https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105668
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105665
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |12.1.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #7)
> So, to summarise my understanding:
>
> - the problem is not specific to darwin, I can fully reproduce on
> x86_64-linux-gnu
>
> - the problem only a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #4)
> Or perhaps there shouldnt be
> set (BIT_NOT_EXPR, op_bitwise_not);
> set (BIT_XOR_EXPR, op_bitwise_xor);
>
> operations on pointer values? I see also su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
bitwise and is allowed for pointers on GIMPLE for alignment purposes and to
avoid round-trips to/from integer types for this. It's only natural to then
allow all bit operations on pointers (and hard to exc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105662
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I think that first of all controlling this per OMP/OACC region would be more
useful (as for the "mandatory on-device" case). Shouldn't there be sth in the
respective specs for this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105660
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #12)
>
> > It's difficult (if not impossible) for the vectorizer to second-guess
> > the followup FRE, we're a long way from doing loop + SLP vectorization
> > in on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105629
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 19 May 2022, hp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105629
>
> Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
>
>What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105487
--- Comment #9 from Paul Smith ---
Just to note, there are similar needs for empty directories in the GCC
installation itself; for example in a GCC install of a 64bit compiler without
32bit support this directory will be created by the installer
-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r13-673-20220519175438-gd863ba23fb1-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20220519 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
--- Comment #12 from Hongtao.liu ---
> It's difficult (if not impossible) for the vectorizer to second-guess
> the followup FRE, we're a long way from doing loop + SLP vectorization
> in one go and discover we can elide the vector store.
I'm t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 101929, which changed state.
Bug 101929 Summary: [12 Regression] r12-7319 regress x264_r by 4% on CLX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101929
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105493
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
regarding 525, it's pr101929.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105312
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
I'm guessing not but is it worth adding the SPARC testcase from the dupe, given
this one is only run for arm?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98645
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
No, this isn't fixed, it is still broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99708
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103515
--- Comment #6 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #5)
> (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #4)
> > The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
>
> Kewen, can we mark this as FIXED?
Sorry, no. The issue isn't fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #15 from HaoChen Gui ---
As r12-8128 was revoked, failure of pr56605.c is still not fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> The GCC divergence comes from
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/
> 9f943b2446f2d0a345bbf9b4be3d3a4316372270
(Why refer to gcc commits through some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105667
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105667
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
here is one which removes the inner lamba to just a templated function inside a
template struct:
template
struct h {typedef int type;};
template
struct t{};
template
struct crash {
using Types = typen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105667
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[C++20] templated lambas in |[C++20] lambas in template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105667
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase without the need for tuple includes:
template
struct h {typedef int type;};
template
struct t{};
template
struct Example {
using Types = typename h<[] () {}>::type;
static void c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105667
Bug ID: 105667
Summary: Internal compiler segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #13)
> What's the status of these test cases now, given all of the fizes applied so
> far? Can we marked this as FIXED?
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98645
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105666
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patches should be set to gcc-patches after reading
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105666
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vineet.gupta at linux dot dev
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105629
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105666
Bug ID: 105666
Summary: RISC-V 507.cactuBSSN_r build has costly FMV
instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101882
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner ---
Is there any new status on this? Fixed perhaps?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner ---
What's the status of these test cases now, given all of the fizes applied so
far? Can we marked this as FIXED?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104257
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103515
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #4)
> The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
Kewen, can we mark this as FIXED?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105636
--- Comment #2 from Indu Bhagat ---
I found the minimum reproducer to be:
$ cat testcase.c
static int sa[100];
int n;
static int (*a2)[] = (__typeof__(int (*)[n]))sa;
I tried to debug this and found out that the likely cause is some invalidit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102059
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102059
--- Comment #41 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ea6d0ed6860e4f1d8f609c26de9d9a7f7a9ad2d
commit r11-10022-g3ea6d0ed6860e4f1d8f609c26de9d9a7f7a9ad2d
Author: Michael Meiss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105665
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
--- Comment #7 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
So, to summarise my understanding:
- the problem is not specific to darwin, I can fully reproduce on
x86_64-linux-gnu
- the problem only arises if you configure with a --program-suffix that is
eq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE |[11/12/13 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105665
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-19
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105665
--- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su ---
Compiler Explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/jsT5Evv54
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 13.0.0 20220519 (experimental) [master r13-673-gd863ba23fb1] (GCC)
[600] %
[600] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
[601] %
[601] % gcctk -Os small.c
[602] % ./a.out
Segmentation fault
[603] %
[603] % cat small.c
int a, b, c[1], d[2], *e = c;
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
Perhaps the macos mv has recently been upgraded to POSIX.1-2018. Step 2 of the
mv operation didn't exist in the 2004 edition.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105636
--- Comment #1 from Indu Bhagat ---
Thank you for reporting this. I can reproduce it, nice and easy :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
--- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
I can reproduce it with various combinations of configure options, with and
without bootstrap. It appears that the triggering factor is the combination of
two options:
--with-gcc-major-version-onl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98865
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d863ba23fb16122bb0547b0c678173be0d98f43c
commit r13-673-gd863ba23fb16122bb0547b0c678173be0d98f43c
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105507
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I'm wondering if there are any downsides to just removing "-static-libgcc"
> from both "--with-stage1-ldflags" and "--with-boot-ldflags".
None presumably, since you already have dependencies on DLLs.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
--- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
1. I've reproduced it on x86_64-linux, so it's not a weird macOS mv bug
2. I have reasons to think (no hard proof, though) that it's a new bug: we're
hitting it during Homebrew testing, but it was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604599/utilities/mv.html
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604599/functions/rename.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
install-driver: installdirs xgcc$(exeext)
-rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$(GCC_INSTALL_NAME)$(exeext)
-$(INSTALL_PROGRAM) xgcc$(exeext)
$(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$(GCC_INSTALL_NAME)$(exeext)
-i
quot; ]; then \
rm -f
/private/tmp/gcc-20220519-78662-28g74h/gcc-11.3.0/build/../instdir/opt/homebrew/opt/gcc/bin/aarch64-apple-darwin21-gcc-11;
\
( cd
/private/tmp/gcc-20220519-78662-28g74h/gcc-11.3.0/build/../instdir/opt/homebrew/opt/gcc/bin
&& \
l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
Bug ID: 105664
Summary: Install with suffix creates extra file
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod ---
Or perhaps there shouldnt be
set (BIT_NOT_EXPR, op_bitwise_not);
set (BIT_XOR_EXPR, op_bitwise_xor);
operations on pointer values? I see also support
set (BIT_AND_EXPR, op_pointer_and);
set (BIT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm:
_13 = pQList_4(D) | pNewNode_6(D);
_14 = (long unsigned int) _13;
That should be invalid gimple also ...
This might be my bug introduced by r12-5358-g32221357007666 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105507
--- Comment #9 from Christoph Reiter ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #8)
> > We currently link:
> >
> > shared: gmp, winpthread, zlib, zstd
> > static: mpc, mpfr, isl
> >
> > Not for any particular gcc related reason I think, some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.2
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
Bug ID: 105663
Summary: Segmentation Fault on optimization level O2/O3
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105662
Bug ID: 105662
Summary: [RFC][OpenMP][OpenMP] - permit disabling host-fallback
mode?
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105659
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
If I recall the conversation correctly, either the CPU-specific D language
hooks should be moved to macros - equivalent to TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS and
others. Or the tm_d file should be packed with a lot more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105660
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105660
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105660
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105632
--- Comment #1 from Lance Fredrickson ---
Created attachment 52999
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52999&action=edit
Avoids using poisoned malloc in libcc1
Adds to libcc1plugin.cc and libcp1plugin.cc
#define INCLUDE_MEMORY
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105573
Bug 105573 depends on bug 105312, which changed state.
Bug 105312 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr on
arm-linux since r12-834-ga6eacbf1055520
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105312
What|Rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105312
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|12.0|11.3.0, 12.1.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105148
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105559
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d293946d5c318549af88f96c4c2175dcbb8f4cf1
commit r11-10021-gd293946d5c318549af88f96c4c2175dcbb8f4cf1
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105431
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16a2fcfe247364088ca9d6d058d870bdfa28b345
commit r11-10020-g16a2fcfe247364088ca9d6d058d870bdfa28b345
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105368
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e6ae76385c60ad1ef63270ba969729a40ca1245
commit r11-10019-g3e6ae76385c60ad1ef63270ba969729a40ca1245
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105312
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33914983cf3734c2f8079963ba49fcc117499ef3
commit r11-10018-g33914983cf3734c2f8079963ba49fcc117499ef3
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105263
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2557f9081e5bf440abe3fc184cbdaea0447ec64
commit r11-10017-gb2557f9081e5bf440abe3fc184cbdaea0447ec64
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105173
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4f2bd4edea8beabcf9caea98f951dcac612b126
commit r11-10016-gf4f2bd4edea8beabcf9caea98f951dcac612b126
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105163
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:132c3bb06a90887f5c173e00b7f2c5163e054ac1
commit r11-10015-g132c3bb06a90887f5c173e00b7f2c5163e054ac1
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105148
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64b3a86d33e08072ea78f2a87c8a275bd15f07cb
commit r11-10014-g64b3a86d33e08072ea78f2a87c8a275bd15f07cb
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105250
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0be87cc23d0b0e07656e94137978971555bebbb3
commit r11-10013-g0be87cc23d0b0e07656e94137978971555bebbb3
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105140
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:740d64815c6c8afff5e92fff0f5e9e600361ff75
commit r11-10012-g740d64815c6c8afff5e92fff0f5e9e600361ff75
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105657
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105649
--- Comment #2 from Giuliano Belinassi ---
This issue is related to PR98125.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105648
--- Comment #3 from Giuliano Belinassi ---
Not sure if duplicate, but it certainly is related to PR99888 and PR98125.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105657
--- Comment #2 from Ken Moffat ---
Jonathan,
many thinks for your time and and explanation. It seems that when the desired
version of gcc is in /opt/gcc, the mach build system used by firefox needs
LDFLAGS=" -L/opt/gcc/lib" - that allowed it to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105647
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Giuliano Belinassi
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16e02662c092c6e3087628ef0030e7daa2f71485
commit r13-633-g16e02662c092c6e3087628ef0030e7daa2f71485
Author: Giuliano Belinassi
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105661
Bug ID: 105661
Summary: Comparisons to atomic variables generates less
efficient code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105537
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.1.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105618
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:374cee99d01fceb89d0929da8b38051e6c9768f0
commit r12-8403-g374cee99d01fceb89d0929da8b38051e6c9768f0
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25d7a7381099b46b6554c5e20b00b19d460c2123
commit r12-8402-g25d7a7381099b46b6554c5e20b00b19d460c2123
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2022
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25d7a7381099b46b6554c5e20b00b19d460c2123
commit r12-8402-g25d7a7381099b46b6554c5e20b00b19d460c2123
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b251f8be6b018966edad5daeb45c42fd193b24b4
commit r12-8401-gb251f8be6b018966edad5daeb45c42fd193b24b4
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:844a5c8ca768dc0cc90c1a943756610832d686a8
commit r12-8400-g844a5c8ca768dc0cc90c1a943756610832d686a8
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105559
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a040e982945a5795081e81be35094b604d596d3
commit r12-8399-g2a040e982945a5795081e81be35094b604d596d3
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105537
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a53eff4ad05f234a509dd2995d5a7612d5baa4e8
commit r12-8398-ga53eff4ad05f234a509dd2995d5a7612d5baa4e8
Author: Richard Biener
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
