ptr on each call
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106855
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106870
Bug ID: 106870
Summary: ctrl_altering flag is not set correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106869
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106867
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22cefe5c22a90d20e2d9f629402b0522c03fa59c
commit r13-2516-g22cefe5c22a90d20e2d9f629402b0522c03fa59c
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 12:36:22PM +0200, Alex Ernst via Gcc-bugs wrote:
> $ gcc -v
> gcc version 10.2.1 20210110 (Debian 10.2.1-6)
>
> $ clang -v
> Debian clang version 11.0.1-2
>
> $ cat hello.c
> int i;main(){for(;i["] o, world!\n",'/'/'/'));}read(j,i,p){write(j/p+p,i---j,i/i);}
Garbage in, g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106869
Bug ID: 106869
Summary: ranges::unique does nothing unless ranges::sort called
first or something else is wrong.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
$ gcc -v
gcc version 10.2.1 20210110 (Debian 10.2.1-6)
$ clang -v
Debian clang version 11.0.1-2
$ cat hello.c
int i;main(){for(;i["]
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
