https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105587
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105587
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-13
Summary|[13 Regres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105455
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105455
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e628690d6333f0cc4d338cd8b796408f35e07ced
commit r12-8372-ge628690d6333f0cc4d338cd8b796408f35e07ced
Author: Alexandre Oli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105455
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90a8eab4a1292430467f68b65e5127f7760acc94
commit r13-380-g90a8eab4a1292430467f68b65e5127f7760acc94
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105588
--- Comment #2 from Hubert Tong ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> _Alignof(expression) is still an extension it can return what ever GCC
> decides
Sure, although why GCC should have corresponding C and C++ extensions that
b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105589
Bug ID: 105589
Summary: [ICE] templated type alias over std::array with bound
type in template function fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102583
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105588
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
_Alignof(expression) is still an extension it can return what ever GCC decides
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102583
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ab4b484153031c407b7d8c760b6a2605da1199a
commit r13-379-g8ab4b484153031c407b7d8c760b6a2605da1199a
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri Apr 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105588
Bug ID: 105588
Summary: _Alignof (C) and alignof (C++) on dereference of
`double *` disagree on 32-bit x86
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105039
Jeremy Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||JEREMY.ROBINSON at SIEMENS dot
COM
-
for instructions.
gcc version 13.0.0 20220512 (7f78783dbedca0183d193e475262ca3c489fd365)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102300
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] |[11 Regression] Qualified
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101767
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0807111e6347778910c9cf63521b7c838effceb8
commit r10-10731-g0807111e6347778910c9cf63521b7c838effceb8
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41723
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2e39b9e1568484192c3a4c2b4425b06e701a3fe
commit r10-10730-gc2e39b9e1568484192c3a4c2b4425b06e701a3fe
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102300
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2e39b9e1568484192c3a4c2b4425b06e701a3fe
commit r10-10730-gc2e39b9e1568484192c3a4c2b4425b06e701a3fe
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100608
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105245
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102629
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 82980, which changed state.
Bug 82980 Summary: [9/10 Regression] template keyword should not be required
for captured decl of the "base" type since r6-6866-gff2faafcf689b6c2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82980
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102071
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfa3a04be981f63af41f9a960df06e84c2634c5f
commit r10-10729-gcfa3a04be981f63af41f9a960df06e84c2634c5f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102071
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd669a0613aaa23222977eecc9e7165aa3fd1bcf
commit r10-10728-gfd669a0613aaa23222977eecc9e7165aa3fd1bcf
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67f742536cbb60d5f8b7bba2cac0a141191e29af
commit r10-10727-g67f742536cbb60d5f8b7bba2cac0a141191e29af
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105265
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67f742536cbb60d5f8b7bba2cac0a141191e29af
commit r10-10727-g67f742536cbb60d5f8b7bba2cac0a141191e29af
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82980
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3efc6fd0df1ce4988a1ae117d3a77134213930a3
commit r10-10726-g3efc6fd0df1ce4988a1ae117d3a77134213930a3
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104646
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d939233ef460133e012d8f40f9d8c8fcb73bb7b8
commit r10-10725-gd939233ef460133e012d8f40f9d8c8fcb73bb7b8
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102629
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93ec7bf22530610ef697fd3a64a28bebd589c790
commit r10-10724-g93ec7bf22530610ef697fd3a64a28bebd589c790
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59950
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:080e737a851d57697d0aac55749296c5c454c421
commit r10-10723-g080e737a851d57697d0aac55749296c5c454c421
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105245
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c7905a9f10d28dfd27ddf21d3bf38a3e261ee10
commit r10-10722-g6c7905a9f10d28dfd27ddf21d3bf38a3e261ee10
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100111
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c7905a9f10d28dfd27ddf21d3bf38a3e261ee10
commit r10-10722-g6c7905a9f10d28dfd27ddf21d3bf38a3e261ee10
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101717
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20dc7a2119cc0a4e5ddc4a6899a7350621f05440
commit r10-10721-g20dc7a2119cc0a4e5ddc4a6899a7350621f05440
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100608
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b01044ec7fbed24e9394bcf49e524acdd52849e7
commit r10-10720-gb01044ec7fbed24e9394bcf49e524acdd52849e7
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98249
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c69f7c449cc1c0d48e13b8680023a59f541260e
commit r10-10719-g6c69f7c449cc1c0d48e13b8680023a59f541260e
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101767
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:846bff4d4659d9b2026da574194599f38a00cc79
commit r10-10718-g846bff4d4659d9b2026da574194599f38a00cc79
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98717
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97246
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|10.3
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104669
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102629
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0484f60e6409ef6e837e4712d212a5d827767ba
commit r11-9988-gf0484f60e6409ef6e837e4712d212a5d827767ba
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104646
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a67bc6320d34b20fe838d479a6a1e110f1160c89
commit r11-9987-ga67bc6320d34b20fe838d479a6a1e110f1160c89
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82980
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc8739c2ab14f0108e4fabbd565fa0918e4425ee
commit r11-9986-gdc8739c2ab14f0108e4fabbd565fa0918e4425ee
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105265
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:728f97cf0431ff342beceea4f91afa1707133248
commit r11-9985-g728f97cf0431ff342beceea4f91afa1707133248
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:728f97cf0431ff342beceea4f91afa1707133248
commit r11-9985-g728f97cf0431ff342beceea4f91afa1707133248
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105245
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe81f5bd3c3e764d1355eda3e44e37cec99cd23c
commit r11-9984-gfe81f5bd3c3e764d1355eda3e44e37cec99cd23c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100111
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe81f5bd3c3e764d1355eda3e44e37cec99cd23c
commit r11-9984-gfe81f5bd3c3e764d1355eda3e44e37cec99cd23c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104669
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c45820ead85b8bc6f8283f7692a85d0c12ded4f
commit r11-9983-g0c45820ead85b8bc6f8283f7692a85d0c12ded4f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102071
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:394c852a6b4bed8117c790c2cd1553e224975ad5
commit r11-9982-g394c852a6b4bed8117c790c2cd1553e224975ad5
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5296b77556da4682d5a1e2318c0643affaa00563
commit r11-9981-g5296b77556da4682d5a1e2318c0643affaa00563
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586
Bug ID: 105586
Summary: [11/12/13 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)
with -O2 -fno-if-conversion -mtune=power4
-fno-guess-branch-probability
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17632
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0080f0285dfa9b7f0b7a6c5ec79e28eb662b953
commit r13-375-ga0080f0285dfa9b7f0b7a6c5ec79e28eb662b953
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105584
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #3 from Jonat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105585
--- Comment #2 from Ed Catmur ---
Affected code: https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/issues/1175
The proposed patch to abseil-cpp corresponds to adding an assumption that `b`
is true above.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105585
--- Comment #1 from Ed Catmur ---
Flags: -O1 -Wstringop-overflow=1
https://godbolt.org/z/8r8roz7Pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105585
Bug ID: 105585
Summary: [12/13 Regression] Spurious stringop-overflow warning
with
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105584
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-June/066038.html
According to the proposal, it looks like this attribute could benefit libstdc++
too since I do see similar issues before.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105584
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
[clang] Implement the using_if_exists attribute
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/369c64839946d89cf5697550b6feeea031b2f270
This shows how the attribute works. Hope GCC could add it.
Also probably ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105584
Bug ID: 105584
Summary: libcxx needs using_if_exist attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105545
--- Comment #5 from Tom Hughes ---
On top of -O1 you seem to need all of -fexpensive-optimizations -ftree-vrp
-fipa-sra to trigger it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105545
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes ---
You don't need -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS in C++20 mode but you do in C++17 mode it
seems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105573
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
1. Could you consider the fix for backporting please to 11? It works for me
as-is.
2. Will the testcase be committed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105545
Ed Catmur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ed at catmur dot uk
--- Comment #3 from Ed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104862
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104017
--- Comment #6 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes ---
This is from a report I made in private to Martin, for GCC12.
That tidbit seems to have been lost in the bug creation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
There's a reduced test case, can you please include it in testsuite?
namespace {
typedef long size_t;
}
typedef char uint8_t;
typedef long uint64_t;
namespace {
template struct integral_constant {
stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104862
Alvin Wong changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105411
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley ---
> I've added TEST_ALWAYS_FLAGS to the gcc/testsuite/lib/gm2.exp as per other
> tests.
Looks good now. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105583
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
It may be a duplicate of PR102881 since decltype lambda is also used.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105544
--- Comment #11 from Fabian Vogt ---
(In reply to ibuclaw from comment #10)
> (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #9)
> > (In reply to ibuclaw from comment #8)
> > > (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #6)
> > > > I had a quick debugging ses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92918
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.5 |11.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105583
Bug ID: 105583
Summary: Syntax error when alias template in requires-clause
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfda40f8147412328f699628a54b0aaa584776e7
commit r13-373-gdfda40f8147412328f699628a54b0aaa584776e7
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105580
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105544
--- Comment #10 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #9)
> (In reply to ibuclaw from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #6)
> > > I had a quick debugging session: The DMD lexer code doesn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97938
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.4 |10.4
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105582
Bug ID: 105582
Summary: ICE on procedure pointer assignment inside block
Product: gcc
Version: og11 (devel/omp/gcc-11)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105581
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
There is nothing abstractly wrong with ordering false and true.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> > With -fdelete-dead-exceptions, it started with r12-248-gb58dc0b803057c0e.
> > The reduction is pretty slow..
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105581
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Well. There is a meaning for the code though.
> That is negative > other_negative
> Means negative is true while other_negative is false the result will be tru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105312
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 105573 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105573
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105572
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105572
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I bisected that and it's fixed in master (not present in any release branch):
commit fb0e49d8e05e61ca2af9b5f60b01ad5fb6d274ff
Author: Alan Modra
Date: Tue Mar 8 22:48:51 2022 +1030
Constant fold view
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.1.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94b8a37fa16f7638cc1965718f4ec71719506743
commit r13-340-g94b8a37fa16f7638cc1965718f4ec71719506743
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105581
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
Equivalent to negative && !other_negative.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> With -fdelete-dead-exceptions, it started with r12-248-gb58dc0b803057c0e.
> The reduction is pretty slow..
That just exposed the issue I think since the failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105581
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Well. There is a meaning for the code though.
That is negative > other_negative
Means negative is true while other_negative is false the result will be true
which is exactly what it is testing here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE in |[12/13 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105578
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to shuyu liu from comment #0)
> `constexpr` does not work on PowerPC when you use `-mabi=ibmlongdouble`.
That's a pretty bold claim! **Some** long double arithmetic does not work in
constant exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Curdeius Curdeius from comment #4)
> Created attachment 52967 [details]
> A slightly reduced case
>
> A bit more reduced reproducer.
> Not sure it helps.
No, we would need a pre-processed sourc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105581
Bug ID: 105581
Summary: boolean types and relational operators problem
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc
index d4d0aba880c..9f7f12846cb 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc
@@ -2593,6 +2593,11 @@ vn_reference_lookup_3 (ao_ref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Perhaps with -fno-strict-aliasing we think the store to *this might alias
> with it? Though, that shouldn't be about TBAA but simple points-to
> analysis, whe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #4 from Curdeius Curdeius ---
Created attachment 52967
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52967&action=edit
A slightly reduced case
A bit more reduced reproducer.
Not sure it helps.
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
