https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105640
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'll also cite my response in
https://mailman.openmp.org/mailman/private/omp-lang/2020/016879.html
"The rationale for not using sm_XX for arch is that at least users of
compilers that target more than one C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105640
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And no, t-omp-device isn't needed, that one is solely for targets that can be
used for offloading. i386 has it because of the intelmic offloading.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105640
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It isn't implemented on anything but x86, nvptx and gcn.
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/threads.html#02066
has some more details.
aarch64 would be another HPC related target.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105640
Bug ID: 105640
Summary: [OpenMP] Context selectors missing for PowerPC
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95737
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a174dc1a7f2bf0a71475ff633b130a60c0c3ff4a
commit r13-582-ga174dc1a7f2bf0a71475ff633b130a60c0c3ff4a
Author: Haochen Gui
Date: Wed Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105639
Bug ID: 105639
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in propagate_controlled_uses, at
ipa-prop.cc:4195
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104375
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104375
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:102237c9f2f2667eb73cb5473bd3a9a97296a414
commit r13-581-g102237c9f2f2667eb73cb5473bd3a9a97296a414
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Apr 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to harper from comment #17)
> On comparing that with ifort's result I think that the only remaining bug
> is that if decimal='comma' then '.' is neither a decimal symbol nor a
> separator (see f2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104610
--- Comment #18 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104610
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:850a13d754497faae91afabc6958780f1d63a574
commit r13-580-g850a13d754497faae91afabc6958780f1d63a574
Author: liuhongt
Date: Tue Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105637
Rob Lefebvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||john.robert.lefebvre@gmail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105556
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6e36f05fbb081abb068958d8900ad34b303a70b
commit r13-579-gc6e36f05fbb081abb068958d8900ad34b303a70b
Author: Peter Bergner
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105638
Bug ID: 105638
Summary: Redundant stores aren't removed by DSE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 07:56:18PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
>
> --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Steve Karg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105622
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102307
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b0c8377729a3c62a0589713574ab939aaab
commit r13-576-g2b0c8377729a3c62a0589713574ab939aaab
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105190
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99685
pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105637
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-17
Summary|[12 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99685
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pat Haugen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ee68beee709e48fce85b8892ff9985acc6a91a8
commit r13-574-g2ee68beee709e48fce85b8892ff9985acc6a91a8
Author: Pat Haugen
Date: Tue May 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105115
--- Comment #2 from ronghua at iu dot edu ---
The simplified PoC:
$ echo _RYAbB2_ | ./binutils/cxxfilt
Segmentation fault
Root Cause Analysis:
1. In `rust_demangle_callback`, "_R" at beginning causes `rdm.version ==
0`[1][2], so `demangle_pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105637
Bug ID: 105637
Summary: [11 Regression] Wrong overload selected in base class
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105131
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #6)
> > I quoted the F2018 standard constraint.
> >
> > C708 An entity declared with the CLASS keyword shall be a dummy
> > argument or have the ALLOCAT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105633
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105634
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105634
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105636
Bug ID: 105636
Summary: ICE in gen_ctf_array_type, at dwarf2ctf.cc:379
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105635
Bug ID: 105635
Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE in gimple_parm_array_size, at
pointer-query.cc:592
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105634
Bug ID: 105634
Summary: ICE: Floating point exception in
maybe_warn_class_memaccess
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105633
Bug ID: 105633
Summary: ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.cc:1582
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105507
--- Comment #1 from Christoph Reiter ---
I've bisected it now:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=76f9c7f44fffb0b03266730b137313fe79f1c99e
76f9c7f44fffb0b03266730b137313fe79f1c99e is the first bad commit
commit 76f9c7f44fffb0b032667
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105115
--- Comment #1 from ronghua at iu dot edu ---
Hello, It's already more than one month since my post, and the bug still exists
at latest commit (e.i. e84412c6a3c3eed1a4eca5fe18f329bfa7efea40), so I would
like to know why it is still `UNCONFIRMED`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98662
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|checking ICE in |[9/10/11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102471
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Another source of possible benchmarks:
https://gitlab.com/sosy-lab/benchmarking/sv-benchmarks
>From SV-COMP: https://sv-comp.sosy-lab.org/
This embeds the Juliet testsuite, but also many other tests.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61469
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
N2963 is up for discussion in WG14 tomorrow, but there are still
significant issues with the wording to resolve.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105631
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Ioan Angelo Mîțiu from comment #2)
> Yeah, they are part of QT-package.
> I'll try to assemble a minimum project/config for reproducing it but won't
> be so trivial.
I think that's a lot of wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105632
Bug ID: 105632
Summary: Canadian Cross build failure - error: attempt to use
poisoned "malloc"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105169
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Giuliano Belinassi
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a3f38a966a52893fb5bae301a1a3d56961358fb
commit r13-566-g7a3f38a966a52893fb5bae301a1a3d56961358fb
Author: Giuliano Belinassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105631
--- Comment #2 from Ioan Angelo Mîțiu ---
Yeah, they are part of QT-package.
I'll try to assemble a minimum project/config for reproducing it but won't be
so trivial.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105631
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-17
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105458
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6101a276c34b94f692206739d98aa7faf2e7b2ad
commit r13-564-g6101a276c34b94f692206739d98aa7faf2e7b2ad
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105631
Bug ID: 105631
Summary: GCC internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when
trying to compile Qt 6.3
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61a6923e8917b6efcf349515a00a485dfd5b42e4
commit r13-563-g61a6923e8917b6efcf349515a00a485dfd5b42e4
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105630
Bug ID: 105630
Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/
-O1 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105629
Bug ID: 105629
Summary: [13 Regression] g++.dg/opt/pr94589-2.C for cris, m68k,
s390x
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99785
--- Comment #22 from Jeff Muizelaar ---
GCC doesn't support clang's xyzw vector attributes, so it still not easy to
build the clang path in GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105585
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105602
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105602
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ebe5dace8c318b38f42cfe1d148e90dcdfadb31e
commit r13-557-gebe5dace8c318b38f42cfe1d148e90dcdfadb31e
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105626
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105628
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The warning is correct but it should not be done.
Simpele testcase:
struct s{ int f; };
int g(struct s t){
return (t.f?&t.f : 0)? 1 : 0;
}
The problem is gcc did some optimizations before the warning and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105628
Bug ID: 105628
Summary: False positive with -Waddress
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105415
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sure, that must be a different problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fro
n-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r13-555-20220517114234-g1815462a6e5-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-powerpc64le
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20220517 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105626
Bug ID: 105626
Summary: -Wformat should accept u8"" strings
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105625
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Good, I can prepare a GCC patch once the binutils support is there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105415
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99785
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035
Bug 103035 depends on bug 105621, which changed state.
Bug 105621 Summary: [13 Regression] Wrong code with -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105621
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105613
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vsevolod.livinskiy at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105621
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105600
--- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan ---
Alternatively a Dockerfile to build the Gentoo environment needed to reproduce
the issue might help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61469
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Ho-hum - this was my patch that removed constraint from const_int predicates.
We are talking about:
(define_insn_and_split "*anddi_1_btr"
[(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=rm")
(and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105600
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105613
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105613
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:254cbf72661b932eb039220fccef9a2546ab8f4e
commit r13-552-g254cbf72661b932eb039220fccef9a2546ab8f4e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
--- Comment #12 from Michael_S ---
On related note...
One of the historical good features of gcc relatively to other popular
compilers was absence of auto-vectorization at -O2.
When did you decide to change it and why?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
--- Comment #11 from Michael_S ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #8)
> > > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7)
> > > > Hmm, we have speci
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105459
--- Comment #7 from Kewen Lin ---
I wonder if it's fine to move init_function_start downward after
execute_all_ipa_transforms call? the testing is ongoing.
--- a/gcc/cgraphunit.cc
+++ b/gcc/cgraphunit.cc
@@ -1817,7 +1817,6 @@ cgraph_node::expan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105459
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105618
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] |[11/12 Regression] Missed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105618
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ebce0e9bd8d714a8607ae24331a3d842b0d11859
commit r13-550-gebce0e9bd8d714a8607ae24331a3d842b0d11859
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105618
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105618
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
There was quite some massaging in handling of PHI uses, notably we now have
/* For PHI nodes the block we know sth about is the incoming
block
with the use. */
81 matches
Mail list logo
