https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102633
--- Comment #7 from Martin Uecker ---
Sorry, somehow I missed this. I will look at this once I am back from travel
(if Marek hasen't fixed it)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106419
--- Comment #9 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
> So for which pseudo and which hard register did this ICE, and what did the
> code look like at that point?
The culprit pseudo is r133, the values of those rela
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 105493, which changed state.
Bug 105493 Summary: [12/13 Regression] x86_64 538.imagick_r 6% regressions and
2% 525.x264_r regressions on Alder Lake after r12-7319-g90d693bdc9d718
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105493
cuilili changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106451
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Yes, I've opened PR106375 for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105493
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> Can this be considered fixed on trunk?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106358
Bug 106358 depends on bug 106319, which changed state.
Bug 106319 Summary: False positives from -Wanalyzer-va-arg-type-mismatch on int
promotion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106319
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106319
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106319
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db613e8fa841259f74740665ee9e508bd73ea1c4
commit r13-1848-gdb613e8fa841259f74740665ee9e508bd73ea1c4
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106450
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106449
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106451
Bug ID: 106451
Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/pr56837.c fails after
r13-1762-gf9d4c3b45c5ed5
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103504
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103504
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a872c617293cf9f6dfae7ed889bbca34884f145c
commit r10-10916-ga872c617293cf9f6dfae7ed889bbca34884f145c
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103504
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2916e857c2941b57cbecf42ee8d5b9ab9d0c8b7d
commit r11-10176-g2916e857c2941b57cbecf42ee8d5b9ab9d0c8b7d
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103504
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2009850b2b7042a678c385cd72e6ceb40caac8cd
commit r12-8620-g2009850b2b7042a678c385cd72e6ceb40caac8cd
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106450
Bug ID: 106450
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at
final.cc:2860 (error: could not split insn)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106419
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
So for which pseudo and which hard register did this ICE, and what did the
code look like at that point?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106419
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
That mfctr;mtctr is extremely slow of course, and that mtctr is superfluous
completely (this is true for all registers, not just CTR, nothing special to
PowerPC even). I know this is just -Og, but stil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103504
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:600956c81c784f4a0cc9d10f6e03e01847afd961
commit r13-1846-g600956c81c784f4a0cc9d10f6e03e01847afd961
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106447
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106449
Bug ID: 106449
Summary: ICE in #pragma omp parallel for simd
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106448
Bug ID: 106448
Summary: [OpenMP] atomic compare – g++ wrongly accepts
parenthesized condition
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106016
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:975658b782f36dcf6eb190966d5b705977bfd5eb
commit r13-1845-g975658b782f36dcf6eb190966d5b705977bfd5eb
Author: Peter Bergner
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106304
--- Comment #2 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
This is the best I can do without having to manually de-noise CMake's compile
commands: https://godbolt.org/z/6s1GGYhM4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106369
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102633
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100460
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
They are needed for O_CREAT.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106261
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102633
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104965
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> Re-confirmed. Didn't we change libstdc++ to not expect CSE around new?
I don't think that's valid, is it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2022-01-29 00:00:00 |2022-7-26
--- Comment #9 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69410
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94212
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98662
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-01-14 00:00:00 |2022-7-26
--- Comment #6 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100460
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105135
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101461
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102058
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
--- Comment #7 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102250
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-07-26
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 102473, which changed state.
Bug 102473 Summary: [12/13 Regression] 521.wrf_r 5% slower at -Ofast and
generic x86_64 tuning after r12-3426-g8f323c712ea76c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102473
Wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102473
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102540
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102633
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102697
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106311
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106311
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9be0feeadeeac2166fbe3823421bc5712bc59087
commit r12-8619-g9be0feeadeeac2166fbe3823421bc5712bc59087
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102879
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
--- Comment #16 from Ri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102982
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103195
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103388
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106447
Bug ID: 106447
Summary: nvptx offloading: C++ '__iterator_category' 'return'
ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104165
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104200
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #29 from Richard Biener ---
What's the status here on the GCC 12 branch and trunk?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104368
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104475
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104787
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104789
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104912
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 104935, which changed state.
Bug 104935 Summary: [12/13 Regression] 554.roms_r ELF binary increased with
r12-7612-g69619acd8d9b5856
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104935
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104935
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104965
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104965
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104986
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105216
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91299
--- Comment #11 from Alexander Monakov ---
Marxin, you've marked this as WAITING, can you please re-evaluate? The nice
testcase from comment #2 is reproducible on trunk as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Note on trunk we get things way less optimized and end up with
[local count: 695302893]:
__x.38_144 = (long unsigned int) " ";
__y.39_145 = (long unsigned int) _137;
if (__x.38_144 < __y.39_145)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106316
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The declare variant directive is just on stub, it doesn't add properties to the
variant function.
I think you need #pragma omp declare target device(host) to (onhost) to make
sure onhost isn't defined for th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105427
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106345
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105329
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 53359
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53359&action=edit
gcc13-pr105329.patch
Untested workaround.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106311
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2333b58c9892667545d0c2c3ecd2d7b947197511
commit r13-1841-g2333b58c9892667545d0c2c3ecd2d7b947197511
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105267
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105412
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.5.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105427
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105430
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105438
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105452
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106435
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 53358
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53358&action=edit
Patch under test
This works without regression on x86_64 Darwin, now doing wider testing.
The basic approach sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105458
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.1.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105463
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105493
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Can this be considered fixed on trunk?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105580
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Michael_S from comment #12)
> On related note...
> One of the historical good features of gcc relatively to other popular
> compilers was absence of auto-vectorization at -O2.
> When did you d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106446
Bug ID: 106446
Summary: -Warray-bounds false positive on downcast under
condition
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106444
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106444
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2615502971ca11c15f1949c03d93ccfe1ce54f55
commit r13-1840-g2615502971ca11c15f1949c03d93ccfe1ce54f55
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
>
> --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> My preference would be still to make the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think the vast majority of string mutations involve
inserting/appending/substituting an unrelated string, so non-overlapping. We
can make your change on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106099
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo