unk-r13-1189-20220621080317-g7905a9ac267-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20220621 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105740
--- Comment #8 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105740
> >
> > --- Comment #5 from Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106052
--- Comment #1 from Matt Beardsley ---
Just wanted to clarify that the prev. comment only reproduces with an asserted
build.
However, I first observed this in a 300,000+ LOC preprocessed file with a
release gcc build. But I could not stably min
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106052
Bug ID: 106052
Summary: ICE with -Wmismatched-tags with partially specialized
friend struct of self type
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105870
--- Comment #8 from JUN SHA ---
I have fixed this bug and will commit the patch then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106051
Bug ID: 106051
Summary: -Wmismatched-tags gives false positive warning when
"class C" is "using namespace"d into a namespace with
another "class C" declaration
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105991
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4306339798b6843937c628c5ece8c234b309b13d
commit r13-1191-g4306339798b6843937c628c5ece8c234b309b13d
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Wed J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106035
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #2 from kargl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106035
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 53187
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53187&action=edit
implementation of feature; no testcases
The attach patch has had some minimal testing while it was u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106022
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #53171|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105691
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 09:28:27PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105691
>
> --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Submitted version: http
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105691
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted version: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-June/057940.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99963
tabloid.adroit at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tabloid.adroit at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98469
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106050
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105691
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105824
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Interesting MSVC accepts it too ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105775
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #2 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106050
Bug ID: 106050
Summary: ICE in reject_statement, at fortran/parse.cc:2879
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106049
Bug ID: 106049
Summary: ICE in gfc_simplify_pack, at fortran/simplify.cc:6481
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106048
Bug ID: 106048
Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ubsan_encode_value, at
ubsan.cc:143 / verify_gimple failed
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106047
Bug ID: 106047
Summary: ICE in structure_alloc_comps, at
fortran/trans-array.cc:9574
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105807
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #2 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80637
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang accepts this while MSVC rejects this for the same reason as GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80637
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 53185
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53185&action=edit
Updated full testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106046
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 53184
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53184&action=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105960
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2474c8e09a93027cde39ecb6a53742142c8496ed
commit r12-8501-g2474c8e09a93027cde39ecb6a53742142c8496ed
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bogus "may overlap" memcpy |[12/13 Regression] bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cuzdav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106044
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106046
Bug ID: 106046
Summary: GCC fails to disambiguate call to static member
function when inside a class template
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106045
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106045
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85d613da341b76308edea48359a5dbc7061937c4
commit r13-1190-g85d613da341b76308edea48359a5dbc7061937c4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106038
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
> backwards STV?
There's a pass in x86 backend called STV(scalar to vector, the pass convert
scalar instructions into vector mode when profitable), I guess "backwards STV"
means converting vector instruction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105545
Peter Dimov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pdimov at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106038
--- Comment #5 from Noah Goldstein ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> The vectorizer does not anticipate store-merging performing "vectorization"
> in GPRs and thus the scalar cost is off (it also doesn't anticipate the
> differe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97936
Petr Sumbera changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sumbera at volny dot cz
--- Comment #19 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106033
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106033
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7905a9ac26707ed6ac49e40e35a9c8755c6574e3
commit r13-1189-g7905a9ac26707ed6ac49e40e35a9c8755c6574e3
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105913
--- Comment #5 from Marc Poulhiès ---
Oh, nice, should have checked before commenting then ! Thanks !
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106044
--- Comment #2 from Chris Uzdavinis ---
Even marginally simpler:
#include
auto f() {
return "_" + std::string(" ");
}
Originally I marked it as tree-optimization since it's only with -O3, but it
could be an issue in the standard library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106022
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> > Created attachment 53169 [details]
> > A patch
> >
> > This patch multiplies the vector store cost by the number of scalar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106036
--- Comment #2 from Kacper Słomiński ---
Okay, this seems to have been a false alarm, sorry for that! Our C library was
missing the typedef for intptr_t in unistd.h, which POSIX does specify. After
adding that, libgcc compiled without problems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106045
Bug ID: 106045
Summary: Incorrect testcase in libgomp.c/target-31.c at -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105913
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Marc Poulhiès from comment #3)
> Fixed in github, but not yet in gcc's repository AFAIK.
It is, as of today, 10:33 UTC, when I did the 'git push'. ;-).
(If there's more to do, then please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104872
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Buch ---
Bug is still present in GCC 12.1 and current trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106044
--- Comment #1 from Chris Uzdavinis ---
only in c++20, too.
lt.org/z/KMWehnscM
Command line:
g++12 -O3 --std=c++20 -Wrestrict source.cpp
Output:
In file included from
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20220621/include/c++/13.0.0/string:40,
from :1:
In static member function 'static constexpr std::char_traits::char_type*
std::char_traits::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105913
--- Comment #3 from Marc Poulhiès ---
Fixed in github, but not yet in gcc's repository AFAIK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105913
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94899
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab981aab92cbc71918fbaadcf6fa64bdb2b69be7
commit r13-1187-gab981aab92cbc71918fbaadcf6fa64bdb2b69be7
Author: Arjun Shankar
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0c30fe3b888f20215f3e040d21b62b603804ca9
commit r13-1186-ga0c30fe3b888f20215f3e040d21b62b603804ca9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2df1df945fac85d7b3d084001414a66a2709d8fe
commit r13-1185-g2df1df945fac85d7b3d084001414a66a2709d8fe
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105740
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57424087e82db140c06d4ea73f9700d5291c5bc2
commit r13-1184-g57424087e82db140c06d4ea73f9700d5291c5bc2
Author: Xionghu Luo
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105740
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105740
>
> --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> The problem with switch-conversion done mu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106041
--- Comment #7 from Jan Wassenberg ---
Sure, added GCC11 .ii. It does indeed still freeze GCC 12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106041
--- Comment #6 from Jan Wassenberg ---
Created attachment 53181
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53181&action=edit
GCC11 zipped preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105740
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The problem with switch-conversion done multiple times is that when it is done
early, it can do worse job than when it is done late, e.g. we can have better
range information later which allows (unfortunatel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106041
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Wassenberg from comment #4)
> Thanks for having a look! BTW forgot to mention: version 11.0 does not have
> this issue.
Can you please share pre-processed source from GCC 11? And can you ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105740
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
IIRC switch conversion was run early originally because it was supposed to
improve inlining heuristics. One might view if-to-switch + switch-conversion
as canonicalization which would mean running it befor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106041
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|12.0|12.1.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106043
Bug ID: 106043
Summary: Power10: lacking vec_blendv builtins
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106038
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105864
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Ivan Sorokin from comment #5)
> I would suggest (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> > nullptr_t t, t1 = nullptr;
> > __builtin_memcpy(&a[0], &t, sizeof(t));
>
> > So I suspect thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105864
--- Comment #5 from Ivan Sorokin ---
I would suggest (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> nullptr_t t, t1 = nullptr;
> __builtin_memcpy(&a[0], &t, sizeof(t));
> So I suspect this should be marked as invalid.
The questions is how G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105736
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Siddhesh Poyarekar
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70454c50b4592fe6876ecca13268264e395e058f
commit r13-1183-g70454c50b4592fe6876ecca13268264e395e058f
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105740
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106036
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106041
--- Comment #4 from Jan Wassenberg ---
Thanks for having a look! BTW forgot to mention: version 11.0 does not have
this issue.
70 matches
Mail list logo
